Jon Letendre

  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Everything posted by Jon Letendre

  1. Q’s posts are getting less vague with each passing day. Just yesterday Q posted an interesting fact about the Ukrainian State: It is the largest donor to the Clinton Foundation.
  2. He did back down like a little girl. We are to believe he had the intelligence, backbone and cunning to rise quickly and become a billionaire in Wall Street, then all of that failed him one day and he went with backing down like a little girl. Piece of Shit Mitt is on their team, he “backed down” to one of his own. Same for McStain four years earlier.
  3. I thought it was really funny when Donna Tweeted her belief back in January that their Trump/Pence assassination ploy was going to work and Nancy was going to return to the country from her trip (in Royal purple) as President. Oh, Donna. And now she is so very bitter because she knows she will be subjected to tribunal and hanged if she doesn’t kill herself soon. Donna Brazile‏Verified account @donnabrazile FollowFollow @donnabrazile More Donna Brazile Retweeted TIME #MadamSpeaker today #PresidentPelosi shortly thereafter #MLKWeekend is underway Keep Hope Alive! Donna Brazile added, 2:12 Verified account 1:35 PM - 18 Jan 2019
  4. The soldiers enforcing Billy’s political ideology on Hong Kongers are taking arrows in the street now. The patriots need to ambush some police patrols and get them some fully automatic rifles.
  5. Gosh Billy, you used to publish every Q post. Wont you still be publishing every Q post? What made you decide it was better to stop?
  6. No wonder he loves tariffs so much, Congress can’t control spending of that revenue, Trump does. The Chinese tried to assert leverage by trying to hurt our farmers by suddenly ceasing purchases. Trump suddenly imposed new tariffs on Chinese goods coming into America and hands those tariff proceeds to our farmers. Our farmers still get their revenue, we keep the food. Going up against Trump looks like a very frustrating process. Our great Farmers will recieve another major round of “cash,” compliments of China Tariffs, prior to Thanksgiving. The smaller farms and farmers will be big beneficiaries. In the meantime, and as you may have noticed, China is starting to buy big again. Japan deal DONE. Enjoy! 9:08 AM · Nov 17, 2019
  7. The son of a bitch stole "Schitt" from me, never asked me about it, nothing! I swear if he starts using Liddle'Diddler© or Diddler©, I will sue.
  8. See Moron; the moment of NeverTrump hope when you have a friend of Trump over a barrel is when you tell him he can avoid conviction, go free, if he simply sings like a bird about Trump’s crimes. But he didn’t sing and he didn’t get a deal. So, the news of his convictions on all counts is the final news that the gambit failed. Get it? Of course you don’t get it, you’re a moron. Unless of course you intend to prove me wrong about knowing nothing and being able to explain nothing, by explaining how this leads to the big prize, by explaining how this matters?
  9. Q started posting again. Billy, why couldn’t all you losers stop the pimply kid in his mom’s basement? And did I see right that 8Kun where Q posts is or was routed through a Dept of Defense server? That kid in his mom’s basement is really something else again, no? Q posts:
  10. So how does it lead to the prize, how does it matter to anything? Spell it out for us. You won’t because you know you have no idea what you are talking about and you know that trying anyway will not go well for you. As with the entire last year everything you assert will be decisively shown to be false within a week (unless you go with: “it doesn’t mean shit.”) But go ahead and prove me wrong ...
  11. Liddle'Diddler had better hurry up. After impeachment comes a trial in the Senate, it all takes time. What if he can't get it done before Trump's DOJ arrests him and puts him in a facility conducive to "suicides"? Surely you have heard enough testimony and it is time for an impeachment vote, right Diddler?
  12. Well, another Diddler of single digit aged children has been arrested and guess who we have video of praising this individual? Yes, it is Liddle’Diddler-in-Chief, Adam Schitt himself, again. He would be a multi-millionaire by now if he could pick horses to bet on like he picks pedophiles, to praise and promote. "An Emmy-winning former medical correspondent for NBC was arrested for allegedly asking a 9-year-old girl to send him sexually explicit photos, according to new reports. "Dr. Bruce Hensel, 71, was charged Wednesday with asking the daughter of a friend through an online messaging app for the photos in August, the Los Angeles Times reported."
  13. Remember Joel Davis? The pedophiles-run-the-international-child-service-NGOs, Joel Davis? I can’t find it right now but there is video of Liddle’Diddler Adam Schitt singing Joel’s praises at a dinner party (“GREAT person, I've known his activism for many years.”. I shared it at the time. Edit: Sorry, I was thinking of Diddler praising Jussie Smollett ... I met @JussieSmollett at the Pride Parade in Los Angeles, and I've seen the passion and moral clarity of his activism first hand. This week he was the victim of an horrific attack. We pray for your speedy recovery, Jussie, and reject this act of hatred and bigotry. 8:36 AM · Jan 30, 2019 Red shoes
  14. Another bastard your congenitally stupid side planted into Team Trump has been taken down? Ok, good. And thank you for the endless entertainment Billy, as you plainly have never stopped believing he is a Trump loyal and that his fall is bad for Trump. Thanks 😀
  15. B-b-but it’s settled science that human life on this planet is impossible if Venice gets too wet, strictly and obviusly impossible.
