The 2020 Presidential Election Tournament

[william.scherk]

16 hours ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

Here's a ballot counter hard at work filling in ballots to be counted.

Here's Scott Adams with a fun twist on what I think is the same video^** cited by Anna Paulina Luna. 

What is happening in that video, precisely? In my researches I haven't yet found a clear set of Who What Where When How and Why that is nailed down as factual. Could Scott be right that we need to be expand our imaginations ... or is it more Objectivist to amass all evidence, such as it is, before proceeding to the Conclusion check-out?

The full Adams episode can be found here.  The title is somewhat alluring: "Election Hallucinations and Absurdities Everywhere."

"Clearly Filling Out Ballots" is my secret dancer name.

__________________

** I've been compiling attempted debunkings of various viral videos of "shenanigans" ... discovered that the video probably cited by Scott Adams disappeared from its original place once the account was terminated.  If I can find it, I will update in a response to this comment.

Edited November 6, 2020 by william.scherk
Added: note on video Adam's may have meant

[Michael Stuart Kelly]

On 11/5/2020 at 12:25 AM, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

There is even a theory going around that certain military, intelligence and law enforcement people are helping with this. And maybe they even managed to mark certain ballots in a unique way to prove the fraudulent from the legal. Most of all, the fraudulent ballots have to be confirmed by the respective state as official, meaning they then become legal records. The result will be the bad guys will have an enormous difficulty in replacing them once the recounts start.

To elaborate on this, Steve Pieczenik promotes this idea. Pieczenik has one hell of a curriculum in spookville, including Kissinger and many others on that level, the Council on Foreign Relations, in and out of the State department, even as an official, being Tom Clancy's chief consultant on the spook and military info end, but also Clancy's business partner and co-creator of two popular series and even co-author, being an author of novels in his own right, and so on.

In more recent years, Pieczenik has appeared on Alex Jones and this has led to some people not taking him seriously. But from many of the things I've seen him say that have borne out, especially during the 2016 election and during President Trump's first term, I don't think dismissing him outright is a good idea.

That's why at first I was iffy on this ballot tagging idea, but after I saw him involved, I believe it is entirely possible.

 

The idea

The gist of the idea he claims is this.

The military developed a use for a blockchain encryption code based on QFS (Quantum Financial System). And they used this in watermarks they had printed on the election ballots. The spook side discovered and infiltrated the printing offices each state was using to print the ballots and then managed to include this watermark, which looks innocuous, in the material used for printing.

===EDIT: This is what the watermark is supposed to look like:

===END EDIT

And apparently some of the ballots were printed in printing offices in China.

From what we are told, the people running this operation at Homeland Security are able--through this blockchain code--to pinpoint the location of every ballot, including those thrown away, those being held clandestinely, and so on. Something they invented through high level scans or whatever is able to follow ballots with this watermark when they are moved

Pieczenik said the National Guard has already been deployed to start making arrests.

 

Pieczenik's credibility

I don't know how far to believe all this, though. I do think something in the neighborhood is going on. For example, I know AG Barr recently put out information that the National Guard is now permitted to enter polling places with guns. That was all over the news.

Also, do you remember in the beginning when President Trump found leaks by using a secret code (like a certain inversion of words or misspelling or expression, etc.) in different copies of material he gave to his people? When the information was leaked to the press and published, he would see which code was present in the quotes or copy/pasted or linked material, then he would know which person leaked.

That was when Trump had no idea of the size of the monster he was dealing with. But it does show he thinks like that.

So I believe there is something to Pieczenik's story. I'm just not sure it's as he says. He's been a spook for an awfully long time and spooks lie for a living. Also, Pieczenik is getting older, so I believe it possible he could be exaggerating certain things to feel like he's still in the game.

At Infowars, Owen Shroyer interviews Pieczenik, but one of the presenters (David Knight) who knows all about this story will not have him on, not because Knight doubts the story. He says this is all possible based on the technology that now exists. (He's even surprised blockchain was not used in the votes this go around because, apparently the system is made and ready to go.) It's because he thinks Pieczenik is still working with the CIA or something like that and has different intentions than he says.

 

Let's hope

Anyway, if arrests start coming from finding large piles of blank ballots or ballots marked Trump on them in hidden places or garbage piles, including people located and arrested because following the watermark blockchain code gave the chain of handling, it will be a huge blessing to the country.  

Let's see what happens, but I am rooting for this to be true to some extent.

It's certainly wonderful to think about.

