Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 12/01/2020 in all areas

  1. How can there be proof when crooked courts do not accept evidence, when the mainstream media won't even mention it, and when tech giants openly censor people talking about it? Watch the videos of the different hearings I have provided here on OL and anyone can see all the evidence they need. There is gobs and gobs of it. And from what I understand, the hearings only scratch the surface. Soon this evidence will be in the respective courts--going straight up to the Supreme Court--in a form where it can be transformed into proof. Or, alternatively, watch what a few state legislatur
    1 point
  2. Ouch. This one hurts. and What's worse, Polly was on it back in Nov. 7. In other words, the 2020 elections were run on voting machines partially owned by the Chinese Communist Party. I want to see lots of people going down over this. Michael
    1 point
  3. Maybe you'll eventually catch up to its thus far being a stolen election. Ellen
    1 point
  4. The chart below I found out there on the Interwebs is not about storytelling per se--that is until you look at the items as story themes and look at the predominance of them in the stories within the mainstream news and culture. The column on the left is from the 1950's and is more abstract (that is, more general). On the right, it is how to concretize such a theme through the COVID-19 filter. (This isn't 100% correspondence, but enough of it is to be quite useful as a story-wars approach.) Notice on the left how images don't come to mind easily. But on the right, they do. That's no
    1 point
  5. Once this kind of evidence gets to the Supreme Court, it's all over. The white hat hackers have been surveilling the Deep State. And like Col. Waldron said, they have "the traffic and the packets." And even if some fluke happens and it does not get to the Supreme Court, data logs and recordings (and however they do it and prove the records have not been altered) of votes being changed online is the equivalent of a military attack. Despite what the media feels like right now (if you are unfortunate enough to consume the mainstream media raw), President Trump has so many pat
    1 point
  6. TG, Don't be sad about Objectivism. I predict it will change a lot over time. And here's why. In religions and social ideologies like communism, there is a strong community organizing component. Ditto for families (there is no biological way to eliminate families from the evolution of the species, so that is a fundamental). This is not present in Objectivism except in the most distant and abstract terms. So, at present, from the way I see it, Objectivism works best as a kind of self-help philosophy (a great one for most contexts) when it sits squarely on top of a Christian
    1 point