  16. I know that in some cases short selling activities can reduce volatility, but the question is one of averages. Similar to how in economic theory the law of demand is safe from the occasional consumer who prefers the highest priced everything. Financial and economic theory share a highly deductive procedure. The theories don’t require empiric confirmation, in fact such is often impossible. For example, look at all the debate over rent control. Economic theory conclusively demonstrates that rent control reduces maintenance, improvement, overall investment in the rental stock. But there will always be someone who wants a study. And of course a study may indicate that investment dropped following institution of controls, or a study may indicate investment grew following controls and both results are meaningless, for we already know that controls reduce investment. So whatever quality and quantity of rental stock you see, you can know that on average those rental units would be nicer, more updated, more renovated, leak less, etc., than they are, and there would be more of them available for rent, if there was no rent control. That’s my take on a proper financial theory of shorting. I’m not of the opinion it should not be allowed, but I would be fine with it ending, too. It adds volatility. Traders like that — you can’t rapidly trade and profit that which is steady. As a long term investor, I don’t like extra volatility or the legalization of magic tricks to promote artificial extra trading in the stocks I own.
  17. Korben? You saw how the media giants squashed the Jeffrey Epstein story years before his arrest?
  18. New Emmy Category Announced: Best Covering For A Pedophile “ABC News and CBS News are favorites for the award, with CNN in a close third. The former two nominees covered up a huge news story that could have brought down Jeffrey Epstein and fired the woman who leaked audio of the story being discussed, while CNN has been reluctant to report on the cover-up carried out by the station's peers.”
  19. No, the rush to cover does not come when the shit hits the fan, the rush to cover comes when better news arrives and the gloom lifts. As I mentioned in previous post, this means that the buys by short sellers come precisely when needed the least for price recovery, artificially speeding the recovery in price. They worsen and hasten the decline by presenting magical additional selling pressure when news for the company is bad then they inject some meth for an extra speedy recovery after the crisis; thus their activity causes additional price swing (and speed of swing) on both ends, a.k.a., price instability. Regarding shorts’ effect on price; there is no such thing as additional selling pressure that does not act to press down on price.
  20. Regarding wars for oil; Rockefeller, Clinton, Cheney, Bush, Obama, Deep State, Genie Energy scum got us into Syria so they could steal oil. Trump/Putin/Erdogan have taken it away from them, their enemies in common.
  21. Poetic headline. Nothing warms my heart like dead scum. What a great day. “White Helmets 'MI-6 Co-Founder' Found Dead In Turkey”
  22. Now, about price stabilization. You focus exclusively above on the short seller’s later action of buying to cover his shares loan, but you ignore his earlier selling of stuff he doesn’t like and doesn’t own. We have to look at both. While you are correct that his (later) buying acts to buoy a battered stock, the effect is evenly offset by his contribution to the battering in the first place, by adding selling pressure from thin air. He helps the recovery and he also helped the decline, so, his contributions to price stability are -1 and +1 or, zero. But the two actions of the short seller, selling short then buying to cover, are fundamentally different and this difference has a lot to say about price stabilization. Let’s first examine his later buying to cover. This is after the stock price has declined precipitously and the public starts to see that the bad news is really not all that bad for the company, the price went down too far and it should be higher. Every investor on the planet has opportunity to see all this and become a buyer, we don’t especially need the short seller’s buying, there is no fundamental shortage of buyers. Let’s next examine his short sale that actually came earlier. Bad news had hit about the company’s future prospects. Again, the entire investing public could see that the company’s prospects were negatively affected by the news and every investor in the world could understand that selling right then may have been wise. But who could sell, in a normal, no tricks allowed, world? Who could sell? Only those persons already in possession of shares could sell, not the whole damn investing world. There is a fundamental limit to the number of sellers and this fact contains the decline, in a normal world. So the true contributions to price stabilization are -1.X and +1.0, making a net negative effect on price stability.
  23. The actual owners are who we and they think they are, not the clearing house. You seem to have lost sight of the buyer of shares sold short. He receives dividends because he is an owner of shares of the company. He is the 11th owner of the 10 shares the company has issued.
  24. Correct. Do you really not understand? Some shares were borrowed and sold to a third party. So how could an additional, vaporous, owner not have been introduced? The clearing house is not that 11th owner but the person who bought the shares from the short seller is the 11th owner of the 10 shares. That 11th owner receives the dividends the short seller pays four times per year.