Michael

[Ellen Stuttle]

1 hour ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

To elaborate on this, Steve Pieczenik promotes this idea. 

When I click on the link, I get the message that the page can’t be opened because "The URL can’t be shown."

Ellen

[Michael Stuart Kelly]

18 minutes ago, Ellen Stuttle said:

When I click on the link, I get the message that the page can’t be opened because "The URL can’t be shown."

Ellen

Ellen,

Fixed.

Michael

[Michael Stuart Kelly]

I forgot to mention something about a possible Contingent Election and Nancy Pelosi:

8 hours ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

Granted, the House of the incoming Congress will get this vote after the Jan 3 swearing in ceremony, not the outgoing Congress. But since Pelosi lost seats in the election, even with massive voter fraud, the Republican majority will prevail. That would mean President Trump would be elected by a vote of 26 (or maybe more) to whatever is left--in other words, he would be elected by the majority of States.

If a Contingent Election is called, the House will elect the President with each State Delegation getting one vote. Fifty votes all total.

Pelosi's idea of targeting mostly big cities for electing House members has led the Democrats to have a weak showing in number of States.

Then in this election counting, she is losing seats left and right. 

No wonder the Dems are pissed at her big-time. In one highly plausible and legal scenario, her leadership could literally cost the election of Biden.

But I don't actually think it's that plausible. I think there are going to be massive numbers of ballots thrown out after a fun date with the Supreme Court. With those ballots will go votes for House members. It won't be Republican votes for House members. It will be Democrat votes.

So this could possibly turn the House over to the Republicans by due and proper election just from counting all legal ballots and no longer counting illegal ballots.

If that happens, I believe Pelosi's career ends.

 

Michael

[Michael Stuart Kelly]

Now for a word of progress from Rudy.

Kick some ass, Rudy...

Michael

[KorbenDallas]

8 minutes ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

If that happens, I believe Pelosi's career ends.

I hope so!!!!  She can't get work done, too much ideological stonewalling.

[Michael Stuart Kelly]

Something is starting to stir.

and:

Oh God.

Am I really quoting Shannon Bream?

Dayaamm!

Well, to be fair, I think she's changed a little. Her subtext is no longer Dem and is now pro-Trump. Meaning before she used to light up and be all smiles when she discussed liberal news and become poker-faced and curt when she discussed Trump-related news. Now it's the contrary.

I think she's become angry with Dem misbehavior after covertly carrying their water for so long. Shannon is a lawyer, but she's also a deeply religious person. I think she now believes she is witnessing sin on a massive scale.

And if so, I think she's right.

Michael

[Michael Stuart Kelly]

Hammer and Scorecard.

Now used for massive voter fraud.

To start: I saw this a few days ago:

WAR ROOM: PANDEMIC EP 470 HAMMER SCORECARD LT. GEN. MCINERNEY STEVE BANNON 2020/11/02

It isn't the whole show (Bannon's being banned by big tech), but it is the 10 minutes that is relevant. And to find a copy I believe will stay up, I chose one with Japanese subtitles on BitChute.

 

34 minutes ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

Now there's this.

Holy shit.

Sydney Powell and Tom Fitton are on board.



I love it.

I will add some written stuff on Hammer and Scorecard when I find something decent.

Here's a link I found. It's a bit fringe and I don't have time to make it pretty. But it seems accurate for the most part.

Biden Using SCORECARD and THE HAMMER To Steal Another U.S. Presidential Election — Just Like Obama And Biden Did In 2012

Michael

[Michael Stuart Kelly]

This looks like one of the ways Hammer Scorecard works.

In the clip, where CNN fucked up by allowing a few frames to escape, the Democrat gained 560 votes while at the very same time the Republican lost 560 votes.

Michael

[Michael Stuart Kelly]

7 hours ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

The idea

The gist of the idea he claims is this.

The military developed a use for a blockchain encryption code based on QFS (Quantum Financial System). And they used this in watermarks they had printed on the election ballots. The spook side discovered and infiltrated the printing offices each state was using to print the ballots and then managed to include this watermark, which looks innocuous, in the material used for printing.

===EDIT: This is what the watermark is supposed to look like:

===END EDIT

And apparently some of the ballots were printed in printing offices in China.

Since I edited a much earlier post to include an image, I quoted part of it here for people who already read the original and missed the image.

Michael

[Ellen Stuttle]

3 hours ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

Something is starting to stir.

