About my choice of Anglo Saxons, Whites and White-Man


Reason Man

Recommended Posts

Why the choice of words Anglo Saxons, White-man and Whites



Please take efforts to read this and see where you "whites" stand.



After expanding the above Introduction from one page to more than six pages due to Obama’s invitation to UN in US elections, I offered it on the net forums for comments. A few people agreed enthusiastically that the Left has been targeting for some time now mainly the ASP male for his loyalty to individualism and rationality; a few others also agreed but said that they were taken aback by the words ASPs and whites. But the major attack, that I was a racist came from some Objectivists whom their opponents call as ARI Ditto-heads. (There are many opposing groups within O’ists, umpteen times more amongst Libertarians; Nicknames are common and used even to trash others’ good points. As per information given to me, the arguments below are representative of most ASPs who as per me are taking huge beating because of these ideas. My intent on the forums has always been to learn from wrong ideas, and never go into ego-problems.) So I asked “Why are special names like Af-Ams, El Raza etc allowed to minorities, why are they not only Americans, and when the word whites is used it becomes racist?”


One person declared “Racist, you don’t have place here!” But the major response came as a slap which became the main argument: Quote The reason that the allegations have occurred only when the words white, A-S, etc are used because you have been using them and they deserve to be attacked. Collectivism is collectivism. The reason why Af-Ams, and other groups are "allowed" to identify and associate by their race is something called individual rights. They do so freely, that is their right, and the consequences are their problem not mine. What you are advocating is far worse and is a morally treasonous approach, that is: If they can be racist why can't I? A second-hander to second-handers. You are dispensing with your own mind and depending specifically on the unreason of others to form your own position on the subject.


I referenced Nazi Germany because it obviously refutes your methodology and is well documented both in terms of concrete details and essential ideas. See, Leonard Peikoff's book: The Ominous Parallels. That is a great example of how history actually works. Unquote


Every sentence of this quote is revealing and worth studying, and let’s do so.


(Please note that I already have a 26 page sub-article titled ‘Racism’ in the book; most of the following is addition to it. Many points like Reverse Racism, Backlash etc referred to below are explained in more detail there. The present sub-article had to be hastily added because of strong allegations of racism consequent to my need to use words white-man, whites etc after learning late about Obama’s UN invitation.)



What are Nazis? Nothing special, “Collectivism is Collectivism” is used against me but actually applies to them. In collectivism a special ‘ruler-elite’ is always there, whether identified or not – Brahmins, Padres, Plato’s men of gold, Ulema, Communist Commissars etc. Their collectivist theories are just a means to enslave society – though Nazis were racists still they required socialism as base (National Socialists), and all other Germans were only to execute the orders of the Nazi elite around the ‘superman’ Fuehrer. What did they do or give to the world? Same thing that is going on for thousands of years – loot, enslave, murder, destroy. It is not true that everything (i.e. ideas and concretes) are well documented about them alone – Theories and doings of Dark Ages, Islam, Brahmins, commies, every variant of “Collectivism is Collectivism” are the same as what Plato has detailed in The Republic, only a correct analyst / interpretor is needed to analyze. In fact it may surprise Americans if I quote from the sub-article ‘Racism’ ahead – Quote Capturing other tribes and races as slaves was not only Greco-Roman custom, it was a way of life all over the earth. Therefore the Brahmins in India, who have been calling themselves as ‘gods on earth’, adored Hitler, celebrated his initial victories and established an organization like his (which is very active even in North America and intends to repeat his doings)! (Many westerners may not have heard of Brahmanvaad, but Nietzsche, Hitler’s idol, was an ardent admirer who knew Brahmins’ theories of ‘rights and duties’ based on racial gradation very well! They were mutual admirers.) And as said all along, genocide based on race is common in Africa even today. Unquote Nazism was never anything special except for the latest science, military techniques etc that it employed for destruction; “Collectivism is Collectivism”. Not only the above ‘mutual admiration’, and similarities like Swastika, but commentators have claimed that most theory of Aryan superiority was developed after taking the base from India where it is being practiced for 2500 to 3000 years. For the ditto-heads’ information, that is how old their ‘brand new theory’ is, that all people including Greeks and Romans were practitioners of similar racism.



As shown below, racism is just an ancient variation of collectivism, but has been projected as some sort of a separate “higher evil”, a scare-crow, especially to gag the Anglo Saxons against socialism (the welfare state) promoted from behind other races in America.



Now let us ask the question what are the ASPs, what they brought into and gave to the world? Referring to the century following the American Revolution (because today they are substantially eroded due to Reverse Racism against them): THE ASPs WHO FOUNDED AMERICA WERE UNIQUE IN THE ENTIRE HISTORY OF MANKIND – THERE NEVER WAS A NATION AS MAGNANIMOUS, AS BENEVOLENT AS AMERICA! WHAT THEY GAVE, NOT ONLY TO THEMSELVES, BUT TO ENTIRE MANKIND (IF IT DESERVES IT) WAS THE DECLARATION OF INALIENABLE RIGHTS OF AN INDIVIDUAL, THE ONLY MEANS TO BE MAN THE RATIONAL BEING. This is so very unique that majority of mankind including many ‘developed’ Europeans have not understood it even today, are unable to deal with the new phenomenon; leave alone the ‘undeveloped’ people of the world, even Europeans with their Louis and Bonapartes, Bismarcks, Hitlers and Czars would have just been destroying each other, inventing more destructive weapons. All that they understand out of it is democracy (and America too has eroded into the same muck of democracy.) The ASPs too originally started with ancient slavery that is even today going on the world over (with the African as typical slave carried a thousand years back by the Arabs even to places like India) – but they soon emancipated them, set up funds for their upliftment, even tried to resettle them in Liberia, and have heaped huge largesse of socialistic welfare on them. I have already talked about 5 sets of people emancipated by the ASPs at the start of Introduction. Whosoever on earth is free today owes at least some part of it to the Anglo Saxons! (All these are decribed ahead as never-before-never-after happenings; no other community has ever done this in man-kind’s history, and perhaps nobody ever will.) The world has unbelievably changed, in fact not after the American Revolution, but the British Empire itself because English theories were the root of American Revolution. (The sub-article titled “Inheritance -- An Important Factor ...” explains about slavery, racism etc overlapping with the initial years of American Republic.)


All people giving up their countries to migrate to America are specifically doing so because of that culture. Many other people made individual contributions but they would have remained unborn like during dark ages.



