Run Hillary Run - Still an outside possibility

[Selene]

Evita's woman problems...a blistering article by Godwin...

Quote

When Madeleine Albright and Gloria Steinem tried to shame and bully young women into supporting Hillary Clinton, they inadvertently revealed a dirty secret of the left’s fixation on gender, race and ethnicity.

They demonstrated that hiding behind the gauzy appeals to make history is a willingness to use brass knuckles to achieve conformity. In their warped vision, biology trumps individuality, and those who don’t agree are traitors to their gender.

That’s not just unappealing, it’s also un-American. Our democracy is energized and more representative when no vote is taken for granted.

Comparing both parties "diversity quotient" and the fact

Quote

The world is passing them by. Consider that nearly 60 percent of Iowa Republicans caucused for Cruz, Rubio or Carson, a powerful statement about growing diversity in one party.

Consider, too, that the nation’s two Indian-American governors, Bobby Jindal of Louisiana and Nikki Haley of South Carolina, are both Republicans. One of two African-Americans in the Senate, Tim Scott, is also from South Carolina. (Democrat Cory Booker of New Jersey is the other.)

The demographic scrambling helps explain the decline of Clinton’s support among women. After Sanders beat her by 70 points in Iowa among all people under the age of 30, New Hampshire polls gave him a 64-to-35 percent edge among women under 45.

Preet Bharara, the Federal prosecutor...

Quote

... doesn’t just do something about political corruption, he also talks about it. And that’s almost as important.

By failing to point out the crooks, the New York pols who aren’t corrupt have done little to distinguish themselves from those who are. That was the tough message the Manhattan federal prosecutor delivered on a rare visit to Albany.

“You think no one knew Sheldon Silver was corrupt before he was put in handcuffs?” he said of the convicted former Assembly speaker. “Not a chance,” he answered, adding, “No one made a call, no one blew a whistle, no one sounded an alarm.”

Maybe Silver can give up Evita, or, Huma...

http://nypost.com/2016/02/10/hillarys-bullies-trying-to-make-election-all-about-gender/

[Selene]

 

 

Camile Paglia hammers Steinem:

Quote

Steinem’s polished humanitarian mask had slipped, revealing the mummified fascist within. I’m sure that my delight was shared by other dissident feminists everywhere. Never before has the general public, here or abroad, more clearly seen the arrogance and amoral manipulativeness of the power elite who hijacked and stunted second-wave feminism.

Damn she writes well!

She turns to Madeline Albright next:

Quote

The next day, Hillary was accompanied on the campaign trail by former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright (a Bill Clinton appointee), who proclaimed, to Hillary’s laughter and applause, “There’s a special place in Hell for women who don’t help other women.” Waspishly policing the earth was evidently insufficient for the feminist politburo, who are now barging into the salvation and damnation game.

Back to Steinem, whom she at first admired, Paglia notes that:

Quote

Steinem and the leaders of the National Organization for Women allowed their own partisan agenda to distort the true universality of feminism. They became backstage secret agents for the Democratic party. Steinem was caught in blatant hypocrisy when she gave Bill Clinton a free pass for his gross violation of fundamental sexual harassment principles in inducing a young intern, Monica Lewinsky, to service him in the offices of the White House.

Finally, she dismisses Evita with this paragraph which is pointed and pithy:

Quote

For nearly 25 years, Hillary Clinton, with her simmering subtext of contemptuous bitterness about men, has been pushed along and protected by a host of powerful women journalists in print and TV, Steinem chums or sympathizers who have a lot to answer for. Charmed by Hillary in their exclusive dinners and private chitchats, they encouraged her presidential ambitions. But after two national campaigns, it should be obvious that Hillary has no natural instinct or facility for understanding and communicating with the public on the scale that the presidency demands. Sexism has nothing to do with it.

http://www.salon.com/2016/02/11/sexism_has_nothing_to_do_with_it_camille_paglia_on_hillary_clinton_gloria_steinem_and_why_new_hampshire_women_broke_for_bernie_sanders/

A...

[merjet]

Clinton Foundation received subpoena from State Department investigators

" There is no indication that the watchdog is looking at Clinton. But as she runs for president in part by promoting her leadership of the State Department, an inquiry involving a top aide and the relationship between her agency and her family’s charity could further complicate her campaign. "

[KorbenDallas]

2 hours ago, merjet said:

Clinton Foundation received subpoena from State Department investigators

" There is no indication that the watchdog is looking at Clinton. But as she runs for president in part by promoting her leadership of the State Department, an inquiry involving a top aide and the relationship between her agency and her family’s charity could further complicate her campaign. "

Was going to post this link.  Halfway down the page sits a bonus, a video of the Clinton's moronic daughter trying to piece together sentences after being asked a straightforward context question.

