Sessions, leaks, security, Manafort and 'false news.'


william.scherk

4,261 views

Six fun (sad/awful/false/infuriating) stories emerged from the swamp in the last couple of days. Peter Taylor noted elsewhere on the site some vows made by Attorney-General Jeff Sessions on the issue of "leaks."  Some of the usual suspects have pretended that this is a "Threat" against the noble profession of prostitution journalism.

The strongest or least-false coverage of this issue from that point of view may be from font of evul Politico ... in a story called Jeff Sessions' Attack on the Media Is Worse Than You Think.  Of course, Objectivist analysis might find that the threat is more than necessary, and that it will encourage a proper "chilling effect." Less clear is the notion of "Lie Detectors" (in the White House). Polygraphs are a useful investigative tool, but not accepted by US courts on the whole. 

Less intrusive than a lie detector is the power to subpoena ... but see the story for all the convolutions. (one stand-out point was that it is relatively rare for journalist-itutes to be prosecuted or held in contempt for refusing to reveal sources [think Judith Miller]; the Politico story points out that the four arrested cited-but-not-cited by Sessions were not recipients but those who had purloined secret and often highly-classified 'spy' entrails from the DC borg.)

*********************************

The second story circulating is that Robert Mueller has impaneled a grand jury in Washington, DC.  This may or may not be true -- even though everyone and the dog has been biting on the "news." I do not know if this would become public in the normal course of justice.

The third story is that President Trump is a lazy do-nothing, who spends far too much time at his golf clubs ... instantiated in a nasty Newsweek cover.

The fourth story is related to the Mueller grand jury suggestion ... this excerpt is from the brief Slate article "U.S. Reportedly Intercepted Suspected Russian Agents' Chatter That Manafort Asked for Their Help With Clinton:

Quote

Buried in a long story on CNN Thursday recapping the current state of play in the Russia investigation was a reminder that former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, who is largely out of the spotlight at the moment, may not be for long. Manafort, who had spent years on the political fringes helping dictators and strongmen get elected around the world and then lobbying on their behalf in Washington, came out of nowhere to join the Trump campaign, and then take over the reins when Cory Lewandowski was fired in June 2016. By that time, unusual communications between the Trump campaign and Russian officials had pinged on U.S. intelligence agencies’ radar. As did Trump’s new right hand man.

In the summer of 2016, US intelligence agencies noticed a spate of curious contacts between Trump campaign associates and suspected Russian intelligence, according to current and former US officials briefed on the investigation… CNN has learned that investigators became more suspicious when they turned up intercepted communications that U.S. intelligence agencies collected among suspected Russian operatives discussing their efforts to work with Manafort, who served as campaign chairman for three months, to coordinate information that could damage Hillary Clinton's election prospects, the US officials say. The suspected operatives relayed what they claimed were conversations with Manafort, encouraging help from the Russians.

There are obviously multiple investigative balls in the air, and the public focus has shifted of late to Donald Trump Jr. and Jared Kushner, who certainly have had longer and more lasting influence on Donald Trump, but keep an eye on Paul Manafort, his Russia connections are deep and dodgy.

Update, Aug. 4, 2017: Jason Maloni, a spokesman for Manafort, issued this statement on the latest round of accusations: “Paul Manafort did not collude with the Russian government to undermine the 2016 election or to hack the DNC. Other than that comment, we aren't going to respond to anonymous officials illegally peddling second hand conspiracy theories.  But the Justice Department, and the courts if necessary, should hold someone to account for the flood of unlawful government leaks targeting Mr. Manafort."

Manafort was the first somewhat hinky part of the Trump campaign and influence apparat to appear in posts here on OL, back a year and more ago.  It's not surprising that Mueller would request documents and testimony from the Manafort axis.  It isn't that he was a tool of Russia or an obvious go-between, but that he could have been a major conduit for the wink-wink quid pro quo that the crazy Russia conspiracists are certain is going to be found.

Did Mr Manafort wink-nudge the Trump attitude that 'we take help from where it comes, given that politics  is a dirty dirty game'? I mean, isn't the essential question reduced to who promised what in return?  

I take the tentative position that Trump's stated positions on Russia during the campaign and since being in office are obvious. So it will be exceedingly hard to show him 'promising' things on the down low, since he did it on the stump. Then, if he was inclined to reduce sanctions bite on Russia and to warm things up between the superpower and the also-ran, it was open and public.  Which requires that underlings and satellites were going to be the ones dealing with the details of wink-wink, nudge-nudge. If you are a Menshist, or not.

(the more hysterical of the Russia hoopla employees and hobbyists are those who think every rumour is true, every leak informs the big picture. So the Flynn Effect [very pro-Russia relax] and other fizz from the week means Russian "information warfare" was coordinated. Which is alarmist nonsense, right?)

*************************************

The fifth story is about vacation-time, but in this instance taken by the manly President of Russia. Here's a sample:

GettyImages-826469374-1024x683.jpg

The sixth story is as usual performed by two casts, in two theatres. In the permutations, a Cernovich wing in the White House leaks out a broad range of accusations against Trump's National Security Adviser Lt. General HR McMaster -- that he is a tool of Soros/Rothschilds/Saudis, an enemy of Israel, and ever-so Swamp-Like that his hideous influence must be extirpated from Cabinet.

