"In the matter of Q"

Credence and interest in the QAnon phenomena  

3 members have voted

This poll is closed to new votes
  1. 1. Which choice best represents your interest in the QAnon phenomenon

    • Uninterested
    • Interested, but skeptical
    • I already know what I know
    • None of your business. I don't declare my interests
    • "Don't bother to examine a folly ... "
    • I'd be interested in an objective analysis of the phenomena
    • I will explain everything in a guest post here, if given the opportunity

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 12/02/2018 at 02:32 AM

I'd like to open a field of discussion for the QAnon phenomena.  Here is where I will post in already existing material presented at OL by members.  I'll take direction from comments and from poll answers. 

  • What is Q / QAnon?
  • Why should anyone on OL pay attention?
  • Is skepticism justified?
  • What are the main questions readers have in mind to guide discussion?

No special rules or guidelines for this thread; the OL guidelines are good enough and will apply here. .  Please keep personal abuse to a minimum. Creative insults are kosher, but if they aren't on topic, why post them?


Our forum leader opened discussion on the phenomena back in January of this year.  My key-word search-term was "QAnon,"  not "Q," so the search results will not necessarily return all incidence of discussion touching on the phenomena.

On 1/3/2018 at 4:10 AM, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

[...] If you really want to go down a Rabbit Hole where anti-deep state magic happens for real, look into "QAnon."

I will post a thing about him later, probably in a new thread or on the Conspiracy Theory thread. He's been spot on accurate predicting a lot of recent happenings right before they happen. More recently he's been doing some twittering and he seems to like hamming it up a bit, so here are a few teasers:


And this:



And this:



And this:





More coming...



Recommended Comments


Q started posting again.

Billy, why couldn’t all you losers stop the pimply kid in his mom’s basement?

And did I see right that 8Kun where Q posts is or was routed through a Dept of Defense server? That kid in his mom’s basement is really something else again, no?

Q posts:



Share this comment

Link to comment
22 hours ago, Jon Letendre said:

Just yesterday Q posted an interesting fact about the Ukrainian State: It is the largest donor to the Clinton Foundation.

What drop number was it?

For general readers -- Qmap.pub has extended its features ... many Q drops have been augmented with extra information compiled and analyzed by whoever runs that site. Eg, 


Fact-checking needed?

Share this comment

Link to comment

So you would rather post about an 1800’s movement than about Q, in your Q thread.

Not publish each and every post like you have for years?

Have all you idiots finally grasped the reality of Q?

You get now that he is both real and systematically helping take down all your heroes, don’t you?

It seems you finally do.

Share this comment

Link to comment
Testing an easier way to add in Q-drops. Previously I took screen-captures of Qmap items one by one, then uploaded them, then posted them, then added link attributes pointing to the actual drop on (previously) 8chan.net.  Since the 'new' Q server is on an unreliable and often-unreachable channel of the facelifted 8kun, and since Qmap has now added extra editorial material, it's easier for a lazy person like me to simply copy text/HTML snips from Qmap ...
This is the experiment. Unfortunately for Q-enthusiasts, there is no way to reach 8kun through Qmap or from these drop-copies below. While 8chan was still functional, Qmap featured embedded links to the particular drop ... but cannot do that now as the 8Kun hosting services are a mess. When you try to get to the original ... 
Coordinated and planned?
Puppets have masters.
Senate was the target.

[Q #3620]

Publicly known?
Think non_public.
Access granted.


[Q #3619]
/pf/ was taken down [cleared of content] just prior to platform TERM [specific reason].
NAT SEC [charter] prevents use of 'keys' to establish IDEN via public utility/domain - non_reg.
Formation of 'clean' board possible to lock in trip(s) > issues w/ safeguards.

Fredrick Brennan finds the handwaving and excuses hilarious and inept. 

The Qmap site has sharing links embedded. This is an example of what a lazy-man's Qdrop to OL could look like, if anyone at all is interested. The headline is from whoever manages the code at Qmap -- "Vindictive Vindman ..." is a editorial gloss. 

-- if you click the meat of the Tweet above, you get sent to an individual Qmap posting, with even more editorial material added: 


Edited by william.scherk
  • Haha 1

Share this comment

Link to comment

Penultimate. Trap gun slogan [OBS]. Think thank thunk.

