Ellen Stuttle

Members
  • Posts

    6,944
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    63

Posts posted by Ellen Stuttle

  1. 12 hours ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

    His daily dose stack is as follows (and this, as I understand it, is only for a few months, that is, no need for this quantity or even supplements after the vaccine has weakened):

    Vitamin C - 5000 mg
    Selenium - 200 mcg (micrograms)
    Magnesium - 500 mg (or better, 10.6 mg for every 2.2 lbs of body weight)
    Apple pectin - 700 mg

    Watch the video to see his explanations for these elements and doses. Once again, no guarantees.

    At least this stuff doesn't hurt you.

    Michael,

    Please check the figure for Selenium.  Did Dr. Ardis say 200 mg or 200 mcg?  200 mg is way above the potentially toxic level.

     

    RADIOPAEDIA.ORG

    Selenium toxicity (rarely: hyperselenemia) is caused by excessive intake of the non-metallic element selenium (Se) in the diet. Epidemiology It is less common than selenium deficiency. It is most frequently seen in...

    Ellen

  2. fauci-future-warning.jpg
    WWW.THEGATEWAYPUNDIT.COM

    Remember, if you are doubly or triply vaccinated you won’t catch the Covid. Right? WRONG!! The latest lefty to succumb to the false assurances from Biden and his team of medical mediocrities is...


    Some excerpts:

    Quote

    That is not how a genuine vaccine is supposed to work. If you take the vaccine for measles, polio or smallpox you do not get measles, polio or smallpox. But the number of people getting Covid notwithstanding having a couple of jabs is growing and it is alarming.


     

    Quote

    Israel and the UK, two of the countries with the greatest percent of vaccinated citizens, are battling a new wave of Covid infections. Most of these new cases are people with jabs.


     

    Quote

    Here’s the UK data: [See the article]

    And here is Israel: [See the article]


     

    Quote

    Contrast what is happening in the UK and Israel with India. Only 18.2% of Indians are fully vaccinated. But India has not been ravaged by a new wave of Covid infections. One of the big reasons is the widespread use of Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine. India is not known for great sanitation, clean drinking water or social distancing. Here is its chart of daily cases: [See the article]


     

    Quote

    The VAERS data is a flashing red light that should alarm health care professionals (VAERS is the acronym for Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System)

    • Almost two times as many people have died from Covid affects world wide in the last eleven months as died from all other vaccines in the 31 years that VAERS data has been collected (14,925 vs 9,001).
    • There have been 701,561 adverse reactions to the COVID vaccines in eleven months. All other vaccines combined since 1990 reported 820,671.

    The figures given are maybe a third or so lower than the actual number of reports, since the CDC has periodically slashed figures.

    Ellen

  3. On 10/3/2021 at 6:35 AM, anthony said:

    A private org. named PANDA has been at dedicated work over a year in South Africa under the auspices of the local libertarian Free Market Foundation. And who knew we had this locally? Not until a friend linked me to it a week ago, did I know the name and where to find it. Another half-silenced voice going against the conformist narrative. Nick Hudson is the thinker, writer and speaker. He has impassioned insight into the driving forces and much of the scientific angles behind the pandemic, the wholly unnecessary, brutal response-measures and its reign of fear aimed to totalitarian ends. Recommended, other articles in the series and the follow up articles and speeches listed at the bottom.

    Nick-Hudson-WP-image-2.jpg
    WWW.BIZNEWS.COM

    Nick Hudson looks at the forces at play which, he believes, are 'driving the world in the direction of centralist totalitarianism.'

     


    Thanks, again, Tony, for a recommendation.

    Here's a chilling quote from Nick Hudson's article:

    Quote

    We are on the cusp of having our behaviour and speech “nudged” by our vaccine passport, the aim of which is to bring about a tyrannical system of social credit scoring.

