Journal of Ayn Rand Studies V17 N1 (July 2017)


Recommended Posts

JARS: New July 2017 Issue Arrives!

After The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies published its blockbuster 2016 double issue, "Nathaniel Branden: His Work and Legacy" (getting a few reviews along the way), JARS returns to its biannual format with a brand new issue. The print version of the July 2017 issue will be on its way to subscribers in the coming weeks, and will be published electronically by JSTOR and Project Muse as well. It features essays from a wide variety of perspectives, along with reviews of books on timely topics and continuing discussions of key issues in Rand studies.

NEW JULY 2017 JARS

Readers should go to our 2017 index and click into the drop-down menu for Volume 17, Number 1 - July 2017 (Issue #33). Under the "Table of Contents," readers will find abstracts for each of the essays listed below; under "Contributor Biographies," readers will learn more about the writers featured in our newest issue.

Table of Contents

ARTICLES

Russian Egoism Goes to America? A Case for a Connection between Ayn Rand and the Shestidesiatniki- Aaron Weinacht

Just Who Is John Galt, Anyway? A Carnivalesque Approach to Atlas Shrugged - Charles Duncan

The Beneficiary Statement and Beyond - Merlin Jetton

Ultimate Value: Self-Contradictory - Robert Hartford

Six Years Outside the Archives: The Chronicle of a Misadventure, in Three Acts - Robert L. Campbell


REVIEWS

Debunking Neosocialism (a review of Christopher Snowdon's book, Selfishness, Greed, and Capitalism: Debunking Myths about the Free Market) - Reviewed by Gary James Jason

Debunking Ecofundamentalism (a review of Rögnvaldur Hannesson's book Ecofundamentalism: A Critique of Extreme Environmentalism) - Reviewed by Hannes H. Gissurarson

After the Avant-Gardes (a review of After the Avant-Gardes: Reflections on the Future of the Fine Arts, edited by Elizabeth Millán) - Reviewed by Troy Camplin


DISCUSSION

Reply to Roger E. Bissell: Thinking Volition - Merlin Jetton

Rejoinder to Merlin Jetton: Conditions of Volition - Roger E. Bissell

Reply to Marsha Familaro Enright: Remembering the "Self" in "Self-ish-ness" - Robert White

Rejoinder to Robert White: The Problem with "Selfishness" is Still Problematic - Marsha Familaro Enright


JARS is published by Pennsylvania State University Press, but is distributed by the Johns Hopkins University Press Fulfillment Services. Folks wanting to obtain a subscription should inquire here. Enjoy!

 

Posted by chris on June 6, 2017 07:33 PM | Permalink | Posted to Periodicals | Politics (Theory, History, Now) |Rand Studies

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just subscribed to the print addition for two years. The process never asked me for a credit card. Am I going to be billed for a paper check? I prefer using my Amex card. Any suggestions?

Peter Taylor 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎6‎/‎14‎/‎2017 at 3:57 PM, Roger Bissell said:

I know nothing about this process, sorry. Send them an email.

Thanks, Roger. I received a bill in the mail and sent in $74.20 if I remember the amount correctly. I can't wait! I think that after I read, "The Goddess of the Market" I stopped reading much about Objectivism except for Robert Tracinski's online column for which I also recently, re-subscribed. And I gave The Atlas Society $100 last week.  

Peter 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I have just skimmed the newest “The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies” and I won’t give any spoilers. I liked Merlin Jetton’s section on “Breaches of Trust,” and “Conflicts of Interest.” I quote, “The Conflicts of Men’s Interests,” alleges that there are no such conflicts. However, she failed to prove there are no “conflicts of interest” with that term’s common meaning.”

And the article, “Developing an Instrument to Measure Objectivism,” has an intriguing title. Peter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Peter said:

I have just skimmed the newest “The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies” and I won’t give any spoilers. I liked Merlin Jetton’s section on “Breaches of Trust,” and “Conflicts of Interest.” I quote, “The Conflicts of Men’s Interests,” alleges that there are no such conflicts. However, she failed to prove there are no “conflicts of interest” with that term’s common meaning.”

And the article, “Developing an Instrument to Measure Objectivism,” has an intriguing title. Peter

Thanks, Peter. The issue to which you refer is V18 N1 (July 2018),  so I started a new thread here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now