Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, william.scherk said:

Cambridge Analytica shenanigans pays off for Facebook.

William,

It sure did.

It's a perfect smokescreen for what Facebook has really done to influence the elections. And not just in the US.

The Cambridge Analytica outrage is small potatoes that's surfing on Trump hatred. It's not as grievous as the way elitists (including Maddow) jacked up some bozo Russian meme makers, who they said swung the election for Trump by posting a small number of memes on Facebook. But it's still the same animal. While the press prompts people to look at Cambridge Analytica as it feigns outrage, Facebook does much, much worse behalf of the elitists, especially those on the left.

I'm glad to see Maddow on her "muh Russians" gig, though. She's working hard to help reelect President Trump.

Michael

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Notice how the spin is that the Trump allowed the meddling in the last Presidential election? Fox had a new video of Joe Biden talking about Russian and other meddling in the last Presidential election. He said something like this didn't happen on the Obama / Biden watch. But Joe? It did. You were IN POWER in 2016 and Trump didn't get sworn in until January 2017 if I have my calendar dates right. So Jobama allowed the meddling and they should be held accountable.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/27/2019 at 11:33 PM, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

VIDEO - THE TRUTH ABOUT SMART CITIES

Polly ties the modern Smart City concept to a similar villa project during the French Revolution and she even talks about the lady from Google that James O'Keefe busted above in this thread.

If you know nothing about Smart Cities, this video will educate you in no time flat and in an interesting manner to boot. Seriously.

For those who noted the references to Masdar City ...

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't put anything here in the Fake Social Media thread for a while, but the clash between the tech giants and the government has been heating up. The tech giants did the unthinkable. Not only did the Federal Government open antitrust investigations against them, the AGs of 48 States did so, also. That means the tech giants unified the Democrats and Republicans.

Also, there has been a controversy about whether a social media platform is a platform or a publisher. When there is liability for something published, the companies claim they are platforms and should fall under the Safe Harbor Law. When they want to censor someone, they claim they are publishers and have a right to do so.

But they have been very careful to not keep to the publisher part in official documents since that could open them up to a hell of a lot of lawsuits, class action and otherwise. But Facebook just screwed up bigtime.

Facebook Admits It’s a Publisher in Court Filings

Let's see how that plays out, but it doesn't look good for Facebook at first blush.

Michael

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a particularly obnoxious example of fake social media:

Senior Twitter Executive Exposed As British Psy-Ops Soldier

Quote

Middle East Eye are reporting a striking story that, if true, should be circulated widely as possible. It sheds a whole new light on just how deeply interwoven the Social Media monoliths and the Deep State truly are:

The senior Twitter executive with editorial responsibility for the Middle East is also a part-time officer in the British Army’s psychological warfare unit, Middle East Eye has established.

Apparently, Gordon McMillan – twitter’s head of editorial for Europe, Middle East and Africa – not only works for the British government, but is a reservist in the 77th Brigade.

Spooks and social engineers everywhere. All promoting the establishment ruling class, sometimes openly, but mostly covertly. Social media is a perfect environment and breeding ground for them.

Michael

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Intriguing video that explains how robots/AI at Youtube automate de-listing and de-indexing and de-monetization. 

 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, william.scherk said:

Intriguing video that explains how robots/AI at Youtube automate de-listing and de-indexing and de-monetization. 

 

Very creative, but nothing in the video is true. Get a grip, conspiracy theorist.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Even if there was any reality to this tin-foil hat hysteria, they have the right to take care of their brand, Korben said it best ...

  • KorbenDallas
   On 9/6/2018 at 1:38 AM,  Michael Stuart Kelly said: 

But the fact that he thinks social media censorship is OK in America

KorbenDallas said: 

It's not censorship by the government, that would be violating free speech.  It's a company taking care of their brand!  You can kick someone out of your store if they are disrupting things, KICK ALEX OUT

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Jon Letendre said:

... they have the right to take care of their brand...

Jon,

As a publisher or as a platform?

As a publisher, I agree. As a platform, they have some sweetheart government protections (crony deals) and lots of government funding. Not to mention massive employee swaps with the Obama administration. So what the hell kind of private company is that? Just because something is legal, that doesn't make it rights-based. Slavery was legal in the US for a long time. Private companies should be private in deed, not just in legal registration, to claim Randian-like rights basis.

But even so, legally, as a platform, they can't censor folks for political speech. (Like a telephone company cannot censor speech for using telephones.) As a publisher, if they were a publisher, they can.

When they want their own freedom and lack of liability for content, they claim they are a platform. When they want to censor political speech, they claim they have the same rights as a publisher without really saying it.

So why don't they embrace being a publisher?

A shit-ton of lawsuits for libel, that's why.

(btw - I didn't see the video William posted except for the opening strawman it set up. After that, I didn't think it was worth watching. I don't mean that in a snobbish manner. It's just why watch a half-hour of debunking a strawman? It looks creative, though.)

Michael

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, then you have to watch more of the video, Michael.

See, the people bitching and complaining in Billy’s video can simply express themselves somewhere else. Isn’t that the response from their side of the political divide when people they don’t  happen to identify with are being silenced by the social media giants?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Emphasis added.

2 hours ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:
7 hours ago, william.scherk said:

Intriguing video that explains how robots/AI at Youtube automate de-listing and de-indexing and de-monetization. 

[...] I didn't see the video William posted except for the opening strawman it set up. After that, I didn't think it was worth watching. I don't mean that in a snobbish manner. It's just why watch a half-hour of debunking a strawman?

What was the opening strawman, as you perceived it after watching an introductory minute or two?  

 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, william.scherk said:

What was the opening strawman, as you perceived it after watching an introductory minute or two?  

William,

It was actually less than a minute. Here are a couple of screenshots.

image.png

I took that to mean these guys think YouTube is demonetizing gays as a target group. Suddenly YouTube became homophobic (inadvertently, of course).

If that's not the message, then the opening of this video sucks--a total communication fail. And that portends that I will spend at least a half hour (probably more) just to figure out what these guys mean. If it is the message, I'm not interested. That's a friggin' strawman.

The space in my brain for looking at class victimization stories is full right now.

Michael

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ignore sources and they cease to resonate. Ignore Billy and Billy is diminished. Duh. If you contribute to his site. Duh. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

William,

It was actually less than a minute. Here are a couple of screenshots.

image.png

I took that to mean these guys think YouTube is demonetizing gays as a target group. Suddenly YouTube became homophobic (inadvertently, of course).

If that's not the message, then the opening of this video sucks--a total communication fail. And that portends that I will spend at least a half hour (probably more) just to figure out what these guys mean. If it is the message, I'm not interested. That's a friggin' strawman.

The space in my brain for looking at class victimization stories is full right now.

Michael

It is indeed a straw man. It's Narrative™. Spin.

J

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...