Two guys come shambling up the alley. First guy looks like Steve Bannon, the second guy looks like  McMaster, and the guy with McMaster is brown and in a turban**. Which one would you ask out on a date/for help?  Which one is leaking to the Washington Post, or -- as this week -- to Cernovich-Breitbart-Gateway Pundit?

I think there is a mini-war of ideas in the White House, which slops over into a war of words and Grand Hoopla Theatre in the mediatic multiplex. But what do I know. I am that guy who wrote "Why Donald Trump lost the election." 

 

Spoiler
i11.jpgshare.png Amir Tibon / Haaretz:
Far-right Bannon Affiliates Attack McMaster for Being ‘Controlled by Jews’ and ‘Hostile to Israel’  —  Campaign against McMaster intensified after he fired a number of mid-level officials from the National Security Council, who were considered loyal to Bannon and to the former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn
RELATED:
share.png Julia Manchester / The Hill: 
Trump defends McMaster in wake of criticism on the right
Discussion:

Incidentally, as a bonus seventh story -- did you know that obsessive humans do such things as rigorously analyze Twitter accounts that peddle the Kremlin lines of attack?

Yes you did, but did you know that PR and political attack campaigns have a particular 'footprint' or pattern? Of course you did, so it won't be a surprise that there is a website that tracks real-time information-warfare memes and their flows in Kremlin-friendly orbit. If you squint and pretend to be Louise Mensch, yesterday's peak trends like the Cernovich Leaks from the angry West Wingers about McMaster were coordinated with a robust 'managed news' campaign directed by the drunk guy in the alley. See if you can find your favourites bot link or alt-news site here. I add a screenshot of the crazy site, but first an intro from the feverish topic ends of Twitter.

 

__________________________

* I am picturing Harjit Sajjan, who rarely togs out in his Commander outfit, but still. Who doesn't feel safer when a turbaned Sikh gets on the bus?  I would think Bannon was a drunk, and McMaster probably a loud talker. Which makes me think how many more generals should join the Trump cabinet and administrative apparatus.

102 Comments


Recommended Comments



On 11/2/2017 at 4:32 PM, william.scherk said:
On 8/20/2017 at 11:17 AM, Ann Coulter said:

Coulter added that it was Kushner, along with former Goldman Sachs executive Gary Cohn and national security adviser Gen. H.R. McMaster, who finally got Bannon’s scalp and are probably targeting Conway and Miller as well.

-- I don't buy this, although it might be partially true. In the CBS interview in September, Steve Bannon was very complimentary regarding Jared Kushner:

If Coulter is right, then I am wrong indeed -- if I thought Bannon was being fully forthcoming about Jared Kushner, a new Gabriel Sherman article at Vanity Fair puts paid to that thought.  “I HAVE POWER”: IS STEVE BANNON RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT?

Sherman traveled with Bannon during his last Asian trip, and comes up with some pretty ferocious non-complimentary quotes. 

Any chance of Bannon and Kushner salvaging a working relationship collapsed over Kushner’s role in the decision that many see as the possible linchpin of Trump’s downfall. In early May, Bannon and Kushner tangled over Trump’s plan to fire F.B.I. director James Comey.

Over the weekend of May 6 and 7, Bannon was in Washington when Kushner, Ivanka, and Stephen Miller accompanied Trump to his golf club in Bedminster, New Jersey, where the decision to fire Comey was finalized. The White House announced Comey’s dismissal on the afternoon of Tuesday, May 9. Bannon was furious when he found out. “It’s the dumbest political decision in modern political history, bar none. A self-inflicted wound of massive proportions,” he later said. “Especially in light of recent news, for the country, the president’s best decision was firing James Comey. His second best decision was firing Steve Bannon, bar none,” a White House official said.

Bannon believed the Russia collusion case was meritless, but he blamed Kushner for taking meetings during the campaign that gave the appearance the Trump team sought Putin’s help. “He’s taking meetings with Russians to get additional stuff. This tells you everything about Jared,” Bannon told me. “They were looking for the picture of Hillary Clinton taking the bag of cash from Putin. That’s his maturity level.”

 

steve-bannon-presidential-candidate-embe

Link to comment

There is a book coming out January 9 -- Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House -- by Michael Wolff.  Excerpts have appeared in the UK Guardian, as well as in New York magazine.  Wolff has a good/bad reputation among his writerly peers -- a good writer, a bad reporter. But it seems he was given a pass to the White House last year. 

The headlines right now are of a type:  'Treason! Sez Bannon.'  But of interest to the Q-Anon fan club here is the reaction of President Trump to the Bannon quotes in the excerpts ...

Yikes. 

