Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation since 07/22/2021 in all areas

  1. Why am I not surprised? A group that advertises itself as a go-to place for Republicans to get elected is really a a go-to place for Democrats (or those who hold the same values) to get elected as Republicans. This article at the Gateway Pundit talks about Landmark Communications in Georgia, but wanna bet there are similar organizations in all 50 states? BREAKING HUGE: Georgia’s Raffensperger, Sterling and Fuchs All Connected to Firm that Helps Georgia Democrats Run as Republicans And here is the article in The Georgia Record that broke the story. Landmark Communications – The ‘republican’ Political Consulting Firm In Atlanta That Runs Democrats As Republicans, Some With Ties To Chinese Communist Party No time to comment further, but the headlines say it all. The articles give the details on who was propped up by Landmark and how they got busted. Michael
    2 points
  2. So you walk into my house and steal my TV set. I go to the police station, video in hand , and say that you stole my tv set. The thief says that I stole the tv set from them. The police say that they refuse to look at my video and the courts say that I do not have evidence, nor standing. Alice in Wonderland. The Matrix
    2 points
  3. Michael, Tamed. That's the word that comes to mind in these recent times, even pre-pandemic (which played perfectly into certain hands). The taming of the collective people, not only by nanny governments but by the people who childishly need them. Again, like livestock, aptly, this shows the masses can be taught to be willingly herded and corralled with not a bleat or moo in protest.
    2 points
  4. Peter, So did you look at what I presented? (The Dr. David Martin stuff.) It's "observable, verifiable and repeatable." Ditto for what Martin presents. Did you look? If you don't observe something that is readably observable, it doesn't matter what you say about it--good or bad. All you are able to do is present speculations and/or opinions from other people who told you stuff. I agree that silly people, conspiracy kooks and the like are a huge waste of time for the intelligent, but people like Dr. David Martin and Robert Kennedy, Jr., are not silly people or conspiracy kooks. Nor do they inhabit professional environments in science, law and so on that are characterized by silliness or kookiness. Instead, they are among the top in their fields. So, if people of this stature are blowing a whistle, why not observe before dismissing? As to the photographs and paintings going around of SARS-CoV-2 (like here, for example), I'm not that familiar with electron microscopy, so I have to repeat, like I said above, that I am not a person qualified to answer the many questions that arise from what Dr. David Martin, Robert Kennedy, Jr., etc. present. I only know, so far, that others from the establishment are not answering such questions with things that I can observe. I have to trust what they say, even when they come up with pictures. For example, how in hell do I know they are presenting pictures of SARS-CoV-2? They say so. That's it and that's all she wrote. Since these are people from institutions that consistently lie to the public, that's just great. The best I can say is that people from institutions that consistently lie to the public say the pictures they present are... (fill in the blank). So one of the questions I am waiting to see answered by the whistleblowers is, what are these pictures? Are they pictures and images of SARS-CoV-2 or what else could they be? Another question is, if COVID-19 doesn't exist as a virus, or there is no pandemic, what actually killed the people who reportedly died of COVID-19? There are plenty of other questions. I can't answer them objectively (so far). And they won't be answered objectively by ignoring them or taking the pronouncements of government authorities at face value. You know, if I had not seen what I have seen with the manmade climate change debacle, the stolen 2020 election, and so on, it would have never occurred to me to doubt medical scientists. Now, if I want to use Objectivist epistemology, like you say, especially the "observe" part, I believe I would be wrong to take anything (and that includes "and" and "the") modern government authorities and establishment scientists say at face value. Doctors included. Especially when gobs of money and power are in the mix. Given their truth track record, I would have to call believing them without looking at other experts and checking their pronouncements where I can, even when they occur in peer-reviewed publications, an act of faith. And faith is not a tenet of Objectivist epistemology. I'm a lay-person, not a PhD. I'm simply doing what I can to not be lied to and fall for it. I believe this is what moves you, too. (I see you as one of the good guys. ) You have more invested than I do since you can't untake the vaccine, but that is not a factor in epistemological method. Notice that our disagreements are generally over things we cannot observe and confirm. So, for many of our disagreements, I like to follow what President Trump says. "Let's see what happens." Did you catch the language? "See" is a form of observing. A statement like that--i.e. (paraphrased), waiting until there is something that can be seen in order to be certain--is pure Objectivist epistemology in action. Michael