Now consider what the world gave back to the two sides. In this regard the Nazis were short-lived, immediately got defeated (and only in such minor aspects they are different from others), but they still got the standard response from the world within their limited short span prior to defeat. The real returns are seen to the priests, the ‘idealists’ who authored the theories of collectivism -- they were wroshipped as gods for finishing off mankind, in India the tradition was that ‘untouchables’ and ladies had to wash feet of the Brahmins and drink that water as pious! Even today priests of all religions continue to be ‘moral authorities’, continuing to be gods in more undeveloped places.


What did the ASPs get in return? Unexceptionally everybody looks at them as Satan’s Land, as looters of earth, as racists and enslavers (unbelievable, but the world’s idea of racism is just limited to considering white man, particularly the American, the emancipator, as racist, so also about freedom, enlightenment and everything good – he is the epitome of evil! As said above, racism has to be specifically mentioned because it is newly artificially blown up to gag the ASPs.) To repeat an idea from Introduction: All over the earth minorities are persecuted victims and are at a disadvantage. With America it is the opposite – it is the majority community that is being subjected to huge injustice! (I have called it as Reverse Racism).



What we see in the above returns to priests as originators of evil collectivist theories versus returns to the ASPs is an inversion that those who killed mankind were worshipped, while those who did good are thoroughly hated.


In terms of returns to individuals I have explained in this book the above returns as ‘the established norm’; throw dirt at the benefactor, kill him, lynch him because, as a rational individual, he is not going to hit back. This is how individual men were lynched, burned, flayed and hacked during the dark ages all over the earth and heroes like Galileo paid for bringing glory to man. Many in Europe (like Ibsen and others) projected this as ‘one man versus society’ fights; it’s good description is in ‘The Fountainhead’. In plain language it is just Hatred of the good for being the good. This anti-life behavior, loyalty to irrationality built into men is the reason for total stagnation of mankind for thousands of years, no advance in knowledge, no improvement, poverty, open injustices, killing, looting and murder.


If the above is the treatment given to an individual then it can also be done on group basis – traders as a group have faced it throughout history, but they have never come into prominence because there have always been some traders who have compromised, accepted lowly position and continued serving mankind. (In India the traders were part of the sinners club (paap-yoni) along with ladies and untouchables – everywhere else they were treated so even if not designated as sinners. Jews have been victimized and persecuted all over the earth for the specific reason that historically traders as a group have been as close to rationality as allowed by the rulers of societies. But note one peculiar fact—though Indian traders were ‘sinners’ as per religion and were freed by the British, yet they continue to be loyal to Hinduism (i.e. its rulers), and nurture critical attitude against the British! Even in America today they covertly maintain an anti-western attitude, and though they are not outright terrorists, yet are the main source of fund for the above mentioned pro-Hitler party. That same is the case with a huge portion of mankind, which I use as a major basis for deriving my theory that the emancipated later on defeat the emancipators!


The group that has come into prominence due to this treatment, because it has never bowed down so far, is the Anglo Saxons as a nation, the Americans. But still, even if not bowing down yet they too have not faced the phenomenon as well as desired, and therefore have suffered huge demoralization and erosion in their society, are on an unstoppable slide to abyss. Today, America is facing the same phenomenon of hatred of the good for being the good from the entire remaining earth! Its almost universal, but the special place they have gathered to practice this hatred officially is the United Nations under whose auspices the evil has a higher footing than the good. (So much is America eroded that they took lead in forming these institutions and are funding and trying to use them for a combination of spreading democracy as well as East India Co activities! And now the monster wants to enter their country!)


And more – the Anglo Saxons are facing that hatred from within their society too, the phenomenon has slowly gathered momentum after the civil rights movement (or perhaps the New Deal) and the haters have already appreciably nurtured the ‘minorities’ to finish off the spirit of the Anglo Saxons and their loyalty to rationality. (This is on relative basis and in sense of life terms – in terms of conscious philosophy America is substantially finished and already degenerated into the welfare state and plutocracy.)



The above hatred of the good for being the good is the end-product of thousands of years of collectivist theories being imposed on mankind (i.e. pounding of brother-love, unselfishness, charity etc has made them so.) The respect and worship of the murderous rulers was mainly out of fear and awe, because they murder. The men under them have learnt to respect fear and punishment, and hate achievement, reward and life. That is the main reason why the ASPs got such a response – that they are rational achievers, are benevolent, are conscientious, are not murderers, killers and looters.


Against the above hatred of good for being the good, the Anglo Saxons introduced the opposite emotion in human relationships – admiration of and encouragement to the good! It is not fully rational, but substantially more than other communities that are driven by malevolence, as close to full rationaliy as mankind has ever reached. (Note that this is not only a few individuals’ virtue; overall their community is virtuous, is motivated by benevolence and magnanimity. If somebody wants he may call this as racist, but actually it is just fact of reality, and he is a hater. Otherwise science, literature, production would not have got boost, we would have still been in Dark Ages.)


The community of ASPs is benevolent because their philosophy is reality oriented. (To be exact it is Aristotelian, but today many Americans do not understand this fact due to erosion). Their success and superiority is consequent to that. They not only created science, technology, production etc, but – created pro-science, pro-life sentiment, benevolence, magnanimity and mutual goodwill.


Others not only lack science, production etc, but are malevolent, anti-life people who hate rational success. Hating rationality is an automatic part of their life, part of their emotional make, consequent to their basic anti-Aristotelian philosophy, whether religion, communism, socialism – or plain passivity towards life. These collectivist philosophies produce haters of the good on mass scale. This is a characteristic related with the philosophies underlying their upbringing. Their philosophies may be evil and not the men intrinsically, yet after infusion of these philosophies during upbringing, a lot of these men do become evil. For them science, production etc are no value, destruction is, getting free doles at the cost of others is value, dishonesty etc are motivators. Defeating rationality is their most important value and motivator, automatically because, they realize subconsciously that rationality is a product of ego which they are hammered in is the most evil thing on earth. Even if all are not actively evil, yet they are covert supporters of evil and irrationality. With these people goodwill does not work – they will misuse it; take advantage to destroy the one who offers it. (The Boston Marathon Bombers of April 2013, the Tsarnaev brothers are a good example of this – 10 years of good life in US, scholarships etc did not change them! But all of them will not necessarily take that drastic action – majority may take only minor actions like ‘voting’ for defeat of rationality in elections, i.e. voting against individualism and for welfare-state, for unlimited immigration, etc.) Ditto-heads may argue: all such men are not bad, and despite evil theories of upbringing, modernity also has an effect on them, so some of them are good, or partially good – the question is how far should the benevolent community take chance with them? To what extent should the benevolent community get its social standards eroded, the way it is happening in the US?



