Wolf DeVoon Posted December 21, 2016 Share Posted December 21, 2016 I was thinking of something less exciting, one or two nukes exchanged somewhere in the Levant. So many players, long grudges and animus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
william.scherk Posted December 29, 2016 Author Share Posted December 29, 2016 I am cynical about this announcement, but hope springs eternal. From "Syria-wide ceasefire comes into effect." Quote A spokesman for the main moderate Syrian opposition groups said earlier they had agreed to abide by ceasefire negotiated by Turkey and Russia, which includes all parts of Syria. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has said that Turkey will press ahead with its military offensive to clear a border area in northern Syria from ISIS militants, saying the agreement does not cover terror organizations. They include the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) and the al-Qaeda-linked Fatah al-Sham Front. Osama Abu Zeid has told reporters in Turkey that the truce will be followed by peace talks in Kazakhstan that will focus on finding a solution for Syria's crisis. He said 13 armed opposition factions have signed the five-point agreement. (Sarah Baptist/CBC) Abu Zeid says the peace talks will be based on the Geneva 2012 declaration that called for a transitional governing body with full executive powers to run affairs in Syria during the transitional period. He said "this means that there will be no presence for [President Bashar al-] Assad in the future." Excerpts of the agreement that were obtained by The Associated Press say the truce will include all areas where the "moderate opposition" has a presence, including those where al-Qaeda's branch in Syria exists. It says the opposition will be given the right to name its delegation to peace talks in the Kazakh capital of Astana. The talks will begin within in one month. It says the peace talks will be in accordance with December 2015 United Nations Security Council resolution 2254 which endorsed a road map for a transitional period that includes parliamentary and presidential elections within 18 months. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaalChatzaf Posted December 30, 2016 Share Posted December 30, 2016 1 hour ago, william.scherk said: I am cynical about this announcement, but hope springs eternal. From "Syria-wide ceasefire comes into effect." I will assume that "settlement" will last at most two weeks, and that is optimistic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
william.scherk Posted January 29, 2017 Author Share Posted January 29, 2017 On 12/19/2016 at 6:48 PM, william.scherk said: It's not like the conflict will go away or that we will get a sense of new policy this week or next. Meet y'all back here next time the flea enters my ear. No flea, just consequences ... of new policy. Sent back after three hours. And these are Christians. https://t.co/EEOqJWx8eR — Colin Kinniburgh (@colinreads) January 28, 2017 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted April 7, 2017 Share Posted April 7, 2017 This is an old thread that I was just reminded of privately. Well, we found out what President Trump will do with Syria when push comes to shove. The Breitbart headline says it all. Trump Ordered Syria Attack, then Ate Dinner with Chinese President There are people for and against this for differing reasons. But there are no good guys in this situation (except us, of course ). Both Syrians and the rebels (the Al Qaeda leaning ones) have used poison gas on civilians, so it doesn't matter who did it this time around. The message was to both sides and it was to stop the shit. Period. However, I also think President Trump relied on intelligence from folks who are serious, highly competent, patriotic, and do not want to repeat the weapons of mass destruction fiasco of the Bush years. So he probably hit the right target without a false flag. There is one thing everyone can agree on. This is a much different style of governing than the former administration. President Trump will act--and act decisively--when he deems action necessary. There is none of this red line that moves crap. Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Posted April 7, 2017 Share Posted April 7, 2017 Michael wrote: President Trump will act--and act decisively--when he deems action necessary. There is none of this red line that moves crap. end quote CBS broke into programing to tell us about the attack on Syria. Scott Pelly was actually shook up about it, as he reported what facts he knew. And today I heard Schumer and Pelosi both endorsed the attack. It was a good move. 58 of 59 missiles seem to have hit their targets. The 7 people killed worked at the poison gas depot. Maybe the released gas killed them. The Russians were warned just before the attack to get out. No American lives were risked, or at least any more than the fact of serving in the military is a risk. I am impressed at the swiftness and surety of our response. We were morally correct in our action. Peter PLAYBOY: What about force in foreign policy? You have said that any free nation had the right to invade Nazi Germany during World War II. RAND: Certainly. PLAYBOY: . . . And that any free nation today has the moral right -- though not the duty -- to