anthony

The Candid Ecologist, Patrick Moore (ex Greenpeace)

Recommended Posts

Interesting talk.  Especially his comment on cloud formation.  The Climate Mafia refuses to weight the influence of cloud formation properly, --precisely-- because they cannot model it.  So they claim it does not make that much difference.  This is false. Henrik Svensmark, a Danish physicist has show in the laboratory what clouds can do .  He has created physical models the simulate the real effect of clouds on the earth.  Svensmark has be treated in a rather shabby fashion by the Climate Mafia.  Clouds are the Venetian Blinds of the Earth's climate system and cloud formation is driven to a great extend by cosmic radiation which varies according to where we are as we travel around the center of the Milky Way and the Sun's gravitational effect.  When the Sun's gravitational effect is strong cosmic rays are held at bay and cloud formation is slowed.  Right now we are near a Solar Minimum so the magnetic field from the Sun is relatively weak.  So more clouds should form which will have a cooling effect on Earth's climate over an extended interval of time. 

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Robert Tracinski wrote about Climategate: For more than a decade, we've been told that there is a scientific "consensus" that humans are causing global warming, that "the debate is over" and all "legitimate" scientists acknowledge the truth of global warming. Now we know what this "consensus" really means. What it means is: the fix is in . . . . end quote

So the data a few years ago saying climatic global warming is real and man-made, was bogus. Have things changed? (Yup, to a degree. Joke.) I am not convinced humanly generated carbon emissions is a big factor in global warming.  A recent White House report shows that warming is increasing which means a general increase in rain and snow for earth but other areas will still have drought, as usual. Hurricanes will become more intense because of increasing water surface temperatures. Of course, the left leaning greenies are saying President Trump isn’t taking the report seriously enough.

Elon Musk or is it mush, said he is moving to Mars but I don’t think it is to avoid the climate. He will need a supply chain like no other. Just as “Okies” migrated in the 1930’s to areas where food could be grown, people will continue to migrate to avoid the heat, wild fires, rising salt water, and dust. Overall, there will be more rain and more arable area so our food bowl is not in jeopardy but it will relocate over centuries. Where is it too hot to live or vacation? Miami is safe for quite a while.         

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Missing Link ...

Real Clear Politics, November 24, 2009, ClimateGate: The Fix is In.

Quote

[...]For more than a decade, we've been told that there is a scientific "consensus" that humans are causing global warming, that "the debate is over" and all "legitimate" scientists acknowledge the truth of global warming. Now we know what this "consensus" really means. What it means is: the fix is in.

This is an enormous case of organized scientific fraud, but it is not just scientific fraud. It is also a criminal act. Suborned by billions of taxpayer dollars devoted to climate research, dozens of prominent scientists have established a criminal racket in which they seek government money-Phil Jones has raked in a total of £13.7 million in grants from the British government-which they then use to falsify data and defraud the taxpayers. It's the most insidious kind of fraud: a fraud in which the culprits are lauded as public heroes. Judging from this cache of e-mails, they even manage to tell themselves that their manipulation of the data is intended to protect a bigger truth and prevent it from being "confused" by inconvenient facts and uncontrolled criticism.

The damage here goes far beyond the loss of a few billions of taxpayer dollars on bogus scientific research. The real cost of this fraud is the trillions of dollars of wealth that will be destroyed if a fraudulent theory is used to justify legislation that starves the global economy of its cheapest and most abundant sources of energy.

This is the scandal of the century. It needs to be thoroughly investigated-and the culprits need to be brought to justice.

Robert Tracinski is editor of The Tracinski Letter and a contributor to RealClearMarkets.

 
 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you mention him when trying to show climate changers they immediately scream “ha he is a shill for oil, forestry and mining”. Therefore anything he says is false!  Except it isn’t..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now