    If the WEF has its way, by 2030 we are to eat bugs instead of meat, own nothing and be happy, have our identity read at checkpoints by heart rate scanners so that we don’t have to take off our masks, not need vehicles as we’ll ‘never need’ to walk more than 15 minutes from our houses, connect to the internet only with government authorisation, benefit from a range of technological implants, and sacrifice bodily integrity to whatever injections authorities demand. Some say these are not goals, but predictions. Yet political agendas, as Marx showed us, are generally elucidated by way of predictions cast as inevitable outcomes to which the arc of history bends.

    This techno-technocracy will apparently end not only viral pandemics, but all manner of perceived global threats, from climate change, gender-based violence, and toxic masculinity, to systemic racism, top soil erosion and other catastrophes du jour. A close working relationship between mega-corporations and a government of the global elite threaten to make it less important whom we elect at home than who is funded from abroad. 

    Our rights and liberties are in grave danger of being constrained in the interests of preserving the earth’s rights, as enshrined by the Terra Carta, squashing the Magna Carta back in its liberal box after eight centuries of escape. 

    Third, there is a background of financial unravelling, as decades of monetary mismanagement come home to roost, foreboding a financial crisis to make the last one look trivial. Central bankers are pushing for resolution by way of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), which, in their ‘programmable’ form, allow for unprecedented state control of transactions and hence society.

    Covid measures are a first taste of what a detached class, truly enamoured of these ideas, would like to impose upon you and me. Permanently. 

    Repeating the link:

    https://www.biznews.com/undictated/2021/09/28/nick-hudson

    Ellen

  4. I'm repeating a post I just made on another thread ("Definition of Power"), since the post pertains to the PCR procedure.

     

    ======

     

       17 hours ago,  william.scherk said: 

    If this is not utter bullshit, you should be able to provide this "public information."

    Considering the amount of internet snooping you do, it's quite an indication of the degree of censorship and suppression on the subject of Covid that you weren’t aware that the PCR procedure (which was never intended as a test) lacks specificity.

    Here are some quotes from the article Dglgmut linked to:

    6554b6be8c0d829a8bf63ae0c82cf121_link.pn You are being redirected...

    STATEOFTHENATION.CO

    I don't know anything about the people being quoted except that what they say is accurate.

    ===

    According to Jason Hommel, a prolific writer and researcher and also the author of the very important article regarding coronavirus testing entitled “Scientists Say the COVID19 Test Kits Do Not Work, Are Worthless, and Give Impossible Results”:

    “PCR basically takes a sample of your cells and amplifies any DNA to look for ‘viral sequences’, i.e. bits of non-human DNA that seem to match parts of a known viral genome. The problem is the test is known not to work. It uses ‘amplification’ which means taking a very very tiny amount of DNA and growing it exponentially until it can be analysed. Obviously any minute contaminations in the sample will also be amplified leading to potentially gross errors of discovery. Additionally, it’s only looking for partial viral sequences, not whole genomes, so identifying a single pathogen is next to impossible even if you ignore the other issues.The idea these kits can isolate a specific virus like COVID-19 is nonsense.”


    ===

    […] from an article also by Celia Farber, David Crowe, “a Canadian researcher with a degree in biology and mathematics and host of “The Infectious Myth” podcast, also the president of the think-tank Rethinking AIDS, also clearly explained the problems with the PCR based coronavirus testing, “revealing a world of unimaginable complexity, as well as trickery”:

    “The first thing to know is that the test is not binary. In fact, I don’t think there are any tests for infectious disease that are positive or negative. What they do is they take some kind of a continuum and they arbitrarily say this point is the difference between positive and negative.”

