Michael Stuart Kelly

Root Admin
  • Posts

    38,408
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    605

Posts posted by Michael Stuart Kelly

  1. btw - Guo Wengui rocks. He's a major force for Taiwan. And he's helping undermine the CCP.

    In addition, his company aired the perverted videos on Hunter Biden's laptop, he funds Gettr, and he even sings.

    On 9/16/2021 at 5:03 PM, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

    I watch a lot of Steve Bannon's War Room.

    It struck me just now that the theme song, "Fight for Hong Kong" featuring billionaire Miles Guo as the singer (and probably the songwriter) is really good. Note, this is often erroneously called "Take Down the CCP," which is a different song by Miles Guo. 

    Here is the YouTube video:

     

    But we all know that YouTube can take this down at any minute, so here is a link to the song on Rumble:

    AfPob.4Wpjb.1.jpg
    RUMBLE.COM

    Song is the theme song from Steve Bannon Warroom Pandemic. Let's take down the CCP

     

    And here are the lyrics:

    Quote

     

    Fight for Hong Kong
    Miles Guo

    他们的恐惧
    是我们的武器 我们的胜利
    谢谢了 兄弟姊妹们
    你们健身了吗?
    行动!行动!行动!
    中共,你完了
    Take down the CCP

    Take down the CCP
    Take down the CCP
    Take down the CCP
    Take down the CCP
    Take down the CCP

    Everything is just beginning
    For the games you want to play
    Bring it on and I will fight till the end
    Just watch and see

    It′s all started everything's begun
    And you are over
    Coz′ we're taking down the CCP
    Spread the word all through Hong Kong
    We will fight till they're all gone
    We rejoice when there′s no more
    Let′s take down the CCP

    They've all lied for too long
    We will end what they do wrong
    Spread the word all through Hong Kong
    Let′s take down the CCP

    Let the bullets fly a little longer
    And you will surrender
    Let the bullets fly a little longer
    We will let freedom to live
    We will, when you surrender
    Let the bullets fly a little longer
    Let the bullets fly a little longer

    中共 (let the bullets fly a little longer)
    你完了 (let the bullets fly a little longer)
    中共 (let the bullets fly a little longer)

    干灭中国共产党,这个CCP
    才能让我们远离恐惧 take down the CCP

    They try to scare the nation with fabrication
    But we see through the lies
    You will fall, we will fight you back
    Police corruption with crooked assumption
    They ran our lives
    But no more, we will win
    We will take down the CCP

    Spread the word all through Hong Kong
    We will fight till they're all gone
    We rejoice when there′s no more
    Let's take down the CCP

    They′ve all lied for too long
    We will end what they do wrong
    Spread the word all through Hong Kong
    Let's take down the CCP

    Let the bullets fly a little longer
    And you will surrender
    Let the bullets fly a little longer
    We will let freedom to live
    We will, when you surrender

    Let the bullets fly a little longer
    Let the bullets fly a little longer 站起来吧
    Let the bullets fly a little longer 站起来吧
    Let the bullets fly a little longer 被奴役的人们
    Let the bullets fly a little longer 行动
    Let the bullets fly a little longer 行动
    Let the bullets fly a little longer 你完了
    Let the bullets fly a little longer (take down)
    Let the bullets fly a little longer (CCP)

    Let the bullets fly a little longer
    And you will surrender
    Let the bullets fly a little longer
    We will let freedom to live
    We will, when you surrender
    Let the bullets fly a little longer

    Take down The CCP (let the bullets fly a little longer)
    Take down The CCP (let the bullets fly a little longer)
    Take down The CCP (let the bullets fly a little longer)
    Take down The CCP (let the bullets fly a little longer)
    Take down The CCP (let the bullets fly a little longer)
    Take down The CCP (let the bullets fly a little longer)
    Take down The CCP (let the bullets fly a little longer)
    Take down The CCP (let the bullets fly a little longer)

    Take down the evil CCP

     

    There are two main hooks in this song: "take down the CCP" and "let the bullets fly a little longer."

    Both, to me, are rip righteous roaring hooks.

    :)

     

    I've tried to find out where this song is making a huge splash online, but I sense censorship. You can find the song, just not many views.

    However, since this is the War Room theme song, it is heard by about 90 million people with every broadcast (based on podcast download numbers). That means it is heard every day by many millions more people than that.

    Enjoy.

