~ I think any discussion re 'others' (such as Kelley, Branden, Peikoff, etc) relevence to O'ism's essentials
just m-i-g-h-t call for a totally separate thread; they ALL have some relevence even in bringing up unexpectable 'side' (though extremely important) issues. But, re 'essentials', per se? Hmmm. --- I see, from your response, that we may be parting ways here.Victor:
~ If you can do Galt's speech
"...while standing on one foot"...more power to ya, man!
~ Please don't confuse a PR-oriented summarization with what I've clarified as to what *I* meant by the 'essentials'
. A summary of 'X' isn't 'X.' I was talking about 'X,' not it's Cliff's Notes.
~ Rand had a 'comment' about a woman president...in TVOS
? I thought her commented thought on that was ONLY in some magazine. Whichever, such is an 'adjunct', and, not really arguable as part of her philosophy's 'essentials', correct?
Edited by John Dailey, 24 December 2006 - 12:51 AM.