    He continued:

    “PCR is really a manufacturing technique. You start with one molecule. You start with a small amount of DNA and on each cycle the amount doubles, which doesn’t sound like that much, but if you, if you double 30 times, you get approximately a billion times more material than you started with. So as a manufacturing technique, it’s great. What they do is they attach a fluorescent molecule to the RNA as they produce it.  You shine a light at one wavelength, and you get a response, you get light sent back at a different wavelength. So, they measure the amount of light that comes back and that’s their surrogate for how much DNA there is. I’m using the word DNA. There’s a step in RT- PCR test which is where you convert the RNA to DNA. So, the PCR test is actually not using the viral RNA. It’s using DNA, but it’s like the complimentary RNA. So logically it’s the same thing, but it can be confusing. Like why am I suddenly talking about DNA? Basically, there’s a certain number of cycles.”

    Regarding Kary Mullis’ intention for the PCR, this is what he said:

    “I’m sad that he isn’t here to defend his manufacturing technique. Kary did not invent a test. He invented a very powerful manufacturing technique that is being abused. What are the best applications for PCR? Not medical diagnostics. He knew that and he always said that.”

    ===

    Ellen

     

    ======

  5. 16 hours ago, william.scherk said:

    If this is not utter bullshit, you should be able to provide this "public information."

    Considering the amount of internet snooping you do, it's quite an indication of the degree of censorship and suppression on the subject of Covid that you weren’t aware that the PCR procedure (which was never intended as a test) lacks specificity.

    Here are some quotes from the article Dglgmut linked to:

    STATEOFTHENATION.CO

    I don't know anything about the people being quoted except that what they say is accurate.

    ===

    According to Jason Hommel, a prolific writer and researcher and also the author of the very important article regarding coronavirus testing entitled “Scientists Say the COVID19 Test Kits Do Not Work, Are Worthless, and Give Impossible Results”:

    “PCR basically takes a sample of your cells and amplifies any DNA to look for ‘viral sequences’, i.e. bits of non-human DNA that seem to match parts of a known viral genome. The problem is the test is known not to work. It uses ‘amplification’ which means taking a very very tiny amount of DNA and growing it exponentially until it can be analysed. Obviously any minute contaminations in the sample will also be amplified leading to potentially gross errors of discovery. Additionally, it’s only looking for partial viral sequences, not whole genomes, so identifying a single pathogen is next to impossible even if you ignore the other issues.The idea these kits can isolate a specific virus like COVID-19 is nonsense.”


    ===

    […] from an article also by Celia Farber, David Crowe, “a Canadian researcher with a degree in biology and mathematics and host of “The Infectious Myth” podcast, also the president of the think-tank Rethinking AIDS, also clearly explained the problems with the PCR based coronavirus testing, “revealing a world of unimaginable complexity, as well as trickery”:

    “The first thing to know is that the test is not binary. In fact, I don’t think there are any tests for infectious disease that are positive or negative. What they do is they take some kind of a continuum and they arbitrarily say this point is the difference between positive and negative.”

    He continued:

    “PCR is really a manufacturing technique. You start with one molecule. You start with a small amount of DNA and on each cycle the amount doubles, which doesn’t sound like that much, but if you, if you double 30 times, you get approximately a billion times more material than you started with. So as a manufacturing technique, it’s great. What they do is they attach a fluorescent molecule to the RNA as they produce it.  You shine a light at one wavelength, and you get a response, you get light sent back at a different wavelength. So, they measure the amount of light that comes back and that’s their surrogate for how much DNA there is. I’m using the word DNA. There’s a step in RT- PCR test which is where you convert the RNA to DNA. So, the PCR test is actually not using the viral RNA. It’s using DNA, but it’s like the complimentary RNA. So logically it’s the same thing, but it can be confusing. Like why am I suddenly talking about DNA? Basically, there’s a certain number of cycles.”

    Regarding Kary Mullis’ intention for the PCR, this is what he said:

    “I’m sad that he isn’t here to defend his manufacturing technique. Kary did not invent a test. He invented a very powerful manufacturing technique that is being abused. What are the best applications for PCR? Not medical diagnostics. He knew that and he always said that.”

    ===

    Ellen

     

     

     

    • Upvote 1
  6.  