    It's a wonderful song and it deserves to be heard on its own.

    Let the bullets fly a little longer against the CCP indeed. 

    Michael

  2. Navarro is on Trump's team about as close to Trump as can be.

    What Navarro is saying now is what Trump has been saying all along. Not loudly and mostly in meetings, but he has been saying it.

    Before too long Trump will be saying the nMRA jab is not a vaccine just like Peter Navarro is now saying. And as I keep saying, Overton Window, etc. etc. etc. 

    If Trump does not get reelected and a squish does, the dead bodies will pile higher and higher and higher.

    Michael

  3. I added the transcript to the above video between Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro. And for convenience, I'm repeating the transcript here.

    2 hours ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

    EDIT: Here is the transcript I made. I did not check it for errors since, I presume, not many will read it. So there might be an error here and there. And don't forget. Trump listens and listens hard to Peter Navarro.

    Quote

    BANNON: Peter Navarro. Peter, from the first cold open. Biden said, "I'm going to give you speed and science vs chaos and confusion." Sir, I hate to be so brutally frank about this, but he's talking about you. That you're the person that does chaos and confusion. Okay? And that's what they had last winter. And he's giving you speed and science. What say you, sir?

    NAVARRO: So I guess if I'm the guy he's criticizing, I'm the guy on February 9th, 2020... Write a memo: we can get the vaccine done by October or November. We did it in Trump time. Had 150 million doses handed over to the Biden regime after Inauguration Day. And it was a miracle. So if that's chaos and confusion, embrace the chaos and confusion. 

    Now, let's compare the track records. Biden had the Trump vaccine from day one. More people... more people have died from COVID under the Biden regime, over 350,000, than did under the Trump regime. And we were in the fog of war. We didn't know what was hitting us. And we didn't know that it came from this lab here, the Tony Fauci building. It was genetically engineered. So I'll take the Trump record anytime. 

    What's missing here from the Biden plan is any mention of therapeutics. Of those 353,000 people...

    BANNON: Pretty shocking...

    NAVARRO: ... who died under the Biden regime... That's like, ehnnn... it's about three and a half Rose Bowls of people. Right? Well over half of those people would be alive today if hydroxychloroquine were readily available to people through their private physicians. 

    I had a very interesting conversation with a young woman today. She's in her thirties. She's got several children. She got COVID. She's got of a fairly significant case of it. She's in her 9th day, not feeling well. It's the worse thing she's ever gone through. She was unable to get hydroxychloroquine anywhere in the state of Arizona. She got a prescription for Ivermectin, but couldn't get it filled. And so she's left with... her only protection is an experimental technology, an RNA technology which is not really a true vaccine, which could basically interfere with her reproductive cycle. So that's the Biden plan. 

    And, Steve, here's what alarms me. Germany versus Sweden. Florida versus Vermont. We have a world now split by scientism and science. The scientism is this godless worship of a fake vaccine--it's going to make Pfizer and Moderna shareholders rich. But it's likely going to cause endless [mutations] and not provide adequate protection for people. 

    (crosstalk)

    BANNON: Hang on. We're burning daylight. I appreciate that. But you said "fake vaccine." This is one that you called the Trump vaccine earlier and this is the one you worked on. So it's not fake. It's just not for everybody. Right? 

    NAVARRO: It's not a vaccine. So let me be clear about this. 

    (crosstalk)

    NAVARRO: It's an experimental RNA technology that injects antibodies, a limited number of spike proteins, gets a limited immune response, and gives you some protection in the show term, but breeds vaccine resistant mutation. 

    So, look. President Trump did a great job on this. OK? But we're using it in the wrong way. It should only be a measure for senior citizens at risk... at high risk of death and people for comorbidities. 

    BANNON: Target it...

    (crosstalk)

    NAVARRO: I can't say this more. Flood the zone with hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin, zinc, vitamin D, azithromycin, and all the other things that are coming up as cheap antivirals.

    I'm telling you, Steve, more than half of the people that Joe Biden has killed with his policies on COVID would be alive today. And remember Fauci was the guy during the Trump Administration, along with Hahn at the FDA and Janet Woodcock, who's the current head of the FDA, and Rick Bright who killed hydroxychloroquine during the Trump Administration... So, there are literally, of the seven hundred thousand plus people who have been killed here in this country, more than half of them would be alive today. 

