Michael Savage: "This may be the last election!"


GALTGULCH8

Recommended Posts

That was just banter. I enjoyed your image, it was vintage Adamism, I could see the valiant citizens assemble to fight Statism, leading with their crotches.

Carol:

When you cut to the core of men and women...it is pretty much focused on those primitive drives. However, amongst the more enlightened, progressive class, they are above it all.

You know, like William "BJ" Clinton,...oops, well, like Theodore Kennedy and Senator Dodd, oops waitress sandwiches... well then JFK, oops, Marilyn Monroe, the interns, his famous statement that he was not through with a woman until he had her three ways, Nelson Rockefeller, oops died with the gallant salute in his office...

Ok, we are all in the same sexual gutter, some of us are willing to admit it lol...

Adam

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With today’s expertise, can the code be frozen or hardwired into each voting machine to avoid tampering? I would also suggest disconnecting every voting machine from a central control, any phone lines, internet, or wifi connection. A camera with a tabulator would be good to have. A paper trail (backup) would be good to have. Honest and bonded people in the voting hall would be good to have.

After the vote is tabulated, random calling to voters would be the final backup. I know they have preprinted lists of voters in my State, Maryland, with lots of your information on it such as phone numbers and even cell phone numbers. That could detect fraud.

“Hello, Michelle? You were voter 715 today at your Chicago precinct at 10:15 today. It shows you voted for Barack Obama. Is that correct?”

“Hell NO! I knew it! He is even trying to fix the election in his home town! I voted for Mitt because Obama has been cheating on me with Lindsey Lohan and Brad Pitt. I got suspicious after that National Enquirer expose. Wait til I get my hands on that half honkie!”

Peter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

“Hello, Michelle? You were voter 715 today at your Chicago precinct at 10:15 today. It shows you voted for Barack Obama. Is that correct?”

Mr. Taylor:

Let me introduce you to the Australian ballot...

has something to do with secret!

Adam

Affectionately applying correction

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adam wrote:

. . . has something to do with secret!

end quote

Oh sure. I have heard of secret ballots. Does that mean voters don’t have to dip their index fingers into indelible blue ink any more?

The fraud call answers would be voluntary. “Yes, I did vote for Mitt” or “It’s none of your damn business!” would be OK. I truly think some sort of back up is needed after watching that programmer admitting he created a voting fraud program. Remember 10,000 dead voters, voting for John F. Kennedy in Mayor Daley’s Chicago?

Now there’s *secret* (the Platonic ideal) and the Aristotle / Randian / scientifically verifiable *secret.*

Peter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure Obama plans to do that. I know the UN plans to take over the world and enforce global socialism as is stated in Agenda 21. But it just won't work. Obama, no matter how ambitious and powerful he is, is not able to completely abolish elections and get away with it for the same reason the UN won't be able to abolish the second amendment and send armed forces to disarm every citizen with success. It is very true that people want to take over the world; their plans are as stupid as they are. Obama may try to pass legislation forbidding further elections and such legislation, though I doubt it, may pass. But would there not be chaotic riots once people realized that they are irrefutably living under a dictatorship? Of course there will be riots and of course there will be rebellion. The same goes for Agenda 21's plan to abolish the second amendment and force citizens to sell their property to the world government and from then on pay rent; once and if America falls into absolute dicatorship and irrefutable tyranny there WILL be riots and there will be chaos and rebellion. The despots know it which is why they draw out their plans, but no matter how long it takes to get to the point of obvious dictatorship, once and if it happens, there will be riots, chaos and rebellion. Ask anyone how they would react if Obama forbid further elections, how they would react if the UN ordered armed forces to go house to house and disarm every citizen and force them to sell their houses to the government and thereafter pay rent. Ask a police officer if he would, if ordered, go from house to house and disarm the innocent. As I said earlier, yes, there are powerful people who want to gain dictatorial power over their country (Obama) and the globe, but their plans are just too stupid to work. They will fall of their own evil and stupidity, I think. Think about it, if Obama had dictatorial power over the economy and could enforce anything he wanted how long would it take for our country to fall into the worst depression its ever seen and how long after that would there be rebellion and chaotic riots. There are many people like Alex Jones who are terrified of the UN and Obama because they're evil and want to take over the world. Yes Obama and the UN are powerful, but only as powerful as the support they get from their victims. What if the Germans told that maggot Hitler NO during elections? What if no one supported or worked for Stalin? "Stop supporting your destroyers" -AR.

