Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 08/10/2020 in all areas

  1. MSK wrote: "Brant, Damn you. Too often you manage to say in a sentence or two what it takes me paragraphs and paragraphs to say" (link). I will summarize in a few sentences what took you paragraphs and paragraphs to say. You find fault with the messenger, e.g. citing the CDC or WHO or CNN. You believe that entitles you to dismiss the entire message as propaganda, falsehoods, and garbage. That’s despite any facts or merits in the message. You even cite a fact and then concoct a slur. You don’t have enough interest to discern what is relevant and objective from what isn’t. It’s so much e
    2 points
  2. At approx. 50:09 (cued up):
    1 point
  3. Jon, It's tough trying to explain my state of mind re the credibility of the liars to people who are emotionally wedded to the Ruling Class Establishment institutions. They want to keep talking about these institutions and people as if there were something serious to gain from it. To me, it's like trying to tell them I don't find anything the spirit cooking lady says about, say, Ayn Rand's fiction credible to people who do, and who regularly consume art made with semen, blood and honey. If they want to consume that art, that's their business. But I want nothing to do with it and
    1 point
  4. Our Great and Dear President Trump is reminding the Democrats of the last time they threw a big tantrum, but still lost their slaves (and new nation.) He is discussing giving his acceptance speech at Gettsyburg, where the battle which ended that tantrum took place.
    1 point
  5. But Michael, some people are a certain way and liars do not turn them off. Liars are not "them" to them. They see generous liars as practicing normal exchange of ideas. They won't be offended until the liars damage them personally.
    1 point
  6. Ha! I think it's dawning on the Ruling Class Elitist Establishment Defense Crew that I actually mean this. Find other sources and experts, guys. I don't give a fuck about the ones you bow to. I'm not alone, either. And we all vote. Michael
    1 point
  7. Merlin, Of course I do. They are proven liars. Do you need a list of their lies, or are you already aware of their lies? Why on earth do you find them credible? This is horseshit. That entitles me to dismiss anything coming from those liars as propaganda, falsehoods, and garbage. Why? Because when I rely on them, I have to guess what is true and what is false. This is kinda obvious, no? Let me put it clearly in case this is difficult for you to understand. I don't listen to liars because they lie. Frankly, neither should you. But that's your
    1 point
  8. Some obviously knowledgeable people created the document at hcqtrials.com. However, “knowledgeable” does not mean honest or trustworthy. Lying and misrepresenting with lots of statistics and a very complex model is easy to do. It will be interesting to see if Rush Limbaugh does a show about the alleged massive study, or not. He has a slew of researchers and money to check it out before he pontificates. He has touted HCQ several times.
    1 point
  9. Yes, Professor Moriarty, she did. Her tweet grossly misrepresented reality by omitting pertinent, important facts.
    1 point
  10. That's fine. I'll take the HCQ.
    1 point
  11. And this. With a little luck, maybe she can get a role in a Batman movie. The Lovechild: The Daughter of Two-Face's Revenge Michael
    0 points