reason.on

Members
  • Content Count

    373
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About reason.on

  • Rank
    $$$$
  • Birthday 07/18/1973

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Location
    Denver, Colorado

Previous Fields

  • Full Name
    R. Christian Ross

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. http://www.maryjones.us/ctexts/t08.html The Battle of the Trees The Book of Taliesin VIII. From The Four Ancient Books of Wales I HAVE been in a multitude of shapes, Before I assumed a consistent form. I have been a sword, narrow, variegated, I will believe when it is apparent. I have been a tear in the air, I have been the dullest of stars. I have been a word among letters, I have been a book in the origin. I have been the light of lanterns, A year and a half. I have been a continuing bridge, Over three score Abers. I have been a course, I have been an eagle. I have been a coracle in the sea
  2. http://www.co2science.org/scripts/CO2Scien...obalwarming.jsp RCR
  3. http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/global-warming051607.htm RCR
  4. Since my name has recently been brought into this "discussion" again, I want to state clearly for the record that I could not agree more with ES's statement above. RCR
  5. A quick note from the ether: I'd more-or-less decided to disavow myself of this discussion forum for a number of reasons, not the least of which was the ownership's attitude towards repeated plagiarism and consequently the basic intellectual integrity of the list. Since I've been a regular here and elsewhere, I feel the need to state for the record: I agree with everything that ES has written on this thread with regard to Victor and his literary kleptomania. Without question his actions here were morally wrong, and as someone who is on the verge of simply not returning to this place because
  6. In fact, the very first chapter offers just such a summation (although, it is in the context of correcting Gore's elementary mistakes/distortions, and is not a general science lesson): RCR
  7. Michael, I do not believe that I have "demonized" you in the slightest...in fact, I think it is you who have "demonized" me and what I've posted on this thread representing the skeptical postion; you certainly mischaracterized my contributions a few posts back, and never bothered to correct this error. Also from your response, you seem to suddenly think I am the only person who has critized or become confused by your "appraisal" of Gore's movie, when in fact, I think I've probably said the least out of anyone on this thread; yes, I've posted more outside material than anyone else, but I've sa
  8. Michael, I am having a very difficult time coming up with any kind of consistent understanding of what the heck you are trying to say in this thread, so I guess I just have one question...do you still contend, as you did with your initial and subsequent posts, that Al Gore presented a worthwhile and GOOD *scientific* presentation of what is known and not known with regard to climate science? RCR
  9. http://www.tcsdaily.com/Article.aspx?id=040406C Global Warming Hysteria Has Arrived By Roy Spencer : 04 Apr 2006 On April 4, the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee will hold a hearing to discuss a white paper that Senators Jeff Bingaman (D-NM) and Pete Domenici (R-NM) released on a mandatory cap and trade program for carbon dioxide emissions. The majority of panelists that will provide testimony in the hearing are for a cap-and-trade program, suggesting the Committee views global warming to be a serious problem and that a cap-and-trade approach is the preferred mechanism for fightin
  10. Interestingly, Michael Crichton used the same story in a speech he made back in 2005... http://www.crichton-official.com/speeches/index.html Another telling quote from a different speech: RCR
  11. "If an argument *is* fallacious, does this mean we *ought* not to accept it? If so, how can this be, if it is impossible to derive an "ought" from an "is." RCR Good example. More formally. Premise - Argument A is fallacious. Conclusion - We ought not to accept it. Smuggled "ought" - "Accepting fallacious arguments is bad." Now, notice that I did not say "Accepting fallacious conclusions can lead to error." This is an observable fact - a conclusion of a different kind. But we still need "Accepting errors is bad." to reach the final "ought" conclusion. We ALWAYS need another "ought" in there.
  12. http://www.climatecrisis.net/blog/ Learn How to Deliver the Truth August 28th, 2006 You’ve seen An Inconvenient Truth. You’ve made changes in your life to reduce your carbon footprint. Looking for something else to do to help solve the climate crisis? How about learning how to give the presentation that is at the heart of An Inconvenient Truth? Starting this Fall, Al Gore and a team of renowned climate change scientists and educators will train more than 1,000 individuals to give a version of his presentation on the effects of - and solutions for - global warming, to community groups throughou