This tweet by Kimberly Robinson (linked to from the Giuliani tweet you posted) has a screenshot of the court order.

—

I think PA has been playing games with percentage of votes tallied.

Simple example to illustrate:

On Tuesday, they say that 96% of the votes have been counted, and the total number of votes reported as tallied already ads up to 96, which would mean that the total is 100, with 4 votes remaining to be counted.

Then, on Wednesday, they say that 98% of the votes have been counted, and the total number of votes reported as tallied already adds up to 100*, which would mean that the total is 102, with 2 votes which have materialized from somewhere remaining to be counted.

*99.96 - rounding to illustrate

 Ellen

[Michael Stuart Kelly]

7 hours ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

The military developed a use for a blockchain encryption code based on QFS (Quantum Financial System). And they used this in watermarks they had printed on the election ballots. The spook side discovered and infiltrated the printing offices each state was using to print the ballots and then managed to include this watermark, which looks innocuous, in the material used for printing.

Setting aside the blockchain encryption thing, it looks like ballot tagging is a real thing. 

Take a look at this article;

HUGE EXCLUSIVE: Keep the Faith – President Trump Will Win The Election Based on the Constitution Per Retired Intel Operative Tony Shaffer

Before I quote from this article, let's look at who Tony Shaffer is. That's a Wikipedia link. Here is a different bio (more elaborate) at his Amazon author page: Tony Shaffer. (Affiliate link.)

He's the guy who warned about Mohamed Atta before 9/11. He's also one of the first guys who busted open the spying on the Trump campaign.

Currently he's a pundit on the main TV news shows, the Senior Fellow and Acting President of the London Center for Policy Research, and he is on the Trump 2020 Advisory Board.

The article starts with the text of a tweet he made on Nov. 5, a day and a half ago.

Notice that Shaffer refers to the Department of Homeland Security and an audit of all counted ballots. I presume this is within the powers of the DHS to demand.

Quote

A hypothetical question for all the Democrat trolls following my feed…
What if DHS anticipated DNC counting fraud.
What if they “tagged” each legitimate ballot.
What would happen if DHS does an audit of all counted ballots and find ballots without the tag – what happens then?

 

Next Shaffer made some comments and asked another question:

It’s done in known contracted sights…you do understand law enforcement asks for cooperation all the time from companies, right?

A third tweet from Shaffer indicated that there are numerous ways to mark documents without the markings clearly identifiable:

Oh, there is more than that now…
People don’t understand how light works…and what they don’t see can be seen in infrared and ultraviolet…we had a whole block of instruction at “the Farm” on secret writing…it is amazing…

 

This caused an uproar on Twitter and liberals freaked out thinking they might have gotten caught in their attempt to steal this year’s election.

Stay tuned. I think some heavy shit is coming...

Michael

[Michael Stuart Kelly]

According to John Soloman, the FBI is doing its gig and investigating voter fraud correctly. But it has decided to not talk much in public and we all can notice that there are no leaks. 

Good.

Here is a quote from that video.

But let's see what comes of it before I will heap praises. I bet there are many like me.

Michael

[Michael Stuart Kelly]

Here's a meme going around.

It's usually coupled with one of President Trump's favorite sayings:

The best is yet to come.

 

Michael

[Dglgmut]

 

lol now I see Georgia and Pennsylvania are now showing Biden leading... By the end of the 'counting,' Biden is going to have 400+ electoral votes.

[turkeyfoot]

5 hours ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

According to John Soloman, the FBI is doing its gig and investigating voter fraud correctly. But it has decided to not talk much in public and we all can notice that there are no leaks. 

Good.

Here is a quote from that video.

But let's see what comes of it before I will heap praises. I bet there are many like me.

Michael

The Dems' got over their skis'.

Sidney Powell was on Dobbs' show following JSolomon. In that interview she mentioned Hammer and Scorecard, the CIA program aimed at foreign entities to turn elections then turned on American elections to accomplish same. Also the 3% figure and probably the first mention on cable news. Dobbs' knew nothing or claimed so. There's Ms Powell outing the deceptive practices of Dem operatives. She'd make a good poker player. I loved it but only as a missing link that remains to be proven. Then Fitton mentioned the Republican pussies who ignore long standing voter rolls of dead people as he has sued states over the years which resulted in the cropping of same. I'm pretty sure a fiction writer could copy the theme, chapter and verse and have a best seller.

We've been played.

J Solomon also said the Durham report or some part of it will come out next week.....he was schetchy. Oh Durn, we missed it be a week!

