Definition of Power


Dglgmut

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, william.scherk said:

Are you saying there is no reliable means to test for the presence of the virus that causes COVID-19?

That is what I'm saying. This is a great video with several good references that goes into the topic of virus isolation:

0503166d273437c4.jpg
ODYSEE.COM

Please support my channel ▶https://www.subscribestar.com/DrSamBailey Support the Virus Mania Documentary kickstarter:...
1 minute ago, william.scherk said:

How many deaths are reported in Victoria may be a useful question. But where did you see this information shared?

I don't think the number of deaths is useful information because the debate is not about vaxx vs no-vaxx. It's about forcing the vaxx vs letting people choose. Any evidence that the vaxx is effective is completely irrelevant.

Here's the story:

health-minister.jpg
WWW.INDEPENDENTSENTINEL.COM

Shocking results out of Victoria, Australia. Victoria Health Minister Foley announced 867 new COVID cases were recorded yesterday.  Foley...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Dglgmut said:
19 hours ago, william.scherk said:

How many deaths are reported in Victoria may be a useful question. But where did you see this information shared?

[...] Any evidence that the vaxx is effective is completely irrelevant.

Here's the story:

Here's another story:

5ded1bbe150fec43d7a220cd63c05d6a?impolic
WWW.ABC.NET.AU

A momentary slip of the tongue from Victorian Health Minister Martin Foley at a press conference this week is being used in anti-vaccine messaging in Australia and overseas.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know a single peson who has had the flu since March 2020.

Not a kid, no one.

It's a flu d'etat.

Stock market traders use to speak of painting the tape.

Same thing here, only the underlying commodity has changed.

  • Smile 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, william.scherk said:

Here's another story:

5ded1bbe150fec43d7a220cd63c05d6a?impolic
WWW.ABC.NET.AU

A momentary slip of the tongue from Victorian Health Minister Martin Foley at a press conference this week is being used in anti-vaccine messaging in Australia and overseas.

 

Thanks for the correction. I did wonder if it was a mis-speak, but when I found it in text form I figured he had read it correctly.

 

That makes more sense; I thought this was a potential turning point for the waning of the vaxx effectiveness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Marc said:

I don't know a single peson who has had the flu since March 2020.

Not a kid, no one.

It's a flu d'etat.

Stock market traders use to speak of painting the tape.

Same thing here, only the underlying commodity has changed.

It's public information that the PCR test cannot tell the difference between flu and COVID. It doesn't even detect viruses, it detects genetic sequences which can be found in healthy and unhealthy people alike.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/1/2021 at 3:40 PM, Dglgmut said:

It's public information that the PCR test cannot tell the difference between flu and COVID.

If this is not utter bullshit, you should be able to provide this "public information."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can read about what the PCR actually is in other places than mainstream media. Just because it's not on CNN does not mean it's not public information. The inventor made a number of statements about the limits of the PCR technique while he was alive and other accomplished scientists have spoken out as well.

Here's an article on the lack of specificity of the test:

STATEOFTHENATION.CO

The point is that it cannot tell the difference between healthy and diseased, let alone flu and COVID. If you have flu-like symptoms and you test positive, you're obviously now considered a COVID case.

Are you pushing back as hard against socially amplified information as you are against the counter-narrative?? Are you being objective or are you looking for answers that are easier for you to defend while still feeling like an intellectual?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, william.scherk said:

If this is not utter bullshit, you should be able to provide this "public information."

Considering the amount of internet snooping you do, it's quite an indication of the degree of censorship and suppression on the subject of Covid that you weren’t aware that the PCR procedure (which was never intended as a test) lacks specificity.

Here are some quotes from the article Dglgmut linked to:

STATEOFTHENATION.CO

I don't know anything about the people being quoted except that what they say is accurate.

===

According to Jason Hommel, a prolific writer and researcher and also the author of the very important article regarding coronavirus testing entitled “Scientists Say the COVID19 Test Kits Do Not Work, Are Worthless, and Give Impossible Results”:

“PCR basically takes a sample of your cells and amplifies any DNA to look for ‘viral sequences’, i.e. bits of non-human DNA that seem to match parts of a known viral genome. The problem is the test is known not to work. It uses ‘amplification’ which means taking a very very tiny amount of DNA and growing it exponentially until it can be analysed. Obviously any minute contaminations in the sample will also be amplified leading to potentially gross errors of discovery. Additionally, it’s only looking for partial viral sequences, not whole genomes, so identifying a single pathogen is next to impossible even if you ignore the other issues.The idea these kits can isolate a specific virus like COVID-19 is nonsense.”