[Selene]

Here is the key...

Quote

Judge Andrew Napolitano said Thursday that “the FBI now has leverage” in the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server and can indict Clinton’s top aides and trade less punishment for testimony against her.

Citing the report by Fox News’s Catherine Herridge and Pamela K. Browne, Napolitano said on Fox News’s “America’s Newsroom” that “Mrs. Clinton’s top aides regularly received from Mrs. Clinton via her private server Top Secret emails. These are emails which the aides lacked the security clearance to receive.”

“So this tells us a couple things,” Napolitano said. “One, Mrs. Clinton was so reckless in the manner in which she sent out Top Secret emails, knowingly sending them to people who weren’t authorized to receive them.”

http://dailycaller.com/2016/02/11/napolitano-the-fbi-now-has-leverage-with-hillary-aides-video/#ixzz3zuh92UuF

 

This is the way to reverse engineer an indictment...

Quote

“We know two, their acceptance, discussion and transfer of this is a felony. We know three, that the FBI now has leverage. The Justice Department can indict her top aides and trade with them,” Napolitano said. “What would they want? Testimony against Mrs. Clinton in return for a deal with them. This is the way the government works.” (RELATED: Hillary Clinton’s Emails Contain ‘Operational Intelligence’ That Put Lives At Risk)

 

The aides in question include Cheryl Mills, Huma Abedin, Philippe Reines, Jake Sullivan and Patrick Kennedy. (RELATED: Rep. Issa: FBI ‘Would Like To Indict Both Huma [Abedin] And Hillary Clinton’)

Later, Napolitano added when the aides were exchanging the Top Secret information with Clinton, it was “not OK because in the process their of exchanging Top Secret emails … they wittingly or unwittingly, and under the law it doesn’t matter, wittingly or unwittingly, exposed the nation’s most important secrets to persons who would cause us ill when they get those secrets.” (VIDEO: Former Sec Def Robert Gates: ‘Odds Are Pretty High’ Russia, China, And Iran Accessed Hillary’s Server)

WATCH:

 

A...

[william.scherk]

I got around to OldPantsuit and OldJoo in their verbal skirmish labeled Debate. This is the closing moments of her argument. It looks like she has come to a way differentiating herself from him.  Wonkery on this subject at Vox, "Hillary Clinton finally found her argument against Bernie Sanders."

 

[Selene]

Evita's attempt failed Bill.

[william.scherk]

2 hours ago, Selene said:

Evita's attempt failed Bill.

Of course -- I mean to those shaving a difference in 'socialism' between the two, or actual alternative policy trails.  If you can imagine a Canadian political spectrum, she sounds like a Red Tory or a Liberal, whereas he sounds like an NDP rabble-rouser.

I think I see her main point, true or not, effective or not, to be repeated ...  he is a one-issue candidate and she ain't.  She hit a lot of progressive liberal accordion buttons and I can imagine she really has a policy book on each and every item. She, I think, believes she can insert her ass in the Oval Office, whereas he doesn't.  But of course I could  be entirely wrong. If you don't have actual hope in your heart, why run such a merciless race?

(which is kind of a Trump question as well -- and more easily answered).

I was down the border yesterday with sisters as part of High Family Week. Shopping and gawking like the cheeseheads we are, we did as usual tote up all the differences to the naked Canadian eye. In a nutshell, the Land of the Free. The extra choices and the extra margin of error -- from the full range of coffee creaming agents which we don't get to the dowdy and outlandish and depressing outfits and body-types at which no one bats an eye. You guys, at least in public in and around Bellingham, Washington, know how to behave without aggression -- and this despite the cleavage in political opinions. It reminded me of the folks on Callfire who just weren't about to shout at me or TrumpTech on the phone. They just quietly got on with their affairs.

Back to HRC and the Bern, and differentiating the two -- I remember her performance over eleven hours testifying under oath before the House committee. I tried to fix her voice and demeanor and it was Red Tory. In the short clip she comes across to me in similar fashion, with the Bern as a more monocular, less-adaptable and less-briefed person, someone who would be orange-hued in the Canucki spectrum (Red in Canada is Liberal, Conservatives are Blue, the NDP Marigold Orange). 