    IMG_6009-1.jpg
    WWW.THEGATEWAYPUNDIT.COM

    CDC Director Rochelle Walensky this week said the Covid vaccines do not prevent transmission of the China virus. “Our vaccines are working exceptionally well,” Walensky said then in the same breath admitted...

     

    ==== Quote

    "CDC Director Rochelle Walensky this week said the Covid vaccines do not prevent transmission of the China virus.

    “'Our vaccines are working exceptionally well,” Walensky said then in the same breath admitted they 'cannot prevent transmission.'

    "Walensky actually warned the vaccinated from infecting the unvaccinated.

    "You just can’t make this stuff up.

    "'So if you’re going home to someone who is not vaccinated…I would suggest you wear a mask in public indoor settings,' Walensky said during an interview with CNN’s Wolf Blitzer. 

    "In other words, the vaccine mandates have nothing to do with 'science' or saving lives."

    ==== End Quote

    See the link for video.

    Ellen

     

  7. 7 hours ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

    This book came out today: What Really Happened In Wuhan by Sharri Markson. (referral link)

    I'm not liking the subtitle of that book:

    A Virus Like No Other, Countless Infections, Millions of Deaths

    That sounds like Markson is buying some hype herself.

    Also, I'm wondering if she says anything about - if she even knows about - Lawrence Sellin's belief that the outbreak started inadvertently from experiments conducted at the Wuhan World Military Games, October 18-27, 2019, getting out of hand.

    Here's Sellin's most recent Gateway Pundit post on that thesis:

    fu-sen-1.jpg
    WWW.THEGATEWAYPUNDIT.COM

    Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, there have been numerous and persistent reports from athletes of influenza-like symptoms either during or soon after attending the Wuhan World Military Games...

    Key claims from that piece:

    "The source explained that the subsequent outbreak in Wuhan was entirely unexpected. That is, there was no laboratory leak, but the unintended spread among the Chinese population of Wuhan of a virus for which the PLA had underestimated its transmissibility.

    "Chinese defector Wei Jingsheng also claimed recently that COVID-19 was deliberately released during the Wuhan World Military Games."

     

    Note: Although Joe Hoft is credited as author, the piece is actually by Lawrence Sellin.  They forgot to put the by-line in.

    Ellen

  8. 30 minutes ago, tmj said:

    You ended a missive about ‘the virus’ with ‘things do get around’ ,made think of spread.

    The connection dawned on me when I awoke after a bit of a nap - things getting around…a virus spreading.  Sigh.  I was merely being delighted at the thought that a UK blogger's article was referenced by a South African OL member and then, via another OL member, provided some useful information to a Connecticut Congressman trying to forestall continuance of Governor Lamont's Covid mandates.  That I inadvertently reminded someone of Carol's snide…..

    Posting is dangerous. 😔

    Ellen

     

    • Smile 1
  9. 1 hour ago, anthony said:

    Ellen,  pleased you've found the site useful! The Guardian being leftist, the site presumably is "Off"-Left exposing the Covid propaganda they fed.

    Very useful.  Kit Knightly did a super job of putting things together in one place, and easily understandable by layperson readers and graphically easy to grasp.

    As it happens, your posting the link occurred on the near-eve of a Congressional battle in the Connecticut legislature, and we sent the link to a congressman we know, who said he'd be using material from it in a session in process as I type.

    Things do get around!

    Ellen

  10. On 9/26/2021 at 10:51 AM, Ellen Stuttle said:

    Oops.  Larry Johnson gets wrong whom to credit for the wonderful cribsheet:

    If anyone reading here has an account at Gateway Pundit, please inform them of the misattribution.

     

    C84D931D-6B2C-4CF1-852E-D202ED7AEDB0.jpe
    WWW.THEGATEWAYPUNDIT.COM

    The Guardian, a UK newspaper, has published a wonderfully informed, detailed list of key facts you should understand about COVID. I am going to give you the reader’s digest version, but here is the link to...


