Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Another reason to look at the goings on around the Q Continuum is to understand the psychology of others, since we do, after all, live in a society where both the leadership and voters have an impact

With the metaphysical threats of China, the wuflu attack on western civilization, the rise of a brazen global oligarchy, and totalitarian ideas like the Great Reset, and the recent elections and kanga

A big difference between elitists doing crud in other countries and their doing it here is the Americans (the real ones) of whom there are still an abundant number in this country's populace.  America

Posted Images

Did John Roberts SCREAM through the walls at a meeting of the Supreme Court Justices.

No. Not a chance.

30 minutes ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:
45 minutes ago, william.scherk said:

In re Roberts SCREAMING, via Hot Air: 

No, John Roberts Didn’t Demand That Texas’s Lawsuit Be Dismissed For Fear Of “Riots”

 

On 12/17/2020 at 5:28 AM, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

This appears to be the source of the hooey:

 

That's not the source, that's one source because it's a different case than Epstein island

Is it not the source of the bulls**t about SCREAMING?

Misinformation is in the air like a virus. Hard-eyed, hard-minded Objectivist approaches seem more likely to pay off in reliable knowledge. 

Anyway, I don't think anyone posting puts credence in the SCREAMING story.  As for the hooey of Epstein Island, how many John Roberts are there in the English-speaking world?

Link to post
Share on other sites

In re Faith and Hope. Emphasis added.

On 12/17/2020 at 10:36 AM, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

One thing is for sure. I find the idea that Lin would put this out without having a credible source impossible.

Once the audio becomes available, this is going to be like the Access Hollywood audio was for candidate Trump. Let's see if Roberts and Breyer figure out how to deal with it the way Trump did his headache. I don't think they have the talent to pull it off.

What if this does not happen?  I wonder how we could agree on what makes for a 'credible source' in these circumstances

"But now it’s war, so we’re going all the way on who and what this human garbage has in their closets

John Roberts is compromised to the point he must be removed and replaced.  Congress has the authority under Article I to remove judges for High Crimes & Misdemeanours.

Sex with children on Epstein’s Orgy Island, illegal adoption via nations other than those of babies’ birth, and treason all qualify.

 And that’s just the short list."

Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, william.scherk said:

Did John Roberts SCREAM through the walls at a meeting of the Supreme Court Justices.

No. Not a chance.

Is it not the source of the bulls**t about SCREAMING?

Misinformation is in the air like a virus. Hard-eyed, hard-minded Objectivist approaches seem more likely to pay off in reliable knowledge. 

Anyway, I don't think anyone posting puts credence in the SCREAMING story.  As for the hooey of Epstein Island, how many John Roberts are there in the English-speaking world?

No idea if he screamed or not, my beautiful fellow Canadian, but I do know for certain how many cases he voted on the wrong side.

That's what screamed out to me, n'est past?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reading the arguments for the Texas case as a layperson, it seems SCOTUS more or less used PA’s reasoning that original jurisdiction isn’t qualified due to the nature of harm professed by the suit. PA cited case(s?) that shows precedent that the high court only hears disputes betwixt states based on actual or financial harm, and that by that reasoning voting/franchise dilution doesn’t comport. As a layperson that sounds a little weak as an argument to deny suit , especially in this particular suit . It certainly smacks of gigantic CYA and begs the question of possible motivations to put forth and adopt that stance , perhaps I’m misunderstanding the legal wranglings , but if that is essentially the case it really feels like a crap ton of barely appropriate jurisimprudence.

And all the more reason to assume they denied the case to appease the Left , either by personal compromise or by principle compromise , neither being worthy actions of the body.

It is extremely hard to muster enough generosity of thought to not believe All of our institutions are broken beyond repair at this junction. I fear we live now in a post institution world. Other than sports statisticians, I can’t off the top of my head name an expert or opinion to have much faith in, and more to the point I believe that is a sign “they” are on the cusp of achieving something wholly awful. And I’m sick of hearing that that’s a conspiracy theory.

I fucking hope there is a bigger better Gitmo in Iceland or Greece or wherever and I hope it comes to good use, soon.

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, william.scherk said:

Michael Flynn talks 'military capabilities' and Marsha La.

Here's a link to the full NewsMax story. Flynn was in conversation with Greg Kelly: Michael Flynn to Newsmax TV: Trump Has Options to Secure Integrity of 2020 Election | Newsmax.com

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The left is going nuts with this.

The only reason I am posting it in this thread is because today is a really important day for President to make some kind of move. And today is the day the Guardians are formally named.

The Space Force is, reportedly, deeply involved in monitoring the 2020 election fraud.

And there's this:

Here is the picture without being truncated.

image.png

:)

Michael

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/17/2020 at 12:36 PM, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

Man, talk about a perfect-fit-with-no-daylight pretext for martial law...

Just to show some legal backing:

and

I think Ron looked this up in answer to this:

Army Leaders Join Gen. Milley and Release Statement Saying There Is “No Role” for US Army in Martial Law in Determining Elections

So there actually is a role. But it must come from the "US national leadership," which is the President.