    2 points
  5. Something I don't normally do, but... What would Ayn Rand say, today? NYT reporter deletes tweets urging Trump supporters to be called 'enemies of the state' amid backlash Katie Benner claims her original tweets were 'unclearly worded' https://www.foxnews.com/media/new-york-times-katie-benner-deletes-tweets
    1 point
  6. I'm repeating a post here I did in another thread since it contains information pertinent to this thread.  Here is the list for people who do not have Telegram. Click on a link and you can see the chat activity on a browser.  Add these people to the members of the main channel and that's where you get the larger number. As I said, this started only a few days ago and it already has all these states up and about 150k people actively using them. What do they do? They share information on how to get full forensic audits in their states for the 2020 election and how to pass voting integrity laws. They deal with who to contact, what procedures are necessary, what the state laws are, how to spread the word around and get people on board, and things like that. I imagine Twitter is not amused. But who needs Twitter to change the country? btw - Bopping around, I came across this statement from today by Arizona Senate President Karen Fann: So Ken Bennett was barred from continuing with the Senate's recount because of the leak (which he apologized to Senator Fann for). However, he will be involved in drafting the final report. Meanwhile the fake news media is trying to gin up a shit storm. It sounds to me like this audit is right over target. Notice that all the right people are communicating with each other as the alt media gets stronger and stronger. Don't forget, this post is only dealing with Telegram. There are a bunch of alt sites (like GAB, Gettr, Parler, and so on) where audit activity is being discussed and promoted. And don't forget the physical stuff. All those churches and organizations out there that hold meetings. Short of a military takeover of the American Government and establishment of a dictatorship, there is no way for the oligarchy to stop this audit train. Also, Big Tech and even the fake news media are finally getting a taste of the limitations of their power. Michael
    1 point
  7. This reminds me of 2016 no ground game. Every move Trump made people would question then Kaboom! News would come out. Trump is acting now like he did then and the Kabooms keep happening. Heck, I even remember some idiot on this board who said that Trump was done and Rubio would be the next President.
    1 point
  8. Guardian Angel Gone Wild I was just watching Peter Navarro talking to Steve Bannon. He made a comment in such plain language, it shed light on a dark part of what is going on. The clarity was refreshing. I wont give the exact quote because I don't want to spend time hunting for the text on the video and transcribing it (but you can if you want--see here ). But I will paraphrase. Navarro said that Fauci never imagined in a million years that the virus would escape the Wuhan Lab. What he really wanted to do over there was create a deadly virus, then create a vaccine for it. That nails it. In addition to being an evil fuck whose greed for government money knows no bounds, he's a basket case with a guardian angel complex. His type usually appear in hospitals where they (trying hard to not get caught) make helpless patients suddenly sick so when the alarms go off, they can show up out of nowhere and save the day. Some arsonists are like this. They set fire to buildings with people in them so they can show up and rescue those people. Actually, anybody who causes accidents or illness so they can save the day are like this. The Death Con By acting in such manners, Fauci has been responsible for countless deaths over the years. His favorite trick is to withhold medication while telling dying people that a vaccine is on the way. Then ignoring the issue as people drop like flies and he sucks money from the government. That is exactly what he did with AIDS. (See the movie, The Dallas Buyer's Club, for a film version of how this process played out.) This is what happens when the government and private sector get too entangled. A monster like Anthony Fauci gets in charge of vast sums of research money for things that can cause an enormous amount of damage. The rest is history all throughout organized civilization. Floyd Ferris Fauci's Atlas Shrugged counterpart is Floyd Ferris, who was in charge of vast sums of government money, cultivated and intimidated scientists with funding, and came up with that damn Project X. If you want a great mental image for Floyd Ferris, look at Anthony Fauci. Michael
    1 point
  9. It's only Jimmy Dore satire (and some of it is quite funny ), but these assholes--Hunter and Joe--deserve this. If anyone knows how to launder money, they do. Michael
    1 point
  10. T2 should make a stop in Cuba..and stay there.
    1 point
  11. They were kind of wow, actually. As a livable city I can't imagine any better. Wish I could have met you for a beer at the Brunswick Tavern and set you straight on political philosophy, when I had more of my wits about me.
