BaalChatzaf

Judge Kavanaugh and the Crazy Lady

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, tmj said:

TRUMP 2018 !

why not?  Trump in 2018 probably means Pochahantis probably won't win, if she runs

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

why not , indeed

For the Rs that are recently discovering a backbone and or borrowing the strength of Trump's, voting to keep Ds and their Deep State and socialist push at bay is to vote for Trump's agenda.

Finestine has already said she would reopen the Kavanaugh debacle( the one she created) should she be elevated to the Chairpersonship of Her committee.

Trump continuing to win is like good, really good :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello? Billy? Hello?

You had said something about the left having eaten someone's homework, then you quoted me discussing the hypocrisy of the left, and then you posted a report on Ellison's divorce filings:

On 10/17/2018 at 7:07 PM, william.scherk said:

From the Twin Cities Pioneer Press, bylined to Kyle Potter and Steve Karnowski:

In unsealed divorce filings, Rep. Keith Ellison says ex-wife abused him

 

I replied with info and questions. I asked you to explain your post.

On 10/18/2018 at 6:13 AM, Jonathan said:

And you think that that is somehow relevant to my comment? Wow.

I'm not understanding your little attempt at gotcha. Perhaps you mistakenly thought that the woman to whom the divorce papers refer is the same woman whom Ellison is accused of assaulting? If so, she's not the same woman.

Other than that possible explanation of error, I have no idea where you're coming from or what you're trying to say. Please explain. I'm totally lost about the link that you're trying to make between my comment on the left's hypocrisy regarding accusations against Kavanaugh versus against Ellison and the unsealing of the divorce papers.

Briefly, this was the point of my comment (a point which you clearly missed): Kavanaigh was accused without evidence or corroboration. Ellison was accused, but with both evidence and corroboration (in fact, it was a witness, the woman's son, and not the alleged victim, who made the accusation public). With Kavanaugh, the left instructed us that we are to believe women, and that if we don't agree that Kavanaugh is guilty and unfit to serve, then we are laughing at all women and at rape. On the other hand, with Ellison, we are not to believe the woman, and our doing so magically does not signal our hatred and disbelief of all women victims. In fact, it's cool to endorse Ellison and to ignore his accuser.

J

P.S. Edited to add the names of the women: Kim Ellison, Karen Monahan, and a third, Amy Alexander. They are not the same woman. Each of them is an individual, with different events in their lives. They are not interchangeable.

Also: Any abuse of Keith Ellison committed by Kim Ellison would not justify Keith's abuse of Karen Monahan, if that is what anyone is thinking. If someone is "reasoning" that people have the right to use retaliatory force, and therefore Keith was within his rights to retaliate against Karen for Kim's initiations of force, then, no, that's not the way that it works. Actual retaliatory force would be against only the person who initiated it, and only in proportion and in immediate self-defense.

 

No response.

Have I misunderstood something? Help me out. Show some goodwill.

J

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/18/2018 at 9:52 AM, BaalChatzaf said:

why not?  Trump in 2018 probably means Pochahantis probably won't win, if she runs

 

 

You mean in 2020? Although one could suggest they are voting for Trump in 2018 if their candidates for the house, senate, and locally, support Trump's agenda. Of course there is always the possibility that President Trump won't run in 2020 for whatever reason. If he is tired of it, Pence could be President and Trump the Veep. Or Pence could simply take over more of the President's duties, not that I see that happening. But after two more years? . . . . Naw. Won't happen. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, Peter said:

You mean in 2020? Although one could suggest they are voting for Trump in 2018 if their candidates for the house, senate, and locally, support Trump's agenda. Of course there is always the possibility that President Trump won't run in 2020 for whatever reason. If he is tired of it, Pence could be President and Trump the Veep. Or Pence could simply take over more of the President's duties, not that I see that happening. But after two more years? . . . . Naw. Won't happen. 