    And let's not forget, Steve, we have the highest death rate--here--of any any major countriy. Let me say that again. The United States of America has the highest death rate of any major country. We've got, supposedly, the most sophisticated in-quotes "vaccine," but no therapeutics.

    (crosstalk)

    BANNON: OK. But hang on. But now that you say that, they argue because only 59.8% of the country's fully vaccinated, Dr. Navarro. 

    NAVARRO: It's got nothing to do with that. I mean (mocking laughter), there's plenty other countries with lower death rates with much lower vaccine rates. It's just total BS. 

    And I keep saying vaccine, but it's not. The injectables, the jabs that they put out there. It's not helping. 

    This latest version, which should have been the Xi Jinping version, they call it omnicron instead because they skipped a letter of the alphabet. Which is just another kowtow to the world. People are getting that virus and they've had the jab. I mean... this is insanity. People are dying needlessly.

    (crosstalk) 

    COMMENT: Notice how Peter Navarro's emphasis is on saving lives. And it doesn't matter what saves them. He wants to save lives, not be right in a duel of gotchas or differing theories or verbal gymnastics or Trump Derangement Syndrome or Trump Bedazzlement Syndrome.

    It's all about saving lives.

    That difference in frame is the part I'm having difficulty getting across.

    By blaming Trump for not fixing Biden's idiocy and crappy frame, we are playing the fiddle while Rome is burning. Trump, Navarro, and those other guys are not. They are trying to put out the goddam fire as Biden keeps spewing gasoline all over it.

    In the context of no therapeutics and the government mandating the vaccine for everyone, even for children, trashing the vaccine or talking it up is bullshit. If Trump bashed the vaccine right now, does anyone honestly think Biden and his idiots will stop spewing gasoline on the fire?

    The fire is over there among the idiots, not here where there is no power. And it's raging in the here and now, not in the sometime somewhere.

    We need to get the medicine, or access to the medicine (therapeutics) distributed to everyone. 

    Appeasing the idiots and adopting their frame will only result in more fire.

    Michael

  4. Ellen,

    2 hours ago, Ellen Stuttle said:

    I suspect that there are folks at the FDA who are good enough at cellular biology not to have needed clinical trials in order to anticipate trouble.

    Ellen,

    There sure are. A couple of them quit under Biden for the very reasons you are talking about. But, you have to admit, folks that good never dispense with critical trials, especially not to burn someone at the stake.

    :) 

     

    I know you don't watch videos due to health reasons, but this one explains the Trump outlook perfectly.

    yrDNc.qR4e.jpg
    RUMBLE.COM

    Navarro: World Split By Scientism And Science

    I'll see if I can make a transcript for you.

    And once again, I am not saying Trump is an angel. I am saying he is in transition on the vaccine thing. And I'm saying if one wants to be objective, he should be judged on facts--reality facts, not just on narrative and words.

    Michael

     

    EDIT: Here is the transcript I made. I did not check it for errors since, I presume, not many will read it. So there might be an error here and there. And don't forget. Trump listens and listens hard to Peter Navarro.

    I repeated the transcript and commented on it here.

    Quote

    BANNON: Peter Navarro. Peter, from the first cold open. Biden said, "I'm going to give you speed and science vs chaos and confusion." Sir, I hate to be so brutally frank about this, but he's talking about you. That you're the person that does chaos and confusion. Okay? And that's what they had last winter. And he's giving you speed and science. What say you, sir?

    NAVARRO: So I guess if I'm the guy he's criticizing, I'm the guy on February 9th, 2020... Write a memo: we can get the vaccine done by October or November. We did it in Trump time. Had 150 million doses handed over to the Biden regime after Inauguration Day. And it was a miracle. So if that's chaos and confusion, embrace the chaos and confusion. 

    Now, let's compare the track records. Biden had the Trump vaccine from day one. More people... more people have died from COVID under the Biden regime, over 350,000, than did under the Trump regime. And we were in the fog of war. We didn't know what was hitting us. And we didn't know that it came from this lab here, the Tony Fauci building. It was genetically engineered. So I'll take the Trump record anytime. 

    What's missing here from the Biden plan is any mention of therapeutics. Of those 353,000 people...

    BANNON: Pretty shocking...

    NAVARRO: ... who died under the Biden regime... That's like, ehnnn... it's about three and a half Rose Bowls of people. Right? Well over half of those people would be alive today if hydroxychloroquine were readily available to people through their private physicians. 

