Recommended Posts

Here we go again.

Amodei on Trump impeachment inquiry: ‘Let’s put it through the process and see what happens’

Quote

Rep. Mark Amodei supports the House’s inquiry into whether President Donald Trump should be impeached, but is withholding judgment on whether Trump has crossed the legal line. 

That was yesterday in one publication--The Nevada Independent, but then echoed all over the legacy news media.

Now today in Breitbart:

Exclusive—Rep. Mark Amodei Does Not Support Impeachment Inquiry Despite Fake News Claims
 

Quote

Rep. Mark Amodei (R-NV), Nevada’s only Republican U.S. House member, confirmed to Breitbart News on Saturday afternoon in an exclusive phone interview that media and leftist claims that he supports an “impeachment inquiry” are inaccurate: he does not support an “impeachment inquiry” into President Donald Trump.

. . .

He just wishes the national media would have done a little more research before getting this story so badly wrong by falsely saying he supports an impeachment inquiry into Trump. He noted that when the Access Hollywood tapes came out in the 2016 election, he actually publicly defended Trump—and has been a longtime supporter of the president and the White House.

He should have called the national media reporters scumbags.

Imagine what the fake news media is going to do with deep fakes once they become easy to make.

Michael

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What ever happened to The Muck Raker Journalists who went after really bad people? They may have been explosive in their search for rotten scoundrels but they did not go after good people. They did not lie. They did not create fake news. Even the journalistic term "smear" was reserved for people who deserved being exposed. Now it seems they are Nazi propogandists.    

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was looking at some of the news programs this morning and a very odd thought occurred to me.

I became aware of the fact that I wasn't tuning in for the substance. I already know the anti-Trumpers are running another fraud and making everyone talk about impeachment, but that's a big fat nothing-burger distraction. In practical terms, the best result they can hope for is to watch the Senate kill their efforts. So what's the point?

I was tuning in to study the way men and women who have sold out talk and act. Sometimes I laugh at the more idiotic idiots (like the lady who says--and believes it can happen--that we have to impeach both President Trump and Vice President Pence so Nancy Pelosi can become president :) ), but mostly I tune in to study these grown and educated adults with totally corrupted souls.

Do you remember old circuses and carnivals that had two-headed ladies, geeks (guys who bit the heads off live chickens or snakes), and all kinds of grotesque humans? People paid to see that. And once inside the tent, they couldn't take your eyes off it. That's the state of mind and spirit I am in when I watch the legacy news these days (with a few exceptions). But instead of looking at deformed bodies, I am looking at deformed souls.

How can they treat lies that they know are lies, that fool no one, as serious topics of discussion and dress up to do it at that?

I do not ever want to become something like that.

It gives me the creeps.

Michael

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Brant,

Do you really think they are different than what came out in the New York Times today?

Free Speech Is Killing Us

Quote

Using “free speech” as a cop-out is just as intellectually dishonest and just as morally bankrupt.

. . .

Free speech is a bedrock value in this country. But it isn’t the only one. Like all values, it must be held in tension with others, such as equality, safety and robust democratic participation. 

So sayeth the power luster to the NPC's of America:

image.png

 

I think TV press and the print press are all doing the same thing on purpose, lying and manipulating on purpose in order to subjugate people (not to themselves, but to the people they worship), and they have all corrupted their souls.

I also believe they did that they got money for it.

Michael

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The NYT is being bankrolled by Carlos Sim (sp).

--Brant

or was--but there's always another billionaire sugar daddy waiting in the wings to pay that whore

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fun (if obvious) 'deep fake' video ...

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks William. That is the best impressionist I have ever seen. I had my wife watch it after me and she knew who was being "done" almost every time. I missed Morgan Freeman but the second time I figured it out. Duh.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ABC News just listed the bastard's crimes. He was truly evil, and died too soon . . . he should have suffered. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm listing this here in Fake News because the mainstream press breathlessly pushed each of these boneheaded campaign (generally saying "the walls are closing in" on Trump.)