Can I introduce you to paragraphing because I am not going to wade through this mass.

And, for your information, who do you think is going to have the balls, or, the ovaries to put their asses into the streets to oppose a "state of emergency"?

Ever heard the quote "It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!"? Its the last paragraph of Patrick Henry's most heroic speech.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure Obama plans to do that. I know the UN plans to take over the world and enforce global socialism as is stated in Agenda 21. But it just won't work. Obama, no matter how ambitious and powerful he is, is not able to completely abolish elections and get away with it for the same reason the UN won't be able to abolish the second amendment and send armed forces to disarm every citizen with success. It is very true that people want to take over the world; their plans are as stupid as they are. Obama may try to pass legislation forbidding further elections and such legislation, though I doubt it, may pass. But would there not be chaotic riots once people realized that they are irrefutably living under a dictatorship? Of course there will be riots and of course there will be rebellion. The same goes for Agenda 21's plan to abolish the second amendment and force citizens to sell their property to the world government and from then on pay rent; once and if America falls into absolute dicatorship and irrefutable tyranny there WILL be riots and there will be chaos and rebellion. The despots know it which is why they draw out their plans, but no matter how long it takes to get to the point of obvious dictatorship, once and if it happens, there will be riots, chaos and rebellion. Ask anyone how they would react if Obama forbid further elections, how they would react if the UN ordered armed forces to go house to house and disarm every citizen and force them to sell their houses to the government and thereafter pay rent. Ask a police officer if he would, if ordered, go from house to house and disarm the innocent. As I said earlier, yes, there are powerful people who want to gain dictatorial power over their country (Obama) and the globe, but their plans are just too stupid to work. They will fall of their own evil and stupidity, I think. Think about it, if Obama had dictatorial power over the economy and could enforce anything he wanted how long would it take for our country to fall into the worst depression its ever seen and how long after that would there be rebellion and chaotic riots. There are many people like Alex Jones who are terrified of the UN and Obama because they're evil and want to take over the world. Yes Obama and the UN are powerful, but only as powerful as the support they get from their victims. What if the Germans told that maggot Hitler NO during elections? What if no one supported or worked for Stalin? "Stop supporting your destroyers" -AR.

Let's examine some of these statements, one by one.

Obama may try to pass legislation forbidding further elections and such legislation, though I doubt it, may pass.

Probably correct. But with voting machines being dishonest, that would be the same as no election but with the advantage that the people are pacified.

But would there not be chaotic riots once people realized that they are irrefutably living under a dictatorship? Of course there will be riots and of course there will be rebellion.

Certainly. The Globalists anticipated that. They expect that. That is why the Globalist want to disarm the people (as Hitler did) and they arm themselves with hollow point ammo and they are ready with FEMA camps and some new high tech weapons.

Ask anyone how they would react if Obama forbid further elections, how they would react if the UN ordered armed forces to go house to house and disarm every citizen and force them to sell their houses to the government and thereafter pay rent. Ask a police officer if he would, if ordered, go from house to house and disarm the innocent.

About phony elections, I don't see much rebellion against voting machines; most people think voting machines is just a conspiracy theory. All voting machines should be banned. All elections with voting machines should be declared invalid.

About disarming citizens, they did in Germany and they are even more clever about it now. They plan to condition people to believe owning a gun is bad.

About police officers, we can hope that they become Oath Keepers, but look at the Rawesome Foods case for one example.

There was a news report about a man who applied to become a police officer and his application was rejected because his IQ was too high. The explanation given was that police live a boring life and people with high IQs tend to get bored and quit and then it's a waste of police training. That may be, but I have a suspicion that the main reason is that people with high IQs have more tendency to question orders.

