Message added by william.scherk

For a ground-floor view of the phenomena of QAnon ... including the gestation of 'Watkins-Q-kun':


william.scherk

12,731 views

Credence and interest in the QAnon phenomena  

3 members have voted

  1. 1. Which choice best represents your interest in the QAnon phenomenon

    • Uninterested
      2
    • Interested, but skeptical
      1
    • I already know what I know
      0
    • None of your business. I don't declare my interests
      0
    • "Don't bother to examine a folly ... "
      0
    • I'd be interested in an objective analysis of the phenomena
      0
    • I will explain everything in a guest post here, if given the opportunity
      0

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 12/02/2018 at 02:32 AM

I'd like to open a field of discussion for the QAnon phenomena.  Here is where I will post in already existing material presented at OL by members.  I'll take direction from comments and from poll answers. 

  • What is Q / QAnon?
  • Why should anyone on OL pay attention?
  • Is skepticism justified?
  • What are the main questions readers have in mind to guide discussion?

No special rules or guidelines for this thread; the OL guidelines are good enough and will apply here. .  Please keep personal abuse to a minimum. Creative insults are kosher, but if they aren't on topic, why post them?

hr

Our forum leader opened discussion on the phenomena back in January of this year.  My key-word search-term was "QAnon,"  not "Q," so the search results will not necessarily return all incidence of discussion touching on the phenomena.

On 1/3/2018 at 4:10 AM, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

[...] If you really want to go down a Rabbit Hole where anti-deep state magic happens for real, look into "QAnon."

I will post a thing about him later, probably in a new thread or on the Conspiracy Theory thread. He's been spot on accurate predicting a lot of recent happenings right before they happen. More recently he's been doing some twittering and he seems to like hamming it up a bit, so here are a few teasers:

 

And this:

 

 

And this:

 

 

And this:

 

 

:)

 

More coming...

 

584 Comments


Recommended Comments



40 minutes ago, william.scherk said:

There will likely be a new crop of people at the September 13 Washington DC rally. 

William,

You can count on it.

FBI infiltrators who actively entrapped people who would not have otherwise broken the law (mostly due to sheer incompetence since the people targeted for entrapment are generally young and dumb) have already been busted for the Gov. Whitmer kidnapping attempt. I believe it was 12 FBI such infiltrators out of the 18 involved. And many such infiltrators have already been busted for the capitol rally mess on Jan. 6 while many more are being busted right now.

In other words, the Deep State has blown many of its undercover agents who are willing to make crime happen and participate in it rather then stop crime from happening, but I have no doubt the Deep State has a lot more agents in the wings salivating to go undercover and who have sold out their integrity as law enforcement agents long ago.

So I expect a new crop of those.

And, of course, there will be the members of Antifa, BLM and so on who are paid to instigate violence. There will likely be a new crop among those, too.

Incidentally, around MAGA-ville, this is a drumbeat. They are telling people to not allow themselves to be set up and be wary of anyone promoting violence or crime. Such promoters will probably be from the FBI or some other alphabet soup agency.

:) 

Michael

Link to comment

One of the main organizers of the September 18 demonstration in DC is Matt Braynard. His YouTube channel is Matt Braynard - YouTube

In this upload, Braynard has some requests of assemblees on how to peacefully interact with any law enforcement attending.

On Twitter:

Who is Matt Braynard?

Spoiler

At a #FreePoliticalPrisoners meeting on July 14th sponsored by Braynard's "Look Ahead America" in Arizona, a number of 'election integrity' voices were heard, on the screen and on the stage live -- including such luminaries as Paul Gosar.

Jacob Chansley's status at the time was a great concern. I've cued up the video to the part where Chansley's case was covered at the event:

 

 

Edited by william.scherk
Link to comment

William,

With that lineup, now you are in the ballpark.

I wouldn't rely on the HBO propaganda series, though. Granted, I haven't seen it. But going by the comments on YouTube, it's at a Minstrel Show level about Q followers.

Entertainment for retarded bigots. 

:)

Michael

Link to comment
19 hours ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

I wouldn't rely on the HBO propaganda series, though. Granted, I haven't seen it.

Granted.  Although ...

On 8/27/2021 at 9:58 AM, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

Well how can one identify something at all, much less correctly, if he never sees it?

Yes..

19 hours ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

But going by the comments on YouTube, it's at a Minstrel Show level about Q followers.

Entertainment for retarded bigots. 

Bigot: a person who is obstinately or unreasonably attached to a belief, opinion, or faction, especially one who is prejudiced against or antagonistic toward a person or people on the basis of their membership of a particular group.

Link to comment
19 minutes ago, william.scherk said:

Bigot: a person who is obstinately or unreasonably attached to a belief, opinion, or faction, especially one who is prejudiced against or antagonistic toward a person or people on the basis of their membership of a particular group.

William,

Exactly.

Trump Derangement Syndrome, ergo MAGA Derangement Syndrome, fits this perfectly.

You make a mistake, though, in thinking that one must see ONLY one thing and one thing only to be able to evaluate it.

One can look at the products and views of a person or organization over years, detect a strong bias, then see a new product come out featuring the very thing they are biased against, then make an educated guess that this is more of the same old shit.

In other words, "never sees it" is not quite accurate if one has seen the same people produce the same bigotry over years.

Having HBO do a documentary on QAnon is akin to having David Duke do a history of African-American achievements in the world.

Would you want to watch that for information?

If one were black, would a black person really have to look at that shit in order to be informed of what being black means?

Duke has made it clear where he stands about blacks over years.

Ditto for HBO. And this is reinforced by the comments to the documentary, which are nothing but sniggering and mocking Q people.

You get your information from there if you wish. I have better things to do.

I don't want to watch propaganda by bigots and call that information.

Michael

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment

Not too surprising, but. Ron Watkins has signalled his intention to run for a congressional seat in Arizona. It's not clear if he will be able to establish residency ...

 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now