    I had a very interesting conversation with a young woman today. She's in her thirties. She's got several children. She got COVID. She's got of a fairly significant case of it. She's in her 9th day, not feeling well. It's the worse thing she's ever gone through. She was unable to get hydroxychloroquine anywhere in the state of Arizona. She got a prescription for Ivermectin, but couldn't get it filled. And so she's left with... her only protection is an experimental technology, an RNA technology which is not really a true vaccine, which could basically interfere with her reproductive cycle. So that's the Biden plan. 

    And, Steve, here's what alarms me. Germany versus Sweden. Florida versus Vermont. We have a world now split by scientism and science. The scientism is this godless worship of a fake vaccine--it's going to make Pfizer and Moderna shareholders rich. But it's likely going to cause endless [mutations] and not provide adequate protection for people. 

    (crosstalk)

    BANNON: Hang on. We're burning daylight. I appreciate that. But you said "fake vaccine." This is one that you called the Trump vaccine earlier and this is the one you worked on. So it's not fake. It's just not for everybody. Right? 

    NAVARRO: It's not a vaccine. So let me be clear about this. 

    (crosstalk)

    NAVARRO: It's an experimental RNA technology that injects antibodies, a limited number of spike proteins, gets a limited immune response, and gives you some protection in the show term, but breeds vaccine resistant mutation. 

    So, look. President Trump did a great job on this. OK? But we're using it in the wrong way. It should only be a measure for senior citizens at risk... at high risk of death and people for comorbidities. 

    BANNON: Target it...

    (crosstalk)

    NAVARRO: I can't say this more. Flood the zone with hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin, zinc, vitamin D, azithromycin, and all the other things that are coming up as cheap antivirals.

    I'm telling you, Steve, more than half of the people that Joe Biden has killed with his policies on COVID would be alive today. And remember Fauci was the guy during the Trump Administration, along with Hahn at the FDA and Janet Woodcock, who's the current head of the FDA, and Rick Bright who killed hydroxychloroquine during the Trump Administration... So, there are literally, of the seven hundred thousand plus people who have been killed here in this country, more than half of them would be alive today. 

    And let's not forget, Steve, we have the highest death rate--here--of any any major countriy. Let me say that again. The United States of America has the highest death rate of any major country. We've got, supposedly, the most sophisticated in-quotes "vaccine," but no therapeutics.

    (crosstalk)

    BANNON: OK. But hang on. But now that you say that, they argue because only 59.8% of the country's fully vaccinated, Dr. Navarro. 

    NAVARRO: It's got nothing to do with that. I mean (mocking laughter), there's plenty other countries with lower death rates with much lower vaccine rates. It's just total BS. 

    And I keep saying vaccine, but it's not. The injectables, the jabs that they put out there. It's not helping. 

    This latest version, which should have been the Xi Jinping version, they call it omnicron instead because they skipped a letter of the alphabet. Which is just another kowtow to the world. People are getting that virus and they've had the jab. I mean... this is insanity. People are dying needlessly.

    (crosstalk) 

     

  5. William,

    I already saw that.

    Video's a bitch for wrongdoers, ain't it?

    The Dem side is funny about wrongdoing when caught.

    Reminds me of Bill Clinton, "I did not have sex with that woman."

    Alex Baldwin, "I did not pull the trigger."

    Anthony Fauci: "I did not fund gain of function research."

    And on and on...

    :)

    On the serious side, sometimes this problem is epistemological. I believe some words-people (as opposed to deeds-people) who think "controlling the narrative" is equivalent to reality actually start to believe their own bullshit and convince themselves that denying something will make it go away in reality--even when the whole world watched them get busted.

    Good luck to the lawsuit people defending the obviously busted. At least the lawyers will get paid...

    :evil: 

    Michael

    • Thanks 1
  6. I know I'm flogging a very tired horse right now and everything in me persuasion-wise is saying to let it be for a bit to get the timing right, but these two hidden patterns are on my mind and I want to get them off my mind so I can work on my story-hacking project today. 

    Let's start with this.

    On 11/29/2021 at 7:37 PM, Mark said:

    MSK:
    “Trump is enormously intelligent and does not evade facts when he does productive things. And, persuasion-wise, he knows how to move the Overton window.  Do you?”

    Does MSK?