The way the people were disarmed in Germany, according to a person who lived thru the experience, was the people were told that there is this big problem of crime and therefore the people are requested (not forced) to register their guns. The good people, wanting to be helpful, voluntarily registered their guns, thinking that they were helping to win against crime. A few months later, the people were told that the problem of crime was not solved and so now the people must give up their guns. By this time the government knew who had guns because they were registered. What is happening in the USA (and probably some other countries) is even more clever than that. People are being brainwashed into thinking guns are bad and they will voluntarily give up their guns.

There are many people like Alex Jones who are terrified of the UN and Obama because they're evil and want to take over the world. Yes Obama and the UN are powerful, but only as powerful as the support they get from their victims. What if the Germans told that maggot Hitler NO during elections? What if no one supported or worked for Stalin? "Stop supporting your destroyers" -AR.

I agree that we, the people, have the power to stop the cockroaches. It is like Hopper explaining that the ants outnumber the grasshoppers a hundred to one and "if they ever figure that, there goes our way of life". But we should not assume that victory will happen by itself. Never relax in the hour of victory and never despair in the hour of defeat.

I will tell you a little secret. The Globalists are terrified shitless that they might be exposed.

I will tell you another secret. Evil is a plant that grows in the dark, the darkness of ignorance and deception. The light of knowledge is lethal to evil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure Obama plans to do that. I know the UN plans to take over the world and enforce global socialism as is stated in Agenda 21. But it just won't work. Obama, no matter how ambitious and powerful he is, is not able to completely abolish elections and get away with it for the same reason the UN won't be able to abolish the second amendment and send armed forces to disarm every citizen with success. It is very true that people want to take over the world; their plans are as stupid as they are. Obama may try to pass legislation forbidding further elections and such legislation, though I doubt it, may pass. But would there not be chaotic riots once people realized that they are irrefutably living under a dictatorship? Of course there will be riots and of course there will be rebellion. The same goes for Agenda 21's plan to abolish the second amendment and force citizens to sell their property to the world government and from then on pay rent; once and if America falls into absolute dicatorship and irrefutable tyranny there WILL be riots and there will be chaos and rebellion. The despots know it which is why they draw out their plans, but no matter how long it takes to get to the point of obvious dictatorship, once and if it happens, there will be riots, chaos and rebellion. Ask anyone how they would react if Obama forbid further elections, how they would react if the UN ordered armed forces to go house to house and disarm every citizen and force them to sell their houses to the government and thereafter pay rent. Ask a police officer if he would, if ordered, go from house to house and disarm the innocent. As I said earlier, yes, there are powerful people who want to gain dictatorial power over their country (Obama) and the globe, but their plans are just too stupid to work. They will fall of their own evil and stupidity, I think. Think about it, if Obama had dictatorial power over the economy and could enforce anything he wanted how long would it take for our country to fall into the worst depression its ever seen and how long after that would there be rebellion and chaotic riots. There are many people like Alex Jones who are terrified of the UN and Obama because they're evil and want to take over the world. Yes Obama and the UN are powerful, but only as powerful as the support they get from their victims. What if the Germans told that maggot Hitler NO during elections? What if no one supported or worked for Stalin? "Stop supporting your destroyers" -AR.

Let's examine some of these statements, one by one.

Obama may try to pass legislation forbidding further elections and such legislation, though I doubt it, may pass.

Probably correct. But with voting machines being dishonest, that would be the same as no election but with the advantage that the people are pacified.

But would there not be chaotic riots once people realized that they are irrefutably living under a dictatorship? Of course there will be riots and of course there will be rebellion.

Certainly. The Globalists anticipated that. They expect that. That is why the Globalist want to disarm the people (as Hitler did) and they arm themselves with hollow point ammo and they are ready with FEMA camps and some new high tech weapons.

Ask anyone how they would react if Obama forbid further elections, how they would react if the UN ordered armed forces to go house to house and disarm every citizen and force them to sell their houses to the government and thereafter pay rent. Ask a police officer if he would, if ordered, go from house to house and disarm the innocent.

