Jeezus Q Kryst!!!!


BaalChatzaf

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 100
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Does anyone other than myself happen to remember Rosalie Nichols? I don't know what became of her, but she was a full-blooded "Native American," a lesbian, and a libertarian (somewhat fond of Rand) who was very active in the California movement during the 1970s.

After the murder of Harvey Milk in 1978, I went along with Roy Childs to a mass meeting held at a Baptist Church in San Francisco. The meeting was a protest against the "Twinkie Defense" that was successfully used by George Moscone to obtain a light sentence for the wanton murder of Milk. The rally featured a number of speakers from different political persuasions, and Roy had been ask to present the libertarian perspective on the problem.

Roy gave an excellent talk, but his libertarianism made him very unpopular with the crowd, many of whom booed and jeered so loudly that I could barely hear at times. That hostile response was unexpected, and it rattled Roy. Immediately after he stepped off the stage, Rosalie came storming on and grabbed the microphone, and she tore the audience a new one for its rude treatment of Roy. Her opening was classic: "My name is Rosalie Nichols. I'm a Native American, a lesbian, and a radical feminist...." You could have heard a pin drop in the church after that. Rosalie's "credentials," for that crowd, were impeccable. 8-)

I recall that, during the early 1970s, Rosalie self-published a critique of Ayn Rand's position on the land rights of Indians and their treatment by Europeans. It was good, as I recall, though I haven't seen a copy in decades.

Ghs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This "raise awareness" horseshit the way you are proposing is something for do-gooder people to pat themselves on the back with and complain about the world as they go home to their laps of luxury. Boo hoo. The world doesn't feel guilty like I do. The world is broken.

At age 65, I find that my awareness is more difficult to raise than it used to be. I hear that's a common problem among older men.

Ghs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I looked at it.

A term "harmful mascot" was used over and over, but I looked in vain for any specific harm. The best I could find, other than the word racism used over and over, was this: that a harmful mascot "diminishes the place, status, and humanity of contemporary Native citizens."

How does it do that?

Crickets chirping...

In the same paragraph, there is this amazing comment: "What is true about many of the brand origin stories is that team owners during the birth of these brands hoped to gain financially from mocking Native identity."

Team owners thought mocking Indians was a good money-making idea (instead of getting fans to, er... say... root for the team)?

LOL...

:)

Whoever wrote that doesn't understand business or sports.

Gonna have to do better than that to persuade anyone of anything.

Just saying something doesn't make it true.

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This "raise awareness" horseshit the way you are proposing is something for do-gooder people to pat themselves on the back with and complain about the world as they go home to their laps of luxury. Boo hoo. The world doesn't feel guilty like I do. The world is broken.

At age 65, I find that my awareness is more difficult to raise than it used to be. I hear that's a common problem among older men.

Ghs

George,

At 62, I, too, find increasing shortcomings in my awareness, no matter how hard I try to erect it.

:)

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

George,

At 62, I, too, find increasing shortcomings in my awareness, no matter how hard I try to erect it.

:smile:

Michael

Is that a deliberate pun?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This "raise awareness" horseshit the way you are proposing is something for do-gooder people to pat themselves on the back with and complain about the world as they go home to their laps of luxury. Boo hoo. The world doesn't feel guilty like I do. The world is broken.

At age 65, I find that my awareness is more difficult to raise than it used to be. I hear that's a common problem among older men.

Ghs

George,

At 62, I, too, find increasing shortcomings in my awareness, no matter how hard I try to erect it.

:smile:

Michael

I'm 70. WTF are you people talking about?

--Homo Erectus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone other than myself happen to remember Rosalie Nichols? I don't know what became of her, but she was a full-blooded "Native American," a lesbian, and a libertarian (somewhat fond of Rand) who was very active in the California movement during the 1970s.

After the murder of Harvey Milk in 1978, I went along with Roy Childs to a mass meeting held at a Baptist Church in San Francisco. The meeting was a protest against the "Twinkie Defense" that was successfully used by George Moscone to obtain a light sentence for the wanton murder of Milk. The rally featured a number of speakers from different political persuasions, and Roy had been ask to present the libertarian perspective on the problem.

Roy gave an excellent talk, but his libertarianism made him very unpopular with the crowd, many of whom booed and jeered so loudly that I could barely hear at times. That hostile response was unexpected, and it rattled Roy. Immediately after he stepped off the stage, Rosalie came storming on and grabbed the microphone, and she tore the audience a new one for its rude treatment of Roy. Her opening was classic: "My name is Rosalie Nichols. I'm a Native American, a lesbian, and a radical feminist...." You could have heard a pin drop in the church after that. Rosalie's "credentials," for that crowd, were impeccable. 8-)

I recall that, during the early 1970s, Rosalie self-published a critique of Ayn Rand's position on the land rights of Indians and their treatment by Europeans. It was good, as I recall, though I haven't seen a copy in decades.

Ghs

I'm sure I have a copy in a box somewhere. I probably won't be unearthing it until early next year.

--Brant

edit: nope, don't have it; I have "Confessions of a Randian Cultist" (somewhere)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, you admit that Jesus is Christ? You acknowledge that the rabbi Joshua ben Yusef was the Messiah? I always knew that all that physics babble was just a thin cloak, Bob...

No. He was my cousin. Crazy Josh. All that crap about his mother being a virgin!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of the backlash has started.

The same folks who found Redskins offensive granted some very interesting trademarks.

Hypocrisy, anyone?