For the curious only, the buffet of high hoopla via Memeorandum.com:

Spoiler
 TOP ITEMS: 
i23.jpgshare.png David Smith / The Guardian:
Trump Tower meeting with Russians ‘treasonous’, Bannon says in explosive book … Donald Trump's former chief strategist Steve Bannon has described the Trump Tower meeting between the president's son and a group of Russians during the 2016 election campaign as “treasonous” and “unpatriotic” …
Discussion:
David A. Graham / The Atlantic:   The President vs. Steve Bannon
RELATED:
i53.jpgshare.png Michael Wolff / New York Magazine:
Donald Trump Didn't Want to Be President  —  One year ago: the plan to lose, and the administration's shocked first days.  —  Election Night: It “looked as if he had seen a ghost.”  —  On the afternoon of November 8, 2016, Kellyanne Conway settled into her glass office at Trump Tower.
Discussion:
i49.jpgshare.png Jonathan Swan / Axios:
Steve Bannon touches the third rail of Trumpworld  —  Steve Bannon gave an interview to author Michael Wolff that is jaw dropping — even by Bannon's extreme standards.  —  Why this matters: Bannon's comments won't surprise anyone who's spoken to him, but as on the record statements they are shocking sources close to the president.
Discussion:
Matthew Nussbaum / Politico:   Today in Trumpworld — Jan. 3
i65.jpgshare.png Rebecca Savransky / The Hill:
New book: Rupert Murdoch called Trump a ‘f—ing idiot’  —  Rupert Murdoch once called President Trump  —  a “f—ing idiot” according to an excerpt of “Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House,” by Michael Wolff, that was published by New York Magazine on Wednesday.
i60.jpgshare.png Breitbart:
Book: Steve Bannon Calls Kushner, Manafort, Don Jr. Trump Tower Meeting with Russians ‘Treasonous’  —  Former Trump Chief Strategist Steve Bannon describes Don Trump Jr., Jared Kushner, and Paul Manafort's infamous Trump Tower meeting with Russians during the 2016 campaign as “unpatriotic” …
i48.jpgshare.png Maegan Vazquez / CNN:
Bannon: 2016 Trump Tower meeting was ‘treasonous’  —  STORY HIGHLIGHTS  — The book, “Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House” by Michael Wolff, is based on hundreds of interviews  — Bannon also reportedly told Wolff: “They're going to crack Don Junior like an egg on national TV”
Link to comment

Regarding the Michael Wolff book ...

23 hours ago, william.scherk said:

But of interest to the Q-Anon fan club here is the reaction of President Trump

... or at least the reaction of President Trump's lawyers. According to the Gateway Pundit's Jim Hoft (quoting a story at ABC News):

BREAKING: Trump Lawyers Send Cease and Desist Letter to Steve Bannon (VIDEO)
President Donald Trump’s lawyer sent a cease and desist letter to former Chief Strategist Steve Bannon on Wednesday night.

A portion of a statement from Charles J. Harder, as reported in a variety of outlets:

"This law firm represents President Donald J. Trump and Donald J. Trump for President, Inc. On behalf of our clients, legal notice was issued today to Stephen K. Bannon, that his actions of communicating with author Michael Wolff regarding an upcoming book give rise to numerous legal claims including defamation by libel and slander, and breach of his written confidentiality and non-disparagement agreement with our clients. Legal action is imminent.”

Harder also signed a legal demand letter to both Wolff and his publisher (full text PDF here) -- directing the author and publisher to immediately stop any publication of the book or excepts and commentary. Relevant portions:

trumpDemandletter01.pngtrumpDemandletter01a.png

-- see also the FoxNews report by Alex Pappas: Trump demands publisher stop release of book that caused Bannon fallout

Link to comment

An article from The Hill (here) said (bolds are mine),

Breitbart News chairman Stephen Bannon on Wednesday was about to issue a statement praising Donald Trump Jr. and disputing his quotes in a book from Michael Wolff, but the statement was spiked after President Trump went nuclear on his former chief strategist.

Multiple sources with knowledge of the situation say that Bannon’s aides sought to impress upon him the need to put out a statement quickly. The aides had crafted a statement, which was pending Bannon’s approval, when the White House beat him to the punch. 

In the unreleased statement, Bannon had planned to call Trump Jr. a patriot and dispute the account in Wolff’s book, "Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House," in which Bannon described Trump Jr. as “treasonous” and “unpatriotic” for setting up a 2016 meeting at Trump Tower with a Russian lawyer. 

Bannon and his allies did not see a need to release the statement once Trump accused his former top campaign aide of having “lost his mind.” They believe the president’s statement effectively ended the relationship between the two men. 

“He was literally just about to respond but backed off when the White House issued the statement,” said one source.

Bannon had a lengthy window to respond after the book excerpt was first released early Wednesday morning. It was a missed opportunity for Bannon, as the statement might have been enough to salvage his relationship with the president, those close to the Breitbart News chairman say.

[...]

And The Washington Post has reported that the wealthy conservative donors Robert and Rebekah Mercer are furious with Bannon and choking him off financially. Rebekah Mercer owns the majority stake in Breitbart News, Bannon’s flagship conservative publication. 

[...]

