Jules Troy Posted May 8, 2014 Share Posted May 8, 2014 I was impressed how he outright states how Obama should be impeached over Benghazi. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jts Posted May 8, 2014 Share Posted May 8, 2014 ARTICLE OF IMPEACHMENT OF PRESIDENT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMARESOLVED, That Barack Hussein Obama, President of the United States, is impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors, and that the following article of impeachment to be exhibited to the Senate:Read the rest of it at:http://www.impeachobamacampaign.com/articlesofimpeachment/Won't happen. His Messiahship is above the law. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jules Troy Posted May 8, 2014 Author Share Posted May 8, 2014 61. President Barack Obama, in flagrant violation of his constitutional oath to execute his office as President of the United States and preserve and protect the United States Constitution, has usurped the exclusive authority of Congress to authorize the initiation of war, in that on March 19, 2011 President Obama initiated an offensive military attack against the Republic of Libya without congressional authorization. In so doing, President Obama has arrested the rule of law, and saluted a vandalizing of the Constitution that will occasion ruination of the Republic, the crippling of individual liberty, and a Leviathan government unless the President is impeached by the House of Representatives and removed from office by the Senate.In all of this, President Barack Obama has acted in a manner contrary to his trust as President and subversive of constitutional government, to the great prejudice of the cause of law and justice and to the manifest injury of the people of the United States.Why the hell is he still president? (I'm actually surprised he is still breathing..) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted May 8, 2014 Share Posted May 8, 2014 Why the hell is he still president? (I'm actually surprised he is still breathing..)Jules,For as ugly as it is, Obama is still the president and I would not want to see harm come to him.The issue is bigger than just one man and so is the office of the presidency.Our system is built to withstand the worst of leaders and replace them with better ones, not to be overthrown by crime because we have a bad leader.btw - I, too, was surprised to see Seagal say what he did. And, of course, impeachment is a legitimate process to remove a bad leader if Congress so decides.Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jules Troy Posted May 8, 2014 Author Share Posted May 8, 2014 Totally agree Michael. I suppose I'm not that surprised, god could you imagine the freeking fallout if that happened? Looking forward to the next election though Christ he sucks. Over 1000 presidential orders?? That's even more than in WWll ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selene Posted May 8, 2014 Share Posted May 8, 2014 Totally agree Michael. I suppose I'm not that surprised, god could you imagine the freeking fallout if that happened? Looking forward to the next election though Christ he sucks. Over 1000 presidential orders?? That's even more than in WWll !Be nice to verify that statement before we storm the barricades don't you think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaalChatzaf Posted May 8, 2014 Share Posted May 8, 2014 Totally agree Michael. I suppose I'm not that surprised, god could you imagine the freeking fallout if that happened? Looking forward to the next election though Christ he sucks. Over 1000 presidential orders?? That's even more than in WWll !Barak Obama is our elected King.Ba'al Chatzaf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jules Troy Posted May 8, 2014 Author Share Posted May 8, 2014 Let's just hope there IS another election... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jts Posted May 8, 2014 Share Posted May 8, 2014 Let's just hope there IS another election...They will have elections. But elections won't do any good. The Soviet Union had elections. Elections can be rigged. But elections serve to convince the people that they are in control, prevent them from rebelling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaalChatzaf Posted May 8, 2014 Share Posted May 8, 2014 Let's just hope there IS another election...There will be. You might not like the results any better though.The freedom of the Press and the Media has not be significantly curtailed during the reign of Emperor Obama. Ba'al Chatzaf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selene Posted May 8, 2014 Share Posted May 8, 2014 Geez can you folks lose the paranoia...however, if you believe what you assert, should you not be on strike? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nerian Posted May 8, 2014 Share Posted May 8, 2014 The people of America are getting what they want and what they deserve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jules Troy Posted May 8, 2014 Author Share Posted May 8, 2014 Geez can you folks lose the paranoia...however, if you believe what you assert, should you not be on strike? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jules Troy Posted May 8, 2014 Author Share Posted May 8, 2014 Lol no I'm just a nervous neighbour living in Canada! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selene Posted May 8, 2014 Share Posted May 8, 2014 ""You can run, but you can't hide!"...Joe LouisWith the backing of major promotion, Louis fought thirteen times in 1935. The bout that helped put him in the media spotlight occurred on June 25, when Louis knocked out 6'6", 265-pound former World Heavyweight Champion Primo Carnera in six rounds. Foreshadowing the Louis-Schmeling rivalry to come, the Carnera bout featured a political dimension. Louis' victory over Carnera, who symbolized Benito Mussolini's regime in the popular eye, was seen as a victory for the international community, particularly among African Americans, who were sympathetic to Ethiopia, which was attempting to maintain its independence by fending off an invasion by fascist Italy.