===

[…] from an article also by Celia Farber, David Crowe, “a Canadian researcher with a degree in biology and mathematics and host of “The Infectious Myth” podcast, also the president of the think-tank Rethinking AIDS, also clearly explained the problems with the PCR based coronavirus testing, “revealing a world of unimaginable complexity, as well as trickery”:

“The first thing to know is that the test is not binary. In fact, I don’t think there are any tests for infectious disease that are positive or negative. What they do is they take some kind of a continuum and they arbitrarily say this point is the difference between positive and negative.”

He continued:

“PCR is really a manufacturing technique. You start with one molecule. You start with a small amount of DNA and on each cycle the amount doubles, which doesn’t sound like that much, but if you, if you double 30 times, you get approximately a billion times more material than you started with. So as a manufacturing technique, it’s great. What they do is they attach a fluorescent molecule to the RNA as they produce it.  You shine a light at one wavelength, and you get a response, you get light sent back at a different wavelength. So, they measure the amount of light that comes back and that’s their surrogate for how much DNA there is. I’m using the word DNA. There’s a step in RT- PCR test which is where you convert the RNA to DNA. So, the PCR test is actually not using the viral RNA. It’s using DNA, but it’s like the complimentary RNA. So logically it’s the same thing, but it can be confusing. Like why am I suddenly talking about DNA? Basically, there’s a certain number of cycles.”

Regarding Kary Mullis’ intention for the PCR, this is what he said:

“I’m sad that he isn’t here to defend his manufacturing technique. Kary did not invent a test. He invented a very powerful manufacturing technique that is being abused. What are the best applications for PCR? Not medical diagnostics. He knew that and he always said that.”

===

Ellen

 

 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
On 10/1/2021 at 3:40 PM, Dglgmut said:
On 10/1/2021 at 2:40 PM, Marc said:

I don't know a single peson who has had the flu since March 2020.

It's public information that the PCR test cannot tell the difference between flu and COVID.

Revisiting this, after some persistent "snooping." 

The issue of tests has come up in the household since the barriers to normal border traffic are coming down your end. One of my siblings travels internationally as a flight attendant, but we often take the land border crossing nearby for authentic Mexican eats and general day-tripping, bargain-milk-shopping and visiting our great aunt in Seattle (she's now 103).

The newest 'relaxed' rules for entering the USA by air take effect today -- passengers are required to be fully-vaccinated and to have a recent negative COVID-19 test; combining these strictures with the slightly harsher and stupider newest Canada re-entry requirements means some advance planning.

Basically, to get into the USA by land, we need to show that we are fully-vaccinated, but don't have to provide negative results from a COVID-19 test. But, of course, to get back into Canada, we have to prove we are fully-vaccinated and provide a negative COVID-19 test. 

This mismatch of course is going to hurt the border communities to the south that rely to some part on Canadian visitors. I expect the testing requirement for Canadians returning north by land to be put aside sometime soon ...

In any case, what tests do you or I need to get from here to there and back to the here? Firstly, no antigen tests. Secondly to twentiethly ...

Quote

Types of pre-entry test

  • Rapid antigen tests aren't accepted.

Accepted types of molecular tests

  • PCR - Polymerase chain reaction
  • Nucleic acid test (NAT) or Nucleic acid amplification test (NAATs)
  • Reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP)

These tests use methods such as a nasopharyngeal (NP) swab, nose swab, or saliva sample.

Other acceptable types of tests
  • RT-PCR – reverse transcription real time PCR
  • Quantitative PCR (qPCR)
  • Isothermal amplification
  • Droplet digital PCR or digital droplet PCR (ddPCR)
  • Transcription-mediated amplification (TMA)
  • RNA (Ribonucleic acid)
  • Ct (cycle threshold)
  • CRISPR
  • Sequencing
  • Next generational sequencing (NGS) or whole genome sequencing (WGS)
  • Oxford Nanopore sequencing (LamPORE)
  • Detection of the N gene
  • Detection of Orf1a/b
  • Detection of the S gene
  • Detection of the E gene
  • Detection of the RdRp gene

 I got on the "How does RT-PRC (purportedly) work?" train in Snoopsville.  A couple of videos from the trip stood out as being sufficiently detailed to be informational, but not insanely technical.  Here's one:

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/8/2021 at 3:55 PM, william.scherk said:

Revisiting this, after some persistent "snooping." 

That particular post was research, and research of direct personal relevance to you if you want to be doing Canada/U.S. Border transversings and you need a negative Covid test to get back in Canada from the U.S.

Another fairly recent post you did was curiosity-motivated research.  You wanted to know the meaning of a term ("corresponding author").

However, your typical activity is snooping - poking around, not for the sake of finding truth but for the sake of finding dirt, something to sneer at.

Ellen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now