Net inference: There is a class of men (today called as ‘undeveloped’, backward etc) to whom benevolence should be offered only conditionally and with restrictions and caution – else they will defeat the emancipator. Large groups of men come under this category, whether formed on religious, racial-ethnic or some other basis – example of last is that at some stage of erosion of social standards, the poor of a benevolent society (ASPs) may get attracted to communism by slow degrees known as welfare state!


This matter about encouragement to versus hatred of the good is not a minor matter to be exchanged and forgotten. America’s slide in domestic politics (and demoralization due to opposition on international stage) is generally due to the above hatred of the ASPs by others, and the fate of their country is quite dependent on this matter. Because of their pro-life philosophy, the ASPs lack knowledge of evil, but another thing I experienced is that their arrogance comes in the way of accepting this lack, and instead they continue to suffer losses (and erode) at the hands of evil.


(Note that white is a confusing word, covering far more than Americans; the Brothers Tsarnaev too were white. But it has also become a symbol of hatred all over the earth mainly representing the American whites, followed by the Europeans. So I have only used it as that symbol of American ASP values. Please keep this in mind about the use of words whites and white-man.)



Now, a question from the point of view of the haters: how to kill this benevolent, magnanimous Anglo Saxon ‘way of life’? For that democracy is enough. The thesis of this book (indicated by its very title) is that finally the emancipated people are used to destroy their emancipators – like the plebeians did to Rome mainly for the sake of doles, and which is what will happen in America. Democracy being based on sheer numbers, i.e. lowest strata of society eventually reduces every good society to that level of intelligence and life. While Part I and Part II of this book describe how majority was pursued to substantially destroy America (Worship of Majority being part of the title of Part I), here the important point is how the Democractic Party strongly used race to nurture Af-Ams as a vote-block and for that purpose built the scare-crow of Nazism against the Anglo-Saxons.


Nurturing the black vote-block: If the Anglo Saxons were left to themselves (i.e. if they really were racists like the Romans who did not allow non-Romans in their affairs), they would have survived for longer period of time than Romans because of lessons learnt from Greek, Roman and other histories, higher rationality of the ASPs etc, and this would have given them more time to get a solution to democracy. On the other hand what weakens them to fall faster than Romans is – other groups / races whose strong but sub-consciously practiced way of life is opposite of Anglo Saxon individualism, which means the ASPs’ magnanimity has been used against them! To expose this is the main reason to bring race into this discussion – it is not to insult some races. (There are other uses of studying races too).


It is the GOP that emancipated the Af-Ams, or rather the relatively more rational ASPs fought with relatively less ones (the Democrats), who as original racists ran the KKK even after Civil War, segregation, tooth and nail opposition to emancipation etc – BUT – who later on saw that this mass of emancipated people can be used to grab power and who now “own” this vote-block by almost killing America. The New Deal bonanza is what attracted the Af-Ams to the Dems (prior to which they were loyal to GOP), and they got stuck to the party with the Democratic Platform of 1960 because of its shocking super-communist idea of rights of man. As I have shown ahead, this may even take America to Civil War. The blacks now vote 95+% for the Dems specifically for undermining those very ideas (individualism, capitalism etc) the ditto-heads pretend to defend and say this is merely their individual right and not a movement of destruction purposefully encouraged! As per the ditto-heads, 95% voting to one party is not being on one side of argument (with a few exceptions on the other side), but being divided on both sides of the argument.


Exceptions: Note that there will always be exceptions on both sides, good and bad; after all groups of millions of people cannot be without exceptions – example, the less than 5% Af-Ams who either did not vote or voted Republican are only the exception that prove the rule and not a division of vote amongst the two parties. So also some whites may be actual racists and may misuse the situation to inflict injustice – a good society should punish them, but these few exceptions do not invalidate this entire analysis.



In the sub-article on Racism I have quoted two black writers, Thomas Sowell and Walter Williams. Williams says, “The welfare state did to the blacks what slavery could not do, that is to destroy the black family”. (Of-course those writers being of repute, beyond reach, and black, ditto-heads will not call them as racists for using the word ‘blacks’ the way they pounced upon me.) I have shown with good argument that as part of nurturing Af-Ams as their vote-block the Democrats have destroyed the black family, have addicted them to drugs, have criminalized them, made them parasites dependent on ever-increasing doles – but the final end is to destroy the Anglo Saxon for being the bearer of rationality. Means I have not called blacks as evil, but somebody else has criminalized them, which the ditto-heads don’t allow me to analyze and expose properly.


Same process of building vote-block is now being repeated with the other (bigger) ‘minority’ who even run race based separatist anti-US organizations like La Raza (the Race) – and as per the ditto-heads this is only their individual rights, but identifying it makes one a Nazi! (I have given examples of this happening since the days of Lyndon Johnson, the case of Justice Sonia Sotomayor where the GOP had to shut their mouth because of ‘vote value’ and Dems exercising Reverse Racism against them, etc).



Reverse Racism: One special tool the Dems have developed is what I have called as Reverse Racism. I have described it at length in the sub-article on Racism ahead, but its brief description is as follows:


Reverse Racism has two sides – continuously increase the doles of the “weak” community under various heads – e.g. free food, social security, schooling, medicine and even naming parks, memorials, etc to increase their “prestige”; underplay or almost neglect their vices, and if somebody dares to mention it, attack him strongly as racist. The other side of the coin is to continuously attack the “stronger” community under various heads – they are selfish, egoist, heartless people who created the problem of slavery; declare strict implementation of rational rules (to make the minorities observe law) as racism; declare every mention of their virtues including the fact that they are emancipators, as racism. (One more instance of this is ‘white male privilege’ referred to below). Create special name for some Americans as Af-Ams, but as soon as one utters Anglo Saxon or white American, declare him to be a Nazi! As part of nurturing the vote-block promote and encourage, some even by tax money, NAACP, BET, Black Music Awards, Black Beauty Contests, Black Day, Black Month etc; neglect the anti-America activities of La Raza, a specifically race based organization of Hispanics. That is: Reverse Racism consists of a massive, hundred percent interchanging of vices and virtues (described in the book), with an eye on vote-bank.