Michael

Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Brant Gaede said:

Suspended account. Twitter.

Brant,

The Last Refuge account is up. The account suspended is the one that produced the tweet they embedded in their tweet.

But the deleted tweet was the same video that William posted from the C-SPAN director (see here), which is still up.

Also, the deleted tweet was still up when I made my comment above ("I did it anyway.") I checked at the time I made that comment because I wanted to see the difference between the two tweets. And there were some differences, but only in the tweet text. The C-SPAN director was more informative while the deleted tweet has some snark in it.

btw - The Last Refuge is quite credible. It looks like Twitter didn't like the horse they road that time, though. Rather than shoot the rider, they shot the horse.

Michael

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

Just to show some legal backing:

and

I think Ron looked this up in answer to this:

Army Leaders Join Gen. Milley and Release Statement Saying There Is “No Role” for US Army in Martial Law in Determining Elections

So there actually is a role. But it must come from the "US national leadership," which is the President.

Michael

Keith Olbermann just had a meltdown about this, sounding very panicked, calling it "seditious", called Powell a "liar", etc...hah....pot, kettle, black...
 

 

  • Smile 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is an interview with Lin Wood that may be clarifying. It did not cover the WH meeting, but it did a lot of other things. This Dec. 27 interview was with Clay Clark on the Thrive Time Show podcast.

BREAKING!! | LIN WOOD’S MOST IMPORTANT MESSAGE OF THE YEAR | AMERICA HAS BEEN ATTACKED BY COMMUNIST CHINA TWICE THIS YEAR

If you want to know what the Kraken is, Lin explains what he believes it is.

Th transcript starts at about 31:30, a couple of seconds later. 

Quote

CLAY CLARK: Okay. these are two final questions from the listeners out there. What is the Kraken in a nut shell? You hear Sidney Powell tweeting about the Kraken. We hear people referring to Kraken. Your hear General Flynn tweeting about the Kraken. If you had to explain it to somebody who's encountering this information for the first time? I mean, just yesterday, we reached seven million people. I was on the phone with someone. They said, "Do you realize between all the different shows you guys run yesterday, seven million people just heard this for the first time?" So I'm just asking you, what is the Kraken, sir?

LIN WOOD: Well, again. Remember I'm Lin Wood, the lawyer. I have certain information. I've worked closely with Sydney. So the authority word on all of these subject matters will be the President of the United States. 

But I can tell you the Kraken, I believe from what I've learned, Kraken was the code name given to a project where the United States recognized that they would, in fact, be attacked in this election. I think the country and its intelligence officers took adequate steps to document what happened on November the third. I think they've known since then. 

I think Sydney has done a magnificent job of trying to set the table for when the President has to announce it. So I believe you're going to find that the President of the United States and key members of our government have known since November third that this election was a fraud. They know how they committed the fraud. And I think that the people that were involved, are being now, and will soon in the future, be brought to justice. 

So that's the Kraken as I understand it. And Sidney Powell is the Kraken. I love to call her that. She laughs, but that's her name now.

CLAY CLARK (laughs): How tall is she?

LIN WOOD: I think she's actually talking about a code name for what will turn out to be one of the most remarkable operations in the history of our country. I've said this before. Donald Trump said in 2016 he was going to make America great again.

CLAY CLARK: Yeah.

LIN WOOD: By the time he leaves office in 2024, I think he will have, in fact, made America great again. I think you're going to find in the coming days that he's going to keep another campaign promise. He's going to drain the swamp. Donald Trump will go down in history as one of the greatest presidents, if not the greatest President since George Washington that that ever served. He'll be in the ranks of the people on Mount Rushmore.

CLAY CLARK: Amen, amen.

So there's that.

:)

About Martial Law per se, President Trump just tweeted the following (btw - our posts crossed.):

Detractors, of course, will pretend he is breaking with Lin Wood and Michael Flynn just like they thought he did with Sidney Powell. The truth is, this is not the right moment to talk about martial law.

If he ever uses this constitutional power, I am pretty sure he will not announce it in advance. So this tweet makes perfect sense to me.

As I wrote to someone elsewhere (on Twitter--Cernovich, who was saying martial law was immoral and lame and impossible):

Martial law is constitutional. Stealing an election is not.

I put that in a tweet and damned if within 2 hours I got some traction: 13 Retweets, 2 Quote Tweets, 48 Likes, and still more coming in every few minutes. Nobody knows who I am over there.

This shows me the country is ready for it if and when he decides to use it.

Michael

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, ThatGuy said:

And Trump fires back, rather curiously...

TG,

What's to be curious about?

President Trump is backpedaling because Keith Olbermann said what he did and Trump started sweating from fear and shivering in his underwear. As we all know, President Trump is terrified of Olbermann. I don't even think he will sleep tonight from worry that Keith Olbermann will kick his ass.

:)

Michael

Link to post
Share on other sites

Finally! Well, it’s better than nothing. Well gee wiz, it is an emergency fellow o’ists.