    It wasn’t The Guardian which published that.  It was a blog called The OFF-Guardian.  Specifically, they describe themselves as persons whose letters to The Guardian were repeatedly not published by that newspaper.

     


    The misattribution has been corrected:

     

    C84D931D-6B2C-4CF1-852E-D202ED7AEDB0.jpe
    WWW.THEGATEWAYPUNDIT.COM

    The Off-Guardian, a UK website, has published a wonderfully informed, detailed list of key facts you should understand about COVID. I am going to give you the reader’s digest version, but here is the link to...

    Ellen

  11. On 9/23/2021 at 9:18 AM, tmj said:

    That , hypoxia, is what I've been thinking about or seeing since almost the beginning of the pandemic.

    tmj,

    Please forgive my nitpicking for clarity, but…

    It took me awhile to figure out that, although you quoted my whole post, it was specifically the second paragraph you were responding to, viz:

    Quote

    And it's looking like being jabbed with the mRNA shots makes at least some people more susceptible to catching Covid and to having a serious case if they do catch it.

     

    and not the question I was wondering about, which is described in the third paragraph, viz:

    Quote

    Currently, we have no idea why some people are badly affected [by the mRNA jabs] whereas others (so far) appear to have no ill effects.  I've been wondering if there's something analogous to an Rh factor which makes the difference, but, if so, I don’t have a guess as to what the factor might be.


    Now that we have that clear….😊

    Yes, the issue of enhanced, rather than decreased, susceptibility is interesting - and it's dogged previous attempts to develop vaccines against coronaviruses.

    Ellen

  12.  


    Oops.  Larry Johnson gets wrong whom to credit for the wonderful cribsheet:

    If anyone reading here has an account at Gateway Pundit, please inform them of the misattribution.

     

    C84D931D-6B2C-4CF1-852E-D202ED7AEDB0.jpe
    WWW.THEGATEWAYPUNDIT.COM

    The Guardian, a UK newspaper, has published a wonderfully informed, detailed list of key facts you should understand about COVID. I am going to give you the reader’s digest version, but here is the link to...


    It wasn’t The Guardian which published that.  It was a blog called The OFF-Guardian.  Specifically, they describe themselves as persons whose letters to The Guardian were repeatedly not published by that newspaper.

    Here's the description from their "About" page:

    https://off-guardian.org

    Quote

    OffGuardian was launched in February 2015 and takes its name from the fact its founders had all been censored on and/or banned from the Guardian’s ‘Comment is Free’ sections. Our editors & admins are based in the US, UK & Europe.

    OffG is dedicated to open discourse and free expression, and will often host articles on both sides of any particular issue. Unless stated otherwise all opinions reflect the views of the author, not the site or its editors.

    Here are the head staff:

    Quote

    OFFG EDITORS:

    Kit Knightly

    Catte Black

    ADMINS:

    Sophie Green

    Sam May



    Kit Knightly is the person to be credited for the cribsheet.

    Tony has already posted a link to the piece, and I was planning on commenting about it.  It's comprehensive, well-organized, well laid out graphically, easy to follow.

    One possible glitch I noticed is the sort of thing detractors could latch hold of and use in an attempt to discredit.

    I've seen reports that the  "whistleblower" "Nurse Erin" - re Elmhurst Hospital - is a fraud.

    I haven’t had time to look into that issue yet.

    Ellen

     

  13. The AMA has issued guidelines to doctors on how to lie about the jabs.  They don’t put it like that - guidelines on how to lie - but it’s what it is.

    gianforte-vaccine.jpg
    WWW.THEGATEWAYPUNDIT.COM

    The American Medical Association (AMA) recently released its Winter 2021 “AMA COVID-19 Guide: Background/Messaging on Vaccines, Vaccine Clinical Trials & Combatting Vaccine Misinformation.” The...

