I don't know. This just instructs me that Bill Butler (the author of the page I linked to and excerpted) is not-to-be-trusted and that he definitely has something other than science on his mind, according to your rule of thumb. But I don't really get it. What is the point of avoiding what Bill Butler writes about Robinson? Because he uses the words 'denial' and 'liars' to refer to such as Monckton and Robinson? If I follow this reasoning, when someone like Robinson decries liars and fraud and s