ThatGuy

Members
  • Posts

    1,316
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    14

ThatGuy last won the day on September 16

ThatGuy had the most liked content!

Previous Fields

  • Full Name
    Rodney
  • Looking or Not Looking
    not looking

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

3,148 profile views

ThatGuy's Achievements

Community Regular

Community Regular (8/14)

  • Reacting Well Rare
  • Conversation Starter Rare
  • Dedicated Rare
  • First Post Rare
  • Collaborator Rare

Recent Badges

338

Reputation

  1. I get all that. But it has to work both ways. And his constant jabs, projections, and evasions, and constant, proudly stated refusals to even consider any evidence presented to him border on gaslighting when he insists on denying us the same consideration of our own judgements. Not to mention his usage of terms like calling us morons, casting doubts on our rationality, and our Objectivist credentials, even. (Make of the latter's worth what one will, but it is enough that he thinks it means something. ) So while your intent is noble, it's not I who need such a speech, but him, because he knows damn well what he's saying, and how he is saying it. As long as he continues to mock and ridicule, going out of his way to interject his views to undercut what others say here when presenting info and evidence, while also promoting fear ("get the Jab or die" in his literal words), the responses he gets, he earns. He claims he is rejecting quack info, but he also rejects proven fact, or ignores it when presented. And that is both intellectually dishonest and gaslighting. ( You can say he's a good guy, but his actions betray that trust. And how many people did Trump call good, only to stab him on the back? ) If he's got issues, well, so do I, and I personally won't stand for his gaslighting. I've experienced the effects of gaslighting in the past, and I can't allow that for myself again. And I have experienced the actions of the "tolerant left" firsthand to know better than to give blind trust, let alone tolerate someone giving them support. Wolf in sheep's clothing and all that. Fool me once... (In a nutshell: if he can dish it out, he better expect to take it.)
  2. WOW. Of course. he doesn't know, though I didn't expect his ignorance to be that bad. American Pravda really did a number on him. Still, one could waste time and effort showing him the footage, and he still wouldn't believe it. "None so blind as those who will not see..." 'Nuff said.
  3. "If you approve of beefed-up security at the Capital for a setup by the FBI, but ignore the invasion at the Texas border, you might just be a clueless rube/useful idiot". -With apologies to Jeff Foxworthy. (I'd say that "the jab" has done a number on someone's brain pan, except that this person was like this long before that, so fuck 'em. Others can give him a "pass" all they want, but I wouldn't trust him not to report Jews hiding in an attic somewhere to the Stasi, because he didn't see the "proof" reported in the Nazi state propaganda.) "I don't see the proof..." Yeah, well, can't see the proof with one's head up their ass, or if one probably never cracked open a history book either to learn about the precedents. "We didn't start the fire..." The Reichstag fire (German: Reichstagsbrand, listen (help·info)) was an arson attack on the Reichstag building, home of the German parliament in Berlin, on Monday 27 February 1933, precisely four weeks after Adolf Hitler was sworn in as Chancellor of Germany. Hitler's government stated that Marinus van der Lubbe, a Dutch council communist, was the culprit, and it attributed the fire to communist agitators. A German court decided later that year that Van der Lubbe had acted alone, as he had claimed. The day after the fire, the Reichstag Fire Decree was passed. The Nazi Party used the fire as a pretext to claim that communists were plotting against the German government, which made the fire pivotal in the establishment of Nazi Germany. Reichstag fire - Wikipedia EN.WIKIPEDIA.ORG
  4. Some people are in doubt about Shadegg...see this thread in response to Rogers' tweet that "they caved". I don't know if it's just pessimism or justified suspicion ("Corrupt people don't just cave...") Time will tell... “CodeMonkeyZ [Ron Watkins] “Shadegg has clear conflicts of interest and Maricopa county citizens should sue about the AZ settlement ASAP! “The fix is in. There will be nothing substantial coming out Shadegg regarding the routers. He actively takes money from Facebook and Hickman’s Egg Ranch.” Major Patriot on Gab: '' - Gab Social GAB.COM Major Patriot on Gab: ''
  5. Resist the Mainstream on Gab: '' - Gab Social GAB.COM Resist the Mainstream on Gab: ' FOLLOW @ResisttheMainstream'
  6. I think I've seen this movie before..."You're going to die, all of you...you are going to DIEEEEE!!!!"
  7. "Sick a few days at worst. Sore arm is the usual. Or go to the ICU. Die. We are supposed to be rational. " - Thus Spoke Peter Joe Rogan: "No." SUCCESS: Joe Rogan Tests Negative for COVID-19 After Using Treatments Opposed by Big Pharma - Big League Politics BIGLEAGUEPOLITICS.COM Podcaster Joe Rogan has tested negative for COVID-19 after treating his condition with Ivermectin, which has been demonized by the But, yeah. More projection and fear-mongering from the peanut gallery who continues to evade and strawman and employ arguments from intimidation/authority. That's ok, though, rational people know better.
  8. "Summary: We won. They dropped their $2.8 meaningless claim for the machine replacement. We get the routers and spunk logs. Cyber Ninjas has full access. Maricopa caved." Wendy Rogers on Gab: '' - Gab Social GAB.COM Wendy Rogers on Gab: 'Summary: We won. They dropped their $2.8 meaningless claim for the machine replacement. We get the routers...
  9. Kenan on Gab: '' - Gab Social GAB.COM Kenan on Gab: 'Government of El Salvador is providing IVERMECTIN to all its citizens free of charge Included in El Salvador's free Covid...
  10. Now THIS is telling...straight outta Atlas Shrugged, re Rearden Steel...
  11. COVID Politics Takes a Dark Turn, Biden Administration Takes Control of Monoclonal Antibody Drugs in Order to Block Treatments in Red States and Ration Equitable Treatment COVID Politics Takes a Dark Turn, Biden Administration Takes Control of Monoclonal Antibody Drugs in Order to Block Treatments in Red States and Ration Equitable Treatment - The Last Refuge THECONSERVATIVETREEHOUSE.COM When Joe Biden’s Health and Human Services made the announcement earlier this month (LINK) that they were taking full control over...