    Actually I have a few times (about Trump and Rand in our neck of O-Land on this very forum back in the 2016 election, about that cruddy "Jim Peron is a pedophile" crap a ways back, and a few other times--I have a pretty good history of moving the direction of crowd intolerance toward reason).

    But that's not why I'm posting this. It only highlights something else: I know what a change in the Overton Window looks like.

     

    Here's a great example, showing how this is happening in real-time right here in MAGA-Land:

    On 12/1/2021 at 6:14 AM, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

    How Trump will eventually come out in public about this is still to be seen. But it will happen.

    And the complement which shows the shift quite clearly at the time it is happening.

    12 hours ago, Mark said:

    Now, to give the devil his due, in mid August he said in a phone interview on Fox News, about the booster shot:

    “That sounds to me like a money-making operation for Pfizer, OK.  Think of the money involved.  Tens of billions.  How good a business is that.  If you’re a businessman, you say, you know what, let’s give them another shot, that’s another ten billion dollars, money coming in.  The whole thing is just crazy...."

    For people who only think in polar opposites, this is not a shift at all. But for people who recognize patterns through time (like I do), this is about as obvious a shift as an elephant in the room. There's still a ways to go, and all major shifts move in waves, but the direction is going in the right way.

    Notice that a change in direction, not a flip of an on-off switch, is how the Overton Window works. Remember, the Overton Window deals with being able to discuss something in public, either the public in general, or the public environment of a group, and have that discussion accepted as legitimate.

    It does not mean getting everyone to suddenly preach the opposite of the majority view and take off in a lynching party.

    As I said, Trump is very good at shifting the Overton Window. Probably his greatest OW shift was on a worldwide scale and it was about China. But there have been several other major issues.

     

    Now to the next hidden pattern, which interlocks with this last example.

    12 hours ago, Mark said:

    However I must retract a conjecture I made earlier.  I now think it very unlikely that Trump is in the pocket of Pfizer.

    This is not four-dimensional chess five moves ahead though.  The man is clueless and self-deluded.

    When I look at that, I see the blank-out if not belittlement about the Overton Window shift, I see the self-correction from one bad opinion to another bad opinion of Trump, I see the negative irony as the tone, and if I look at the rest of that post, I see a whole lot of other signals of bias, thus I see Trump hatred about as clearly as the elephant I mentioned above.

    And, being a person who looks at patterns over and through time, I also see the motive for this: the proudly proclaimed antisemitism--even recently proudly proclaimed antisemitism--going back well over a decade.

    I don't want to see this pattern.

    But it's there.

    So I say what I see.

     

    (Whew! Now that I've let that identification out in the world, maybe I can get some work done on my project. :) As to you, my highly valued reader, don't take my word for anything. You don't have to agree with me, especially since you have to live 24/7 with your own brain. I don't. :) Look with your own eyes and come to your own conclusions. Nothing would make me happier as a result of this discussion.)

    Michael

    • Upvote 1
  7. Now back to the real problem, fighting the goddam bioweapon instead of fighting Trump or fighting Jews or Israel.

    BREAKING EXCLUSIVE… Lawrence Sellin: Evidence Indicates COVID-19 is a Designed Bioweapon with a Toxic Structure that MAY BE REPLICATED IN VACCINES

    towfiqu-barbhuiya-cOH3j5lQDYo-unsplash-1
    WWW.THEGATEWAYPUNDIT.COM

    Guest post by Lawrence Sellin Evidence indicating COVID-19 is a designed bioweapon with a toxic structure that may be replicated in vaccines A previous Gateway Pundit article identified two “smoking...

    From the article (and this is just a taste):

    Quote

     

    A previous Gateway Pundit article identified two “smoking guns” supporting the conclusion that COVID-19 was created in a laboratory.

    First, a de facto scientific recipe for the laboratory creation of COVID-19 was described in the 2018 research grant application to the U.S. Department of Defense’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) submitted by scientists who directly collaborated with the “bat woman” Zheng-Li Shi of the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

    . . .

    The second smoking gun in the DARPA grant application was the artificial insertion of furin polybasic cleavage sites, short sequences of amino acids e.g. proline-arginine-arginine-alanine or PRRA, long-known to increase infectivity and lethality of coronaviruses.

    . . .

    The 2018 DARPA research application proposed to artificially insert furin polybasic cleavage sites, like PRRA, into low-risk bat coronaviruses and then testing the ability of those laboratory-created viruses to infect human cells.