[26][27][28] America's white press began promoting Louis' image in the context of the era's racism; nicknames they created included the "Mahogany Mauler", "Chocolate Chopper", "Coffee-Colored KO King", "Safari Sandman", and one that stuck: "The Brown Bomber".[28][29]Cinderalla man...Louis vs. Schmeling ILouis vs. Schmeling, 1936Main article: Joe Louis vs. Max SchmelingBy this time, Louis was ranked as the No. 1 contender in the heavyweight division[31] and had won the Associated Press' "Athlete of the Year" award for 1935.[28] What was considered to be a final tune-up bout before an eventual title shot was scheduled for June 1936 against former World Heavyweight Champion Max Schmeling. Although a former champion, Schmeling was not considered a threat to Louis, then with an undefeated professional record of 27-0.[32] Schmeling had won his title on a technicality when Jack Sharkey was disqualified after giving Schmeling a low blow in 1930. Schmeling was also 30 years old at the time of the Louis bout and allegedly past his prime.[32] Louis' training retreat was located at Lakewood, New Jersey, where Louis was first able to practice the game of golf, which later became a lifelong passion.[33] Noted entertainer Ed Sullivan had initially sparked Louis' interest in the sport by giving an instructional book to Joe's wife, Marva.[34] Louis spent significant time on the golf course rather than training for the Schmeling match.[22][35]Conversely, Schmeling prepared intently for the bout. Schmeling had thoroughly studied Louis's style and believed he had found a weakness.[36] By exploiting Louis's habit of dropping his left hand low after a jab, Schmeling handed Louis his first professional loss by knocking him out in Round 12 at Yankee Stadium on June 19, 1936.[37]World ChampionshipAfter defeating Louis, Schmeling expected a title shot against James J. Braddock, who had unexpectedly defeated Max Baer for the Heavyweight title the previous June. Madison Square Garden (MSG) had a contract with Braddock for the title defense and also sought a Braddock-Schmeling title bout. But Jacobs and Braddock's manager Joe Gould had been planning a Braddock-Louis matchup for months.[38] Schmeling's victory gave Gould tremendous leverage, however; if he were to offer Schmeling the title chance instead of Louis, there was a very real possibility that Nazi authorities would never allow Louis a shot at the title.[38] Gould's demands were therefore onerous: Jacobs would have to pay 10% of all future boxing promotion profits (including any future profits from Louis's future bouts) for ten years.[39] Braddock and Gould would eventually receive more than $150,000 from this arrangement.[39] Well before the actual fight, Jacobs and Gould publicly announced that their fighters would face for the Heavyweight title on June 22, 1937.[39] Figuring that the New York State Athletic Commission would not sanction the fight in deference to MSG and Schmeling, Jacobs scheduled the fight for Chicago.[39]Each of the parties involved worked to facilitate the controversial Braddock-Louis matchup. Louis did his part by knocking out former champion Jack Sharkey on August 18, 1936. Meanwhile, Gould trumped up anti-Nazi sentiment against Schmeling,[40] and Jacobs defended a lawsuit by MSG to halt the Braddock-Louis fight. A federal court in Newark, New Jersey eventually ruled that Braddock's contractual obligation to stage his title defense at MSG was unenforceable for lack of mutual consideration.[40]The stage was set for Louis's title shot. On the night of the fight, June 22, 1937, Braddock was able to knock Louis down in round one, but afterward could accomplish little. After inflicting constant punishment, Louis defeated the "Cinderella Man" by knockout in Round eight. Louis's ascent to the World Heavyweight Championship was complete.Louis's victory was a seminal moment in African American history. Thousands of African Americans stayed up all night across the country in celebration.[5] Noted author and member of the Harlem Renaissance Langston Hughes described Louis's effect in these terms:Each time Joe Louis won a fight in those depression years, even before he became champion, thousands of black Americans on relief or W.P.A., and poor, would throng out into the streets all across the land to march and cheer and yell and cry because of Joe's one-man triumphs. No one else in the United States has ever had such an effect on Negro emotions—or on mine. I marched and cheered and yelled and cried, too.[41] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Backlighting Posted May 8, 2014 Share Posted May 8, 2014 If Barry was impeached I doubt it would matter much. Biden would then be King (OMG), the Senate still Dem controlled & a good pct. of the population advocating "entitlements". We're screwed until the elections and/ or the voters discover the meaning of individual/ property rights & free market capitalism. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Stuart Kelly Posted May 8, 2014 Share Posted May 8, 2014 The people of America are getting what they want and what they deserve.Oh, God...Here comes Greg...Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmj Posted May 8, 2014 Share Posted May 8, 2014 Impeachment does not necessarily lead to removal from office. It's a two step process ,it originates in the House as a charge and is tried in the Senate. Two presidents have been impeached . If Obama were impeached he would be the second black president to have been.(based on Clinton's claim of being the first black pres ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Backlighting Posted May 8, 2014 Share Posted May 8, 2014 The people of America are getting what they want and what they deserve.Oh, God...Here comes Greg... MichaelDamn, what did I do to "deserve" it...and I don't "want it".I"m an American person. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jules Troy Posted May 8, 2014 Author Share Posted May 8, 2014 The people of America are getting what they want and what they deserve. Oh, God...Here comes Greg...Michael Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jules Troy Posted May 8, 2014 Author Share Posted May 8, 2014 Lmfao!! You beat me to the punch!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moralist Posted May 25, 2014 Share Posted May 25, 2014 Hey, it's the little bird that sings only one note here... Impeaching Obama is a fantasy. He is not a cause. He's only a symptom of tens of millions of people who live in America but who are not Americans because they don't live by American values. It's only logical that a President who also does not live by American values would be elected as the leader they deserve. It's not enough just to complain about a problem without offering a workable personal solution to it.Since each individual American is the only one who possesses complete control over getting the government he deserves.... the solution is to order our lives in such a manner so as not to get the government others deserve......simply by not deserving it.The President is not my leader. I don't need a leader. I govern myself. That's the American way. Greg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Francisco Ferrer Posted May 25, 2014 Share Posted May 25, 2014 Is justice not an American value? Yes. Isn't giving people what they deserve, justice? Yes. Therefore, Obama's is an administration of American values.If a small government, constitution and rights-respecting president had been elected in 2008 or 2012, we would have to grieve, for those who deserve a form of socialism would not be getting their just reward. We can only hope Obama's successor continues his fine work.And was not Katrina an admirable American hurricane, giving the immoral people of this country the punishment they deserve? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moralist Posted May 25, 2014 Share Posted May 25, 2014 Is justice not an American value? Yes. Isn't giving people what they deserve, justice? Yes.Absolutely.By the justice of moral law... people are getting exactly the government they deserve rammed down their gullets......let them choke on it. Therefore, Obama's is an administration of American values. Obama's is an administration of European liberal socialist values. The political majority in America are European liberal socialists who are getting the government they deserve. My own personal experience of the government is completely different than the European liberal socialists because I don't live by their values. And because I don't... the government leaves me alone to enjoy my life. If a small government, constitution and rights-respecting president had been elected in 2008 or 2012... That's a freaking fantasy! There are not enough Americans living in America to elect an American government. Half the country is cashing government benefits checks. One in five children eat government food in a government school. One in every four households eats government food paid for by food stamps. A record eleven million people are on disability benefits which has become the new welfare. Kids owe a trillion dollar debt to the government in student loans which has become the new credit line. Face it, Frank... this is a nation of parasites who all expect someone else to pay their bills. So my advice is to simply stand aside and let them get what they deserve. Greg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Francisco Ferrer Posted May 25, 2014 Share Posted May 25, 2014 Is justice not an American value? Yes. Isn't giving people what they deserve, justice? Yes.Absolutely.By the justice of moral law... people are getting exactly the government they deserve rammed down their gullets......let them choke on it. Therefore, Obama's is an administration of American values. Obama's is an administration of European liberal socialist values. The political majority in America are European liberal socialists who are getting the government they deserve.Then giving justice must also be a "European liberal socialist value." Otherwise, how could we say Obama is dealing justly with Americans? My own personal experience of the government is completely different than the European liberal socialists because I don't live by their values. And because I don't... the government leaves me alone to enjoy my life. If a small government, constitution and rights-respecting president had been elected in 2008 or 2012... That's a freaking fantasy! There are not enough Americans living in America to elect an American government. Half the country is cashing government benefits checks. One in five children eat government food in a government school. One in every four households eats government food paid for by food stamps. A record eleven million people are on disability benefits which has become the new welfare. Kids owe a trillion dollar debt to the government in student loans which has become the new credit line. Face it, Frank... this is a nation of parasites who all expect someone else to pay their bills. So my advice is to simply stand aside and let them get what they deserve. Then we should all cheer for those with "European liberal socialist values" to get elected in 2014 and 2016. For a Congress and President who delivered anything other than that could hardly give justice to the half of the country that "is cashing government benefits checks."Even if we don't contribute to her campaign, we should all feel a deep sense of injustice if Hillary were defeated by, say, Rand Paul.It would be as bad as Katrina missing New Orleans or someone finding a cure for AIDS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now