Now, Trump and his allies are looking at ways to discredit Wolff, alleging that he misquoted them, made-up scenes and broke agreements that events he attended and information he was given would remain off the record.

A personal lawyer for the president has threatened to sue Bannon, Wolff and the book’s publisher and demanding that the book release be canceled.

There could be more efforts like that from others close to Trump.

“We are going to tie him up in litigation for years, until he’s spent more on legal fees than he makes on the book,” said one person quoted in the book.

------------------

Of course, Bannon is a sleaze and I don't believe a word that he was ever going to release a counter statement to the book.  Perhaps this article is a first glimpse of a defense by him.

Link to comment

Meanwhile, in Luciferian pedophile news, would you believe the Department of Justice is investigating the Clinton Foundation? 

clintonF01.png

Because ...

12 hours ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

After all, there's lots of buzz about Gitmo and the deep state these days. Sessions going after pot. New Clinton investigations. God knows what else. And all the media wants to talk about is Wolff's book and Bannon.

Gitmo! The Storm! Dots!

Spoiler
share.png Mike Allen / Axios:
The Wolff lines on Trump that ring unambiguously true  —  There are definitely parts of Michael Wolff's “Fire and Fury” that are wrong, sloppy, or betray off-the-record confidence.  But there are two things he gets absolutely right, even in the eyes of White House officials …
RELATED:
i7.jpgshare.png Sarah Rumpf / RedState:
Furious Trump Fires Off Tweet With New Nickname for Bannon  —  President Donald Trump seems absolutely furious about the upcoming Michael Wolff book, Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House, and he's making sure everyone knows it, firing off another tweet not only attacking the book …
Discussion:
i64.jpgshare.png Kimberly Leonard / Washington Examiner:
Michael Wolff: Trump had little interest in repealing Obamacare, floated ‘Medicare for All’  —  A book detailing the first year of President Trump's time in office claims he floated the idea of covering all Americans through Medicare and had little interest in repealing Obamacare.
i116.jpgshare.png Rosalind S. Helderman / Washington Post:
Mercer issues rare public rebuke of former ally Bannon  —  Stephen K. Bannon's main financial backer is formally cutting ties with the former Trump adviser.  —  In a new statement Thursday, billionaire conservative donor Rebekah Mercer said that she has not spoken to Bannon …
Discussion:
share.png Michelle Goldberg / New York Times: 
Everyone in Trumpworld Knows He's an Idiot
Discussion:
Edited by william.scherk
Link to comment

Sometimes appreciating the vast splendour of reality depends on your angle and focus of view.

12 hours ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

Now the mainstream media, which should be salivating for the next 6 months over Wolff's book and quoting it ad nauseum, is starting to pull out. They don't care that it is fake news. Not really. So why?

Pull out?  Maybe yes, maybe no. In the meantime, the totally stable genius helps out with book sales.

Spoiler
share.png David Frum / The Atlantic:
Donald Trump Goes Full Fredo  —  “I can handle things.  I'm smart!  Not like everybody says, like dumb.  I'm smart and I want respect!”  —  This morning's presidential Twitter outburst recalls those words of Fredo Corleone's in one of the most famous scenes from The Godfather series.
RELATED:
i14.jpgshare.png Daniella Diaz / CNN:
Trump: I'm a ‘very stable genius’  —  STORY HIGHLIGHTS  —  Washington (CNN)President Donald Trump slammed reports questioning his mental stability in a series of tweets Saturday morning, writing he's a “very stable genius.”  —  “Now that Russian collusion, after one year of intense study …
Discussion:
John Hinderaker / Power Line:   Trump, the Genius of Twitter
i11.jpgshare.png David Nakamura / Washington Post:
Trump boasts that he's ‘like, really smart’ and a ‘very stable genius’ amid questions over his mental fitness  —  President Trump continued to defend himself in the wake of a new book that suggests top White House aides feared he was unfit for the job.  —  In a tweetstorm Saturday morning …
Discussion:
Betty Cracker / Balloon Juice:   25th for 45 (Open Thread)
i17.jpgshare.png William Schomberg / Reuters:
Trump book author says his revelations will bring down U.S. president  —  LONDON (Reuters) - The author of a book that is highly critical of Donald Trump's first year as U.S. president said his revelations were likely to bring an end to Trump's time in the White House.
i16.jpgshare.png Alicia Cohn / The Hill:
‘Fire and Fury’ author predicts his book will help end Trump's presidency  —  Michael Wolff, the author of a controversial new book about President Trump  —  's White House, said Saturday that his book is creating “the perception and the understanding that will finally end ... this presidency.”
i15.jpgshare.png Michael Tackett / New York Times: 
Trump Defends His Mental Capacity, Calling Himself a ‘Genius’
Discussion:

What struck me in excerpts from the book (noted above**) was a passage that suggested President Trump "doesn't read." At first glance this seems crazy -- of course he reads. He reads his speeches, he reads documents presented to him in the course of a workday -- and who  has not seen images or video of him marking up pages from newspapers or magazines?  He reads. He might watch a hell of a lot of TV, but he definitely reads†.

But ...  see David A Graham's "The President Who Doesn't Read" published yesterday at the Atlantic.  