    That application was ultimately rejected by DARPA because it involved dangerous “gain of function” experiments creating new human-infecting viruses, which also have the potential for dual use as bioweapons.

    . . .

    Caution, therefore, is warranted regarding mandating COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, which initiate the synthesis of spike protein inside the human body and may replicate the toxic structures introduced into COVID-19, potentially becoming a causative factor in organ inflammation.

    A scientific abstract published on November 8, 2021 concludes that the mRNA vaccines:

    “dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.”

    . . .

    Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. is a retired U.S. Army Reserve colonel and a veteran of Afghanistan and Iraq. He had a civilian career in international business and medical research.

     

    What's more this crap is in a Moderna patent.

    Also from the article.

    Quote

    ... it may be purely coincidental that Moderna, a biotechnology company that produces a COVID-19 mRNA vaccine, holds a patent (US 10,501,513 B2), filed on February 7, 2017, describing “protein cleavage” sites and including a complementary genetic sequence matching that for the furin polybasic cleavage site found in COVID-19.

    Or it might not be coincidental.

    Michael

  8. 8 hours ago, Ellen Stuttle said:

    Yes, I do know.  And I know Jews who say the same, with the same meaning.

    Ellen,

    I've slept on it and I've got to say this.

    I also know Jewish people who vehemently disagree with Israel's covert activities in the US government. I've also mentioned this going back to 2007. And, for the record, I've known self-hating Jews.

    So?

    Does any of that justify antisemitism?

    When a person tells you to your face he's antisemitic, he not only says it, he repeats it, he is proud of it,. what on earth does that have to do with the US government?

    It doesn't, that's what.

    So when you say antisemitism does have to do with the US government and you know Jews who feel the same, I can't help but see Orwell. War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength. Antisemitism is not about Jews.

    Yeah, right.

     

    My saying this is not about defending Jews (although I believe they should be defended after all the shit they have been through). I'm not judging that. Right now, I am pointing out a total misidentification.

    I'm in cognitive before normative mode. If you identify something incorrectly, there is no way to judge it correctly. I've said that for years.

    Now here we have a perfect case of normative before cognitive. Judging, then trying to make reality conform to the judgment. But reality doesn't conform to wishes and floating judgments. Reality is what reality is.

    Like it or not, antisemitism is not about the US government. It never has been and never will be. It's about Jews.

    If people want to talk about Israel and the US government, they should talk about Israel and the US government.  Not about antisemitism, that is, unless they like using loaded language because they like the loaded message it conveys. 

    (Incidentally, I know what's behind this Orwell game when people dig in because I grew up around it. It's right there in the subtext. I've seen this stuff for years, from childhood to adult.)

     

    Leaving a whopper out there and then saying you don't want to discuss it does not make the whopper go away. It's still a whopper and it's wrong. Cognitively wrong. It's a misidentification. Like pointing to green and saying it is red.

    I'm not judging green when I point out the mistake. I might like or dislike green, but I'm not talking about my like or dislike. I have to speak up and say, No. That's green. Repeating that it's red doesn't make it red.

    Michael

  9. On a far different note, get a load of this.

    I read earlier that In Germany, it is legal to have assisted suicide. But now, before one can kill oneself, one has to get the jab. Otherwise the person has to remain alive.

    :)

    Michael

  10. It's too late right now to go into this, but in O-Land, context is always a problem when discussing strategy and tactic.

    I became aware of this real early on back when I started posting online. I wrote an article called "To Turn or Not To Turn, a Question of Cheek" on a different forum. I discussed the difference between strategy and tactic--how the same thing can have totally different meanings in those different contexts, and how I had learned this way of thinking from chess. Those who were around back then know the blow-up that caused. I also got flamed by several people for that strategy and tactic thing. They basically told me that there is no difference, especially when it comes to Rand.

    That's very similar to what I have seen for a long time when people talk about Trump, and frankly about the virus and vaccines.

     

    Here's another way of saying it. One can win a battle and lose the war. And if one loses the war, the gains of winning the battle get washed away.

    I am working toward winning the war. And that means getting the focus and timing right. It means knowing when something is a strategy and when the same thing is a tactic and even when that same thing changes. It means dismantling the efforts of the creeps that released this coronavirus and vaccine mess on humanity (in addition to their other attempts at mass control). It means destroying them. not just getting them to stop for a day or two.

