Jon Letendre

Members
  • Content Count

    2,757
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    40

Everything posted by Jon Letendre

  1. I think it time for Peter to provide his part in this DEBATE about Iran. Didn’t he use all caps? I think he did. Our spat is behind us, Peter, let’s hear what you have to say, it’s been days with no input from you. The “Iranians” attacked two oil tanker ships, (one Japanese–owned, while the Japanese premier was visiting Iran) The “Iranians” shot down a $130,000,000 unmanned aircraft of ours. Then you said that suspicion of CIA doing anything nefarious or standing in the way of peace is petty thinking. Then you and I had a spat. Then Iran executed an agent of the CIA in their Air Force. Show us now that your urged wish for a DEBATE to ensue here was sincere. Now that you are finished telling me to get back to the looney bin, show us what you’ve got. Show us how sincere you were and are and give us some DEBATE.
  2. Oh, sorry, about that Tony. That is the sort of language that Peter likes to pretend is light, warm and humorous. I was testing how it on lands on people here. How did it land? Was it as light, warm and humorous as advertised?
  3. I propose that I respond to my do-over, for Peter. with some recap: Jon: CIA gonna hurt after this. Peter: that's just voices in your head Jon: Did your sister tell you that, while faking an orgasm? Iran: executes CIA agent inside its air force Peter: I won't fuck her anymore Jon: Come on, why do you say that? Peter: She's so stupid. Gets pregnant then denies it's hers. Jon: Ha! Did you see how Iran executed a CIA agent? Won't it be fun to watch who else they execute and we bomb before making peace with them, finally? Peter: [civil, intelligent comment pertaining to the situation in Iran] etc.
  4. Thank you. The answer is no. Cannot stop cussing was not sincere. That was prelude to parodying Peter's whining. No, there is no mental illness close to me. But that would change things, as you acknowledge. And Peter doesn't know, but he does this sort of thing to me anyway. "Voices in your head" is not humor, it is a vicious attack. Snap the fuck out of it. Lol.
  5. Well, not as funny as mental illness. I know some families who would disagree with that, though. But it's not like they understand neuroscience, so i'm sure they're just confused about the nature of humor.
  6. Fantastic! I get the one thing I wanted. You now acknowledge that my 'are you still loving your sister' foray into light humor with Peter is a good-natured way of responding to his light humor allusion to my mental illness. Now it is in Peter's court.
  7. Probably never will. It's my blindspot. Peter's is he can't leave me alone. I attack him for his blindspot and I get attacked for mine. Did Bugs say it was a cruel, cruel world? He should have.
  8. I am not nitpicking and I am not giving you any bullshit. You know and Peter knows how mental illness on a site where intelligence is what counts, lands.
  9. My style of humor contained in my do-over is NOT bashing someone. It is good-natured, cuss-free and follows all Peter's rules.
  10. Right, motherfucker is mainstream. And when it is being used as humor, it doesn't even refer to the target's biological mother. Making slow and sweet love to his sister is similar in that his actual sister has nothing to do with it. I don't even know if he has any sisters, so how could I mean his "actual" sister? And it's not real, actual slow and sweet love because there isn't a specified referent receiving the hypothesized, intense passion. There is only slow, sweet, passionate lovemaking in the abstract, with his sister.
  11. Why are you imposing what humor is? Remember, "hearing voices in your head" is humor, suffering no intention to imply presence of real mental illness. Therefore, "making sweet love to your sister" likewise is humor, pure humor, with no intention to imply that she liked it at all even if it did really happen, which it probably didn't.
  12. Of course! Are you kidding me? Lots of things are left out of war fiction. I get called a nasty motherfucker regularly. They mean the good kind.
  13. I'm sorry, I know many Marines, and you are wrong about how they would respond. My example is mild, you couldn't be wronger. Maybe you met all the polite ones ... I'm thinking, I'm up to six ... and we talk like that when we are together. He can de-escalate, stay on ideas. Watch, it's going to be fine. Peter's got this.
  14. Oh, like like a Marine and an Army grunt. I did that earlier. I will repost it. And then let's go from there, ok, Peter? A total re-do. You could amp it up or down in response to my re-do. If you ramp down, and show respect, it will go probably go down and then go away, and then the real debate you claim to want may ensue. If you ramp up, like the first time, then it will probably boil over, like it did the first time, I will end up using too much humor again, the best humor, the cuss words. You could also leave it there and don't respond to my do-over. Imagine the trouble it would have saved us all if that had been your choice the first time! To set the scene, when our spat started I had just said that if there were to be strikes, they would be against CIA targets (and one day, two? days later the Iranians "struck" a CIA agent.) You made some light humor about me hearing voices in my head. Shamefully, I retaliated, unhumorously. The do-over of my original shameful unhumorous retaliatory response is humorous and without any cuss words ... ===> Who talked you out of the unavoidable truth that the CIA has always had undeclared sites in every country? Was it your sister, while the two of you were making sweet, sweet love?
  15. Oh, like like a Marine and an Army grunt. I did that earlier. I will repost it. And then let's go from there, ok, Peter? A total re-do. You could amp it up or down in response to my re-do. If you ramp down, and show respect, it will go probably go down and then go away, and then the real debate you claim to want may ensue. If you ramp up, like the first time, then it will probably boil over, like it did the first time. You could also leave it there and don't respond to my do-over. Imagine the trouble it would have saved us all if that had been your choice the first time! To set the scene, when our spat started I had just said that if there were to be strikes, they would be against CIA targets (and one day, two? days later the Iranians "struck" a CIA agent.) You said something about me hearing voices in my head. Shamefully, I retaliated. The do-over of my shameful retaliatory response is humorous and without any cuss words ... ===> Who talked you out of the unavoidable truth that the CIA has always had undeclared sites in every country? Was it your sister, while the two of you were making sweet, sweet love?
  16. SPY EXECUTED Iran executes ‘CIA spy in airforce’ just days after shooting down US drone Jacob Dirnhuber 22 Jun 2019, 16:24 Updated: 22 Jun 2019, 22:08 IRAN has executed a former Ministry of Defence employee after intelligence officials reportedly caught him spying for the CIA. The CIA had a spy in Iran's Air Force and the Iranians executed him just days after the "Iranian" shooting of a US drone. That sure is "petty" of The Sun. The Sun must be a "small site," and I feel they need a lecture in civility, too. Poor chums have lost their way. https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/9352702/iran-spy-executed-cia-drone/
  17. So, when you made light humor saying I hear voices in my head, that was an example of you DEBATING my Iran idea, without character assassination, do I have that right, Peter?
  18. Maybe if a well-made handheld or tabletop-sized example was in his hands. It became impossible because he decided we had to be dead wrong and he got "a sense of humor" about that.
  19. Thank you, Ellen. It is so nice to be and feel understood. "Bullshit." Ha! And the man presumes to lecture me on the finer subtlies of humor! I couldn't get a pork chop in return from this crowd if you weren't here, Ellen!
  20. I don't think we need to get into neuroscience. You said "Your version of humor always includes humiliation of another. There are more forms of humor than that." Is Peter's saying I hear voices in my head a form of humor that includes humiliation of another, or not?
  21. But color-blind people don’t go on discussion sites of the color-sighted and tell them about color, while this one, Tony, does.
  22. I was discussing undeclared CIA sites when Peter said I hear voices in my head. Which of those other forms of humor was he using?
  23. I am asserting that he does not have the ability to see it and that is why he did not and does not see it, and that is why he likely will never see it. Not that he is playing playing games, but it is likely quite similar to being a retard with regard to mentally processing spatial/mechanical situations.