Jon Letendre

Members
  • Content Count

    4,023
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    71

Posts posted by Jon Letendre


  1. Psychology is a science.

    Consciousness is a fact of the natural world, so yes, of course it can be investigated systematically, following scientific methods and principles.

    Perhaps all the "psychologists" have done and are doing shit work, so that no valid scientific psychology has yet been exerted. One could then say that psychology in its current state of practice is not science, or is failing to adhere to scientific principles. Same as if "doctors" were still letting blood — you could then say that medicine is not science. You wouldn't mean that medicine cannot be done scientifically, but just that it isn't currently.

    Does anyone hold that consciousness cannot be studied scientifically?


  2. On 5/21/2020 at 5:21 PM, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

    Peter,

    I hope so, too. But let's hope for worse for Cuomo.

    There's a trope that says politicians who send young men and women off to war are killers. Maybe. But people who go to war know they might be killed. They go there aware.

    Old people go to nursing homes to stay alive and avoid risks. A politician who would violate the sanctity of that and create a deadly environment there--even if only from ineptitude or politics--deserves far worse than penalties from a lawsuit.

    Michael

     
    Cuomo is guilty of mass murder.
     
     

  3. Kanye is Trump’s friend, Racist Fucktard. He visits him in the Oval, walks up and hugs him while he sits at his desk — do you need pics? Do you visit the President at his office, walk up to him and hug him while he remains seated, hugging back? You don’t. Kanye is a King compared to your lowly self but you are too stupid and racist to see it, so stupid and racist in fact that you see the opposite.


  4. 56 minutes ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

    You didn't answer my question.

    Michael

    And they answer “what question”

    If they are human, and incapable of going back to figure out to which question of yours you now refer and in practice instead make you go back and reconstruct it all, then I am certain I don’t ever want to try to discuss ideas with them, because it would be impossible. I may toy around with them, but only remembering that these are totally insincere, lazy, dumb people, if they are human. I think they are a piece of software.


  5. Just curious, Michael, have people  ever registered as a multiple? The spirit of it is, well, unindividualist.

    And they can’t respond to your questions, such as names?, in simple introductions. In my experience, in a real discussion selective responses like that instantly collapse real conversations, and here it is in the introductions. 


  6. Of course I could have a conversation with Ed!

    He would never do it, never has, never will.

    He is on record here telling Michael I am a crazy person who he should ban.

    Ed knows I would crush him if he remained honestly in a conversation.

    He is not capable.

    I am not surprised you like his writing, all of it sucks. No matter how much money Bill Gates and the fundie Christians throw at him.

    • Haha 1

  7. This is called murder.

    “It was the single dumbest decision anyone could make if they wanted to kill people,” Daniel Arbeeny said of the directive, which prompted him to pull his 88-year-old father out of a Brooklyn nursing home where more than 50 people have died. His father later died of COVID-19 at home."

    https://abcnews.go.com/Health/wireStory/ap-count-4300-virus-patients-ny-nursing-homes-70825470


  8. They need mail-in ballots in order to cheat enough to defeat Trump and keep their necks out of nooses. They need very intense fear to push mail-in through. Mentally prepare now for false flags and terror, (please start expecting that now so you don't lose your shit and become infinitely malleable when it hits.) It is coming, it is [THEM] -- so get angry when it hits, not fearful.

    • Like 2


  9. POTUS daily ingest HCQ prevent COVID-19?
    Pre announcement: tools [source(s), data, COV-1 v COV-2 analysis, etc.] provided to factually ‘challenge’ narrative?
    Full attack v HCQ by media [D]s?
    Why?
    Why wouldn’t the media [D]s want to work [on all fronts] to find a possible solution [immediate dismissal]?
    Why doesn’t the media [D]s want the pandemic [rearrange: dem panic] to slow-stop?
    Why doesn’t the media [D]s want society to heal [recover]?
    Why doesn't the media [D]s want people to no longer fear going outside?
    Why doesn’t the media [D]s want people to point the finger at China as the source?
    Why does’t the media [D]s want people to return to work [normal daily lives]?
    Who benefits the most?
    Why does corp media [D] attempt to control us?
    Why does corp media [D] challenge [attack] anyone who defies pushed_coordinated narrative?
    Why does corp media [D] attempt to prevent [individual] critical thinking [public]?
    Is this about the virus or something else?
    Everything is at stake this election.
    Q