A comparison of incidences I have described in my sub-article on Racism is as follows: In 2012 there was news about Mitt Romney talking about his ASP roots in Britain, special relationship etc, but the next minute he denied so as to save himself from the haters. (This relationship is more than 100 years old, but the phenomenon of Reverse Racism against ASPs has come to fruition now – today the ASPs cannot talk about that relationship which Churchill, Thathcher etc emphasized so much!) In the 60-70s a man named Cassius Clay purposely changed himself to Islamic Muhammad Ali to taunt ASPs because Africa is majorly Islamic. Even then there were cannibals like Idi Amin and many other Islamic terrorists were developing; what Ali got is sympathy and appreciation while a large section of ASPs merely hung their head in shame. (In 2000-01 Ali was declared “sportsman of the century” in a well-propagandized, highly applauded function – so much America has given to them. After Muhammad Ali and Malcolm X, because of their name and prestige, there is a steady incidence of conversion of Af-Ams and even white-Ams to Islam, which continues to this day. The most important place where it occurs is the prison, so one can know their quality.) So (as per the ditto-heads) Romney is a white racist if he talks about his roots – and they being encouraged as Af-Ams is their right as an individual! So Obama inviting UN in America’s internal matters is his freedom; opposing him is only because he is black and the opponent is a white racist! Earlier I thought this was just cowardice – now I see full scale hatred of the good for being the good. (All these incidences show to what level of demoralization they have driven the ASPs to – the original creators and bearers of knowledge and civilization have no rights in the realm of race.)



With all the above privileges and largesses, one will not believe, but still there is a concept known as “white male privilege”. It means that white males enjoy special privileges in America (and of-course should be stripped of them, or others be loaded with such doles as to equalize everybody). Recently, the day after the Boston bombings by the Brothers Tsarnaev, a man named Sirota wrote an article titled Let's hope the Boston Marathon bomber is a white American Wednesday, Apr 17, 2013 04:54 AM IST, salon.com with a self-explanatory subtitle: “There is a double standard: White terrorists are dealt with as lone wolves, Islamists are existential threats”.

Just take a look at continuous statistics about a ‘minority’ other than Islam – black males are less than 5% of American population, but form more than 60% of non-terrorist criminals; one parameter on which to infer systemic danger is ‘long term statistics’ that the probability of next danger is more from this area, this community etc. The difference between small percentage in population having large percentage amongst criminals and almost none amongst achievers (generally black achievers are West Indians), and large percentage in populace having much less percentage of criminals but many achievers, if neglected beyond a certain level, and its cause not allowed to be identified by shouting hoarse about Nazism, becomes huge crime against humanity, far worse than acts of terrorism, Hitler, Mao etc. (But remember that as per the ditto-heads the men who coin such phrases as ‘white male privilege’ are not racists – its just me who is a Nazi murderer)



Going on the above lines of pampering ‘minorities’ and hating the good, see what Anglo Saxon society is reduced to – in my other book, ‘The Anglo Saxon Protestant Revolution’, I have given several examples of the level of honesty that ordinary man had reached in those societies (including Western Europe). In most towns of England and America newspapers were sold in a simple, standard fashion (I do not know whether this is myth or truth, but we were told these stories in our childhood. But I have given other examples experienced by people known to me.) A pile of newspapers would be left on a stand / stool in any square with a dish for cash by the side – without an attendant. At the end of the day, the cash would be the equivalent of the newspapers taken away. People even left their houses unlocked and unattended, and went away without fear. After so much pampering of minorities and ‘undeveloped’ immigrants I do not think this will be possible in today’s western world. Today let the law enforcers try to be hard on criminals and immediately sympathizers of criminals gather in full force with allegations of racism. Can somebody imagine what corruption, robbery and murder goes on in the ‘undeveloped’ world?


Further, white terrorism like shoot-outs etc could also be a backlash to the injustices ASPs are made to suffer by Reverse Racism, against welfare measures, pampering of ‘minorities’ that vitiate ASP way of life, against jobs lost because of welfare-state induced recessions etc. When ASPs’ tolerance level is crossed some of them will resort to racism against entire races. This Backlash, described ahead, is developing in the US. The haters’ simple trick is: neglect (or rather encourage) minorities’ Reverse Racism and make huge propaganda against white Backlash as Nazism.



Because of Dems converting White House into Kremlin by means of doles, the ASPs have gathered under GOP – so they are always accused of being racist and recently admitted that they did not want to come off as ‘a bunch of angry white men’. This only means that they too will enter the competition of offering doles so as to woo ‘minorities’ – after all some of them admitted that the welfare state is here to stay. They have accepted defeat as far as basic principles are concerned, though the fight goes on for power. Honesty should be their main tool, but they cannot oppose the Dems’ socialism because charity is also the base of their ethics, so they are generally seen to adopt cheating as their response (e.g. using UN, WB and IMF as E I Co, resorting to war-mongering and bail-out plutocracy etc, all of which is supposed to favor the whites.) Every such move gives the Dems new ammo and example that the ‘whites’ are cheats. As far as welfare state is concerned all they can do is me-too’ing. So finally America inevitably heads to the abyss. Overall, this is my basis for aversion of GOP and criticism of ASPs (explained in detail in the book).


Despite all the above, it is the whites who are funding the largesses of the welfare state and Dems’ parasitical vote-block – and yet made to bear demoralization due to Reverse Racism, feel guilty due to allegations, etc. So in the final analysis is this not slavery of the emancipators to the emancipated? Despite being the most magnanimous society, this maligning as ‘angry white men’, racists etc is the work, not merely of one political party, but of several people including the think-tanks whose ditto-heads attacked me for mentioning Anglo Saxon and whites. What will remain once the ASPs are fully demoralized? What is the entire above if not “hatred of the good for being the good”? What else is it if not an agenda to destroy the ASP male who, and whose philosophy and magnanimity, built that country? Would anybody have known freedom or the modern values that many on earth enjoy today? There surely is a plan of destruction behind arguments for the sake of arguments.


(Despite all the above, note that I am not saying the black race in itself is evil – the welfare state, doles and government supported education system has criminalized and addicted them; and above I have extended Walter Williams’ statement to say that the Democrats have done so. As can be surmised from commentators (including Ayn Rand’s article on Racism), the blacks were neither in such bad shape themselves (broken families and single parents, addicition etc), nor trouble to society (criminalization) prior to the welfare state in 60s. Only study of races will reveal how to rectify the situation so as to preserve America – but the haters do not allow it as a matter of principle.)