So, I do believe she has broader concerns and agenda than Bernie. I think she has more fat books of plans.  He has not been preparing himself for the throne half his life, I don't think. She has. Or, her desire for power is fiercer and more longstanding than the Bern's. 

This makes her a much more dangerous presence in the White House than a Sanders, if I can see from an Objectivish angle or under Objectivish lenses. In the middle of the road to a Canadian, wildly if not insanely left to your regular OLer, and someone who must be prevented  by all political means from ascending the throne of power. 

In this, as in all things cross-border political, a bias underlies my remarks -- a bias partially built-in by place of birth or place of frog-in-pan. 

Adam -- by way of strained metaphor, there is a different 'accent' maybe between HRC/BS that only a leftism-steeped person can detect. If it is akin to a dialectical/pronunciation difference alone, no differentiation of great measure lies in the underlying 'language.' By way of example, see if you can tell the difference between the two French-speaking robots in the brief sound file here. They are speaking from the same text, one quite slowly, the second quickly. Which is from the Metropole and which from Hochelaga? 

[Selene]

Thank God for William Jefferson Clinton's down home bigotry and his diminished ego.

At one stop on Thursday, the good ole boy...

Quote

Playing off Congressman Steve Cohen’s introduction that claimed Bill Clinton was just a “stand-in for the first black president,” Clinton told an audience in Memphis, “You know what we learned from the human genome?

“We learned that unless your ancestors — everyone of you — are 100 percent, 100 percent from sub-Saharan Africa, we are all mixed race people.”http://www.theamericanmirror.com/video-bill-clinton-downplays-obama-as-first-black-president/

 

At a campaign stop in Memphis...

Quote

Clinton said the country's financial system is "rigged." 

"Yeah, it's rigged, because you don't have a president who's a change-maker, who, with a Congress who will work with him. But the president has done a better job than he has gotten credit for."

Some of the political pablum phrases that get gobbled up like good grits would cause a conservative, libertarian, or, ojectivist to gag

Quote

"We need health care plans to induce doctors to do what they do at St. Jude, where nobody pays," he said.

 

Quote

"Without an economy that works for everybody, we can't be one America, and we can't go forward together," Clinton said.

Finally, this article exposes how unprepared Evita's vaunted political machine is performing.  They were abysmal in Iowa, non-existent in New Hampshire and pretty rattled in South Carolina.  Apparently, young blacks are split and moving away from Evita.  Whereas the Bernie brigade's:

Quote

office is already operational, with seven staff members and a grand opening set for Saturday.

http://www.commercialappeal.com/news/government/bill-clinton-makes-memphis-stop-for-wifes-campaign-2b822367-7dc6-3729-e053-0100007f0adf-368546981.html

 

[Selene]

More incoming!!

Quote

Sally Miller looked on in amusement as the man who would become the 42nd President of the United States slipped into her own frilly black nightgown.

The former Miss Arkansas has never forgotten how her younger lover proceeded to dance around the bedroom, serenading her with his saxophone and reducing her to a fit of giggles.

This playful scene was typical of the laughter-filled nights that ex-beauty queen Miller enjoyed with Bill Clinton during their 1983 affair, she tells Daily Mail Online in an exclusive interview.

The married Governor of Arkansas would frequently adopt the role of entertainer-in-chief to impress his glamorous older woman, a one-time Miss America finalist.

But while his attempts at lovemaking were largely forgettable, Clinton would rarely disappoint when it came to divulging intimate and potentially damaging secrets about his wife Hillary.

More than two decades on, Miller, a former singer and radio host known as Sally Perdue, is preparing to dish the secrets of their pillow talk in a tell-all memoir.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3427366/He-frilly-nightie-danced-playing-sax-Former-Miss-Arkansas-says-Bill-Clinton-bed-confided-Hillary-sex-women-fears-Hillary-vendetta-sleeps-loaded-semi-automatic.html#ixzz40M6BGNCu
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Poor Evita!!

A....

[Selene]

This is the other major problem that Evita has.  It happened in 2008 when young blacks turned almost 20+ % of their parents, mostly the moms/aunts etc. to go with Barack.

Now it is happening again in the black community and it is in the female community.

Quote

STATE COLLEGE, Pa. — In the sun-drenched student center on Pennsylvania State University’s sprawling campus here, a few days after Bernie Sanders trounced Hillary Clinton in the New Hampshire Democratic primary last week, Renee Tillman, Melanie Suarez and Kamryn Sandidge were picking at their lunchtime salads when they were asked if they considered themselves feminists.