Julie Kelly Lists All of Adam Schiff’s Failed Attempts to Get Trump

Quote

RUSH: Julie Kelly writing in American Greatness now has the timeline. And I want to share the highlights of this piece with you because this — and I’m gonna link to this at RushLimbaugh.com. It’s called “The Impeachment Schiff Show,” and it’s from American Greatness. It’s their website.

. . .

“Russian election collusion –” big zero. “– porn star payoffs, income tax evasion, obstruction of justice, the Emoluments Clause, the 25th Amendment, the Charlottesville rally, the two Michaels (Avenatti and Cohen), Deutsche Bank, Alfa-Bank, and Orange Man Bad — Representative Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) finally has Trump dead-to-rights: A quid pro quo without the quid, the pro, or the quo.”

Now, that paragraph recounts everything they’ve tried that has blown up on them. There was no Russian collusion. Stormy Daniels effort to get rid of Trump bombed. Then they said he evaded income tax payments and they got the Southern District of New York and the Manhattan DA on it. Big, fat zero. Obstruction of justice, big, fat zero. The Emoluments Clause, big, fat zero, 25th Amendment, gonna wear a wire, get Trump proving he’s insane, cabinet has to get rid of him, bombed. The Charlottesville rally where they said Trump was sympathetic to neo-Nazis, bombed!

Michael Avenatti with Stormy Daniels. Avenatti was gonna be the Democrat nominee, he was so hot! Then Michael Cohen. Remember all of these things? All of these things were treated exactly like the phone call with the president of Ukraine’s been treated. It’s my point. Every one of these things — the Russia collusion, Plan A. Porn star payoff, Plan B. Income tax evasion, Plan C. Obstruction of justice, Plan D. Emoluments clause, Plan E. The 25th Amendment, Plan F. Charlottesville, Plan G…and so on.

. . .

Now, interesting, Nancy Pelosi… This story is just now running. It’s from TheHill.com. The headline: “Pelosi Suggests Impeachment Could Expand Beyond Ukraine.” Oh, really! Now, why would that be? Why would it all of a sudden have to go beyond Ukraine? Could it be because Tim Morrison yesterday blew Bill Taylor out of the water? Could it be because everybody knows who the whistleblower is and knows what a partisan hack he is?

Could it be that Vindman is attached to the partisan hack which is attached to other partisan hacks? Could it be that the whole thing’s beginning to implode on them so now what’s gonna be next? You’re gonna go beyond Ukraine?

. . .

Adam Schiff has put together a series of lies that the media has helped pass off as fact, and the lies are really just exaggerated opinion. It’s all imploding because it isn’t real. Trump hasn’t done anything, and their effort to convince the American people he has was blown up when Trump releases the transcript.

So now here comes Pelosi, “Well, we might — we might even now have to go beyond Ukraine.”

Whoa, whoa, whoa!

Wait a minute, Madam Pelosi. I thought Ukraine was it. Russia wasn’t it. Stormy Daniels wasn’t it. Avenatti wasn’t it. Blasey Ford wasn’t it. “B-b-b-but this was it! This was it. This was the gold mine. This was the end of Trump.” Now it’s not? Now it’s not? Now we gonna go back to the Mueller report, obstruction of justice, 11 counts? (Gasp!) Well, in one sense, with impeachment they can go anywhere they want, but follow ’em. If she’s already talking about going beyond Ukraine, what that means is that they may have to dump Ukraine. You should go into this weekend not watching the media and feeling pretty good about this...

Here's the article by Julie Kelly that Rush mentioned:

The Impeachment Schiff Show

It's really hard trying to find where ruling class part of the Democratic Party (and never-Trump elitist Republicans, for that matter) leaves off and the fake news mainstream media begins.

All any of them (including the fake news press) has been able to do against Trump up to now is fail, fail, fail, then fail some more, except when they manage the equivalent of scratching Turmp's armor, at which point they bare their chests in unison and try to yodel victory throughout the jungle like Tarzan, but, like a flock of parrots, all they can manage is to squawk out in cacophony, "The walls are closing in... the walls are closing in... the walls are closing in..."

:)

Michael

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...