President Totally Stable Genius may not be a 'big reader,' but has that ever stood in his way?

Here's what Wolff's book (Number one best-seller at Amazon) said, from the excerpt published at New York Magazine:

As soon as the campaign team had stepped into the White House, Walsh saw, it had gone from managing Trump to the expectation of being managed by him. Yet the president, while proposing the most radical departure from governing and policy norms in several generations, had few specific ideas about how to turn his themes and vitriol into policy. And making suggestions to him was deeply complicated. Here, arguably, was the central issue of the Trump presidency, informing every aspect of Trumpian policy and leadership: He didn’t process information in any conventional sense. He didn’t read. He didn’t really even skim. Some believed that for all practical purposes he was no more than semi-­literate. He trusted his own expertise ­— no matter how paltry or irrelevant — more than anyone else’s. He was often confident, but he was just as often paralyzed, less a savant than a figure of sputtering and dangerous insecurities, whose instinctive response was to lash out and behave as if his gut, however confused, was in fact in some clear and forceful way telling him what to do. It was, said Walsh, “like trying to figure out what a child wants.”

_______________________________

** see also a breathless article from the UK's Independent, "Fire and Fury summary: All the most explosive moments in new book from inside Trump's White House."

† from an Axios tale, Trump 101: What he reads and watches:

He's not a book guy: In fact, some advisers say they don't recall seeing him read one or even talking about one beyond his own, "The Art of the Deal." And, as he told us, he's not one for long reports or detailed briefings. One page usually suffices. Bullet points are even better. But he does consume — often in huge doses — lots of traditional media.

"He's an analog guy," one top adviser told us, saying he never sees the boss on a computer or using his phone for anything but calls. 

The president's media diet:

When Trump was in the tower, he got hard copies of the N.Y. Times and N.Y. Post (which a friend calls "the paper of record for him" — he especially studies Page Six). He "skims The Wall Street Journal," the friend said. No Washington Post, although friends assume he'll add it now. He had started skipping the other New York tab, the Daily News, because he thought it treated him shabbily.

Trump knows specific bylines in the papers and when he's interviewed by a reporter, he can recite how the reporter has treated him over the years, even in previous jobs.
Before the campaign, his aides subscribed to an electronic clipping service that flagged any mention of his name, then his staff printed out the key articles. He'll scroll through Twitter, but he doesn't surf the web himself.

With an allergy to computers and phones, he works the papers. With a black Sharpie in hand, he marks up the Times or other printed stories. When he wants action or response, he scrawls the staffers' names on that paper and either hands the clip to them in person, or has a staffer create a PDF of it — with handwritten commentary — and email it to them. An amazed senior adviser recently pulled out his phone to show us a string of the emailed PDFs, all demanding response. It was like something from the early 90s. Even when he gets worked up enough to tweet, Trump told us in our interview he will often simply dictate it, and let his staff hit "send" on Twitter.

Most mornings, Trump flicks on the TV and watches "Morning Joe," often for long periods of time, sometimes interrupted with texts to the hosts or panelists. After the 6 a.m. hour of "Joe," he's often on to "Fox & Friends" by 7 a.m., with a little CNN before or after. He also catches the Sunday shows, especially "Meet the Press." "The shows," as he calls them, often provoke his tweets. The day of our interview with him, all of his tweet topics were discussed during the first two hours of "Morning Joe."

"60 Minutes" is usually on his DVR. "He's so old-school that he thinks it's awesome to go on '60 Minutes," a friend said. "He loves being one of Barbara Walters' '10 Most Fascinating People' of the year." Before Trump ran, a staple that he watched every weeknight was Billy Bush's "Access Hollywood." Same with Time Magazine. His office and hotels are full of framed copies of him on the cover.

Why this matters: Trump has been hooked on coverage, especially of himself, since the glory days of the New York tabloids, when he would happily leak details about his affairs and business deals. He can't quit it. So the notion he will surrender the remote, or Twitter, or his grievances with reporters is pure fantasy. Aides talk of giving him "better choices" or jamming his schedule with meetings to keep him away from reading about or watching himself on TV. But this is an addiction he will never kick.

Edited by william.scherk
Link to comment
On 1/4/2018 at 10:27 PM, KorbenDallas said:

Perhaps this article is a first glimpse of a defense by him.

In an act of journalism, CNN's Jake Tapper and Jeremy Diamond have more about Bannon's unreleased statement:

http://www.cnn.com/2018/01/06/politics/steve-bannon-donald-trump-michael-wolff-white-house/index.html

Washington (CNN) - Steve Bannon was only minutes away from attacking "Fire and Fury" author Michael Wolff over quotes attributed to the former White House chief strategist, but he decided not to do so after President Donald Trump attacked him after the release of excerpts from the book, according to a source familiar with the situation.

Bannon and his allies drafted a statement Wednesday praising Trump and his son, Donald Trump Jr., after excerpts of Wolff's explosive exposé quoted Bannon calling Trump's eldest son "treasonous" and "unpatriotic," a Bannon ally told CNN.
 