The three, all sophomores, shook their heads. “I couldn’t even tell you what a feminist is,” said Ms. Tillman, 19, who is African-American. She and her friends note that the nation already has a black president; they see themselves in a post-gender world. As Ms. Sandidge, who is also African-American, said, “I don’t find gender that important.”

A few tables away, Caela Camazine, a 19-year-old freshman, said she was “definitely” a feminist. Reproductive rights are her top priority, and the idea of a woman in the White House evokes her childhood dream of a career in medicine. It always bothered her, she said, when people referred to doctors as “he” or “him.”

Today's NY Times, notes this schism within the "feminist" community!!

Quote

“Having a female president to me means opening the door for that pronoun to shift,” she said. Yet she plans to vote for a man: Mr. Sanders.

It is as if Mrs. Clinton’s campaign, based partly on revealing the power of female voters, has instead revealed something else: a generational schism that threatens to undermine it. Mrs. Clinton lost the women’s vote in New Hampshire by 11 percentage points. Broken down by age, the results were even more striking: She led by 19 points among women 65 and older, but trailed by a huge margin, 59 points, among millennial voters, ages 18 to 29.

The responses to her campaign pitted mothers and daughters against one another, set off debates about what feminism is and provoked self-reflection among women of all ages, evident in dozens of interviews and impassioned responses to an online query about whether it is important to elect a woman as president.

What is a picture worth?

A debate watch party hosted by the Clinton campaign in Durham, N.H., this month. Credit Ian Thomas Jansen-Lonnquist for The New York Times

The coalitions are "Balkanising"...

Quote

Madeline Schiebel, 26, a former fund-raiser for Planned Parenthood who was at the gym, said most of her friends — a group she described as “open, forward-thinking people” — were backing Senator Sanders of Vermont.

“Maybe my mom’s generation or my grandmother’s generation, they’re like: ‘We’ve been waiting for so long. Things are finally happening. O.K., there is a woman, let’s get her into office,’” said Ms. Schiebel, who is undecided. “Whereas we’re more like: ‘Eh, well, it’s going to happen. Let’s make sure it happens the way it’s supposed to happen — in a way that’s good for the country.’”

I am amazed at some of the gender concentrations that go on in the modern "University."

 

Quote

Ms. Kennedy feels no similar compunction. Feminism, she said, is all about having choices. “I don’t think a feminist,” she said, “has any obligation to vote for the first woman who comes along.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/17/us/hillary-clintons-candidacy-reveals-generational-schism-among-women.html?rref=us&module=ArrowsNav&contentCollection=U.S.&action=keypress&region=FixedLeft&pgtype=article

 

[KorbenDallas]

VIDEO: Hillary tries preacher routine at gospel awards show

http://www.theamericanmirror.com/video-hillary-tries-preacher-routine-at-gospel-awards-show/

 

[Selene]

I want her blood tested...she looks high on "ups."

 

[Selene]

One aspect of a dedicated Communist like Van Jones is that he keeps burrowing into the system.

We sure remember when Van Jones, an O'bama insider appointee, was exposed by one of Glenn Beck's prior personalities, as a Communist.

And now, he is a part of the media complex.

Quote

Jones later added, "Sanders does have a great civil rights story to tell. In the sixties he was for civil rights. Unfortunately, Hillary Clinton was for Barry Goldwater. He can talk about other issues, and I think he should, especially when he's talking to an African-American audience. tell your story about civil rights."

Nice line.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/article/2001217

A...

[Roger Bissell]

All of this chatter about the GOP primary process is beside the point, as I see it. Here's the scenario I see going forward:

1. The indictments against HRC and her assistant (Mrs. Anthony Do-You-Dig-My Wiener) will be delayed until after Election Day in November.

2. Hillary will win a huge landslide victory over Trump and return control of the Senate to the Democrats.

3. Once the indictments are made, Obama will use his Constitutional authority to pardon HRC and her crony (crone?).

4. Once sworn in as the 46th President, HRC will appoint BHO to fill the Scalia vacancy on SCOTUS. (Barry *is* a great Constitutional scholar, after all.)

Does the full horrific deliciousness of that amazing prediction transmit - or did I use too many abbreviations?

REB 

[Selene]

Nope, it was clear to me.

By the way, this year is starting to look like one of later Drury novels.

A...

