Good Keeriiiiist!
This looks like something out of the wrong side of a Rand novel. The general impression I get is a bunch of obnoxious vain rich people with strong political connections playing and posturing at living in Rand-world. Grandiose claims wedded to irrational business plans and a just plain flaky business concept (starting with what looks like complete neglect of defining a target customer base).
They are trying to wed a higher learning institute with a vacation resort at the outset (complete with equestrian center, golf course, etc.)! What are these people thinking? People who have an academic study load don't have time to play golf. Nor do they have time to hang out with those who do.
Outside the lawsuits, public financial information and other signs of professional rejection by the academic world, there are some really strange indications of general incompetence. From the article
School of Hard Knocks by Mary Eva Cassada for
The News & Record of South Boston, Virginia, dated January 14, 2007:
QUOTE(Cassada)
Even on the academic end, he said, instructors were expected to create revenue-generating programs.
. . .
Staffers of both institutions [distance learning institutions eCollege and Learning House] reported that CEO Fuller was difficult to deal with and sent highly positioned employees on her personal errands.
. . .
Staff meetings could be contentious, emotional affairs: "I saw one woman ... take a lashing that I'm sure General Patton wouldn't have given to a soldier," said a separate source.
. . .
Most troubling to a half-dozen sources are what they describe as attempts to tarnish the reputations of some employees who leave.
A really cute touch is given at the end of the article:
QUOTE
Note: To protect anonymity, the gender of all unnamed speakers has been designated by the masculine pronoun "he."
Of course, I am basing my comments on this article. The official website gives a prettier picture:
Founders College.
I skimmed through the site, but I get tired of reading a bunch of unsubstantiated claims and self-praise that were short on concretes.
My unsolicited business advice would be to junk the college and develop the resort. Unless these people like losing money.
A harder course would be to junk the resort for the time being and develop the college, but they would have to get a real hotshot college administrator and give him real power to do what needs to be done. I don't see the vanity of those behind the venture permitting that.
Or they could go whole hog and do a Monadnock Valley routine to get their money back since (so far) they have made a mockery of Objectivism in higher education anyway. What do they have to lose?
Michael