Though many ASPs have been taken in by Reverse Racism against them and run for cover as soon allegations are made, yet now there is also a growing awareness of the fact that the Left means to finish the spirit of the ASP (or white) male to destroy America. Just as an example one will get lot of information about Reverse Racism against whites on this link: http://www.solopassion.com/blog/2287. One may have to sift through various entries on this Doug Bandler’s blog; additional information may be available in some other discussions on this forum. I have not read it fully because I am convinced of my arguments; but an article referred to in one comment -- http://www.phillymag.com/articles/white-philly/ and comments on the article are typical of the undercurrent amongst many young white Americans who do not feel as guilty as the seniors. There are comments like blacks are given scholarships and jobs to which whites have no access (this is an admission by a black person); if a school has substantial number of black children and also appreciable numbers of whites, the latter are still given bad treatment by the former. Thomas Sowell’s article talks about how black bullies routinely beat up (sometimes even hospitalize) Asians. And I have shown that black children are purposely being criminalized to create “voting-slaves”, but thereby destroying America – and we are not to talk about all this at the threat of being called racists? (Who is specially privileged if not those bestowed special scholarships, affirmative action jobs etc upon? But look at the haters’ concept of ‘white male privilege’! If whites react then they are Nazis!)



Of the ethnic dangers to the US, the Muslims may be one example because of their fanaticism; but population-wise they are very small and therefore at the moment containable. I see other two as the topmost threats – externally the United Nations and internally La Raza, an organization of some Hispanics. Blacks are an indirect danger, not in themselves, but because of use by others as ‘voting slaves’ – they do not have the capability of totally overturning America (with Malcolm X they have shown the inclination after the civil rights movement) – it is the Hispanics because of various factors like large number and higher capability in education used for propaganda via vicious text-books and the internet. Their organization La Raza (the Race) is not merely racist, but strong enmity is nurtured against America using American money and American system and on American soil, sympathy towards any and every of America’s enemy as part of that enmity, intention of separation from America; MEChA is their student arm, they have produced text-books on lines of such thinking and even vowed to work for the liberation of American territory known as Aztalan! They want that there be no border between US and Mexico, or at least there be no restrictions on immigration – the intention is obvious, to crowd the US with as many Latinos as possible and use democracy to defeat the ASPs. (Remember that as per the haters, who also want unlimited immigration, this is their fundamental right, and one is not to identify it and alert rational people, and by doing so one becomes a Nazi.)



Nazi scare-crow to gag whites: An important part of Reverse Racism is not to allow the ASPs to state their side, in fact even to formulate their side. Formulation requires study of facts related with races. As soon as such a study is undertaken, or one mentions the virtues of the ASPs because of their ‘way of life’ the hater starts shouting hoarse about racism while he himself practices covert Reverse Racism for nurturing vote-blocks. The scare-crow of Nazism has been built for this exclusive purpose, namely to forestall a study by the ASPs, while others keep practicing Reverse Racism against them. It means that everybody else has rights, to be supplied by the whites – but the whites themselves have no rights! It is important for the ASPs to realize that racism is not a new phenomenon, all of mankind was so (and even today many are). Today what is new about racism is the magnanimity and benevolence of the ASPs which is being misused against them (and they are foolishly allowing it)! (See what goes on as prejudice / hate in rest of the world, and one will be aghast that racism is such an issue in America!) Its coming into prominence after Nazi Germany has become very convenient to defeat rationality, so race is elevated to today’s level as if it’s a new category of problems. (Also see further details in my sub-article on Racism.)


The ASPs should realize that while huge Reverse Racism goes on against them in their country, while Af-Ams, Latinos have special names and privileges, only they not being allowed to study racial characteristics is a suppression of their freedom of thought and expression, of their right to defend themselves from things inimical to their country.


Do the ASPs mean to behave like the Nazis, to loot and murder other races? Do they mean to deny individual rights to minorities? Huh – they are the looted party due to those loads and loads of welfare and pampering, and part of continuous immigration is because of ‘welfare’. Under them a thing impossible elsewhere has happened – twice they elected as the most powerful man on earth, a man from a community that has hardly produced men of such stature! (In India, generally a non-Brahmin becoming prime-minister is difficult; Manmohan Singh is an exception after independence, but he is mainly promoted by and completely dependent on a Brahmin family.) Under the circumstances can they be charged of racism if they identify some facts related with groups of men like races and religions? (One should be very depraved even to think about the Nazis in comparison with the ASPs!) Will they spare an ASP criminal, reward ASPs for false reasons, heap doles etc? They are the only society on earth known not to do these things – nowhere else does such justice prevail as in their society, which is the reason for one-way migration to their countries. Am I preaching that they start behaving in a racist manner so as to inflict injustices on, loot and murder other races? And will they accept that advice?


Instead of denying rights to anybody the ASPs give far more than their rights (part of what I have called as their over-magnanimity, cowardice, demoralization etc), but in fact the others (led by the Democratic Party) do not want the idea of rights to remain in existence because rights force them to stand on their own feet and not on crutches of doles. The others want everything to be submerged into the common pot of collective sharing, which means to finish off the ASP way of life of individualism, means to finish off America. It is obvious from history so far that the minorities do not mean to live upto ASP benevolence but instead take undue advantage of it and ultimately destroy it like they live in their societies of origin as barbarians. Let them live upto ASP standards of rationality, let them adopt individualism, and the history so far does make one expect that the ASPs will have nothing against them, in fact they will welcome it because the world will become a better place to live. But because others do not change themselves, and instead misuse ASP magnanimity, should the original creators of these countries not protect themselves?