invade Soviet Russia, Cuba, or any other "slave pen." Correct? RAND: Correct. A dictatorship -- a country that violates the rights of its own citizens -- is an outlaw and can claim no rights. A different Rand quote: Q: What should be done about the killing of innocent people in war? AR: This is a major reason people should be concerned about the nature of their government. Certainly, the majority in any country at war is innocent. But if by neglect, ignorance, or helplessness, they couldn't overthrow their bad government and establish a better one, then they must pay the price for the sins of their governments we are all paying for the sins of ours. If some people put up with dictatorships some of them do in Soviet Russia, and some of them did in Nazi Germany then they deserve what their government deserves. There are no innocent people in war. Our only concern should be: who started that war? If you can establish that a given country did it, then there is no need to consider the rights of that country, because it has initiated the use of force, and therefore stepped outside the principle of right. I've covered this in Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal, where I explain why nations as such do not have any rights, only individuals do. Q: Assume a war of aggression was started by the Soviet Union; assume also that within the Soviet Union, there were individuals opposed to the Soviet system. How would you handle that? AR: I'll pretend I'm taking the question seriously, because this question is blatantly wrong. I cannot understand how anyone could entertain the question. My guess is that the problem is context-dropping. The question assumes that an individual inside a country can and should be made secure from the social system under which he lives and which he accepts, willingly or unwillingly (even if he is fighting it he still accepts it because he hasn't left the country), and that others should respect his rights and collapse to aggression themselves. This is the position of the goddamned pacifists, who wouldn't fight, even when attacked, because they might kill innocent people. If this were so, nobody would have to be concerned about his country's political system. But we should care about having the right social system, because our lives are dependent on it because a political system, good or bad, is established in our name, and we bear the responsibility for it. So if we fight a war, I hope the "innocent" are destroyed along with the guilty. There aren't many innocent ones; those that exist are not in the big cities, but mainly in concentration camps. But nobody should put up with aggression, and surrender his right of self- defense, for fear of hurting somebody else, guilty or innocent. When someone comes at you with a gun, if you have an ounce of self-esteem, you will answer him with force, never mind who he is or who stands behind him. If he's out to destroy you, you owe it to your own life to defend yourself. end quote I was thinking about a counterpoint. I believe Wolf thinks “granted” government power should end at the borderline. Wolf DeVoon wrote: Definitions of justice proffered by others have been lengthy, covering hundreds of pages, intertwining dozens of terms. However, logic is an exact science. Verbosity indicates lack of understanding or deliberate obfuscation. That's why my definition of justice is succinct. A complete theory of justice is presented in one proposition, consisting of one object, one action, and two qualifiers: Justice = armed defense of innocent liberty. The qualifiers are necessary for precision. Verbal defense of liberty isn't justice. It must be armed defense. Not all liberty, just innocent liberty (e.g., the liberty of women and children, who are often unable to defend themselves). end quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted April 8, 2017 Share Posted April 8, 2017 Paul Joseph is not pleased and he raises many points that cannot be ignored. I, too, am not comfortable with the number of Neocons Trump has made peace with. Their thing is globalism (with them among the elites, of course), enriching themselves along the way with endless non-winnable war for profit. I'm one of those who is glad Trump carried out the strike, though. If we are to have a safe world, we cannot allow certain kinds of barbarism to grow. The distance between a government having weaponized gas and a terrorist is an arm's length. Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted April 8, 2017 Share Posted April 8, 2017 Brooke Baldwin tried to get a Syrian in Syria who liked President Trump's attack to bash him over Syrian refugees and, by implication, praise Hillary Clinton. I don't think it went like she wanted it to. I have to admit, when Brooke Baldwin--or anyone in the MSM--gets her ass handed to her for trying to gin up fake news, it feels good. And as she tried to wiggle out of it, the guy wouldn't let her. Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted April 8, 2017 Share Posted April 8, 2017 Here's a more technical big-picture political view from Newt Gingrich. I like Newt, even though many of the people I like don't. He thinks Assad is going down. From everything I seen and read today, I think so, too. Apropos, I read somewhere that the Russians are ultimately embarrassed by Assad's insistence on being a crazy person and they want to replace him, but with someone who will keep their economic agenda going. That sounds plausible to me. The funniest remark I read was from Rush Limbaugh. He said, tongue in cheek, that President Trump was defending former President Obama's honor. From a cockeyed slant, that actually sounds plausible. I can see President Trump defending the honor of the US presidency irrespective of who was in it. Assad stuck his tongue out at Obama, then Trump. So Trump punched him the nose real hard and said (ahem... I paraphrase ), "Put your tongue back in your mouth, asshole. You made a promise to Obama and you will damn sure keep it." Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaalChatzaf Posted April 9, 2017 Share Posted April 9, 2017 15 hours ago, Michael Stuart Kelly said: From a cockeyed slant, that actually sounds plausible. I can see President Trump defending the honor of the US presidency irrespective of who was in it. Assad stuck his tongue out at Obama, then Trump. So Trump punched him the nose real hard and said (ahem... I paraphrase ), "Put your tongue back in your mouth, asshole. You made a promise to Obama and you will damn sure keep it." Michael When and where did this happen? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
william.scherk Posted December 19, 2018 Author Share Posted December 19, 2018 US troops out of Syria. On 11/10/2016 at 11:16 AM, william.scherk said: Trump has been pretty clear about Syria and its travails. He prefers the strong leader, even if that means a strongman or dictator. He is more revolted by Saudi Arabia than by Assad. He will reject any 'refugees' from Syria. He likes a leadership role. He'd like to take Putin under his wing. He'd like to shake up the board. Not quite -- my revolted-by-Saudi-Arabia take was mistaken. On 11/10/2016 at 11:16 AM, william.scherk said: But mainly he is centred on America first. So, I bet Syria is just left to fester in terms of Russian-US sponsored Final Agreement kinds of peace accords, which would make Trump a hero in the history books. I think, cynically, that the Russians and Trump will agree a timetable, like ... let it run for two, three four years until it can be wound down and peace imposed by Russo-Yank might. It's complicated by US-Kurd cooperation in north-eastern Syria, where 2000 US troops help with the SDF (so-called Syrian Democratic Forces). If the headlines are true, President Trump is removing troops from Syria immediately. From the Army Times: Troops to immediately withdraw from Syria as Trump declares victory over ISIS From Wikipedia caption: SDF-controlled territory (green), claimed territory (orange), Turkish-occupied territory (red) in October 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
william.scherk Posted December 19, 2018 Author Share Posted December 19, 2018 Jeez, but the fake news media sure takes the bait in re Syria. "It's complicated." No, Marge, it is not. Well, okay, it is, but not in the way you think. Spoiler New York Times: Trump Considering Full Withdrawal of U.S. Troops From Syria — WASHINGTON — President Trump is considering pulling 2,000 United States ground troops out of Syria in a move that would seek to describe the four-year American-led war against the Islamic State as largely won, officials said Wednesday. Discussion: Jeet Heer / New Republic: Trump declares victory over ISIS in Syria. The Pentagon disagrees. Krishnadev Calamur / The Atlantic: Trump Wanted Out of Syria. It's Finally Happening. NBC News: U.S. troops to leave Syria as President Trump declares victory over ISIS Michael Sykes / Axios: Trump allies question ISIS “defeat” in Syria Caitlin MacNeal / Talking Points Memo: Trump To Pull Troops From Syria Despite Pushback From Pentagon Luis Martinez / ABC News: US withdrawing troops from Syria, as White House declares victory over ISIS Llangdon / WORLD: Report: U.S. to pull troops out of Syria Daniel L. Davis / Test Feed Using Fields: Staying in Syria No Longer Makes Sense Codepink / Common Dreams: CODEPINK Applauds Trump's Decision on Syria Withdrawal Jordan Schachtel / Conservative Review: Iran will be the big winner of US Syria withdrawal Doug Mataconis / Outside the Beltway: Trump To Order Withdrawal of American Troops From Syria Noah Rothman / Commentary: Trump's Syrian Retreat: A Disaster in the Making Kathryn Krawczyk / The Week: The White House says ISIS is defeated. Veterans, humanitarians, and even Fox News hosts disagree. Travis Gettys / Raw Story: Pentagon contradicts Trump's claim that ISIS is defeated: ‘The campaign is not over’ Laurel Wamsley / NPR: White House Orders Pentagon To Pull U.S. Troops From Syria Charlie Spiering / Breitbart: Donald Trump Signals Troop Withdrawals from Syria Kevin Breuninger / CNBC: White House says the US is pulling its troops from Syria after Trump declares victory over ISIS Bloomberg: Trump's Syria Pullout Fuels Confusion With Kurds Left in Lurch Jim Hoft / The Gateway Pundit: Flashback: Obama Said ISIS Battle a “Generational Struggle” … CBS Denver: ‘We Have Defeated ISIS’: White House Orders Pentagon To Pull Troops From Syria Immediately Jinsider / Jewish Insider: Daily Kickoff: What happens if Trump withdraws from Syria | … Middle East Eye: US announces withdrawal from Syria as