Mikee Posted June 3, 2015 Share Posted June 3, 2015 Good points here: http://hotair.com/archives/2015/06/03/so-evading-government-scrutiny-is-a-crime-why/"What if the government installed surveillance cameras on various streets in a municipality and then made it a crime to walk along a route that skirted those cameras?"You'd think the fourth amendment would actually mean something: Amendment IVThe right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."Probable cause" is not a paranoid blanket suspicion of every citizen, else you may as well throw out the entire amendment because it means nothing. "Shall not be violated" becomes a joke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
merjet Posted June 5, 2015 Share Posted June 5, 2015 http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/exclusive-alleged-dennis-hastert-sex-abuse-victim-named/story?id=31530828Who is(are) pressuring Hastert, getting payoff money, and "Individual A" remain mysteries. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now