One hour of old glory as touted by the mysterious entity ... this does not seem like Q-level insider knowledge.  They may need to get caffeinated and a bit blasted on marijuana, to clear away the staleness and low energy.


  • Haha 1

Share this comment

Link to comment

I remember BB was not happy with my little joke that spelled "the jews" as "the juice." Joos is a similar misspelling. I think one of the funniest fictional names ever is "Henny Penny." Is that from some children's story? I forget. Ms Money Penny, are you free tonight? Sorry James. I am watching you right now in "Indiana Jones and The Last Crusade." You look older.  

Share this comment

Link to comment

"Fuck off, pedophile." 

The QAnon movement is chockful of anti-semitic garbage -- based on the wildest bullshit peddled by the Q-collective itself. If the correspondent wasn't so opposed to reason, he'd figure that one out on his own.



Edited by william.scherk
  • Haha 1

Share this comment

Link to comment

Your identity as a pedophile does not make me a bigot, try again.

Why the controversy around this, why are you offended?

If someone can be counted on to consistently disparage right thinking and defend rationalism, what do we call them? We say they look like rationalists, it looks like  they support rationalism.

And that’s what you did for years, Billyboy lover. You laughed at and mocked those who tell the truth about abuse. You even did this with uncontested totally factual disclosures of abuse.

You, and several others who did the same thing here, don’t do it so much nowadays. But you and they did. You made yourselves obvious. Don’t blame me.

Apologize for your past and move on. Stop living, stewing in the past. Stop bringing back the memory of your pedophilia supportive behavior, which is all that is accomplished when you remind us of your identity.

Work and fight and argue for good for once,  become different, and you will get called different names, is how it works.

Share this comment

Link to comment
16 minutes ago, Jon Letendre said:

Your identity as a pedophile does not make me a bigot, try again.

Why the controversy around this, why are you offended?

This is a stupid, ugly question. The accusation you slop around is utterly without warrant.  That you repeat this accusation casually is on your head, Jon.  A malicious repetition of disgusting charges poisons this forum, which you might understand were you not an unreasoning lunatic. You seem proud of this smear, which is also disgusting.

You reap what you sow ... 

Edited by william.scherk
  • Haha 1

Share this comment

Link to comment
1 hour ago, william.scherk said:

The QAnon movement is chockful of anti-semitic garbage -- based on the wildest bullshit peddled by the Q-collective itself. If the correspondent wasn't so opposed to reason, he'd figure that one out on his own.

I haven’t seen it, but will take your word for it.

I read Q and he implores us to love each other, think for ourselves and fight for what is right. Q has never deviated from this ethos. Q has never peddled any bigotry of any kind whatsoever.

I recommend you stop stewing with racists and bigots who say they like Q and

try the people I have recommended here for years. They are women, independent journalists, retired Air Force, authors, medics, gay men:







Share this comment

Link to comment

Now that you have said when you started doing it,

answer the question, Shit-for-Brains Bigot: Why do you continue using disparaging, belittling terms “The Joo” “The Juice” years after OL member Jews voiced their offense?

Share this comment

Link to comment
On 12/8/2019 at 2:43 PM, william.scherk said:

But yeah, let's trust the anonymous Q source who posts to racist lair of scumbags run by a pigfarmer.

"Objectivism, anyone?"

Man, you are funny as hell.

Where else could we be lectured on adhereing to Objectivism by an unusually dumb leftist who hates us and hates Rand and Objectivism?

I used to hunt pheasant and quail in Nebraska. I talked business for hours with locals in their lunch counters in town. Hogs are big business. The installations are modern, industrial-scale. They are enormous facilities that generate enormous cash flow. It has been very competitive for decades. The people still at it are so because of their high business acumen. He is probably enormously intelligent and wealthy.

You just hate him because he is helping expose the evil of your side.

You hate him because he is helping, in his spare time, to take down all your corrupt, fascist political heroes.

You hate him because all your fascist friends who tried to stop him could not stop him.

You hate him because you lost to him, again.

What’s so cute about you is how dumb you are in saying he is a stupid pig farmer, because all it means is that you and all your genius friends cannot prevail against one stupid pig farmer.

  • Like 1

Share this comment

Link to comment

Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.