BaalChatzaf Posted October 22, 2016 Share Posted October 22, 2016 1 hour ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said: And the beat goes on... Michael May Hillary is the Reductio ad Absurdum of our government. Tyranny by menopause... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KorbenDallas Posted October 22, 2016 Share Posted October 22, 2016 Every $5 bill right now.#Gettysburg pic.twitter.com/OCfZyV1zRq— Diane N. Sevenay (@Diane_7A) October 22, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
william.scherk Posted October 22, 2016 Share Posted October 22, 2016 I wasn't the only one whose takeaway from Trump's Gettysburg speech was "First hundred days. Gonna sue them bitches." .@realDonaldTrump Gettysburg unity speech began like Festivus - with the traditional airing of grievances. — John Roberts (@johnrobertsFox) October 22, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted October 22, 2016 Share Posted October 22, 2016 12 minutes ago, william.scherk said: I wasn't the only one whose takeaway from Trump's Gettysburg speech was "First hundred days. Gonna sue them bitches." William, As he should if he believes they acted illegally and with malice. We have a great justice system here in the USA. Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted October 22, 2016 Share Posted October 22, 2016 It's going to be a close election. Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted October 22, 2016 Share Posted October 22, 2016 I love people with a sense of humor. Clinton insider @NeeraTanden on Faiz Shakir-CAP VP & EIC of Think Progress & Sanders speech writer: "He's a fucker." https://t.co/JzJAYKQwLr— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) October 22, 2016 Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brant Gaede Posted October 22, 2016 Share Posted October 22, 2016 On 10/20/2016 at 8:55 PM, Peter said: Thanks to William for the close up of Trump’s earlobe. He does not have the characteristic *crease* found on people who are approaching a medical emergency like a heart attack or stroke. The crease looks like this ( ,left to right, as you look at their ear. I give Donald a clean bill of health, but I predict he will start drinking champagne after winning the Presidency. Peter The "crease" has been debunked. Nothing to do with health. --Brant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
william.scherk Posted October 22, 2016 Share Posted October 22, 2016 Quote Meeting Donald Trump | Virgin https://www.virgin.com/richard-branson/meeting-donald-trump 2 days ago - Some years ago, Mr Trump invited me to lunch for a one-to-one meeting at his apartment in Manhattan. We had not met ... I was baffled why he had invited me to lunch solely to tell me this. For a moment ... By Richard Branson. Missing: kiss date Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted October 22, 2016 Share Posted October 22, 2016 William, Ha! I loved this comment from Branson: Quote Later, I remember contrasting the lunch with a one-to-one lunch I shared with Hillary Clinton. Here we talked about education reform, the war on drugs, women’s rights, conflicts around the globe and the death penalty. She was a good listener as well as an eloquent speaker. As she understands well, the President of the United States needs to understand and be engaged with wider world issues, rather than be consumed by petty personal quarrels. He didn't mention that her way over the years was simply to bump off the really serious problems with six layers of separation. Problematic people who are dead don't act (unless they reanimate to vote for Democrats, but I digress ). And that allows one to focus on being an "eloquent speaker" and concentrate on things like "education reform, the war on drugs, women’s rights, conflicts around the globe and the death penalty." Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 I've got to put this one in humor because there is nothing rational that can explain it other than comedy. Gloria Allred must be fulfilling a contractual obligation to present X number of women accusers against Trump, or she is setting some kind of trap. She certainly is scraping the bottom of the barrel and the story doesn't even make sense. (See here.) A quick breakdown: 1. The woman accuser, Jessica Drake, is a porn star. No, seriously. She's a porn star (Wicked Pictures). 2. She went to a Trump golf course, took a tourist-like picture with him like people do at events, and presented this as proof of something or other. 3. She said Trump kept chasing her after she went to his room with two other women and didn't want to stay, and she was uncomfortable with his attentions (like good moral porn stars feel when chased by billionaires). 4. She claimed Trump offered her $10,000 to spend the night with him, but she didn't want to be with him so she refused. Besides, she had to go back to work at the porn shoot. 5. She thinks Trump's behavior was unacceptable and he should be ashamed of himself. I stand in awe. Dayaamm! Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikee Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 From Dave Barry: Trump hater “Fortunately it wasn’t chunky peanut butter, so vehicles didn’t get scratched,” said Chief Deputy Dan Kontos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 1 hour ago, Mikee said: From Dave Barry: Trump hater “Fortunately it wasn’t chunky peanut butter, so vehicles didn’t get scratched,” said Chief Deputy Dan Kontos. Mike, LOL... That was in Wisconsin. For readers who don't want to go there, a lady thought a Town Hall meeting was a Trump rally and smeared a bunch of cars parked there with peanut butter. The picture of her shows she doesn't look like the sharpest knife in the drawer. The following person does not like Hillary Clinton. This is in Bellmore, which is on Long Island in New York. Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 Olé! Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 LOL... Oh, the pain... the pain... Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
william.scherk Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 17 hours ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said: I loved this comment from Branson: Quote Later, I remember contrasting the lunch with a one-to-one lunch I shared with Hillary Clinton. Here we talked about education reform, the war on drugs, women’s rights, conflicts around the globe and the death penalty. She was a good listener as well as an eloquent speaker. As she understands well, the President of the United States needs to understand and be engaged with wider world issues, rather than be consumed by petty personal quarrels. He didn't mention that her way over the years was simply to bump off the really serious problems with six layers of separation. Richard Branson did not mention the Clinton Body Count? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaalChatzaf Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 18 minutes ago, william.scherk said: Richard Branson did not mention the Clinton Body Count? Homicide was never proven in court. So legally it never happened.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brant Gaede Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 5 minutes ago, BaalChatzaf said: Homicide was never proven in court. So legally it never happened.... And the Holocaust never happened . . . --Brant not a denier except for AGW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 44 minutes ago, william.scherk said: Richard Branson did not mention the Clinton Body Count? William, LOL... That was my way of highlighting the difference between the Social Appearance people as opposed to the Social Reality people. Social Appearance people are generally elitists and there is a very good reason they hold good manners above disgusting acts in reality by other elitists, that is, so long as those disgusting acts are plausibly hidden. Social Appearance at the root is a fundamental part of the elitist mindset. In an earlier post, I gave a partial explanation: 13 hours ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said: I remember a book I read a long time ago that explained something about the elites that made a lot of sense to me: The Proud Tower by Barbara Tuchman. It's about the world prior to World War I. She said (my paraphrase from a twisted memory ) the elites in Europe were infested with scandals, love affairs, embezzlements, murders, and all kinds of dirty rotten scoundrel activities. All the elites covered for each other. All was preforgiven and they all put on a show of propriety for the rest of the world. The only unforgivable sin was getting caught and exposed to the commoners. If that happened to you, then you were ostracized from polite society for life. You became a leper. (Think of a modern-day Anthony Weiner. He got a pass a couple of times because psychology explains it to the commoners. But he went full-on shameless and got caught again. Now he's ostracized and I don't think he's going to be let back in.) Branson is showing himself to be an elitist at heart, although he does surround himself with a lot of Ayn Rand fans. In his small article, he condemns Donald Trump based on Trump's conversation and does not deem to look at Trump's productive and caring acts, and he praises Hillary Clinton based on her conversation and would probably consider it insulting to even entertain a thought about the Clinton Body Count (a series of acts in reality). Elitists do not like commoners to be among them--except as servants or props for their virtue signaling. Period. And they viscerally despise anything that could expose their dirt to commoners. Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