    1 point
  12. Footnote on the basketball, the first basketball court is arguably right here in little and ole St Stephen. Unarguably the. Chocolate bar was invented here by the Ganongs. I do not count the historical revisions of Big Chocolate in the US as credible. Just saying.
    1 point
  13. And one of the best shows in a while, Schitt's Creek, came out of Canada, acted-produced by Eugene Levy and son. The country has a quality film industry.
    1 point
  14. Daily travails of the writer's life. Finding just the right word: Michael
    1 point
  15. I’m pretty sure DARPA is still researching ultra low frequency noise to trigger targeted earthquakes…regardless of what they say..
    1 point
  16. The weather manipulation idea seemed a little far-fetched to me, not that people wouldn't try it, but that it was just beyond our capability. Well... Dubai Is Creating Artificial Rainstorms With Drones "We've reached the "making it rain to stave off complete desertification and beat the heat" phase of the climate crisis." https://gizmodo.com/the-united-arab-emirates-is-creating-artificial-rainsto-1847351652
    1 point
  17. T, Isn't it odd that so many people want to keep the public from access to medicine in order to corral them into vaccine lines? It reminds me of Temple Grandin's system on how to kill cows without them getting anxiety. The whole concept is to gradually remove movement options from the cow while keeping it in a good mood, and gradually restrict its perception. In Grandin's process, a cow gradually sees less and less of what happens to the cow in front of it (which is the reason for the gradual tightening of the path into a single file, all the curves and the sudden appearance of a solid wall), it does not get to see the person who will kill it, and it does not get to see how it will be killed and disposed of. From the cow's perspective, one minute it is, then instantly it is not. I am not saying the people at the top who promoted vaccines are metaphorically doing this, but I don't rule it out, either. People who think of other human beings as human livestock (in other words, elitists) are well aware of this process. It's not a large leap to imagine one of them adapting this template, or at least the reasoning behind it, for their plans. The way the propaganda machine moves in lockstep, and what the propagandists are doing in lockstep, sure looks like a plan of gradually removing movement options from the public while keeping people in a good mood (feeling more or less safe from danger), and gradually restricting their perception. Michael
    1 point
  18. I was able to source some Ivermectin via the inter webs thanks to some links right here on OL , thanks to our host . For about 240 I was able to get enough to follow the FLCCC protocols for a few months for my family. Unfortunately the order arrived 14 hours too late to start a prophylaxis course for the vacation trip we are currently on, but we will start as soon as we get back. I had heard that our local Tractor Supply store has the tubes for horses , but I wasn’t sure about the dosage conversion and or equivalency of the chemical in that form to be comfortable with a substitution. Nice to know someone has lab tested the paste and will consider that route to be a good back up going forward.
    1 point
  19. I just saw Dr. Robert Malone being interviewed by Steve Bannon. This guy is one of the inventors of the mRNA technology used in the modern vaccines. He has not spoken in lockstep with the establishment, has basically issued some warnings for people to be careful with the dangers inherent in this technology, has talked about some of those dangers, and now there is a campaign to expunge him from the Internet. Think about that. They (the establishment) are trying to expunge from history the fucking inventor of the medical platform they now use. WTF? I looked around in a quick scan and they really are doing this. It's not that they disagree with him. It's that they don't want normal people to know anything about him. Michael
    1 point
  20. My simple answer to ''Why AR rejected Conservatism'. She expected more from the conservatives (re: capitalism). The Left didn't even bear mentioning, they were (and are) beyond the pale.
    1 point
  21. Thanks for listening. Politics wasn't on the agenda.
    1 point
  22. The same low-risk/non-risk group (healthy under 40's/50's, approx.) whose lives were arbitrarily devastated first time round, with lockdowns, now have to do it over again with mandatory vaccinations - again, for the sake of everybody else's safety? At ¬some¬ risk of vaxx side effects e.g. thrombosis and unknown risks in future? Teens and children included? This has been a mass sacrifice of the healthy and able to the unhealthy and unable. Who does your life belong to?
    1 point
  23. (Picture reads: "I did not have financial relations with that lab." -Dr. Fauci) Heh. [Edit: I was wrong. Fact-checkers have identified this as satire, although they can't be certain that there was no cigar involved, and forensics are still out on the blue dress...]
