Search the Community
Showing results for 'climate doom' in content posted by Jonathan.
-
your one-stop insult shop Placeholder for GW/CC 'How I got here' thread
Jonathan commented on william.scherk's blog entry in Friends and Foes
By the way, virtually no one truly believes the above, including the people who performed the analyses and published them, and we all know it. Their actions betray them. They don't live as if they believe what they're preaching. In fact, generally speaking, the opposite is true: they usually have much larger carbon footprints than the average person. I'll believe that the alarmists are serious about their claimed beliefs about climate change when they behave accordingly. And that applies to you, Billy, as well. When y'all focus on yourselves and your own actions, and voluntarily take real -
your one-stop insult shop Placeholder for GW/CC 'How I got here' thread
Jonathan commented on william.scherk's blog entry in Friends and Foes
Check out the article below. While reading it, do any critical questions come to mind? Is this science? Is it settled? https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2019-02/ru-ccs022219.php PUBLIC RELEASE: 28-FEB-2019 Climate change shrinks many fisheries globally, Rutgers-led study finds Researchers find losses as high as 35 percent in some regions RUTGERS UNIVERSITY SHARE PRINT E-MAIL IMAGE: BLACK SEA BASS ARE ONE OF THE CLIMATE CHANGE "WINNERS " THAT HAVE SEEN THEIR PRODUCTIVITY INCREASE WITH WARMING OCEAN TEMPERATURES. vie -
your one-stop insult shop Placeholder for GW/CC 'How I got here' thread
Jonathan commented on william.scherk's blog entry in Friends and Foes
I thought that it might be time again to share one of my favorite things about Climate Doom and the alleged consensus. Remeber this? It's what got the whole 97% thing started: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change Notice that the papers were not read, but only the abstracts were considered. And what isn't noted in the above is that even the abstracts weren't actually read, but were only electronically scanned for predetermined words and phrases which might indicate agreement with or rejection of man-blamed climate change. So, they immediate -
your one-stop insult shop Placeholder for GW/CC 'How I got here' thread
Jonathan commented on william.scherk's blog entry in Friends and Foes
Flirt'n' wit' 'zaster -- flashback croakings of The Doom: https://apnews.com/bd45c372caf118ec99964ea547880cd0 U.N. Predicts Disaster if Global Warming Not Checked PETER JAMES SPIELMANNJune 29, 1989 UNITED NATIONS (AP) _ A senior U.N. environmental official says entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000. Coastal flooding and crop failures would create an exodus of ″eco- refugees,′ ′ threatening political chaos, said Noel Brown, dir -
your one-stop insult shop Placeholder for GW/CC 'How I got here' thread
Jonathan commented on william.scherk's blog entry in Friends and Foes
Check this out below: yet another Climate Doom™ alarmist whose actions don't match her words. Are there any who practice what they preach? I don't know of any. I've never heard of any prominent climate scientists or activists who have a smaller carbon footprint than I do. Usually, their footprints are multiple times that of mine. Do you know of any, Billy? Has anyone else here ever heard of a climate scientist or activist who claims to hold the belief of catastrophic anthropogenic climate change and who also behaves consistently with that stated belief? J --- Gas-guzzl -
your one-stop insult shop Placeholder for GW/CC 'How I got here' thread
Jonathan commented on william.scherk's blog entry in Friends and Foes
What are you trying to say, Billy? Are you trying to suggest that I'm being silly, tee hee hee, in characterizing leftists as presenting the issue as imminent Doom? Or what? J -
your one-stop insult shop Placeholder for GW/CC 'How I got here' thread
Jonathan commented on william.scherk's blog entry in Friends and Foes
Billy, I'm curious if you've ever critically investigated weather instrument shelters. Do you feel that you have a handle on that subject? I find it interesting that some scientists, who believe in The Doom and preach it, have expressed the opinion that the methods that were primarily used ten years ago are now considered unreliable, and even junk. Stone Age crap. Yet the predictions of The Doom from back then are still revered. We should have listened to the warnings! And, even though the screen system used prior to that were even worse, trust us, it was settled science as far back -
your one-stop insult shop Placeholder for GW/CC 'How I got here' thread
Jonathan commented on william.scherk's blog entry in Friends and Foes
Yay! We're going to "defeat climate change." Yeah. We're going to control climate. We're not just going to impose massive hardships and restrictions to make a tiny one percent dent. No, we're going to somehow achieve stasis, whether Mother Nature wants us to or not. We're going to tax, regulate, and punish people until the temperature is always the same forever. Jay Inslee: Washington governor to run on climate change 1 hour ago Share this with Facebook Share this with -
