Mikee Posted November 20, 2016 Share Posted November 20, 2016 Measurement of Impulsive Thrust from a Closed Radio-Frequency Cavity in Vacuum Peer reviewed EM drive paper. The "Impossible" EM drive (violates Newton's law) appears to work. From the discussion: "Pilot-wave theories are a family of realist interpretations of quantum mechanics that conjecture that the statistical nature of the formalism of quantum mechanics is due to an ignorance of an underlying more fundamental real dynamics, and that microscopic particles follow real trajectories over time just like larger classical bodies do." Well, that's a relief. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaalChatzaf Posted November 20, 2016 Share Posted November 20, 2016 27 minutes ago, Mikee said: Measurement of Impulsive Thrust from a Closed Radio-Frequency Cavity in Vacuum Peer reviewed EM drive paper. The "Impossible" EM drive (violates Newton's law) appears to work. From the discussion: "Pilot-wave theories are a family of realist interpretations of quantum mechanics that conjecture that the statistical nature of the formalism of quantum mechanics is due to an ignorance of an underlying more fundamental real dynamics, and that microscopic particles follow real trajectories over time just like larger classical bodies do." Well, that's a relief. from http://www.sciencealert.com/nasa-has-trialled-an-engine-that-would-take-us-to-Mars-in-10-weeks But before we get too excited (who are we kidding, we're already freaking out), it's important to note that these results haven't been replicated or verified by peer review, so there's a chance there's been some kind of error. But so far, despite a thorough attempt to poke holes in the results, the engine seems to hold up. It does not count until replicated by independent experimenters. But it sounds very interesting. At last, an engine they is not a modern version of a Tang Dynasty rocket. I hope it pans out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikee Posted November 20, 2016 Author Share Posted November 20, 2016 Another article suggests it has been peer reviewed: http://www.sciencealert.com/it-s-official-nasa-s-peer-reviewed-em-drive-paper-has-finally-been-published I want to live at least another 50 years... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaalChatzaf Posted November 20, 2016 Share Posted November 20, 2016 29 minutes ago, Mikee said: Another article suggests it has been peer reviewed: http://www.sciencealert.com/it-s-official-nasa-s-peer-reviewed-em-drive-paper-has-finally-been-published I want to live at least another 50 years... I saw a journal article which was peer reviewed. I am talking about replicating the result by independent experimenters. A scientific result like that needs to be replicated independently at least twice before it is taken seriously. Assuming the effect is genuine (I hope it is) then t here is the matter of scaling it up so it is a practical device. I have been hoping for some time that an electromagnetic drive or on ion drive could be developed to get us beyond rockets. Rockets go back to the Tang Dynasty in China and their effect is a manifestation of Newton's third law (action/reaction) which is a special case of the conservation of momentum. This E.M. drive still has to conform to the basic conservation laws; conservation of energy, conservation of momentum and conservation of angular momentum. Any true reactionless drive would violate the conservation of momentum. You can be sure that such a result will be regarded very skeptically and it would take meticulous experimental demonstration to falsify the conservation of linear momentum. I think the article you referenced is a bit premature. The physics community is going to need a lot of proof before it will accept that the conservation of momentum has been falsified. The conservation laws are the consequence of certain basic symmetries that occur in nature. A physical effect that violated one of the basic conservation laws would would stand physics on its head. There are other possible energy sources that can be applied to propulsion. For example the Casimyr Effect (vacuum energy) It has been shown to exists but no one has been able to exploit it (so-far) to produce useful physical work. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RF_resonant_cavity_thruster for more on resonant cavity thrust Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now