     

    I recently saw a video by a lady I am beginning to like a lot named Catherine Austin Fitts. She said people ask her all the time how to fight the current war by the globalists without suffering losses. She said it wasn't possible for the most part. Once war starts, part of its nature is to cause losses. And if you lose the war, your losses will likely be everything. Peace is one context. War is another.

    As an aside, I have learned enough to now believe much of the confusion people have about this stuff comes from them trying to keep a core story from changing in their minds. But that's for a longer discussion.

    Michael

  11. I love how so many people know how to get Trump reelected or not.

    Did any of them believe he would be elected in the first place early on the first time out?

    No. 

    And now they are experts three years out from 2024.

    :)

    I think Trump knows how to get Trump elected. He got ambushed by crooks this last time around, but now he knows who they are.

    Michael

  12. 58 minutes ago, Ellen Stuttle said:


    About Robert Malone's connection to the mRNA "vaccines," what he contributed, in 1987, was showing that mRNA encased in a lipid nanoparticle could slip into cells in animal tissue.  It was a long way from that demonstration to developed "vaccines."

    Ellen 

    Ellen,

    Fine, but William's point is that it is valid to consider Dr. Malone as a right-wing crank who has nothing to do with mNRA technology and doesn't know what he is talking about.

    That's what the left is portraying him as. To be "fair and balanced," William is basically saying Dr. Malone is not a scientist is a valid argument in considering his credibility. Do you think that's debatable?

    It's a persuasion thing. Rand used to call this smearing.

    Michael

  13. 1 minute ago, Ellen Stuttle said:

    What did you think he meant, that he’d never heard of me before?

    Ellen,

    That's basically what he said when I called him on doing the clique-building crap he was starting in telling me how to behave with you. I have seen that stuff a gazillion times before and if it doesn't stop when it starts, it grows into a blow up. Always. 

    Then he said you didn't even know him as a lame attempt at a put-down, so I called him on that, too.

    There are readers and others on this forum, not just you and him and me.

    Michael

  14. 11 minutes ago, Ellen Stuttle said:

    Regarding our knowing each other, I took you to mean that we've never met or had any contact with each other outside of internet fora.

    Ellen,

    I can assure you readers didn't.

    How could they?

    Unless they knew the history, all they had were the words they were reading.

    And the words were pretty clear.

    I mean, words meaning what they say are the standard you guys are using on Trump, right?

    Is double standard now the new thing?

    The standard applies to Trump but not to you guys?

    Michael

  15. On 12/1/2021 at 5:21 AM, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

    Watch for the next opportunity for Mark to come out against Trump. It won't matter what it is, he will use it. But the real issue is that Trump is a friend of Israel and Jew lover. It's ugly to say it that way, though, so the new issue will be used. 

    I am sure of that.

    See what I mean?

    Didn't take long, did it?

    :) 

    There will be more.

    Right now it's the vaccine. Tomorrow it will be something else just like before it was Lin Wood.

    But the core will remain.

    Michael

  16. 4 hours ago, william.scherk said:

    For some people she is a diligent worker while he is more of a crank.

    William,

    Just to make sure a point doesn't go unnoticed (seeing how modern political bullies prefer that their bullying go unnoticed), let's notice something.

    There is a very common complaint among experts and darlings of the left it all fields when they challenge the core agenda and narrative being promoted at the time.

    Suddenly, they are crackpots, racists, and so on.

     

    I just finished a book called The Story Paradox by Jonathan Gottschall (the guy who wrote The Storytelling Animal), who is avowedly a leftie, and even though he expresses a leftie perspective in his book, he also challenged some leftie narratives. So he also wrote in his book that he is deathly afraid of being canceled and attacked by his own side for doing this, but he has to plow forth.

    But the most flagrant example is President Trump. Before he became president, the left, especially as pertains to blacks, loved him. He constantly received praise and even awards from the "establishment" black community. Once he became president, the press deemed him a racist and it's been that way ever since.

    This story has happened to countless people. This also happened to Dr. Malone. Blanking it out doesn't make it go away. And blanking it out does not excuse the bullying. 

     

    So the "some people" you refer to who think Dr. Malone is a crank are the kinds of people who change their views depending on the political agenda of the people they like. And they don't mind bullying their targets.

    I can't give these folks any credibility at all in terms of evaluating merit.

    I prefer people who go with science, not bullies and zealots who use science as their schtick to get power and unearned money. Sometimes sex, too.