About phony elections, I don't see much rebellion against voting machines; most people think voting machines is just a conspiracy theory. All voting machines should be banned. All elections with voting machines should be declared invalid.

About disarming citizens, they did in Germany and they are even more clever about it now. They plan to condition people to believe owning a gun is bad.

About police officers, we can hope that they become Oath Keepers, but look at the Rawesome Foods case for one example.

There was a news report about a man who applied to become a police officer and his application was rejected because his IQ was too high. The explanation given was that police live a boring life and people with high IQs tend to get bored and quit and then it's a waste of police training. That may be, but I have a suspicion that the main reason is that people with high IQs have more tendency to question orders.

The way the people were disarmed in Germany, according to a person who lived thru the experience, was the people were told that there is this big problem of crime and therefore the people are requested (not forced) to register their guns. The good people, wanting to be helpful, voluntarily registered their guns, thinking that they were helping to win against crime. A few months later, the people were told that the problem of crime was not solved and so now the people must give up their guns. By this time the government knew who had guns because they were registered. What is happening in the USA (and probably some other countries) is even more clever than that. People are being brainwashed into thinking guns are bad and they will voluntarily give up their guns.

There are many people like Alex Jones who are terrified of the UN and Obama because they're evil and want to take over the world. Yes Obama and the UN are powerful, but only as powerful as the support they get from their victims. What if the Germans told that maggot Hitler NO during elections? What if no one supported or worked for Stalin? "Stop supporting your destroyers" -AR.

I agree that we, the people, have the power to stop the cockroaches. It is like Hopper explaining that the ants outnumber the grasshoppers a hundred to one and "if they ever figure that, there goes our way of life". But we should not assume that victory will happen by itself. Never relax in the hour of victory and never despair in the hour of defeat.

I will tell you a little secret. The Globalists are terrified shitless that they might be exposed.

I will tell you another secret. Evil is a plant that grows in the dark, the darkness of ignorance and deception. The light of knowledge is lethal to evil.

I have no evidence that voting machines are dishonest so I won't hold it as true but I will hold it as probable. That would most definently be something Obama would do and looking at the dictators of the past who forced people to support them, Obama would be one to secretly force others to vote for him, which, in this case if true, would be fraud.

What are FEMA camps? Concentration and death camps? I think the only one right now is Cuba but I don't have much evidence. Besides, the whole United States is lowly turning concentration camp as almost every field is regulated and in order to work you have to serve, involuntarily or not, a collective of gansters WHO ELECTED THEMSELVES INTO POSITIONS OF POWER AND FORCE supported by the government. They make the laws they control every field and argue that you dont have to serve them and you can change careers; (of course I refuse not to be an architect, however, regarding those who would switch careers to escape "professional" regulation, there is like a 95% chance the field they switch into requires gov permission (look up the definition of license) and forced servitude to yet another "professional" lot of gangsters.

You said, "They plan to condition people to believe owning a gun is bad". This is true. However, it only works so long as people take them on faith, act on emotion and accept unearned guilt (the only alternative is force). A lot of people, including my most philosophically dignified father, hold that gun-ownership is evil, but some of them hold that because they want to watch people suffer. That sounds horrible and unbelievably evil but so did the fact of death camps and the KGB. I think Rand discussed something like that: committing so evil an act knowing that its too evil for people to believe and if they do just call them crazy for calling you the devil. My parents do that. And by the way brainwashing, despite what propoganda preeches, requires the sanction of the victim. It does not consist of technologically erasing info in the brain and what not, it consists of lying to the victim and them taking you on faith. Imagine if someone had unlimited faith in what you said, you could get them to believe ANYTHING.

And yes, the globalists are scared shitless. I'm sure Vladmir Putin has heart problems caused by constant hatred for existence. Go to 0:53 for a funny clip of Ban Ki Moon's fear.