Ahead I have described in long details the affinity of ASPs to charity (taking it to the level of foolish self-destruction). I learnt much of it from a chapter in the book of Dr. Ambedkar, champion of Indian untouchables, titled “Hindus and their lack of Social Conscience”, in which he gives long lists of American individuals (like George Washington), institutions and trusts, and churches that have done so much charity for the emancipation of Af-Ams. This is a never-before-never-after happening; no other community has ever done this in man-kind’s history, and perhaps nobody will – as far as I see about rich Hindus (the title of Dr. Ambedkar’s chapter describes them), they totally lack good-will, qualms and compunction. They will collect billions and trillions by corruption and cheating as “black money”, i.e. not pay taxes also, but never give a single cent. (Some ASP fools who came to India with their money and wanted rich Indians to join got that experience of being fools.) ASPs will extend lot of help, goodwill, and charity to all Americans including particularly Af-Ams (because of the foolish slavery-guilt forgetting its history and the fact that they emancipated). But the recipients should accept it gracefully and show gradual improvement. What if they misuse magnanimity, insist on shitting on the head of those who gave them free food? What about government intrusion into economy with the help of their vote totally inverting America, false allegations, rise in crime, etc? Agreed that it is incorrect to punish an individual because of his group background of race or religion or whatever – but I ask the haters of good: is it correct to bring civilization down by allowing that level of indecency to your beloved ‘undeveloped’ people?


Today I am shocked in disbelief that ASPs’ over-magnanimity has backfired to totally invert America; how did they allow this to happen? To repeat one sentence: “You too deserve it white man! In fact your contribution has to be more than their ability to rob and destroy; else it can not happen on such a grand scale!” The situation is exactly like in Atlas Shrugged – if Rearden is not to give so much to his blood-brother in charity (at the threat of it boomeranging on the good), then why should the ASPs do it for ‘minority-brothers’ and ‘undeveloped immigrants’ who will surely misuse the situation to defeat the ASPs?


I repeat for the haters to know: if the welfare state is undone, the UN is abolished, Reverse Racism against whites is stopped along with prohibiting ‘undeveloped immigrants’, there will surely be real good-will and efforts to raise the level particularly of Af-Ams; the ASPs have that much never-before-on-earth generosity – but the Reverse Racism they are suffering is likely to lead to one of several possible modes of destruction – usage of words like ASPs, whites etc is just the beginning, civil war, chaos and collapse could easily be the end.



Till one extends ‘the inalienable rights of an individual’ to other races one cannot be called as racist for making references to racial characteristics if they exist as facts of reality (or taking into account actual racial characteristics to mold one’s behavior and save one’s country / society) – only when one tramples others’ rights on racial basis, insults, persecutes or punishes others on racial basis does one become a racist.


When it is seen that benevolence and magnanimity is being misused, that appreciably many members of a group (not race but group, race being just a specie of the genus group and a falsely overblown issue) behave so as to erode individualism, or specifically against the whites / ASPs, then that group has to be given different treatment – not immediately start punishing every member of that group, but treat them differently as ‘systemic case’, potential danger etc. What kind and intensity of such special treatment depends on the number of individuals behaving badly, the degree of danger posed, etc. Such treatment was given to Germans and Japanese during WWII, and is presently being given to Muslims in America – checking at entry points, in public places, etc. But its degree depends on the danger posed. (May be the Tsarnaev brothers escaped such checking, and now the treatment will be more severe).


This is not limited to minorities alone; when a section of majority community forms such destructive sub-groups they too have to be targeted similarly – e.g. Skin-heads, neo-Nazi groups, communism-based groups like trade unions etc. But when the majority community itself goes out of control, there is no specific group to target, the society itself collapses, which is not the case with Western societies, they are the most stable ones on earth. One thing inferable is that white crime, individual and / or organized, is far less than their percentage, they are the mainstay of their countries, and there is no “white male privilege” on this score.


If group-based dangers / activities are not dealt with on group basis then wars with dictators will be impossible – one will have to deal with each individual of the enemy country. When a free country is at war with a dictatorship because of the doings of a small minority (the dictator’s ruling elite) there are many ordinary people trapped under the dictatorship (and some of whom help the dictator though not all); we know this, yet the free country has to wage war with the entire enemy country. Similarly it has to devise suitable ways to deal with ‘group danger’ when it exists on group basis. The group may not be called as enemy group if it is one’s co-citizens (depending on their activities), yet it has group characteristics that are inimical.


In fact ASPs’ right to life includes studying everything that will endanger their life, their society and their country. This includes inter-alia every group of people that will do so, whether it is communists, Islam or some race that may endanger them. To study it is their fundamental right. Not to allow them to do so is to take away their right to life. It is now upto the benevolent community to take their right back to study facts about races, religious groups, immigrants etc. If they cannot do that then they will have lost their civilization to savagery merely due to cowardice.


Because they are rational, it is obvious that everybody will want to crowd there; literally everybody is knocking at their doors – so should they allow everybody in to get their place destroyed and keep discussing ideas but not particular races, not the fact that particular races / groups / men were responsible for the destruction? They should not mention the fact that the ASPs built a great country and other than them all other races came in later on and destroyed it like the rest of the ‘undeveloped’ world is destroyed? La Raza is already demanding an open border; should they immediately do that? (Also see further details about immigration in the same sub-article on Racism ahead.)


Because some Chinese traveled twice in a container box (and died in the second attempt) to breathe fresh air in ‘the land of the free’, because some Afghans, Iranians etc ran away from their countries of origin (many times carrying their hatred for westerners along with them), therefore it is not necessary for the benevolent community to feel embarrassed in pronouncing ‘my Anglo Saxon culture’, while savages all over the earth fight for the pride of their animal-cultures – the ASPs should not feel embarrassed that 4000 year old slavery overlapped the initial years of their great nation – they should be proud that ‘our way of life emancipated whosoever is free amongst men on earth’ – and they should immediately undertake study of races for various purposes listed in the sub-article on ‘Racism’.


When the ASPs see that their government itself is taken over by haters and appeasers with the help of minorities, they will even have a right to form militias to protect themselves and their way of life – and if they do so and society plunges into civil war / chaos, the hater is to blame!



To further answer the false charge of racism against the ASPs: the danger of the ASPs becoming Nazi is far less than they getting demoralized and losing the meaning of their system by attacks of Reverse Racism; so far their sense of life is very strongly individualistic (they call it as libertarian). They will continue to be individualistic, but unite to protect America if correct arguments are supplied to them. They may become Nazi if demoralization is not stopped – but to do so requires identification of who is doing it, who is using groups (races and religions) against them, etc.


Some, particularly Objectivists, also fear collapse into another Dark Ages because of GOP’s reliance on Christianity (which as I shown herein is due their inability to answer Dems’ welfare state agenda) – that too is very difficult because of strong individualism and rationality inculcated in the ASPs. But that too may happen, something like Nazi Christians, if ASP-bashing and pampering of minority vote-block is not stopped, and ASPs are not given a morale-booster. If that happens, the haters should not blame others but only themselves.