    1 point
  24. Peter, Don't you trust your own eyes? You've been around since near the beginning and you've seen me admit when I was wrong plenty of times. Not only that, I've generally provided sourced information on the corrections. I just don't make a big cover-up, I don't make a litany of blah blah blah about how and why I failed in this one instance, I don't do the shame dance, nothing like that. My approach has been, essentially, to say, "I used to say this. Now I say that. Why? Because of xxxx." And then I move on accumulating information and wisdom. That, instead of not being right, is my guiding value. I doubt you will see me admit I'm wrong about Fauci, though. I have been looking into him. What a snake. He's already disintegrating. But the real ordeal for him will start on September 14 when Simon and Shuster release the book they are publishing on him by Robert Kennedy Jr.: The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health. It can be preordered at the link. Once the media shitstorm kicks in over this book (interviews, pundits, talk shows, exposés, blah blah blah etc.), I believe this will be the time when serious high-level legal moves will come out against him. After all, media money at that time will be made by bashing him (with some spin or other to exempt the criminality of the fake news media, of course). Now that the establishment has cut him off, all political sides are going to come down hard on him. Rand Paul has already made a criminal referral against Fauci to the DOJ. If you don't believe me or think I am being overly biased, use your eyes--your own eyes. Watch and see if this grows or if it simply goes away. If it simply goes away, I'll be glad to say I'm wrong. Michael
    1 point
  25. Yeah, it's also become a darling of conspiracy mongers who want individual choices suppressed. It's a provably harmless drug to humans (I use topically as a prophylactic), and if it is ineffective, too bad. But restricting it's sale is arbitrary. btw I am not anti-vaccination, but it must remain one's choice.
    1 point
  26. I guess he'll just have to fight out in the alley in the great Ford tradition!Sneerk, sneerk.
    1 point
  27. This item can't be worse for the deep state. Men accused in plot to kidnap Michigan Gov. Whitmer claim FBI set them up Now get this. There were 18 people all total--6 militia men and 12 FBI undercover agents. What a joke. The only reason I can think of why the FBI did this was to seed the fake news media with a story about the "danger" of white militia as a prelude to the January 6 setup at the capitol. The US intelligence community needs to be disbanded and rebuilt from the ground up. As it exists, it is one of the clear and present dangers currently threatening the American government. Somehow the people in the US intelligence community believe they are the rulers of America. But they are not. There is a document that rules the US government, one they ignore and probably despise: The Constitution. Michael
    1 point
  28. 1 point
  29. Pennsylvania Decertifies Fulton County’s Voting System After Post-Election Audit The action by Acting Secretary of State Veronica Degraffenreid almost certainly means that Fulton County will have to buy or lease new voting machines. https://pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/2021/07/21/pennsylvania-decertifies-fulton-county-voting-system-audit/
    1 point
  30. A friend sent me the following video which basically makes the case that the entire pandemic a hoax. Note, this is not a fringe YouTuber. Dr. David Martin is on the same basic team as Robert Kennedy Jr., who is a colleague, not just a reference. If I'm not mistaken, Dr. Martin will be a part of the shitstorm mainstream books coming at Fauci a little later this year, including one by Robert Kennedy Jr. The essence of the video is that Dr. Martin had his team examine in depth and untangle about 4,000 patents concerning viruses and vaccines and explain what they mean. What they found was that there is nothing novel about COVID-19. Nothing. It's named as a virus (COVID-19), but when presenting a scientific description, they best they can come up with is a bunch of fragments from computer models cobbled together. Nothing observable in nature. I know this will generate a lot of questions and I am not the one qualified to answer them. Listen to what they guys are saying and judge for yourself. If they are right (and they sure as hell make sense to me, especially with the mountain of evidence Martin presents), this will be a scam even bigger than the 2020 election fraud. A Manufactured Illusion: Dr David Martin with Reiner Fuellmich This was in the description: If that video goes down, here is a copy on Rumble and on Odysee. I've noticed that this video is being spread around under different titles, too. For example, on Rumble it is called "Dr. David Martin: Not novel, No pandemic, No variants...Campaign of Coercion & Terror!" and on Odysee it is called "Evidence COVID Was Deliberate For Profit: "The New Normal Campaign" by Merck Began 1/6/04." I am sure there are plenty of others at other video sites, too. Later I will get more