william.scherk Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 (edited) 2 hours ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said: 2 hours ago, william.scherk said: Richard Branson did not mention the Clinton Body Count? William, LOL... Do you believe that the Clinton Body Count is ... A Thing? I mean, an actual real-world set of people who were mysteriously offed by the Clintons, and an important or essential issue to take into consideration when considering the last weeks of the present election. Do you believe that the Clinton Body Count is 'real'? 2 hours ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said: Branson [...] would probably consider it insulting to even entertain a thought about the Clinton Body Count (a series of acts in reality). You write "Clinton Body Count (a series of acts in reality)." That leads me to infer that you believe the bodies/people on the lists were rubbed out. I will check around the archives, but it seems to be youf first statement about the credibility of the list of (purported) murders. That mysterious epistemological foundation aside, the take-home from the Branson kiss-and-tell was that Mr Trump was consumed by plans of vengeance. That makes sense and comports with reality. Dragging in the Clinton Body Count to discount that message, well, it doesn't do any cognitive work. In my opinion the body count is pure crap, without foundation, and not at all related to Mr Trump's dreams and plans of punishing those who have been 'unfair' to him. Edited October 23, 2016 by william.scherk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 28 minutes ago, william.scherk said: Do you believe that the Clinton Body Count is ... A Thing? William, "A Thing?" LOL... Be careful... Your elitism is showing... But let me be clear... Do I think the entirety of the Clinton Body Count is true? No. I think a good portion of it is forced. Do I think the excessive amount of people who die under mysterious or violent circumstances, or commit suicide, that surround the Clintons (up close) indicate a pattern? Yup. (How many people do you know up close who committed suicide or died under mysterious or violent circumstances? Not many, I bet. Nobody else does, either. ) In other words, do I believe Hillary Clinton is capable of murder to advance her political career? Yup. No doubt in my mind. And she doesn't even hide it. Hillary Clinton discussing Julian Assange: “Can’t we just drone this guy?” Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 My friend Marc sent me the following picture his daughter (Dom) took from Canada. He said his daughter just about died laughing and weeping like she was a little girl again. Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
william.scherk Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 Quote Donald Trump’s campaign manager admits: ‘We are behind’ That is funny-peculiar, besides being an obvious gotcha-truncquoat from the usual suspects at the Washington Post (which sad and corrupt outpost of lies will be punished in the coming 100 Days of Vengeance). Funny-peculiar because you don't do this. You don't let out these truncquoatable three words in a row. Campaign managers are not supposed to give in the Conventional Wisdom of Media Inc hounds. Who says 'we are behind' ...? All right, Red Hat on/off, whew. Not so fast. It is now not funny-peculiar but funny in an unpleasant way, like getting an ugly girl to admit she is ugly on camera. I mean, why badger Kellyanne Conway until she emits the gotcha phrase? Okay but. Okay but she was badgered till she said what the interrogators wanted to hear. She was waterboarded. Good going, freaks of the bad media. Now what? Is somebody going to badger Michael until he cries out "We are Losing"? Never, never. We will fight on the beaches, in the bathtub, after our bedtime, until victory or a well-deserved vacation. On a still-more light-hearted note ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted October 24, 2016 Share Posted October 24, 2016 This is kinda cute. An image is worth a thousand words. Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted October 24, 2016 Share Posted October 24, 2016 57 minutes ago, william.scherk said: Is somebody going to badger Michael until he cries out "We are Losing"? William, Well, they're going to try. btw - I saw that interview earlier. Conway's admission was limited to polls that were qualified by her as having methodological problems. You said it was extracted by badgering her. You left out spin. Enjoy the gotcha, though, while it lasts. Other btw - Alex Baldwin this go around is not nearly as good as other Trump imitators. Trump haters might like his performance in the same manner that racists like a white man in blackface, bug-eyed, eating watermelon and slurping, but the intelligent humor factor for the rest of us is low. What happened to him? Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted October 24, 2016 Share Posted October 24, 2016 16 minutes ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said: Conway's admission was limited to polls that were qualified by her as having methodological problems. You said it was extracted by badgering her. You left out spin. Why do I even bother saying this stuff? From ZeroHedge: New Podesta Email Exposes Dem Playbook For Rigging Polls Through "Oversamples" Here is some Podesta polling wisdom: Quote I also want to get your Atlas folks to recommend oversamples for our polling before we start in February. By market, regions, etc. I want to get this all compiled into one set of recommendations so we can maximize what we get out of our media polling. And what, pray tell, does Podesta intend to "get out of our media polling," hmmmm? You ought to see the state-by-state recommendations. Oversample Hispanics, Afro-Americans, Native Americans, and key regions that are anti-Trump. That's just for starters... Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now