As for your last paragraph, I like better what Rand said: that power is a weed that grows in the lots of an abandoned mind. Evil is not the product of ignorance, its the product of refusing to recognize truth. Your last sentence is absolutely correct. I had philosophical conversation with a man I knew to be evil for the sake of studying him. It was slightly spooky when I first met him as he knew WAY too much about me (where I shop, what websites I go on, what questions if answered will reveal my plans to win against the architectural gansters). He claimed to have been a mercinary, which is what I thought he was as first as he looked at me like a serial killer looks at a victim (that sadistic smile which comes from holding that by killing his victim he can defy reality and win). Anyway, he said something very important. He talked about how DC politicians pretend to themselves that what they're doing is actually for the public good, lying to others who support and believe them is something they can't do without. If others didn't believe their lies they wouldn't be able to evade truth, they hold that others make their lies true by faith (believing their lies are true). He also said that no matter how hard they try to evade the knowlege that they're monsters, they can't. I've long studied evil people as it is somewhat fascinating how people could be so willing to destroy themselves. They spend their life running from monsters, to horrified to know that the worst of those monsters is themself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And what the mercinary said about politicians goes for most evil people. There are two types of insanity. One is mere insanity with which you don't depend on others to belive the non-reality you imagine as real. A parasite of lunacy, the mercinary and most, if not all, politicans, is one who depends on others insanity: a parasite of lunacy, who, for example wishes the sky was orange, believes that if the majority or a certain number of people believe the sky is orange it will turn orange precisely because that many people believed it. Ask someone, "If a tree fell in the woods and you weren't there to hear it would it make a sound?" No rational person would answer no or I don't know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And what the mercinary said about politicians goes for most evil people. There are two types of insanity. One is mere insanity with which you don't depend on others to belive the non-reality you imagine as real. A parasite of lunacy, the mercinary and most, if not all, politicans, is one who depends on others insanity: a parasite of lunacy, who, for example wishes the sky was orange, believes that if the majority or a certain number of people believe the sky is orange it will turn orange precisely because that many people believed it. Ask someone, "If a tree fell in the woods and you weren't there to hear it would it make a sound?" No rational person would answer no or I don't know.

Oh no, there are far more than two types of insanity.

Believing that there are always only two types of anything is not insanity, it is just a cognitive convenience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am sure there are more types than that and much more specific. My differentiation is my differentiation and its true. I'm sure others have different differentiations that are also true. All I did was use dependency as the standard of differentiation (and by the way Rand discussed it in JG's speech and I don't claim credit for first discovering what I said). This conversation can sprout in many different ways but I don't want to discuss epistemology until I better understand it further (which I will in 4 months)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Savage wins historic legal battle against radio syndicator

'Top names in business' already inquiring about taking his show

Published: 1 hour ago

savage27.jpg

Top-rated talk-radio host Michael Savage announced today he has won his legal battle to free himself from his syndicator, the Talk Radio Network, and can negotiate with a new network.

He said he “will not be heard on the radio for some time” but will continue to update his website and produce a free daily newsletter.

As WND reported, Savage sued TRN in December 2010 regarding his contract, alleging the network used “illegal and unenforceable contract provisions” and “other strong-armed tactics” to intimidate him and force him into accepting a “sub-standard agreement.”

The federal case was referred to arbitration.

Savage’s lawyer, Daniel Horowitz, told WND that Savage was awarded money damages and “complete freedom” from TRN. He declined to disclose the amount but said it was seven figures.

Savage has been given ownership of his show, according to Horowitz, which means he will be off the air until he signs a contract with a new syndicator.

“Within an hour of knowing he was free, we were already talking to top names in the business,” Horowitz said.

WND contacted TRN, but a staffer said no one in a position to comment was available.

Get Savage’s free weekly insider newsletter five days a week in your email inbox by going to the top of the home page on Savage’s website and clicking the green “SUBSCRIBE” box.

As WND reported, the new Talk Stream Live “Power 50,” which ranks the top talk-radio shows streaming on the Web, had Savage in the No. 2 spot.

Talk Stream Live says it sampled more than 1.2 million listeners during the first six months of the year to produce “The Power 50 Report” – the 50 most influential talk show hosts on the Internet and on mobile devices.

