What is "Globalism"


BaalChatzaf

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, anthony said:

 

To you (and Bob), I'd mention that the end can never justify the means of getting there. We tread into utilitarianism.

 

My left foot is utilitarianism and my right foot is pragmatism.  Left, Right,  Left, Right....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

William,

Just to let you know, I am for international free trade (complete free trade) and economic globalization. I am also for relatively open immigration (I support screening for communicable diseases and potential violent threats like Jihadism) and I support cultural cosmopolitanism (but not official multiculturalism; I see that as a 'keep to your own kind' pseudo-segregationism). 

My problem is with supranational layers of regulation and control. Things like the EU. 

Jurisdictional competition has been a fantastic ally to liberty and things like the EU ultimately reduce jurisdictional competition. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Brant Gaede said:

And your head?

--Brant

curious

Pure thought

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, studiodekadent said:

William,

Just to let you know, I am for international free trade (complete free trade) and economic globalization. I am also for relatively open immigration (I support screening for communicable diseases and potential violent threats like Jihadism) and I support cultural cosmopolitanism (but not official multiculturalism; I see that as a 'keep to your own kind' pseudo-segregationism). 

I'd be interested in more of your thoughts on multiculturalism of the official kind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are only multi-individuals. Who - also - happen to come from many cultural backgrounds.

To define a person by a culture is incipient collectivism, and racialist, but that's what 'multiculturalists' have been aiming for - in order to circumvent/transcend individualism.

Second stage, having succeeded with that, I think the globalist-progressivists dream of placing those "multi-cultures" into the melting pot, transcending those, in turn - and finally emerging with ...  one Culture.

No more 'differences' among [collectives of] people, therefore no cause for conflict and strife. Humanity and Gaia will then co-exist contentedly. (Shot of dawn sky, orchestra, roll credits). So they believe.

Except. The great saving grace about humanity - reality and the human spirit remains and is as stubbornly individualistic as ever. It (ultimately) refuses to be controlled. In real life, she/he will go on as usual having neighborly spats with another just next door, or else just as easily they become friends. Personal choice determines which. Too bad for the Uni-Culturalists, their prescribed and imposed global Nirvana gets to fail before they begin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, william.scherk said:

I'd be interested in more of your thoughts on multiculturalism of the official kind.

I consider it to be collectivistic, neo-segregationist and an attack on the true diversity of cosmopolitanism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now