"As I said during my interview with '60 Minutes' and many times since, there is no basis to the Russian investigation. It's a political witch hunt orchestrated by the left," Bannon's statement was going to say, according to the source familiar with the situation. "Don Jr., like his father, is a great American and a patriot. And we all know Don Jr. did not knowingly meet with Russian agents. Paul Manafort is an independent actor who clearly put his own interests ahead of the campaign and all involved. Michael Wolff took my remarks about Don Jr. out of context to sell his book. Sadly, this is yet another lefty hatchet job intended to disrespect our President and his supporters."
    The statement was drafted, but Bannon had not yet made up his mind about whether to release it before the President released his own scathing statement about his former chief strategist, a second Bannon ally said. In that statement, Trump blasted Bannon and alleged he had "lost his mind."
     
    It was too late for Bannon to do any cleanup, and the statement was spiked, the source said.

    [...]

    __________

    Sad!

    Link to comment
    On 1/6/2018 at 10:05 AM, william.scherk said:

    What struck me in excerpts from the book (noted above**) was a passage that suggested President Trump "doesn't read." At first glance this seems crazy -- of course he reads. He reads his speeches, he reads documents presented to him in the course of a workday -- and who  has not seen images or video of him marking up pages from newspapers or magazines?  He reads. He might watch a hell of a lot of TV, but he definitely reads†.

    CIA director pushes back on claim in Wolff book: Trump reads BY JULIA MANCHESTER 

    CIA Director Mike Pompeo pushed back Sunday on a claim that President Trump does not read, calling the assertions made in author Michael Wolff's explosive new book on the White House "absurd." 

    "This president reads material that we provide to him. He listens closely to his daily briefing," Pompeo told Chris Wallace on "Fox News Sunday."

    "This president is an avid consumer of the work product that our team at the CIA produces and we do our best to convey that to him every day," he continued.
     
    Pompeo was responding to a reported quote in Wolff's book "Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House" from chief economic adviser Gary Cohn, saying the president will not read anything, including "one-page memos and brief policy papers."

    Wolff, who said he had access to the White House for a year to write his book, also quoted Cohn in the book as saying Trump gets up halfway through meetings with world leaders "because he is bored." 

    "I think the two fundamental issues were that Donald Trump doesn't read anything. Let me accent that — anything. Nothing," Wolff told NPR. "If you're working for the president of the United States, that's an odd position because how do you get information to him? That's already a major hurdle. But then there's the second hurdle — that not only does he not read; he doesn't listen. So it becomes from Day one, the crisis of the presidency: You can't tell him anything."

    So the President does not read books. So what? Is reading a book some sign of character?

    Spoiler
    d717b894d08d66dc9a84470c08e58aad6546d3d1/Getty

    Donald Trump doesn’t read books.

    Reading is a popular pastime, for both laymen and presidents. Barack Obama routinely visits independent bookstores and releases his summer reading list every year. And George W. Bush famously got into a reading duel with Karl Rove, to see who could read the most books.

    But Donald Trump is not much of a reader, despite having written The Art of the Deal, “the number 1 selling business book of all time.” Asked by Megyn Kelly what his favorite book is besides The Art of the Deal, Trump chose All Quiet on the Western Front. (Not sure what happened to the Bible!) Kelly, perhaps sensing that Trump may not have read a book since sixth grade, asked him to name the last book he read. “I read passages, I read areas, chapters, I don’t have the time,” Trump said. “When was the last time I watched a baseball game? I’m watching you all the time.”

     

    Link to comment

    Here below is Mike Cernovich on the record, explaining "what really happened" between Bannon and Breitbart.

    -- we have already learned at least one fact:  Bannon lost his personal financial backing from the Mercer family. Rumours first covered at the Wall Street Journal (amplified at CBSNews, ABCNews, CNN, and other more/less reputable sites) further suggest the Breitbart board is thinking of getting rid of Bannon. Those links/stories are all four days old.

    One of the less reputable sites' (Global Research) headline says today** that the board "bashes" Steve Bannon. This article is echoed/reposted at the Venezuelan government-supported site TeleSur.

    Which brings us to Cernovich. He has claimed a 'mole' or informant in or about the White House, so he could be selling the 'real deal.'

    Not everyone is as perspicacious as Mike Cernovich. For an added vantage, Roger Stone on roughly the same subject, this time appearing with Owen Shroyer ...

    ________________________________

    ** -- a sample of the mildly euphoric-delusional explanandum from TeleSur/Global Research (emphases in original):

    The Bannon sacking will clearly reveal that Bannon is not the driving force behind Breitbart. Nor is the radical ‘right populist’ movement itself an independent force.  Bannon and Breitbart are but a mouthpiece. For what? For the real force behind the Breitbart media outlet, Bannon, and similar media organizations and talking heads pushing far right political alternatives and economic policies—i.e. the billionaire money interests that fund them and make the strategic decisions for them behind the scenes. It is the billionaires who sit on the Breitbart board, and other boards of similar right populist organizations who fund the Breitbarts, the Bannons, and those like them that came before and will come after.

