Matrix, Matter, and Method in Metaphysics


Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, BaalChatzaf said:

Where is the math????

Math (numbers) is necessary for science. Not metaphysics even though metaphysics is also necessary for science. Thus the article starts out wrong and probably stays wrong for that reason if not for a mountain of useless(?) verbiage. We might be able to say the same about epistemology--in fact we can. Rand's ITOE may be needed for philosophy, but little of it makes the transition into scientific methodology. Correct and true science greatly predates Rand, so she's only back-filling respecting science.


no numbers = no science and I don't embrace the faux equations some philosophers like to grace their work with

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now