NBI Art Reproductions


Jonathan

Recommended Posts

Here are images from the "NBI Art Reproductions" brochure, b&w, 1967 (thanks, Brant).

Paintings by Frank O'Connor:

255085202_9eb5004597_o.jpg

Diminishing Returns, oil on canvas, original: 36 x 20, print: 23.5 x 13.125

Painting Within a Painting, oil on canvas, original: 36 x 14, print: 23.5 x 13

Serenity, oil on canvas, original: 36 x 24, print: 23.5 x 15.75

Leap Frog, oil on canvas, original: 30 x 24, print: 19.5 x 15.625

Still Life With Apples, oil on canvas, original: 12 x 16, print: 10.25 x 13.5

Character Study: Man With a Turban, oil on canvas, original: 24 x 20, print: 19 x 15.75

Paintings and drawings by Joan Mitchell Blumenthal:

255085201_11c32603c6_o.jpg

Crystal and Fruit, acrylic, original: 26 x 20, print: 23.5 x 18

Still Motion, charcoal drawing, original: 25 x 19, print: 19.875 x 15.875

Island in the Sky, oil on canvas, original: 24 x 20, print: 23.5 x 19.75

Dancing Leaves, oil on panel, original: 20 x 24, print: 15.75 x 18.75

Awakening, white and black charcoal drawing, original: 18 x 24, print: 14.75 x 19.875

Sunset Silhouette, oil on canvas, original: 12 x 20, print: 11.625 x 19.75

Boy on the Bridge, oil on canvas, original: 25 x 30, print: 19.75 x 23.75

Repose, white and black charcoal drawing, original: 18 x 25, print: 15.5 x 19.75

Smokestacks and Towers, oil on canvas, original: 16 x 28, print: 13.5 x 23.5

Morning and the City, watercolor, original: 17 x 23, print: 18 x 23.5

One painting by Ilona R.S.:

255085200_014538ef74_o.jpg

Portrait of Ayn Rand, oil on paper, original: 17 x 14, print: 13.5 x 10.5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jonathan,

Thank you for scanning and posting these images. You beat me to it, as I just received the package from Brant.

Many, many thanks to Brant Gaede. What Ayn Rand's husband, Frank, was like more-or-less as a painter is now available to Objectivists in general. (I intend to scan most all of the NBI brochures Brant sent and make them available, too.)

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jonathan,

Thank you for scanning and posting these images. You beat me to it, as I just received the package from Brant.

Many, many thanks to Brant Gaede. What Ayn Rand's husband, Frank, was like more-or-less as a painter is now available to Objectivists in general. (I intend to scan most all of the NBI brochures Brant sent and make them available, too.)

Michael

You cannot judge the quality of Frank's or Joan's work by these images. You can say Frank tried a variety of subjects but I cannot discern a strong, particular style. I always disliked "Man Also Rises" for it's sheer crudity. I liked the idea behind it and the title. Joan is technically much, much more competent. I dislike her nudes. I saw her work on exhibition in 1970. Capuletti is interesting but overrated by Objectivists because of Ayn's praise. If he had kept painting (he died of a heart attack 30 years ago) he might have gotten even better and more interesting. He tended to overemphasize landscapes relative to the human subjects. He also tended to leave serious technical mistakes in his paintings. Phillip J. Smith pointed out to his acting students (me included) at the time that in one painting the woman's feet really aren't standing on the floor creating a poor, somewhat jarring effect. I once told Arthur Silber that I found Capuletti "cold," which I didn't like and Arthur said that that's what he did like. I have a signed color brochure for his 1970 New York exhibition at the Hammer galleries. The prices if I remember right were about $10,000 and up. I strongly suspect they aren't all that valuable today; that depends more on his reputation in Europe than the AR association I am pretty sure. Today's dollar is only 1/3 the value of the 1970 dollar if not even less.

--Brant

PS: Ellen, were any of Frank's paintings on display along with Joan's at the exhibition associated with Allan Blumenthal's piano concert in 1970? I think that Capu's were. If they weren't I'd understand why. I just don't remember.

Edited by Brant Gaede
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chris: "Does anyone know where these paintings are now. I suspect Barbara may have an idea."

I was told -- although I don't know first hand -- that Peikoff sold the paintings shortly after after Rand's death. I had owned the one entitled "Serenity," but I finally was forced, for financial reasons, to sell it.

Frank always intended to do a painting to be entitled "Icarus," which I wish he'd been able to do before he had to stop painting. In his concept of it, Icarus would not burn up, but would fly ecstatically, and unharmed, into the sun. If I wrote fantasy, that's how I would visualize Frank at the end, flying free into the sun with all the pain of all the years cast off.

Barbara

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He also tended to leave serious technical mistakes in his paintings. Phillip J. Smith pointed out to his acting students (me included) at the time that in one painting the woman's feet really aren't standing on the floor creating a poor, somewhat jarring effect.

Is it perhaps the same painting that I discussed here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brant wrote,

"You cannot judge the quality of Frank's or Joan's work by these images."

Nor can you really judge the quality of anyone's work based on small scans or web images, especially when they're in black and white. I've seen large-scale color versions of two of Frank's paintings, and I thought they looked pretty good. It's been a long time, so I can't be sure, but I think that Serenity was one of them, and the other was of a male figure in a similar pose, which seemed to be a companion piece. And something just clicked: If I'm remembering correctly, both nudes (or similar paintings) appear briefly in James Valliant's Ideas in Action interview with Leonard Peikoff, as does Capuletti's Desnudo. I seem to recall that the camera work was irritating - too brief, too much motion, and odd, short-lens angles - but with Desnudo in particular, I remember getting a taste of what Ellen has described as the skin tone's living marble quality and dusky alabaster hue, at least more so that what can be seen in scans that can be found online.