information on what and who are involved in the video. I'm even thinking of making a transcript. I managed to get the YouTube transcript before that video gets taken down, but I would have to check it for errors (which are generally quite a few) and format it. Also, a few short stretches are spoken in German (basically Reiner Fuellmich reading user messages or questions, but there are not many). I want to see if I can get translations of those passages. This one is important. For anyone who needs something to read before I do the transcript, fortunately there is an excellent resource to back this up. Take a look at the following PDF. With over 200 pages of references, you can see just how serious this one is. The Fauci/COVID-19 Dossier There are other copies online here and here and here and here and here. I believe there are so many copies going around, all you have to do is search for it by name and you will find it somewhere. btw - Here is Kennedy interviewing Martin on video on July 13: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Interviews David E. Martin. It's on Odysee, so I'm pretty sure it will stay up. I haven't seen it yet, but I will watch it shortly. I found it at the last minute to illustrate that Kennedy and Martin are on the same level of prestige. More coming from me, but I have a feeling this is going to be all over the news before too long. So there should be plenty more coming irrespective of what I do. This story is going to be hard to suppress because it's grounded in deep research and it looks like some serious heavies who know how to get serious exposure are behind it. Michael
    1 point
  31. A Jew speaks.... When WE were led into the gas chambers, THEY said nothing. When WE were forcibly converted, THEY said nothing. When WE were thrown out of a country just for being Jews, THEY said nothing. BUT when WE now defend ourselves, all of a sudden THEY have something to say. How did WE take our revenge on the Germans for their "Final Solution?" How did WE take revenge on the Spanish for their Inquisition? How did WE take revenge on Islam for being Dhimmis? How did WE take revenge on the lies of the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion?" WE studied our Torah, WE innovated in medicine, WE innovated in defense systems, WE innovated in technology, WE innovated in agriculture, WE composed music, WE wrote poetry, WE made the desert bloom, WE won Nobel prizes, WE founded the movie industry, WE financed a fledgling democracy, WE fulfilled the word of G-d by becoming a Light Unto the Nations of the Earth. DEAR WORLD, when You criticize us for defending our heritage and our ancestral homeland -- WE, the Jews of the world, do exactly what You did to/for us; WE IGNORE YOU. You have proven to us for the last 2,000 years that when the chips are down, animosity towards Jews reigns supreme. Now leave us alone -- and go sort out problems in your own back yard whilst WE continue our 5778-year old mission of enhancing the world we all share. -The Jews
    1 point
  32. (1) On Nathaniel's list today, there was a post by Michael Lee which catalyzed something I've been on the edge of realizing: how horrified I am by the amount of...what word do I want? I'll settle for now for the word "venom"...which is emerging in the latest battles over Rand and the Brandens. I'm reminded of a line from "Judgment at Nuremburg": "Are we going to do this again?" For me, and for the Brandens, and for others old enough to have been there at the time of the original split, this is the third major time the battle has been fought (the second time was when David Kelley invited Nathaniel to speak at IOS in '96). Why is there such intensity? Why do people get so personally involved in what happened between Rand and the Brandens? What is at stake for people? And a more overarching question: Why do Objectivists act the way they do? Why do they savage each other's characters over disagreements? Why are they so quick on the trigger finger with condemnations? What is the source of these behaviors? Is it something in Objectivism itself which encourages moralism? I believe that there is something in Objectivism, an attitude which was conveyed by Rand, although I think it would be possible to filter that attitude out. But many Objectivists don't seem to want to filter it out; instead they seem to want to cling to it; they seem to derive a sense of virtue from judgmentalness. (2) By contrast, in reading the posts here today, I've been feeling: How interesting it is, the differences in background, in life stories amongst various persons on this list. And how amicable it's thus far been here -- as Roger said, a kind of haven from the you-know-what going on you-know-where. And the amicability doesn't feel to me forced, instead natural. That always-be-alert-for-evil attitude prevalent among Objectivists seems to me to be missing here. So why is that? Why is it missing? Is there a general characteristic which is present which accounts for the absence? Ellen ___
    1 point
  33. This is floating around on the Internet. I don't know the origin, but neither does anyone I've looked at. Michael
    1 point