Ayn Rand’s explicit views on racism are limited to a single, small article when the more prevalent danger and example were Klu Klux Klan and Nazi respectively. Even her view on immigration is of the time when the problem had not grown much – but because she expressed some views does not mean one will go on justifying them to eternity or become blind to new developments, like the ditto-heads are doing. They can always be revised as evidence of new conditions becomes available. In fact there is nothing new in Ayn Rand’s article on Racism, but the specific reason for writing it is to upbraid Negroes (the word then used for Af-Ams) for their demands of racial quotas, i.e. today’s Reverse Racism of affirmative action. (Changing their label to Af-Ams was a minor part of encouraging their irrationality. Re-read her article on racism and ditto-heads will find that it is really meant to criticize Negroes for demanding racial quotas – I am sure if she were living today, she would have long time back strongly opposed today’s Reverse Racism, the use of race-card by the Dems to destroy America. As shown ahead, there is implied racism in Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged. Her so-called followers have no courage to bring out any original arguments and just use her name as crutches to prohibit others from doing so). Ayn Rand’s advice of not being racist is fine, but today it is secondary (and as said above, it will be difficult for the ASPs to be racists, they being strong individualists). Reverse Racism and Backlash to it, which is showing its true colors now, is the bigger danger. The minorities and the emancipated people have substantially overturned American social structure, thanks to Democrats playing a simple, nefarious trick of heaping unlimited doles on parasites, and the destroyers will keep using minorities for further collapse.


Today Lincoln’s view on races is to be extended to most of non-white mankind – yeah, the same man who emancipated Af-Ams – and its extension is to be considered in arriving at a solution – that the ASPs versus rest of the world are so apart that they will not be harmonious, so should be separated. My consclusion and my extension of Lincoln’s views, as shown ahead, is that unless all others don’t adopt individualism and practice it properly there will never be peace on earth; all others will be a danger to the individualistic community that is already weak in democracy and subject to huge losses despite giving so much. The above also raises questions, especially with reference to America’s pouring money all over the world to spread democracy: what are the preconditions to emancipating others and to what extent is it proper to endanger a free country to take risks? The ‘undeveloped’ are the ones to whom benevolence should be offered conditionally and with caution. Something like: “I will offer them the status of man provided they live upto it by practicing individualism and life of production. My way of life, individualism, and ‘their way’, collectivism (practiced by means of ‘vote’ in a democracy) are not equal, are not just a matter of difference of opinion, but are mutually exclusive, and I shall not allow my country / society to be endangered by them.” I have already dealt with these issues in long details in the book prior to expanding this Introduction. One thing I have explained there is that long time back in the 60s the westerners were warned by an Englishman Enoch Powell that they would come to grief because of ‘immigrant brothers’, which he called as the most important question after the 50s. But after WWII leadership had gone over to the other side of Atlantic, where the winds were of ‘Civil Rights’, so Mr. Powell was declared to be a racist (and later there was repentance for not heeding to his advice, when it was time for grieving.) Even today we have in America haters who hit-out at those hold sane views about immigration as Mr. Powell!



Imminent need of identifying heroic and ‘undeveloped’ communities (I have euphemized to save myself; as a ‘racist’ I have to take precautions): Prior to identifying the above I will explain a bit about ‘group values’ (but not exhaustively). What one feels for one’s country is a subset of ‘group values’ – so also for school, college, district, state etc during sports competitions and performance in academics, or the pride one feels for one’s city for good maintenance despite low taxes against the mess of debt, no maintenance and high crime rate of other cities. This pride is rational. Irrationality is infused when they cheat in sports, fight with each other like “dragging the Union Jack down Europe’s gutters” during foot-ball matches etc. So also racism based on the successes of one’s community like Nazism based on superiority of German culture. But feeling rational pride, setting examples for others to learn etc is neither racism, nor irrational.


(Rationally enjoying group values is one of the ways benevolence manifests, like celebrating the achievements of a member of any of one’s groups like country, schoold, district etc. In the same realm of group values malevolence manifests by infusing irrationality -- they “make the achiever unselfish” by claiming that he sacrificed for the country by winning the Olympic Medal, or that because the group cheers the winner, they all become equal. Instances of this are Russia, East Germany, and China winning medals to outdo the West – but the west wins medals under condition of freedom and wherein the returns to achievers are as per free market, and yet society too takes pride in their achievement, i.e. group value is experienced.)



Important: Just as men are good and bad, countries are good, bad, fanatic etc, so also groups, communities, races etc are broadly so because of their choices (culture, conscious or sub-conscious philosophy etc) and identifying it to show as example to less rational, and as precaution to more rational is not racism at all. Groups too require appreciation and they also undergo demoralization.


If one does not commit partiality to favor or punish an individual on racial basis, insult some on that basis or deprive them of their rights, then to push every achievement into the anonymity of “ideas alone” without identification that some particular community lives the most rational life is a grave injustice to that community. To continuously neglect (or rationalize for) huge instances of crimes and vices of other communities (and attack those who want to study its causes), there rarely are anti-good and pro-evil actions of equal magnitude – the men who encourage this are surely more evil than ordinary criminals. What would happen to an individual under such circumstances, the same is happening to the ASPs as a group, internally in America, and on the world scene; Ditto-heads are not bothered (as the ditto-heads say “the consequences are their problem not mine”), because the ditto-heads’ contribution to society is far less than their retu

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Where would the ASP's be without the Jews?. Remember that the American Revolution was funded by Chaym. Solomon. He not only came up with the money but he did it on Yom Ha Kipurim!

Ba'al Chatzaf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where would the ASP's be without the Jews?.

Probably doing just fine.

Don't get me started.

Remember that the American Revolution was funded by Chaym. Solomon. He not only came up with the money but he did it on Yom Ha Kipurim!

Perhaps. But youse guys also funded the Russian Revolution, and by extension the (Jewish) Bolsheviks, and by further extension, the Holodomor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it just me or does this post seem poorly organized? I find it difficult to read.

Also, do Anglo-Saxons even exist anymore? I don't know anyone who is descended from mostly English stock. Everyone I know who is white is a vast mixture of a variety of European ethnic groups,

Ethnicity is a very temporary thing in history. It isn't relevant to political philosophy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it just me or does this post seem poorly organized? I find it difficult to read.

Ditto. It needs work.