    Ellen

  14. 8 hours ago, tmj said:

    It seems utterly impossible that there are no influenza infections. If there are no documented diagnoses of it then there has to be a problem with testing or reporting.

    If there's any whiff of a positive PCR, the infection is reported as Covid.  Same issue with the missing influenza deaths.

    And keep in mind that the PCR produces loads of false positives (and that the death count is overstated by a factor of maybe a couple hundred percent - i.e., that it's about a third of what’s reported).

    Ellen

    • Like 1
    • Upvote 1
  15. 3 minutes ago, Jules Troy said:

    I had a sore arm for a couple days, ohhhHHHHhh the pain the PAINnnn(snickers).

    Most people have no immediate ill effect.  Some die within days or a week or two later.  Some have horrific problems develop, a range of things, organ malfunctions, skin coming off in patches, paralysis, an amputation needed.

    And it's looking like being jabbed with the mRNA shots makes at least some people more susceptible to catching Covid and to having a serious case if they do catch it.

    Currently, we have no idea why some people are badly affected whereas others (so far) appear to have no ill effects.  I've been wondering if there's something analogous to an Rh factor which makes the difference, but, if so, I don’t have a guess as to what the factor might be.

    Ellen

  16. 1 hour ago, anthony said:

    The rest of us don't know more than we read and hear, "third - hand", since no one can really "follow the science" from viral nature to test tube, to safety testing to the human auto-immune system. There's a large degree of necessary trust involved in experts.

    Actually, some of us - I'm one - can, and I did, have alarm bells ringing loudly immediately upon reading a description of how these mRNA experimental "jabs" (not, properly speaking, vaccines) work.  I'd no more willingly comply with the experiment than take up juggling with lit sticks of dynamite for a hobby.

    The way things are going with results, my immediate "no way, short of at gun point" reaction looks more and more justified.  And we haven’t gotten to long-term damage yet, or to what's being done to fetal development.  There have been a good number of miscarriages.  What will be the results for pregnancies brought to term…??

    I think it is terrible to give the mRNA jabs to children.  Reckless endangerment of the child's future development.  The situation is nothing like protecting a child from deadly or crippling diseases.  I'm no way opposed to vaccines against polio, smallpox, rubella, diphtheria…. I had polio, before there was a vaccine.  Would that there had been a vaccine and I'd gotten it.  I'd have been spared life-long physical troubles which are worsening (post polio).

    I am not an anti-vaxxer.

    But:  I think that these mRNA things are proving to be a medical catastrophe - along with being a statist's bonanza.

    Regarding the latter - Tony, I think that you've been doing a really good job of spelling out the difference between rational self-interest and service to the collective.  Bravo.

    Ellen

    • Thanks 1
    • Upvote 2

  17.  
     
    Quote follows….
     

    The world‘s leading medical journal The Lancet has now published an article explicitly condemning the letter organized by Dr. Anthony Fauci, Peter Daszak of the EcoHealth Alliance, Jeremy Farrar of the Wellcome Trust, and others.



    "there is no direct support for the natural origin of SARS-CoV-2, and a laboratory-related accident is plausible. There is so far no scientifically validated evidence that directly supports a natural origin.”
     

    A lab leak origin of the pandemic is “plausible”, the authors find: “Some unusual features of the SARS-CoV-2 genome sequence suggest that they may have resulted from genetic engineering.”
     
     

    Ebright and collegaues also skewered Fauci’s stooges for placing “unity” and their political agenda over critical evaluation and science:

    End quote.

     

    WOW!

    Could this possibly be a harbinger of some scientific and medical honesty getting into the professional sources?

    Ellen

    • Like 1
    • Upvote 1
  18. 19 hours ago, ThatGuy said:

    I get all that. But it has to work both ways. And his constant jabs, projections, and evasions, and constant, proudly stated refusals to even consider any evidence presented to him border on gaslighting when he insists on denying us the same consideration of our own judgements.