    Link to comment
    On 01/11/2017 at 7:36 PM, william.scherk said:

    I previously edited a memorable video: Carter Page with Chris Hayes regarding George Papadopoulos (without subtitles). It's from MSNBC -- my editing was to blot out all the extraneous screen real estate devoted to extra hoopla. At least watch the first twenty seconds.   http://wsscherk.hostingmyself.com/0SCRN-CPZ/carterPageMSNBCzoomed.mp4

    Carter Page is the zaniest of all the foreign policy coffee-boys who circled, landed and were pushed out of the Trump campaign. (His personal Russia lecturing and investment meetings and other scholarly-ish pursuits are not discussed, so any hint of what policies he recommended or advised are not here noted. Page is however known for his up-front suggestions for a major re-set of the US-Russia relationship.)

    The interview caused a minor sensation on Twitter, because Page is such fun TV (minus the scrolling text, chyron and sub-chyron, ,blurbs and flash that the networks think people want or need. 

     

    Link to comment

    Picking up the thread on Manafort and McMaster ... Manafort's business partner and senior Trump campaign official Rick Gates is reportedly about to take a plea deal with the federal prosecutor. "What does this mean?!" hoopla seems to lurch between 'fuck all' and 'the sky is falling,' which means we have to bring in the experts.

    But I don't have any.

    Here is a snatch of programming from Infowars. Roger Stone was once a business partner of Manafort. In this snatch, Stone takes aim at another former Trump employee, the fabled Steve Bannon.  It was widely reported that Bannon spent 20 hours with special counsel staff answering questions that he previously refused to answer before the committees of benghazi.  Photos of him leaving the federal offices suggest he either got something off his chest, or that CNN is adept at photoshopping. I will let Stone's insider gen lead the speculation ... you have to skip ahead of the usual misreporting some minutes to get Stoned.

     

     

    Link to comment

    If he weren't such a corrupt man, I might feel sorry for Paul Manafort today. A detailed 32-count set of indictments was just filed by grand jury, signed by Myooler.  

    The charges are presumably going to cause a wee boom in the Manafort and Gates households. "Oh, honey, how will we ever get out of this legal hole?"  "Well, apparently, I can plead guilty to lesser charges, flip on my partner,  and just do a little time." "Yeah, sounds good."  

    Notsofast ...

    Link to comment
    17 hours ago, william.scherk said:

    The charges are presumably going to cause a wee boom in the Manafort and Gates households. "Oh, honey, how will we ever get out of this legal hole?"  "Well, apparently, I can plead guilty to lesser charges, flip on my partner,  and just do a little time." "Yeah, sounds good."  

    Notsofast ...

    Or not not.

    ABCnews reports on a letter from Gates to his family, in which he tells them he will be pleading guilty -- Former Trump aide tells loved ones of plans to plead guilty, cooperate with special counsel

    What does this mean for the Cabal, the Satanists, the Gitmo-bound, the secret military tribunals, the unbalanced speculation on the 'real' objects of the Mueller inquiries?  I don't know. 

    What does it mean for the double super secret Jerome Corsi-Qanon reading of events?

    I do not know. Once you have slipped down the rabbithole into believing six impossible things before breakfast, can you ever get out again?

    "There's a war on for your mind."  Yeah, and I think "they" have won ...

     

     

    Link to comment
    On 11/20/2017 at 9:47 AM, william.scherk said:
    On 8/6/2017 at 9:46 AM, william.scherk said:
    Quote

    Trump Defends McMaster Against Calls for His Firing
    By PETER BAKERAUG. 4, 2017

    [...] But after two days of unrelenting attacks on General McMaster by conservative activists and news sites, complete with the Twitter hashtag #FireMcMaster, the president weighed in to quash such talk. “General McMaster and I are working very well together,” he said in a statement emailed to The New York Times. “He is a good man and very pro-Israel. I am grateful for the work he continues to do serving our country.”

    Well, the plot to remove McMaster just got a jolt of energy:

    Unwashed Cernovich's #hashtag wizardry may have moved a mountain, even if only after a delay. 

    Fresh from the aggregator Memeorandum this moment, edited to give prominence to stories in the more right outlets.

     

    i123.jpg Nicolle Wallace / NBC News:

    White House preparing for McMaster exit as early as next month  —  WASHINGTON — The White House is preparing to replace H.R. McMaster as national security adviser as early as next month in a move orchestrated by chief of staff John Kelly and Defense Secretary James Mattis, according to five people familiar with the discussions.

    Discussion:

    Susan Wright / RedState:   H.R. McMaster Is Set to Exit, Stage Left (Another One Bites the Dust)

    Ian Mason / Breitbart:   Report: John Kelly and James Mattis Moving to Oust H.R. McMaster

    Cristina Laila / The Gateway Pundit:   REPORT: White House Considering Replacing H.R. McMaster as Early as Next Month **Updated**

    Ryan Saavedra / Daily Wire:   NBC NEWS: H.R. McMaster Leaving White House. Here's Who's Being Considered To Replace Him

    Link to comment
    9 minutes ago, william.scherk said:

    Trump-whisperer alert.  The busy executive has a meme for all of us (and who will bother fact-checking a President regarding 'previously-dropped charges')

     

    Daniel Dale of the Toronto Star, our  mild-mannered Clark Kent North, that is who!  He has taken on himself the Sisyphean task of fact-checking Trump 24/7, or at least a standard workweek per union regulations. He was one of the the investigative reporters who covered  the late Rob Ford.  The man must be a masochist.