Hahahaha! "Orange man bad. Freedom bad. And, of course, Climate Doom™!!!! I'm not an expert on it, in fact I don't know anything about it really, but Climate Doom™!!! Seriously. I don't have the cult mindset anymore. The Others™ do. Orange man bad." J
-
your one-stop insult shop Placeholder for GW/CC 'How I got here' thread
Jonathan commented on william.scherk's blog entry in Friends and Foes
Yeah, I don't know how to bridge the communication gap here. I'm not asking to be educated. I'm not asking for you to determine what you'll need to teach me, what holes in my knowledge you need to show me how to fill, what learning disabilities you'll need to detect in me and remedy, etc. I'm not asking you to guide me and nurture me. I'm not in need of anything like this: "Let's see, hmmm, do you know what molecules are? You've heard of those? Okay, well, that's wonderful, and maybe we can move along a little faster in your education than I had anticipated. Energy? Have you ever heard of -
your one-stop insult shop Placeholder for GW/CC 'How I got here' thread
Jonathan commented on william.scherk's blog entry in Friends and Foes
It's just so adorable that you're suddenly concerned about someone tolerating dissent in regard to the Climate Doom™ issue. Hahahaha! J -
your one-stop insult shop Placeholder for GW/CC 'How I got here' thread
Jonathan commented on william.scherk's blog entry in Friends and Foes
Hey, Billy this should excite you -- new and refurbished croakings of doom, fresh methods of conjuring up combinations of crises to arrive at extra-scary scare predictions, which of course include Climate Doom™ and population explosions (Yay, Ehrlich might make a comeback!): Scientists fear end to Mankind not 'decades away' but ‘much sooner’ OUR CIVILISATION is doing pretty well – but how long do we have left? https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/760048/civilisation-collapse-when-end-of-the-world ----- J [WSS: Edited to make the URL 'live'] -
your one-stop insult shop Placeholder for GW/CC 'How I got here' thread
Jonathan commented on william.scherk's blog entry in Friends and Foes
Billy posted a video which he likes to believe defeated the above claim. The video shows that someone decades ago used the term "climactic change" in a paper, and that therefore it has always been called climate change and not just global warming. So, we're supposed to forget what we experienced, and believe this fictional alternate history based on this one use of the term. We're also, apparently, supposed to forget that studies in climactic change at the time included theories that we were doomed to experience a new ice age. Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia, see, here's a do -
your one-stop insult shop Placeholder for GW/CC 'How I got here' thread
Jonathan commented on william.scherk's blog entry in Friends and Foes
Because of the Man-Made Climate Doom!!!!!!!!!!!!! Everything is proof of the Doom!!!!!!!!!!!!!! If it's hot, cold or average in Tucson, it's cited by alarmists as proof. On the other hand, when "deniers" use the same tactic, the alarmists are very quick to remind them that weather is not climate. The rules generally shift seasonally. Aw, Billy's having feelings about punctuation. Poor dear. Sheath your interrobangs, everyone, lest he develop a case of the vapors‽ Science is a real, specific thing, Billy, regardless of your disliking that fact and attempting to mock it. You -
your one-stop insult shop Placeholder for GW/CC 'How I got here' thread
Jonathan commented on william.scherk's blog entry in Friends and Foes
People have forgotten about a bit of very important settled science from the past, and I think that we should get back to it: As long as we need to take immediate action to stop Climate Doom™, we should also revive the immediate action on population control. We've lost focus and have let the issue slide. It's still an imminent threat. We can't just forget about it because Ehrlich might have gotten one or two minor details wrong. He was generally right, and, as he believes, his only mistake was in being too optimistic in his predictions. We need to act -
your one-stop insult shop Placeholder for GW/CC 'How I got here' thread
Jonathan commented on william.scherk's blog entry in Friends and Foes
OMG, look at this! A giant bee that was extinct became unextinct because of man-made climate change! And the climate scientists predicted it years ago! The world's largest bee is a big, black wasp-like insect as long as an adult's thumb, and it was extinct — or so scientists thought. The massive bee was rediscovered alive in Indonesia last month, decades after it was last seen. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/wallaces-giant-bee-megachile-pluto-once-thought-extinct-has-been-discovered-alive-on-island-in-indonesia/ It was settled science that it was extinct -- more than 97% co -