Trump declares Islamic State defeated Saagar Enjeti / The Daily Caller: Trump Begins Withdrawing Troops From Syria Greg P. / twitchy.com: President Trump declares victory over ISIS in Syria Daily Kos: Trump announces full withdrawal from Syria, enraging State Department officials and Republicans Ken Meyer / Mediaite: Trump Administration Preparing to Pull U.S. Troops Out of Syria Cheryl Rofer / Balloon Juice: Breaking: The US Is Withdrawing From Syria (According To Trump) RELATED: Dion Nissenbaum / Wall Street Journal: U.S. Military Preparing for a Full Withdrawal of Its Forces From Northeastern Syria — Move throws campaign against Islamic State into question — WASHINGTON—In an abrupt reversal, the U.S. military is preparing to withdraw its forces from northeastern Syria, people familiar with the matter … Discussion: Eli Lake / Bloomberg: Trump Courts Catastrophe in Syria Spencer Ackerman / The Daily Beast: U.S. Officials Try to Slow Trump's ‘Everybody Out’ of Syria Order Politico: POLITICO Playbook PM: McConnell moves to sidestep shutdown Alex Ward / Vox: Trump is pulling all US ground troops from Syria Jack Crosbie / Splinter: Nobody Knows What the Hell America Is Doing in Syria Katie Pavlich / Townhall: It's Official: U.S. Troops are Leaving Syria Kevin Drum / Mother Jones: Trump Plans to Pull Out of Syria Maha / The Mahablog: Trump's WTF? Foreign Policy, Syria Edition Cameron Cawthorne / Washington Free Beacon: Graham Slams Trump's Plan to Withdraw Troops From Syria: It'd Be ‘Obama-Like Mistake’ Streiff / RedState: Did Erdogan Just Roll President Trump In Syria Daniel Larison / The American Conservative: Withdrawal from Syria? Don't Bet On It Military Times: Erdogan: Positive answers in call with Trump, but says Turkey could act against US-backed Syrian Kurds ‘anytime’ Joe Millitzer / FOX2now.com: US preparing for ‘full’ withdrawal from Syria Mary Chastain / Le·gal In·sur·rec· tion: U.S. Prepares to Fully Remove Troops From Northeastern Syria Joanne Stocker / The Defense Post: US will withdraw troops from Syria Jeff Schogol / Task & Purpose: The Pentagon Is Reportedly Preparing To Withdraw All US Troops From Syria Kathryn Krawczyk / The Week: CBS was paying Les Moonves' legal fees this whole time Joseph Curl / Daily Wire: Trump Declares Victory In Syria As U.S. Moves To Withdraw All Troops ‘As Quickly As Possible’ Axios: Trump administration to “transition” U.S. troops from Syria Aidan McLaughlin / Mediaite: Trump Claims U.S. Has Defeated ISIS in Syria more at Mediagazer » CNN: Trump orders rapid withdrawal from Syria in apparent reversal — Washington (CNN)Planning is underway for a “full” and “rapid” withdrawal of US troops from Syria, a US defense official told CNN Wednesday. — The decision, which would be a reversal from previously stated US policy … Discussion: Edwin Mora / Breitbart: Pentagon Confirms: U.S. ‘Started Process’ of Withdrawing Troops from Syria Joe DePaolo / Mediaite: ‘ISIS is Not Defeated’: Lindsey Graham Rips Syria Pullout as ‘Huge Obama-Like Mistake’ Robert Spencer / Jihad Watch: Trump orders rapid withdrawal of US troops from Syria Kathryn Krawczyk / The Week: Trump reportedly orders troops out of Syria, signaling end of ISIS fight Reuters: ISIS kills 700 prisoners in Syria: watchdog Reuters: U.S. weighs complete withdrawal of troops from Syria: U.S. officials Discussion: Washington Post: Trump administration plans to pull U.S. troops from Syria immediately, defense official says Melissa McEwan / Shakesville: We Resist: Day 699 — One of the difficulties in resisting … Madison Summers / IJR: Graham Warns Trump Against Withdrawing US Troops from Syria: ‘Would Be a Huge Obama-Like Mistake’ Ken Meyer / Mediaite: Marco Rubio Rips Syria Withdrawal: A ‘Colossal Mistake’ That Will ‘Haunt This Administration’ Jessica Hopper / ABC News: President Trump's troop withdrawal from Syria a ‘huge’ mistake: Senator Lindsey Graham Discussion: Nahal Toosi / Politico: Trump breaks with his national security team on Syria exit Kathryn Watson / CBS News: White House orders Pentagon to pull troops from Syria immediately Kevin Breuninger / CNBC: Lindsey Graham: Trump is to blame if ISIS comes back after US troops leave Syria Missy Ryan / Washington Post: Trump administration plans to pull U.S. troops from Syria immediately, defense official says Discussion: Adrienne Mahsa Varkiani / ThinkProgress: Here's what Trump's own State Department said about U.S. troops in Syria just one week ago Todd Neikirk / Hill Reporter: Trump Says We've Defeated ISIS in Syria but the UN Says we Haven't The Guardian: Trump surprises allies and advisers with plan to pull US troops out of Syria Sarah Dadouch / Raw Story: State Department personnel being evacuated from Syria: US official David Kurtz / Talking Points Memo: Where Are We Exactly? — This is down deep in the NYT story … Josh Rogin / Washington Post: Trump undermines his entire national security team on Syria Discussion: Kori Schake / The Atlantic: Trump Just Screwed Up the One Thing He Did Better Than Obama USA Today: Trump orders US troops out of Syria, declares victory over ISIS; senators slam action as mistake Nick Paton Walsh / KXLF-TV: Trump is leaving the fight against ISIS (and influence in the Middle East) to Russia and Iran Sheesh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now