Judge Napolitano: Are You Owned by the Government?


George H. Smith

Recommended Posts

I do not have to use the third (3rd) definition to do that...correct?

The third definition is a package deal. Is it their disadvantage or it not being based on merit that is the essential characteristic?

Now can I value a brain surgeon over a hockey player without looking down on the hockey player?

The phrase "to look down on" implies an emotional attachment. Something like contempt. I didn't mean to imply such an emotion when I classified certain groups of natives as primitive.

John:

Got it.

Therefore, you would modify your statement below from Post #21 supra?

Is there anybody who doesn't look down upon some people or groups of people?

Adam

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got it.

Therefore, you would modify your statement below from Post #21 supra?

Is there anybody who doesn't look down upon some people or groups of people?

I'm struggling to recall how I actually meant it. Anthony brought the term in and at the time I didn't pay any attention to it might being necessary to separate the emotional connotation from the rest of the meaning.

That statement by itself is probably true in both meanings - just not with primitive cultures in my case.

To clarify what my stance is: In all three conflicts I'm siding with the more advanced groups, but in the case of South Africa I admit very limited knowledge. Only in the case of the middle east conflict I feel some level of emotions - and even in that case I reserve most of my contempt for the Muslim's Western leftist enablers.

In case of primitive cultures outside a conflict (natives in the jungles of south america, for example), I'm indifferent. It's a bit like thinking about fascinating animal species. I don't "look down" on animals either, no matter how primitive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got it.

Therefore, you would modify your statement below from Post #21 supra?

Is there anybody who doesn't look down upon some people or groups of people?

I'm struggling to recall how I actually meant it. Anthony brought the term in and at the time I didn't pay any attention to it might being necessary to separate the emotional connotation from the rest of the meaning.

That statement by itself is probably true in both meanings - just not with primitive cultures in my case.

To clarify what my stance is: In all three conflicts I'm siding with the more advanced groups, but in the case of South Africa I admit very limited knowledge. Only in the case of the middle east conflict I feel some level of emotions - and even in that case I reserve most of my contempt for the Muslim's Western leftist enablers.

In case of primitive cultures outside a conflict (natives in the jungles of south america, for example), I'm indifferent. It's a bit like thinking about fascinating animal species. I don't "look down" on animals either, no matter how primitive.

That works.

It is a pet peeve of mine that the term discrimination and racism are used as politically correct clubs to silence discourse in my country.

So, I always try to check on the intent of a meaning in a phrase or word.

Angela has been referring to this issue on another thread.

As a teacher of debate and argumentation, the definition of terms is critical to critical thinking! Not to mention redundent to an informed mind.

Adam

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now