    I've formed the suspicion over the course of the 20+ years I've participated on discussion sites where Peter's done that kind of stuff to many persons on many subjects that there's an element of deliberate provocation - intentional button-pushing - "trolling," in short - involved.

    Ellen

  19. 7 hours ago, tmj said:

    I'm not anti vaxx , but I am hardcore skeptical of the jabs and all the institutions pushing them .

     

    50 minutes ago, anthony said:


    The position many share, I believe. Most can be strongly in favor of vaccinations, in principle and practical benefits - and can still think, without contradiction: not for me, not yet, perhaps later on. I'm healthy, a high antibody count, or natural immunity, etc.


    Repeating:  The mRNA "jabs" are not "vaccinations".  They're experimental cell-mechanism alterers.

    Why do you suppose the CDC has - Orwellianly - changed its definition of "vaccine" as of September 1, 2021?

    See the article TG cited three posts above:

    addc90ac-0daa-4ae9-97e9-3fb82c801db6-120
    PJMEDIA.COM

    For your entire life, you’ve known that when you get vaccinated, you’re protected from a particular disease. You’ve probably been vaccinated for such diseases as polio, tetanus, meas...

    Excerpt:

    Quote

    So in a week, a vaccine went from being something that “produces immunity to a specific disease” to something that merely “stimulates the body’s immune response against diseases,” and a vaccination no longer “produces immunity” to a disease, just “protection” from a disease.

    Does anyone else find this disturbing? Why did the CDC suddenly redefine “vaccine” and “vaccination” to make them sound similar to your basic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug or a prescription drug you have to keep taking regularly?

    No explanation for the change is given.

    Is this part of the Biden administration’s efforts to make the public accept regular COVID-19 boosters by changing how we understand the purpose of vaccines? 

    Ellen

  20. 12 hours ago, Ellen Stuttle said:

    my doctor

    Addendum about my current doctor:  He's only been Larry's and my doctor for the last couple years.  He "inherited" us when our former doctor, with whom he was a colleague in a group medical practice, had to retire.

    We had a great deal of respect and fondness for our former doctor.  He'd been our doctor for 34 years when he retired reluctantly because of energy lack following a long battle with leukemia. (He's still hanging in there, with the leukemia in remission, but the long strain of fighting the disease had taken too much a toll on his energy level for him to go on working.)

    I think that our former doctor would have done more research than the current one had done.  I suspect that he would have recommended getting the shots - probably the Pfizer ones - all the same.  And we would have said, all the same, No, we'd rather risk the bug than the dicey mRNA method.  (We don’t want to risk the potential blood-clotting problems with the Johnson & Johnson actual albeit odd vaccine either.)

    Ellen

  21. On 9/5/2021 at 4:21 PM, Peter said:

    Trust your doctor.

    I had my annual check-up last week and informed my doctor of a thing or two (or more) when he was surprised at my not having gotten any of the Covid shots.

    He hadn’t so much as heard of Robert Malone - or of figures for Israel past June, when, briefly, the stats were looking favorable for the "vaccination" program.

    Whatever medical sources he was getting his information from were being selective (charitably speaking).

    Ellen

    See addendum four posts below.

    • Like 1
    • Upvote 1
  22. PS to the above specifically addressed to Peter, who probably won’t read the article, since he says he doesn’t read "alt" sources.

    Peter,

    Please be careful.  Not a good idea to feel safe because you've been "vaccinated."

    It's looking very much like the "vaccinated" are at MORE risk of getting Covid and of dying from it if they get it.

    Ellen

  23. 1 hour ago, ThatGuy said:
    D1617591-2630-4428-BC62-1A7E9DC60F42.jpe
    WWW.THEGATEWAYPUNDIT.COM

    By Wayne Allyn Root It’s been quite a week. I’ve been in the media business for decades and I’ve never before witnessed seen such lies, exaggeration, and outright fraud. All with the intent to force everyone...

    Ellen