[merjet]

8 hours ago, Roger Bissell said:

Here's the scenario I see going forward:

[snip]

4. Once sworn in as the 46th President, HRC will appoint BHO to fill the Scalia vacancy on SCOTUS. (Barry *is* a great Constitutional scholar, after all.) 

Way too soon. I foresee BO making a ton of money in royalties for books about his presidency and for speeches.

Maybe Michelle. 

 

[Selene]

Evita explained that:

Quote

"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."
-- Hillary Clinton
(1947- ) Wife of President Bill Clinton, US Senator (NY-D)
Source: June 28, 2004 fundraiser for Senator Barbara Boxer in San Francisco

 

[Michael Stuart Kelly]

Hillary Clinton is a MARSHMALLOW?!!

LOLOLOLOLOL...

What an image and it's mushiness fits her like a paint job on a blob.

Is there any doubt Trump will beat her when he gets through with her?

Not to me, I'm already feeling sorry for her...

Trump mocks Hillary Clinton: She's a 'marshmallow'

LOL...

Michael

[Selene]

Yes, marsh mellow works really well!

Quote

Mrs. Clinton, Show Voters Those Transcripts

By THE EDITORIAL BOARDFEB. 25, 2016

Photo

 

Credit Ji Lee

“Everybody does it,” is an excuse expected from a mischievous child, not a presidential candidate. But that is Hillary Clinton’s latest defense for making closed-door, richly-paid speeches to big banks, which many middle-class Americans still blame for their economic pain, and then refusing to release the transcripts.

A televised town hall on Tuesday was at least the fourth candidate forum in which Mrs. Clinton was asked about those speeches. Again, she gave a terrible answer, saying that she would release the transcripts “if everybody does it, and that includes the Republicans.”

In November, she implied that her paid talks for the Wall Street firms were part of helping them rebuild after the 9/11 attacks, which “was good for the economy and it was a way to rebuke the terrorists.”

In a debate with Bernie Sanders on Feb. 4, Mrs. Clinton was asked if she would release the transcripts, and she said she would “look into it.” Later in February, asked in a CNN town hall forum why she accepted $675,000 for speeches to Goldman Sachs, she got annoyed, shrugged, and said, “That’s what they offered,” adding that “every secretary of state that I know has done that.”

At another town hall, on Feb. 18, a man in the audience pleaded, “Please, just release those transcripts so that we know exactly where you stand.” Mrs. Clinton had told him, “I am happy to release anything I have when everybody else does the same, because every other candidate in this race has given speeches to private groups.”

On Tuesday, Mrs. Clinton further complained, “Why is there one standard for me, and not for everybody else?”

The only different standard here is the one Mrs. Clinton set for herself, by personally earning $11 million in 2014 and the first quarter of 2015 for 51 speeches to banks and other groups and industries.

Voters have every right to know what Mrs. Clinton told these groups. In July, her spokesman Nick Merrill said that though most speeches were private, the Clinton operation “always opened speeches when asked to.” Transcripts of speeches that have been leaked have been pretty innocuous. By refusing to release them all, especially the bank speeches, Mrs. Clinton fuels speculation about why she’s stonewalling.

Her conditioning her releases on what the Republicans might or might not do is mystifying. Republicans make no bones about their commitment to Wall Street deregulation and tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans. Mrs. Clinton is laboring to convince struggling Americans that she will rein in big banks, despite taking their money.

Besides, Mrs. Clinton is not running against a Republican in the Democratic primaries. She is running against Bernie Sanders, a decades-long critic of Wall Street excess who is hardly a hot ticket on the industry speaking circuit. The Sanders campaign, asked if Mr. Sanders also received fees for closed-door speeches, came up with two from two decades ago that were not transcribed: one to a hospital trade association, and one to a college, each for less than $1,000. Royalties from a book called “The Speech,” Mr. Sanders’s eight-hour Senate floor diatribe against President Obama’s continuation of Bush-era tax cuts for the wealthy, were donated to the nonprofit Addison County Parent/Child Center in Vermont.

The hazards of Mrs. Clinton, a presidential hopeful, earning more than $200,000 each for dozens of speeches to industry groups were clear from the start. Mrs. Clinton was making paid speeches when she hired consultants to vet her own background in preparation for a run. If they didn’t flag this, they weren’t doing their jobs.

Public interest in these speeches is legitimate, and it is the public — not the candidate — who decides how much disclosure is enough. By stonewalling on these transcripts Mrs. Clinton plays into the hands of those who say she’s not trustworthy and makes her own rules. Most important, she is damaging her credibility among Democrats who are begging her to show them that she’d run an accountable and transparent White House.