    Link to comment

    Manafort's sleaziness and ability to deliver benefits to authoritarian figures with "interesting" reputations was I thought one feature in his favour, notwithstanding his experience in leaning on delegates or managing electoral campaigns in, er, Ukraine, for, er, a Putin-poodle with fabulous stolen wealth, see below. Not doing due diligence OR listening to the push-back from "oh, don't hire him, Boss" is on the campaign, and the campaign was in some ways a slop-house of cranks, sleazebags and influence-peddlers jostling to clamber aboard, invited, employed for zero dollars  (a selling point for Trump re Manafort) or not invited. 

    Who is responsible for the campaign? Who took on a corrupted Manafort despite warnings?

    Manafort's ideas to profit by his nearness to Trump with special briefings for Deripaska and a welter of other sleaze and as-charged crimes ... seem predictable.  I recall Robert Campbell being one of us who raised flags here early on Manafort.

    Me, I predicted this stupid Mana fort connection would drag on and on, in effect becoming a Rtar-baby for Trump.  If the President wants to play hard-ball and put all the Manafort sleaze aside as "dropped," well, he's in a fight, using whatever rhetoric serves to keep his legacy free of blemish.  It is what you'd would expect if you feel under siege by a whole lotta witch hunt.

    If Manafort is a witch, it had nothing to do with Trump.  Guaranteed.  He joined a coven long long time.

    Who wouldn't want to join if this kind of thing is the payoff?  Under the L, LAVISH. Under the C, CORRUPTION.  

    yanukovychPalace.png

    Link to comment
    On 6/6/2018 at 8:57 AM, william.scherk said:

    Oh, well, more bad news for Paul Manafort. 

    It appears that the Mueller investigation believes Manafort tried to tamper with witnesses.

    There is bad news and then there is bad news.  

    Judge orders ex-Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort to jail while awaiting money laundering and fraud trials

    Quote

     

    WASHINGTON — A federal judge on Friday ordered former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort to jail to await separate trials on money laundering and fraud charges following allegations that he sought to obstruct the Russia inquiry while he was on house arrest.

    Manafort, who just two summers ago was celebrating Donald Trump's nomination at the Republican National Convention, was charged last week along with Russian business associate Konstantin Kilimnik as part of an alleged scheme to tamper with two witnesses in the existing cases against Manafort.

    Prosecutors asserted that that the alleged obstruction effort, in which Manafort and Kilimnik sought to coach the testimony of the two un-identified witnesses, should trigger the revocation of Manafort's bail, sending him to jail to await a July trial in Alexandria, Va., on bank fraud charges and a separate September trial in Washington, D.C., where he faces a vast money laundering and fraud conspiracy. 

    Investigators have claimed that the "repeated" contacts occurred while Manafort was under house arrest in Virginia, as a condition of his release.

    [...]

     

    It makes me wonder what kind of "extreme vetting" was performed on Manafort when he self-pimped (with a little help from Tom Barrack) to the candidate.

    The last we heard from President Trump was that Manafort "has nothing to do with our campaign."  Har de har har.

    Link to comment
    2 hours ago, william.scherk said:

    Judge orders ex-Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort to jail while awaiting money laundering and fraud trials

    Yes.  Upon evidence that he was abusing the terms of his bail agreement (witness tampering)... he was jailed.  "Pre-trial detention" is a cognate.  But guess who hasn't figured out the basics?

    I wonder if the President believes the BS.

     

    Edited by william.scherk
    Link to comment

    Blah blah blah...

    Jail is not jail if you don't use the word sentence...

    Right...

    What a crock.

    I'm actually glad this happened. By jailing Manafort before the trial, The Swamp has openly declared war--using guns--on President Trump. Now he can act against them as the one attacked. Now we will see who has the larger reach and influence with America's armed forces and law enforcement.

    As the saying goes in Brazil, the bird who swallows stones better know the size of its own asshole...

    Michael

    Link to comment
    3 hours ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said:

    Blah blah blah...

    Jail is not jail if you don't use the word sentence...

    Right...

    What a crock.

    I'm actually glad this happened. By jailing Manafort before the trial, The Swamp has openly declared war--using guns--on President Trump. Now he can act against them as the one attacked. Now we will see who has the larger reach and influence with America's armed forces and law enforcement.

    As the saying goes in Brazil, the bird who swallows stones better know the size of its own asshole...

    Michael

    Yuck,  that saying should not go anywhere but stay in Brazil.

    Maybe next time a Brazilian proverb is the best to illustrate your point,  you should render it in original Portuguese to convey its-- full savour.

    Link to comment

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now