    I gotta hand it to them, though. Some of them get plenty of money, power and sex.

    Some of them even like sex with little kids... :evil:  :) 

    Michael

    • Upvote 2
  17. On 12/1/2021 at 9:17 AM, ThatGuy said:

    But then, re: the latter:

    "Forbes stealth-edits article explaining ‘yes, the vaccine changes your DNA’"

    "A Forbes article that takes aim at 'anti-vaxxers' for claiming that the COVID-19 vaccine “changes your DNA” — arguing that technically it does and that’s a good thing — had its headline changed without explanation to emphasize that the vaccines 'don’t alter your DNA."

    and

    "No editor’s note or other explanation for the change was given by Forbes. While the original headline summarized Salzberg’s argument, the new headline appears to slightly contradict what he wrote."

    TG,

    Here's another article about that.

    brano-QSuou3VAtf4-unsplash-scaled.jpg
    WWW.THEGATEWAYPUNDIT.COM

    In an article published by Forbes on Monday, the mainstream media admitted that COVID vaccines change your DNA but only indirectly and that is a good thing. Forbes published an article from Steven Salzberg...

    :)

    The mainstream press will say anything at any time.

    Truth and fact no object. Lies work, too.

    Michael

    • Upvote 1
  18. 4 hours ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

    Baldwin says he didn't pull the trigger.

    I've been told that Baldwin is trying to make a statement and stay true to his progressive values.

    He wants to counter the conservative mantra: "Guns don't kill people. People kill people."

    He wants to make it: "People don't kill people. Guns kill people. And guns don't even need people to kill people."

    :)

    Michael

    • Smile 1
  19. 4 hours ago, ThatGuy said:

    deleted- wrong topic category (and not humorous)

     

     

    TG,

    Well, let's make it funny.

    Do you think Hitler came in from the ether and is making a comeback?

    I mean, that would be the right place to do it, right?

    :)

    (OK, OK... It wasn't that funny. But it's still cute...)

    Michael

  20. 4 minutes ago, william.scherk said:

    Prejudgement Rules! 

    William,

    For The Atlantic? Absolutely.

    I don't want to waste my time and they've earned their reputation from the things I have read from over there.

    The Atlantic is trash mixed in with a fact or two once in a while.

     

    Here's an image for you. If you take a bottle of fine wine and put just a teaspoon of sewage in it, you spoil the whole bottle. Right?

    Well, what if you have a bottle of sewage and put just a teaspoon of fine wine in it?

    Nothing changes.

    That second is basically my view of The Atlantic.

    Michael

    • Upvote 1
  21. William,

    Rather that go through all that stuff you just posted to find out what some fake news reporter at the the lefty-rag The Atlantic thinks of Dr. Malone, I think it would be far more interesting to find out what the main scientists who worked on the mNRA idea think of him. And not from any information provided by The Atlantic dude. 

    But I'm not invested right now in contesting Dr. Malone's credibility, so finding that out, while interesting, is pretty far down on my priority list.

    Michael

    • Upvote 1
  22. On 10/22/2021 at 7:27 PM, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

    For readers later when today's context is no longer clear, Alex Baldwin is a smug progressive and a huge proponent of everyone getting the coronavirus vaccine--obnoxiously so.

    Yesterday, he shot and killed Halyna Hutchins on a movie set with a prop gun that had a live bullet in it.

     

    This has to be humor.

    alec-baldwin-interview-exclusive-bug-abc
    ABCNEWS.GO.COM

    George Stephanopoulos' exclusive interview airs Thursday on ABC, streams on Hulu

    Baldwin says he didn't pull the trigger.

    So what did?

    The dog that ate his script notes?

    :)

    Michael

  23. More winning.

    JUST IN: Senior Advisor and Chief Spokesperson to Kamala Harris Resigns

    IMG_7847-1.jpg
    WWW.THEGATEWAYPUNDIT.COM

    Symone Sanders Another high profile official is exiting Kamala Harris’s office. Symone Sanders, a senior advisor and chief spokesperson to Kamala Harris, is leaving the White House at the end of the month...

     

    There's more information and context here:

    Screenshot-12_1_2021-9_54_23-PM-scaled.j
    BECKERNEWS.COM

    "Harris' approval rating has plunged even further than Biden's in recent months, with rumors swirling that"...

    Kablooey.

    :)

    Michael