Barbara wrote,

"Frank always intended to do a painting to be entitled "Icarus," which I wish he'd been able to do before he had to stop painting. In his concept of it, Icarus would not burn up, but would fly ecstatically, and unharmed, into the sun. If I wrote fantasy, that's how I would visualize Frank at the end, flying free into the sun with all the pain of all the years cast off."

I remember that Peter Fonda's Frank was working on such a painting in a scene from The Passion of Ayn Rand where we, and Julie Delpy's Barbara, see that he's having difficulties. I thought it was a powerful moment in the film.

J

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some time after Miss Rand's review of Capuletti I visited Hammer Galleries. You could still look at some of Capuletti's work and I was impressed. I also saw Not Guilty and Unitias to Moore. Not Guilty is the cover work on Den Uyl's book on the Fountainhead. Unitias to Moore is on the Coridier web site. I thought he did great work. I was sorry to hear about his early death.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He also tended to leave serious technical mistakes in his paintings. Phillip J. Smith pointed out to his acting students (me included) at the time that in one painting the woman's feet really aren't standing on the floor creating a poor, somewhat jarring effect.

Is it perhaps the same painting that I discussed here?

That's not the one, Dragonfly, but it looks like he had some trouble there as well. I'll see if I can get the title for you.

--Brant

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to take my Capuletti brochure to Walgreens and scan the contents onto a CD and mail it to MSK so he can post it on OL. I'm Internet primitive. I can't even do links (nor have I tried to learn).

Busybody: "Brant. We have to learn how to do links."

Brant: "Don't bother me, don't bother me, don't bother me!"

--Brant

Edited by Brant Gaede
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Busybody: "Brant. We have to learn how to do links."

It's really quite simple. If you are editing on OL, switch to the page you want to link to, click with the right button and choose "copy link address" or "copy address", return to you edit and click on the little blue circle with the two black thingies (earth+binoculars?) above your edit window. It opens a new window with the highlighted text http://. Ignore that text and hit the <shift><insert> keys (or alternatively: <control>v). The address appears now in that field, click on OK. You're now asked for a text to describe the link, the standard suggestion My Webpage appears, you may ignore that too and just type your own text, like here or this link or whatever you want. In your text now the address appears like [ url=http:/<address>/]description (but without the space after the first "[" ). This looks messy, but if you use the preview function, you'll see only the description appear underlined. To show a picture in the text you do practically the same, but using the green tree symbol instead of the blue circle. To link to a specific post on OL is a bit more complicated, but I think this is enough for the first lesson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
Thanks for posting. the NBI Art Reproductions. Does anyone know where these paintings are now. I suspect Barbara may have an idea.

Regarding your inquiry

I have 1 original painting of Frank O'Connor which I purchased from Leonard Piekoff in around 1983 in an art studio of an Objectivist on the north side of a park in the lower east side of Manhattan.

I have 4 1968 prints, Serenity, Painting within a Painting, Leap frog, Still Life with Apples.

I had 3 other original painting by Frank O'Connor, which I have sold over the years. They were: an early study for Serenity, Portrait of Man in Turbin and one which contained a clown with balloons.

The original painting I still have is the actual painting which is in the "Painting within a Painting". It is called "The Mandarin"

In the late 1980s I tried to buy more Frank O'Connor painting, but Dr. Piekoff would not sell, nor would anyone else who had Frank' paintings.

I am now interested in selling the remaining items

If anyone is interested in buying any of these items, please contact me at bobrsp@sbcglobal.net

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> Some time after Miss Rand's review of Capuletti I visited Hammer Galleries. You could still look at some of Capuletti's work and I was impressed. [Chris]

I love his work. Its purity, serenity, and innocence. The painting that sticks in my mind was of a parklike scene in a city with some skyscrapers? in the distance. A man and a woman stand side by side peacefully gazing off into the distance. They are relatively small in the overall composition, the focus is more on their almost idyllic surroundings. Everything is clean, sunny, sharply and clearly drawn. And I remember feeling, in the words of the old song, what a wonderful world.

(I hope I have reconstructed that painting correctly, it's been a very long time.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

While looking through my recently purchased Ayn Rand Letter I saw a notice that the Sures Art Enterprises Ltd. was selling reproduction of art works. I know the company is out of business but does anyone have old brochures from them?

One of the works that is mentioned is a painting called "The Kingdom of Earth". Another is called "The Conductor". Both are by Joan Mitchell.

Any help would be appreciated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 years later...
  • 3 years later...
  • 1 year later...
2 hours ago, Wyatt McNamara said:

Does anyone know where the Joan Mitchell Blumenthal prints might be had today? Anyone still selling these? More broadly, are there any art prints being sold by ARI or others affiliated? 

Wyatt,

Welcome to OL.

I did some searching and only found the typical things, her name on eBay, her name on Pinterest and so on.

I have a feeling this is a niche opportunity for anyone who wants to pick up the ball and run with it. Not just prints of Joan Mitchell Blumenthal's painting, but of Frank O'Connor, Ilona, etc. Maybe prints and posters of quotes, movie stills, etc., from the Randian world. Also, see if it is possible to set up an affiliate arrangement with Cordair. And so on. 

Where to do this is easy. Here are a couple of links to give an idea: Fine Art America (I typed in Ayn Rand), Etsy (I typed in Ayn Rand Art), and so on. There are many places online where one can set up a print-and-ship-on-demand store for no charge except commissions.

This would take a little elbow grease in running down people from that past to get rights or partnership agreements with them or their heirs, but I have a feeling interest in Rand and her circle and her likes and dislikes is a decent niche market with a long-term nature. Not anything to get rich with, but very likely a steady stream of modest profits.

I know this didn't answer your question, but maybe these musings will spark an idea in someone's head.

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now