Oh, how the once mighty have fallen.

[Michael Stuart Kelly]

It ain't over util it's over.

Meanwhile, this is a pretty good way to start the day. 

I don't trust Twitter to mess with this, so here is a screenshot.

Notice how the peanut gallery comment in the embed is red, but in the screenshot on the Twitter site, it's blue.

I'm sure this is due to some damn split tested and massaged reason, but those twits who run Silly-Con Valley are going to learn, it's hard to do covert persuasion on people who have identified you as a large-scale impostor and despise you for the massive amount of damage you inflicted on everyone.

I take that red and blue twit warning in the same manner as if I saw it on a North Korean site run by the North Korean government. And, quite frankly, I have more respect for the North Koreans. They are open bad guys, not impostors.

I'm only using Twitter because President Trump is using it. Once he goes, I go.

 

But, I'm doing this wrong.

Massaging the negative will go nowhere.

The positive message, the true message, and the message I saw unfold with my own eyes is:

PRESIDENT TRUMP WON THIS ELECTION, BY A LOT!

That is reality and I am fighting for reality to be the standard. 

A is A.

A is not B.

It's A.

Those, like me and most likely you, who accept that will finish the job before us.

Why?

Because we have reality on our side, including a government still based on enough protection for individual rights that individuals can see reality and not be afraid to say what they see. Those who have been misled and are not consumed by a lust for power of blinded by hatred will start seeing reality. They will come around one by one and start saying what they see, too.

And, boy, is there some reality for them to see.

A whole lotta reality goin' on.

 

Michael

[Ellen Stuttle]

5 hours ago, Dglgmut said:

lol now I see Georgia and Pennsylvania are now showing Biden leading... By the end of the 'counting,' Biden is going to have 400+ electoral votes.

Biden has been shown leading in GA and PA for a couple days.  You've been lagging behind if you've just caught up to the GA and PA situation.  

At some time this morning - before I looked at about 11:30 am at the AP map I've been following - AP called the race for Biden with the following figures:

 

Biden 284

Trump 214

284 is Biden's previous 264 plus 20 for Pennsylvania, which has now been declared as Biden's.

 

At 12:22 pm, Nevada was declared by AP for Biden, bringing the count to:

Biden 290

Trump 214

 

The final (announced count) will be:

Biden 306    (16 for Georgia to come)

Trump 232   (his current 214

                      + 15 for North Carolina

                      +  3 for Alaska)

 

The final announced figures will thus be the reverse of 2016's:

Trump 306

Clinton 232

 

Methinks the (supposed) end tally was planned in advance to mirror reverse 2016.

Ellen

 

 

[Michael Stuart Kelly]

Wanna bet that the lawsuits are going to involve Dominion Voting Systems?

This is the company that supplied the vote tabulation machines and software.

Hammer and Scorecard are still Hammer and Scorecard regardless of what one may call them later.

Michael

[Michael Stuart Kelly]

8 minutes ago, Ellen Stuttle said:

...  AP called the race... 

Just hunker down. The shit show is starting.

Meanwhile, there's this.

Here is a copy of the image if Twitter goes goofy again.

Michael

[ThatGuy]

The AP/MSM calling the race has no legal bearing,  no official status, correct?

[Ellen Stuttle]

1 minute ago, ThatGuy said:

The AP/MSM calling the race has no legal bearing,  no official status, correct?

Correct.  What AP/MSM say has no legal bearing.

The final tally they're coming up with is really interesting, though, as indication of carefully orchestrated pre-planning the fraudulent vote percentages.

Ellen 

[merjet]

25 minutes ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

Wanna bet that the lawsuits are going to involve Dominion Voting Systems?

"In 2019, the state of Georgia selected Dominion Voting Systems to provide its new statewide voting system for 2020 and beyond" (Wikipedia).

Can you identify the bug or human error that flipped Georgia from Trump leading to Biden leading?

Gwinnett County runs into another technical issue as Georgia vote count inches to completion

 

[ThatGuy]

 

1 minute ago, Ellen Stuttle said:

Correct.  What AP/MSM say has no legal bearing.

The final tally they're coming up with is really interesting, though, as indication of carefully orchestrated pre-planning the fraudulent vote percentages.

Ellen 

Thanks, that's what I thought, tactical maneuever. Didn't make sense to call PA, either, since last night SCOTUS ordered PA ballots rec'd after 11/3 to be separated...