Restoring deleted blog comments


william.scherk

229 views

[Link to kerfufflage on the main stage] Three unfinished 'draft' blog entries had been posted into abeyance, had been put off to the future, which future was January 1 2020.  The entries were glops of quoted material (some of which contained a stupid 'turn Trump to Drumpf' JS routine) ... and I had no pertinent plan to revisit them. When I deleted them, I also deleted a number of comments that were attached to at least one of the entries. 

I had thought there was no way of saving those comments once the blog entries had been removed. However, I noticed today that my syndicated 'feed' represented at Feedreader preserved the deleted items.  Here I post a visual snapshot of six of those items.  The 'feed' only encompassed these six when I checked it today.

factGutCheck01.png

factGutCheck02.png

factGutCheck03.png

factGutCheck04.png

factGutCheck05.png

13 Comments


Recommended Comments

Deleted. Gone. No longer here, departed. Gone up country to a good home.

It was an unfinished blog entry that I failed to detect & delete during the earlier ruckus.

If only you could communicate without loaded language and personal insults ...

[Edited to add in a '&']

Edited by william.scherk
Link to comment

From a Canadian perspective, how do you consider the royal migration to Vancouver Island? Do you think it will be where they will safely stay?

Link to comment

Curious, William, I looked on the net for Vancouver Island’s climate. It rarely goes below 32 degrees F. or above 66. Peter

Today. January Climate & Weather Averages in Vancouver Island. High Temp: 47 °F Low Temp: 37 °F Mean Temp: 42 °F Precipitation: 12.26" Humidity: 90% Dew Point: 39 °F Wind: 6 mph Pressure: 29.99 "Hg Visibility: 10 mi

Little Archie will need a jacket. It seems like a decent place to live. But I would miss warmer summers. It's 41 here on Delmarva. I went outside to throw the birds some seed on our concrete driveway and I was not wearing shows but it didn't bother me  . . .  much.

Link to comment
32 minutes ago, Peter said:

From a Canadian perspective, how do you consider the royal migration to Vancouver Island?

I don't really care that much. If pressed, I'd say that something about the place appealed to the couple, and given their star-power, if they choose to maintain an Island residence, they will likely add much kaching to the economy of the region. Dollars to doughnuts. The capital city of our province is powered by tourism as well as bureaucracy ...

Quote

Do you think it will be where they will safely stay?

Vancouver, British Columbia is a major film, television and digital media production centre.  Meghan could be in the studio after a half-hour seaplane ride from the private residence ...

... one thing that stands out for me is that Canadians on the whole do not 'mob' royals. Although the international paparazzi will likely hound the couple until the end of time, I think citizens would tend to be 'protective,' let them have a private life once they have established a home for their family.

-- a few breathless news stories from our provincial outlets last month remarked upon 'ordinary folks' coming across the couple while hiking in the woods. The encounters seemed to be much ado about nothing:  we saw the Royals, we gave them space, Harry helped us with a selfie.

My mind goes back to The Duke and Duchess of Windsor.  After the abdication crisis they got a life in France.

Edited by william.scherk
Link to comment
1 hour ago, william.scherk said:

Deleted. Gone. No longer here, departed. Gone up country to a good home.

The jottings you deleted yesterday were titled "The #QAnon phenomena, as explained by various outlets and commenters".

Did you mean the plural, or do you not know that "phenomena" is plural?

Ellen

Link to comment
8 minutes ago, Ellen Stuttle said:
1 hour ago, william.scherk said:

Deleted. Gone. No longer here, departed. Gone up country to a good home.

The jottings you deleted yesterday were titled "The #QAnon phenomena, as explained by various outlets and commenters".

Did you mean the plural, or do you not know that "phenomena" is plural?

Many phenomena attend the Q phenomenon.  To my mind, Q is the ultimate boondoggle for rational inquiry. I've been directed a few times to separate "Q" from "QAnon," and I will probably make the same kind of differentiation errors.

Are you taking questions about "Q" and/or "QAnon"?

Link to comment
8 hours ago, william.scherk said:

Vancouver, British Columbia is a major film, television and digital media production centre.  Meghan could be in the studio after a half-hour seaplane ride from the private residence ...

Thank you William. I did not know that. I think my neighbors would give the Royals some space too. It would be kind of cool to be out jogging or walking and coming from the other direction are Harry with his wife and little Archie in a jogging buggy. Some more “Canadian questions?” Do you think of yourself as British in some ways? If you saw Queen Elizabeth in person would you think of her as your monarch? I know that sounds weird but I suppose I would be tongue tied if President Trump knocked on my door and asked to use the bathroom. Aye Capitan! Peter  

Notes. “As gross as ignorance made drunk.” William Shakespeare, in “Othello.”  Was The Bard thinking of Le Cockroach or Representative Adam Shitt? *(inside joke)

Link to comment
16 hours ago, william.scherk said:

Are you taking questions about "Q" and/or "QAnon"?

I don't know what to make of that.  Why would you be asking me questions "about 'Q' and/or 'QAnon'"?

Ellen

Link to comment
5 hours ago, Ellen Stuttle said:

I don't know what to make of that.  Why would you be asking me questions "about 'Q' and/or 'QAnon'"?

Ellen

He wants to save you from “the ultimate boondoggle for rational inquiry.”

But first you have to want to be saved.

Link to comment
On 1/30/2020 at 1:05 PM, william.scherk said:

If only you could communicate without loaded language and personal insults ...

I am not sure how. Is it done like you did to Jonathan and Ellen recently? Implying they were illiterate, unread, unaware of your pet scientists, if they haven’t read your favorite book? Is that how one refrains from using loaded language, Shitbag?

Link to comment

Or should i call you an asshole, as you did Jonathan for, for, what did he do?

Oh, I remember, he repeated his legitimate scientific questions.

So, when I am asked legitimate questions, I call the questioner an asshole?

Is that how I can be a Superior Human like you, Shit-for-Brains?

Link to comment
On 1/30/2020 at 3:39 PM, william.scherk said:

Vancouver, British Columbia is a major film, television and digital media production centre.  Meghan could be in the studio after a half-hour seaplane ride from the private residence

Harry and Meghan are dropping the title “Royal.” Henceforth they shall be called “Roils.” Their new line of fine Canadian Whiskey shall be named “Crown Roil.”

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now