12 Trademarks Declared Less Offensive Than Redskins
06/18/2014
The Daily Caller

From the article:

Currently, federal trademark law does not allow the registration of any names that bring individuals or groups into contempt or disrepute. The PTO cited this rule in their decision regarding the Redskins’ name.

Here are twelve other trademarked names that apparently didn't come up on anyone’s offense radar.


You can go to the link to read the details about the different names, but here they are raw (the first is pending):

Figgas over Niggas

Kraut Kap

Dago Swagg

Cracka Azz Skateboards

You Can’t Make A Housewife Out Of A Whore

Blanco Basura

Home Cookin Biscuit Head

‘teensdoporn.com’

Gypsy Soule Women Who Live By Their Own Rules

Mammy Jamia's

Uppity Negro

All Natural My Dadz Nutz Carmelized Jumbo Redskins

That's the world we live in. You can't make this stuff up.

Gotta love the hypocrites.

:)

When a law is applied like that, let's get rid of those law enforcers. They are either incompetent or malicious and neither case serves. Better yet, let's get rid of that law.

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The premise that hypocrisy and government don't mix is as flawed as the premise that the hypocrisy can be done away with. You can clean out the Augean stables but you can't stop the horses from shitting.

--Brant

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As Louis CK(of famed Catholic Church research)once pointed out, we knew that the 'Indians' were not 'Indians' within fifteen minutes of landing in America....but we still call them 'Indians.'

"You guys aren't Indians? This isn't India?"

"No."

"OK.. We're still going to call you Indians."

In perfect world, the FoxWoods Tribe buys the Redskins and changes their name to "The Drunken Reservation Rats." Just for the pleasure of watching the apoplectic reaction of effete white liberal Ivy Leagers who are suddenly... in 2014....with their panties in a bunch decades after the Trail of Tears over the name that fat federal bureacrats dressed like hogs have been screaming out at trendy Geoergetown Bistros for decades, all part of AMericas version of 'The Hunger Games" played out in the CronyFest on the Potomac.

Go 'rats! Hail to the Drunken Reservation Rats!...

Free offensive name change by a federal government that has wiped it's butt on treaties for centuries for every march down a Trail of Tears; just wait long enough for the wailing to die down, they will get to it eventually.

Naming a football team staffed by the descendants of former slaves 'Redskins' is offensive.

Buying Manhattan for $24 worth of beads, not so much.

The Giants should be renamed 'The Not F'n Midgets.'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now they are going after the Army's attack helicopters: Apache, Chinook, Black Hawk, Kiowa, Creek, Iroquois and Lakota. (See here for a recent news article.)

Granted, the US Army was not the biggest fan of Indians in the 1800's, but I doubt it is trying to demean Indians by naming attack helicopters after major tribes and peoples.

First football teams, now attack helicopters. When will this persecution of the oppressed in America stop?

We need a new law or something...

:smile:

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need a new law or something...

:smile:

Michael

Got one...

Congress shall not make any new laws, unless, and until they:

1) balance the budget;

2) reduce the deficit by at least twenty percent [20%] the first [1st] fiscal year of passage and an additional 20% each additional year until the deficit is zeroed out; and

3) have repealed every Federal Stature and Eliminated every Department/Agency/Bureau and Office not specifically delegated by the enumerated powers in Article I Section 8 of the Constitution.

A...

Post Script:

And then they can go back to their freaking districts and telecommute and never darken that Shining City on the Hill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the word "redskins" is, by nature, derogatory, racist or disparaging, why would the following Native American high schools choose "redskin" to represent their teams? (Source: http://cnsmaryland.org/interactives/redskins-map/index.html )
Redskins High Schools that are
Majority Native American

RMLOGO.gif

Teec Nos Pos, Arizona
American Indian
99.31%

wellpinit.gif

Wellpinit, Washington
American Indian
91.21%

kingston.gif

Kingston, Oklahoma
American Indian
57.69%

The law governing trademarks does not specifically disallow racism but prevents granting protection for a trademark that "may disparage" persons. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/1052

Now, as George Will has pointed out, if "redskin" is disparaging because it refers to a person's skin color, then so is the name of an entire state, Oklahoma, which "is based on Choctaw Indian words which translate as red people (okla meaning 'people' and humma meaning 'red')." http://www.statesymbolsusa.org/Oklahoma/Oklahomanameorigin.html

Why not discontinue trademark protection for the Oklahoma State University Cowboys and the University of Oklahoma Sooners?

And why is Nabisco allowed to use the word "Oreo" to sell cookies?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And you can sue something, or, someone for some such perceived injury.

Just pick the deepest pockets and suffer.

Going to a licensed state therapist would be strategically astute.

Kinda certify your victimhood...

Carry on...lol

A...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Here's a story I believe is pertinent to this discussion, even though public interest has waned a bit about the Redskins name.

Isolated Amazonian Tribe Makes Contact With Scientists, Then the Inevitable Happens
by Liz Klimas
Jul. 23, 2014
TheBlaze

From the article:

Last month, an Amazonian tribe without prior exposure to the modern world made voluntary and peaceful contact with Brazilian scientists. Soon afterward though, it was clear members of the tribe suffered from the flu.

Officials are now trying to take action and protect members of the Ashaninka tribe and other isolated tribes from a virus that could be deadly.


This isn't speculation about something from the past. It is happening right now.

That is reality.

Flu doesn't make such a good story as a massacre. Diseases that Westerners bear without too much injury make for poor villains, so diseases are not too deeply embedded in the popular imagination re Indians. Such diseases do not excuse the past massacres from the "oppressive white man," but they exist. And they are deadly.

They have been far more devastating to Indians in contact with Western cultures than any war.

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now