Allen

Members
  • Posts

    1
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Allen

Previous Fields

  • Full Name
    Allen NA
  • Looking or Not Looking
    not looking

Allen's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

0

Reputation

  1. Under a proper government, wouldn't a bill of rights be unnecessary since the constitution proscribes the actions the government may take. Hamilton's argument on the subject is the best I've read, so i'll post a portion below... "I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and in the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers which are not granted; and on this very account, would afford a colourable pretext to claim more than were granted. For why declare that things shall not be done which there is no power to do? Why for instance, should it be said, that the liberty of the press shall not be restrained, when no power is given by which restrictions may be imposed? I will not contend that such a provision would confer a regulating power; but it is evident that it would furnish, to men disposed to usurp, a plausible pretence for claiming that power. They might urge with a semblance of reason, that the constitution ought not to be charged with the absurdity of providing against the abuse of an authority, which was not given, and that the provision against restraining the liberty of the press afforded a clear implication, that a power to prescribe proper regulations concerning it, was intended to be vested in the national government. This may serve as a specimen of the numerous handles which would be given to the doctrine of constructive powers, by the indulgence of an injudicious zeal for bills of rights." From Federalist #84 http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/bill_of_rightss7.html#note1