Where are her tax returns Mr. White Mittens Privilege? 

[Roger Bissell]

Anti-Clintonians for Hillary about to be formed?

http://thefederalist.com/2016/02/24/ill-take-hillary-clinton-over-donald-trump/

Anti-Nixonites for Nixon

[KorbenDallas]

[Selene]

Just now, KorbenDallas said:

I saw this, and it just goes to show that being a White Privilege Political Prostitute [WPPP] seriously proves that

WASPS and WPPPS rhythm brain sections no longer function.

A...

[Selene]

Very interesting...

Evita's controllers appear to be reverting to the "shielded campaign" that they intended.

Great decision, since Evita has fucked up:

appearances with inept answers to voter's questions and serial coughing fits.

parties with rhythmless Old White Privilege dances: and

exceptionally incompetent answers to Big Media softball interviews...

Quote

Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton is moving her Friday event in Atlanta from Georgia State University to a smaller and more tightly controlled venue at City Hall.

However, the reason for the move...

Quote

is less clear. Could it be because of what happened earlier Thursday in South Carolina? At a fund-raiser in Charleston, a protester called on Clinton to explain, why she once “called black youth ‘superpredators,'” just two days before Saturday’s Palmetto State primary and less than a week before Georgia’s March 1 primary.

It was a reference to a speech Clinton, then first lady, gave in 1996, of a crime bill passed two years earlier. At the time, Clinton said, according to The Washington Post:

“They are not just gangs of kids anymore. They are often the kinds of kids that are called ‘superpredators.’ No conscience, no empathy. We can talk about why they ended up that way, but first we have to bring them to heel.”

Clinton, on Thursday, said she wanted to explain, but the protester had been removed from the room. Later, Clinton told the Post:

“In that speech, I was talking about the impact violent crime and vicious drug cartels were having on communities across the country and the particular danger they posed to children and families.  Looking back, I shouldn’t have used those words, and I wouldn’t use them today.”

Moving from Georgia State’s Student Center to City Hall allows Clinton to better control the audience. Which would also help prevent instances like the protest which happened on a visit to Atlanta in October, when Black Lives Matter demonstrators interrupted a speech she gave at Clark Atlanta University.

... But the last-minute switch raises questions that the campaign wanted to more strictly control her events on the eve of the South Carolina primary, a must-win for Clinton’s White House bid.

The bolded is a textbook Alinsky, knee jerk phrase.  We will not solve any of it, just not identify it anymore!

http://politics.blog.ajc.com/2016/02/25/hillary-clinton-moves-friday-event-from-georgia-state-to-city-hall/

[william.scherk]

On 2/26/2016 at 6:06 PM, Roger Bissell said:

Anti-Clintonians for Hillary about to be formed?

http://thefederalist.com/2016/02/24/ill-take-hillary-clinton-over-donald-trump/

It is a bit of goo:  Clinton-haters or Trump-haters are the more precise and meaningful phrases. Generic Haters also works, along with the cousins Gotcha and You People.  I have seem some presumably Republican-voting individuals state they will touch the screen for Hillary over Donald. 

Is that a real cohort, do you think, Roger? Or teeny and insubstantial?  It is hard to believe that there is a hard core of Hate that will plunge the USA into a death-spiral of torment and decline beyond the failing hellhole that Mr Trump can see -- with the Hate Trump motive actually move fingers on that screen?

I tend to think that a GOP supporter who could contemplate another Clinton White House over a Trump White House might have already been half in the bag for Hillary Clinton. 

But that is nutz, no?

Here is what I haven't seen from the elite and intellectual among Trump Support: try to explain (a la Bidiboo and Chomp's "theories") the non-Trump. What does Trump Support say about those too craven or fearful to take the plunge and Believe? 

I mean, what is wrong with you, Reb. Someone from the Trump side of the GOP bed needs to tell you what the hell is wrong with you and the way you think.  The Hitler motif has been mirrored back onto you, you vile authoritarian-in-disguise, so I suggest dropping all those analogies. Since no one in their right mind has yet tried to psychologize your a-Trumpism as a mental defect, perhaps you in your empathetic wisdom could diagnose yourself through Their Eyes.   At least in imagination.

Be harsh. Fair but harsh. Harsh sells well in the Objectivish Universe.

 

Edited February 27, 2016 by william.scherk
Put some pictures and video to accompany my notes to Reb.