Ooops.  Yes. Make that 2020

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The double standards and hypocrisy continue (note to Billy: Karen Monahan is NOT Kim Ellison, they are two separate individuals):

War On Women: MN Democratic Chair Says He Doesn't Believe Ellison Accuser's Domestic Abuse Allegations

War On Women: MN Democratic Chair Says He Doesn't Believe Ellison Accuser's Domestic Abuse Allegations

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One commentator on Fox News was saying the Kavanagh hearings will have an effect on the elections in 2018, by drawing out Republican and Independent voters who might have stayed at home if they had not seen the disgusting “Leftians” at work.  I hope so. I may “early vote” today or tomorrow.  Peter  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just so we're clear on the credibility of how the Democrats operate at this point in time, and how the ones who get elected Tuesday will continue to operate, look at the Kavanaugh accusers. So far, two have recanted, Julie Swetnick and Judy Munro-Leighton.

Senator Grassley has referred both to the FBI for criminal investigation for later prosecution.  Read the essential details here (Washington Times):

Another Kavanaugh accuser admits to fabricating rape story

President Trump is not amused. And he is not letting this slide.

There is no way to deny it or rationalize it. That's how the Democrats operate. Don't forget, only one Democrat Senator voted for Kavanaugh's confirmation. All of the others did not and, from the looks of things, they are all--every one of them--A-OK with the fraud. They were fine with it at voting time and I haven't come across a single one so far who said they regretted their vote since it was informed by crime and not the truth.

Even now, here's how the Huffington Post is characterizing it.

Trump Tries To Revive Doubt Over Kavanaugh Claims After Little-Known Accuser Recants
The woman, Judy Munro-Leighton, had falsely claimed she authored a anonymous, little-reported accusation.

If that is what you want to continue as mainstream culture, if that is what you find to be good and proper, if that is the way you want to be informed of facts, you know who to vote for on Tuesday. The Democrats will happily serve your heart's desire. Over and over and over.

As for the rest of us, vote Republican.

Let President Trump know you have his back so he can finish what he is doing for the benefit of us all.

Michael

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fake news owned once again.

Manu Raju is the Senior Congressional Correspondent for CNN.

These assholes just won't quit, not even after they have been busted.

They lie because they can't not lie. It's like a dog barking. A dog can't not bark. It's his nature.

CNN people (and other fake news people) lie because it's their nature.

They take a metaphorical dump on their audience every day of the week and bark about it.

Woof woof...

Michael

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

They lie because they can't not lie. It's like a dog barking. A dog can't not bark. It's his nature.

CNN people (and other fake news people) lie because it's their nature.

They take a metaphorical dump on their audience every day of the week and bark about it.

Woof woof...

Barbra Streisand doesn't mind lying when it's on her side, that's for sure.

But when it's not, she turns into a whiny sanctimonious magpie.

Streisand is the only singer I know who has been able to turn a lovely romantic song into fishwife nagging dosed with epic hypocrisy.

Don't forget this is the Kavanaugh thread.

So let's see what Streisand was posting as she was doing the song above:

Don't lie to me? 

Come to your own conclusions.

As for me, I hate to see an artist of the caliber of Barbra Streisand trash her legacy like that at the end of her career. It makes me sad. Another idol from my youth turned shallow, pig-headed and spiteful. I'm going to try to remember the good stuff about her, but it's hard as hell as things like the Streisand Effect pile up along with her politics and songs like the one above.

Maybe if she faded from the spotlight a bit, I can put this stuff out of my mind and go back to loving her as I used to. I mean the lady sings to melt your heart.

Help me out, Streisand. Will ya'?

Barbra Streisand May Move to Canada if Republicans Keep the House

Don't lie to me, don't lie to me, don't lie to me...

:) 

Michael

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

 

 

Barbra Streisand May Move to Canada if Republicans Keep the House

 

Don't lie to me, don't lie to me, don't lie to me...

 

:) 

 

Michael

 

May?    we shall see...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whew! Babs is going to stay in the U.S. now, and not move to, what, where was she threatening to go, Mexico, Venezuela, where they practice her ideology? And now she's going to voluntarily donate all of her wealth to the poor.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/19/2018 at 10:47 AM, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

Just to put a nice tail on this story:

:)

 

Michael

 

As it should be.  

President Trump deserves a lot of credit for sticking with Judge Kavanaugh through that circus.  

I can’t think of any other Republican president, save possibly Reagan, who would have had the stones to do so.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now