“We are proud to report that Rush Limbaugh is No. 1 and Michael Savage is No. 2,” said TSL. “These are the most listened to talk show hosts in the world.”

More to follow …

http://Savage wins h...follow …

Folks:

What I found interesting about this announcement were the July to September 27th, TalkStreamLive.com results which put him as No. 1, with Rush dropping to No. 2 on internet listeners which leads me to believe that the dynamics of communication are totally shifting to the web. Luckily, I live within the shouting distance of WABC radio in New York, so I have a clear choice to listen on my Bose while working or via the internet and depending on what I am working on it is a great choice to have.

However, all over the rest of the US and the world anyone can listen to radio via the internet and it is completely underestimated by the left and the Democratic Party.

Adam

In a message on his website posted today, Savage says he has been “very busily meeting with many interested parties over the past week.”

“Many would like to partner with me,” he writes, “and I would like to thank you, my avid Savage listener and website reader, for your incredible level of support.”

Just days after he ended his relationship with TRN, WND reported, his “Savage Nation” was ranked the No. 1 talk-radio show on the Internet for the third quarter.

After consistently winning the No. 2 spot, Savage surpassed Rush Limbaugh on the Internet, according to TalkStreamLive.com.

“We have watched Michael consistently grow his audience over the last several quarters,” TalkStreamLive.com said in its report of the top 25 shows on the ‘Net. “All of his numbers are way up, especially via mobile and social radio.”

The survey period was July to Sept. 27.

TalkStreamLive.com said all of the metrics collected to produce its top 25 report are via Internet streaming through its new cloud-based server, gadgets, iPhone app and “click-to-listen” links via social networks.

“While I cannot divulge my decision at this time,” he says, “I can say I hope to be back within two weeks with and with the most powerful announcement in modern radio history.”

=================

I can imagine how happy Pippi is with the success of one of her radio heroes.

Adam

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

“The Savage Nation” will return to the air via Cumulus Media Networks Oct. 23, Michael Savage’s new syndicator announced today.

The show, formerly in the 6 p.m. to 9 p.m. Eastern time slot, now will air from 9 p.m. to midnight Eastern, Monday through Friday, Cumulus said.

“Cumulus and Savage will make radio history,” Savage said. “The turbulent times we live in give talk radio a new power. This is the biggest move of my radio career, and I look forward to reaching many millions of new listeners on their flamethrower signals.”

Savage is the author of 28 books, including six New York Times bestsellers. He was awarded the coveted Freedom of Speech Award by Talkers Magazine and earned his Ph.D. from the University of California at Berkeley.

http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/michael-savage-returns-to-air-oct-23/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Thanks Naomi...

This was an interesting thread.

Savage's first three (3) months of 2014 put him number one (#1) with a 20 share [an unheard of number], Rush was a 13 share and no one else broke a 10 share.

This is internet radio and possibly sattelite also like Sirius [sp ??].

A...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Naomi...

This was an interesting thread.

Savage's first three (3) months of 2014 put him number one (#1) with a 20 share [an unheard of number], Rush was a 13 share and no one else broke a 10 share.

This is internet radio and possibly sattelite also like Sirius [sp ??].

Adam,

I could have sworn I saw Naomi's post, the one you refer to. But it's no longer there.

I didn't remove it, so she must have done it.

I think her intent was to bash Savage, not call attention to how popular he is. :)

I might be wrong...

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adam,

I could have sworn I saw Naomi's post, the one you refer to. But it's no longer there.

I didn't remove it, so she must have done it.

I think her intent was to bash Savage, not call attention to how popular he is. :smile:

I might be wrong...

Michael

Eh?

As far as I know, there's no way to delete posts. I think the post you're talking about is in a different thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adam,

I could have sworn I saw Naomi's post, the one you refer to. But it's no longer there.

I didn't remove it, so she must have done it.

I think her intent was to bash Savage, not call attention to how popular he is. :smile:

I might be wrong...

Michael

Eh?

As far as I know, there's no way to delete posts. I think the post you're talking about is in a different thread.

All right!

I love it when I wrong like that.

:)

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now