From The Washington Post. . . . Lawmakers still have to resolve other issues. Those include eligibility for small-business relief; how to structure unemployment aid; and the criteria for sending out a $600-per-person stimulus check. Pelosi told House Democrats during a call on Saturday that lawmakers remained divided over the amount of money necessary for food assistance, according to a person who spoke on the condition of anonymity to share the speaker’s private remarks . . . .

Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

TG,

What's to be curious about?

President Trump is backpedaling because Keith Olbermann said what he did and Trump started sweating from fear and shivering in his underwear. As we all know, President Trump is terrified of Olbermann. I don't even think he will sleep tonight from worry that Keith Olbermann will kick his ass.

:)

Michael

Trump cowering before Olbermann? Now, that's image; certainly not what I meant. lol

Curious because of what it possibly means, and what it doesn't (is it true? Is it optics/disinformation?),  because of all the talk in the past week or so of the possibility of it,  and of people on Twitter REQUESTING that Trump employ it, especially among the q crowd, who point to the post that says "military is the only way"...

This Twitter thread shows the confusion occurring now by people who thought it was coming, debating whether or not the denial is real or surface-level optics...
 


 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Deep State people need to see this video and think about themselves and their souls. As Lin Wood keeps saying, they need to come clean and get right with their consciences. That's on a spiritual level.

On a practical level, those who can need to do this before their gravy train gets derailed, which is coming. Patriotic people like the ones who vote for Trump are a forgiving people when they observe true contrition. And they are a just people without flinching when an overwhelming need to punish is not merely the law, it's justice.

This video shows the situation much better than most.

Here is the video on YouTube (it's under 20 minutes), which I suspect it will be removed once the YouTube censors realize what this really means (like what Nazi Germany did with the Italian movie version of Rand's We The Living).

Here is the YouTube version.

 

Here is one on Brighteon (same thing, just different thumbnail):

ELECTION 2020: The Plot to Steal America

image.png

And here is a Bitchute version.

 

Just think what it means that President Trump retweeted this

Michael

Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, ThatGuy said:

Trump cowering before Olbermann? Now, that's image; certainly not what I meant. lol

Curious because of what it possibly means, and what it doesn't (is it true? Is it optics/disinformation?),  because of all the talk in the past week or so of the possibility of it,  and of people on Twitter REQUESTING that Trump employ it, especially among the q crowd, who point to the post that says "military is the only way"...

This Twitter thread shows the confusion occurring now by people who thought it was coming, debating whether or not the denial is real or surface-level optics...
 


 

Ah. X-22 REPORT just offered a clarification of what Q and POTUS are getting at re: military involvement. NOT "martial law", but the "Insurrection Act".

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

We are witnessing important history unfold.

And in history, often a phrase becomes a meme like "Give me liberty or give me death."

I have a candidate for one of those.

It's from Lin Wood.

Smartmatic and Dominion have been trying to bully and scare Sidney with threatening letters from high-powered lawyers. They went for total intimidation. She is the wrong person to do that to, but she asked Lin to represent her.

I can easily see "I am not impressed. File your lawsuit." become a battle cry.

:)

Michael

Link to post
Share on other sites

I posted this in response to a comment on another thread about the ARI and the election ("Mouthpieces for Election Riggers), but also intended to post this Rand quote here, originally, as it relates to the "Deep State", or in her case, the dismissal of it as stronger threat than the ideas themselves...

If I were to play "Devil's advocate" for ARI, I'd put the blame at the feet of Ayn Rand herself, on this. She dismissed the notion of a grand conspiracy on the level of a "deep state", American or global, consigning such efforts to inept local attempts, and instead gave more credence to the power of  bad ideas to destroy the country (by default of the acceptance of those ideas) than to a concentrated effort by any elite. I think she was naive about it, but then, she wrote that in 1960-61? And hindsight in 2020 is 20/20...

Anyway, here's the quote I'm thinking of, from FOR THE NEW INTELLECTUAL:
 

Quote

 

If America perishes, it will perish by intellectual default. There is no diabolical conspiracy to destroy it: no conspiracy could be big enough and strong enough. Such cafeteria-socialist conspiracies as do undoubtedly exist are groups of scared, neurotic mediocrities who find themselves pushed into national leadership because nobody else steps forward; they are like pickpockets who merely intended to snatch a welfare-regulation or two and who suddenly find that their victim is unconscious, that they are alone in an enormous mansion of fabulous wealth, with all the doors open and a seasoned burglar’s job on their hands; watch them now screaming that they didn’t mean it, that they had never advocated the nationalization of a country’s economy. they are the best illustration of victory by default: their successes are handed to them by the concessions of their victims. There is no national movement for socialism or dictatorship in America, no “man on horseback” or popular demagogue, nothing but fumbling compromisers and frightened opportunists. Yet we are moving toward full, totalitarian socialism, with worn, cynical voices telling us that such is the irresistible trend of history. History, fate and malevolent conspiracy are easier to believe than the actual truth: that we are moved by nothing but the sluggish inertia of unfocused minds.

Ayn Rand. For the New Intellectual: The Philosophy of Ayn Rand (Kindle Location 745). New American Library.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now