your one-stop insult shop Placeholder for GW/CC 'How I got here' thread
Jonathan commented on william.scherk's blog entry in Friends and Foes
Not as kooky as AOC's belief that the world will end in 12 years, but close: Kamala Harris: “In a Relatively Short Time, Portsmouth, NH Will Be Underwater” During a speech at the New Hampshire Institute of Politics on Tuesday, California Senator–and Green New Deal supporter– Kamala Harris had a dire warning for the Granite State: The city of Portsmouth will soon be underwater due to climate change. https://www.insidesources.com/kamala-harris-in-a-relatively-short-time-portsmouth-nh-will-be-underwater/ And then there's Judy the science denier: Judith Curry Ret -
your one-stop insult shop Placeholder for GW/CC 'How I got here' thread
Jonathan commented on william.scherk's blog entry in Friends and Foes
“However, these scientific and national security judgments have not undergone a rigorous independent and adversarial scientific peer review to examine the certainties and uncertainties of climate science, as well as implications for national security.” OMG, they can't be serious! We don't have time for rigorous review and criticism! It's settled science that we can't wait to do actual science. J -
your one-stop insult shop Placeholder for GW/CC 'How I got here' thread
Jonathan commented on william.scherk's blog entry in Friends and Foes
Turdeau really liked Butts, but Butts gots to go, even though he dindu nuffin: https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/canada/gerald-butts-resigns-as-prime-minister-justin-trudeaus-principal-secretary/ar-BBTLPqf Gerald Butts resigns as Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's principal secretary On his way out, of course he had to promote the DOOM™: A well-known policy wonk, Butts has been a vocal defender of the government's Canada Child Benefit and an advocate for carbon pricing as a solution to climate change... ...In his resignation letter, Butts said he hoped fighting global warming -
your one-stop insult shop Placeholder for GW/CC 'How I got here' thread
Jonathan commented on william.scherk's blog entry in Friends and Foes
Who should we sacrifice first in order to prevent the Doom™? What's the scientific consensus? And they should probably be tortured before being killed, right? J -
your one-stop insult shop Placeholder for GW/CC 'How I got here' thread
Jonathan commented on william.scherk's blog entry in Friends and Foes
More from Judy the denier who hates science and probably deserves to be killed: https://judithcurry.com/2019/02/07/climate-hypochondria-and-tribalism-vs-winning/ -
your one-stop insult shop Placeholder for GW/CC 'How I got here' thread
Jonathan commented on william.scherk's blog entry in Friends and Foes
I wrote: No? No answers? No curiosity? Just tee hee hee? Bueller? Bueller? Bueller? Bueller? Bueller? Bueller? Bueller? I had heard that this was going to be the "Year of the Arctic!” here on OL, with “robust arguments” and donation prizes, excitement galore, and unbound enthusiasm for exploring, learning and lecturing all about arctic climate and its contributions to and indicators of the DOOM. Let’s see what we know, and have sleepover parties, and write essays, and scrapbook our favorite scary pictures of Earth on fire. But, suddenly, no interest whats -
your one-stop insult shop Placeholder for GW/CC 'How I got here' thread
Jonathan commented on william.scherk's blog entry in Friends and Foes
Damn it! The cold weather hasn't quite reached record cold. That would've been an extra-exciting propaganda tool. So, I guess we'll have to run with something else. Hardships, frostbite, power-outages, deaths. All due to cold temps due to climate doom. Freezing to death is what your future looks like unless you surrender your freedoms immediately. -
your one-stop insult shop Placeholder for GW/CC 'How I got here' thread
Jonathan commented on william.scherk's blog entry in Friends and Foes
Is Limbaugh wrong? What would we need to know to answer that question? When did alarmists begin citing polar vortices as proof of climate change? What, specifically are their predictions about them? When were the predictions first made? J -
your one-stop insult shop Placeholder for GW/CC 'How I got here' thread
Jonathan commented on william.scherk's blog entry in Friends and Foes
The accusatory approach hasn't been working, and has maybe even beenbackfiring. So the leftist climate activists are adopting a new strategy of lessening the focus on blame and hiding their urge to punish, while also upping the scary doom. The "settled science" is that these hick deniers "livelihoods and health will be at stake"? Everything will be worse: "Local crops are dying or washing away at alarming rates"? Oh, fucking no! More panic! More doom! Urgency, emergency! Good luck trying to sell those lies to those who live in ag regions, and who grow crops, and who theref