Also, do Anglo-Saxons even exist anymore? I don't know anyone who is descended from mostly English stock. Everyone I know who is white is a vast mixture of a variety of European ethnic groups,

Yes, yes, we are all just one teeming amorphous mass of rational actors. Nothing to see here, move along.

Ethnicity is a very temporary thing in history.

R U sirius?

It isn't relevant to political philosophy.

Sez you.

I'm putting a stop to your mind-virus right here.

SB

- Achilles last stand --

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps. But youse guys also funded the Russian Revolution, and by extension the (Jewish) Bolsheviks, and by further extension, the Holodomor.

Getting rid of the Tzar seemed like a good idea at the time. The Revolution was just as much about getting rid of a reactionary ruling clique as it was about bring the "millenium" of socialism. The first happened and the latter did not increase the happiness of mankind. Meanwhile the Jews that mattered emigrated to America. In the fullness of time they added disproportionately to the prosperity of their adopted Nation.

And if you disagree I absolutely insist you give back your polio vaccination. The reason why we don't leave in terror of polio during the warm summers is due to the work of two Jews, Salk and Sabin. And while you are at it, detach the USB from your computer. That was also invented by a Jew.

Ba'al Chatzaf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps. But youse guys also funded the Russian Revolution, and by extension the (Jewish) Bolsheviks, and by further extension, the Holodomor.

Getting rid of the Tzar seemed like a good idea at the time. The Revolution was just as much about getting rid of a reactionary ruling clique as it was about bring the "millenium" of socialism. The first happened and the latter did not increase the happiness of mankind. Meanwhile the Jews that mattered emigrated to America. In the fullness of time they added disproportionately to the prosperity of their adopted Nation.

And if you disagree I absolutely insist you give back your polio vaccination. The reason why we don't leave in terror of polio during the warm summers is due to the work of two Jews, Salk and Sabin. And while you are at it, detach the USB from your computer. That was also invented by a Jew.

Ba'al Chatzaf

Yeah?! Did they invent the wheel?

--Brant

we goyim did our part, you dirty -- Oops! (~blush~)

(slip of the tongue)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps. But youse guys also funded the Russian Revolution, and by extension the (Jewish) Bolsheviks, and by further extension, the Holodomor.

Getting rid of the Tzar seemed like a good idea at the time. The Revolution was just as much about getting rid of a reactionary ruling clique as it was about bring the "millenium" of socialism. The first happened and the latter did not increase the happiness of mankind. Meanwhile the Jews that mattered emigrated to America. In the fullness of time they added disproportionately to the prosperity of their adopted Nation.

And if you disagree I absolutely insist you give back your polio vaccination. The reason why we don't leave in terror of polio during the warm summers is due to the work of two Jews, Salk and Sabin. And while you are at it, detach the USB from your computer. That was also invented by a Jew.

Ba'al Chatzaf

Yeah?! Did they invent the wheel?

--Brant

we goyim did our part

Exactly Brant. It takes a certain kind of...er....chutzpah... to imply that the poor goys wouldn't manage to maintain an ascendent high-tech civilization without help from the SuperJews.

Jews have done good work in the hard sciences. The soft sciences/humanities? Not so much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I need chutzpah!

Yes, you and every other Gentile could use more chutzpah -- it will be necessary for psychological health if you live in a diverse (non traditional) society

The high-trust communitarian ethos you and your father grew up with is being eroded into nothingness. The kind, deferential, polite manners of your era will be seen as cowering weakness by other tribes, and will leave you unprepared.

We will have to learn chutzpah from the Jews in order to adapt to the New World Order:

http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/Jews/Jews-ExploitationVsTrust.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jews have done good work in the hard sciences. The soft sciences/humanities? Not so much.

Physics and Math. That is where brain power counts.

However the best of the breed was Isaac Newton. A Gentile. But he knew how to read Hebrew.

Ba'al Chatzaf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I need chutzpah!

Yes, you and every other Gentile could use more chutzpah -- it will be necessary for psychological health if you live in a diverse (non traditional) society

The high-trust communitarian ethos you and your father grew up with is being eroded into nothingness. The kind, deferential, polite manners of your era will be seen as cowering weakness by other tribes, and will leave you unprepared.

We will have to learn chutzpah from the Jews in order to adapt to the New World Order:

http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/Jews/Jews-ExploitationVsTrust.html

Anti-Semitism for intellectuals, pretending Jews are an even more disparaged group--gypsies.

--Brant

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the risk of running headfirst into a "that's what you would say" response, there are several points on which the Birdman and I are in agreement, but then we split paths.

He is correct that Jews have successfully established a high-trust culture among themselves (or should I say "ourselves," since many would place me ethnically within that group). He is also correct that Jews are doing a good job of out-competing most other cultural/ethnic groups because of said culture. Lastly, he is correct in concluding that this should be the end goal of other cultures that may not be performing as well.

Here is where his thinking goes a bit awry: outperforming isn't "exploitation" per se. Exploitation has a specific meaning, which is that you are using, or especially harming, another person for personal advancement. It's an emotionally attractive position to take because it implies a simple solution (simply rid yourself of the exploiter). I'm also sure he could dig up some offensive Biblical passage in support of his argument, but exploitation is not in line with modern-day Jewish values. As an "insider" in this shared culture by birth, I've never once witnessed Jews conspiring to exploit others. They are very much concerned with self-improvement and advancement, yes, but it's done no more maliciously within the group than outside of it. His second, more critical mistake is the apparently assumption that Jews trust each other simply because of their "Jewness." This misses the point. The high-trust culture doesn't exist because person A happens to be X and person B happens to also be X. The high-trust culture exists because X actually means something and has been established as a reliable predictor of other qualities through thousands of years of cultural reinforcement. If somebody is Jewish, you immediately know certain things about them: a)they probably come from a traditional family b)they are probably middle class or higher (less likely to rob you, etc.) and c)they probably had a basic work ethic instilled in them by their parents. This is why his assumption that white Christians - or whoever - can just decide to band together one day and succeed on that basis - without doing any of that hard cultural work - rings hollow. It's the difference between assuming that Michael Jordan was a great basketball player because he was given the opportunity to play on a great team and recognizing that he became a good player first, through years of practice, and was then allowed to play on the team because of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I need chutzpah!

Yes, you and every other Gentile could use more chutzpah -- it will be necessary for psychological health if you live in a diverse (non traditional) society

The high-trust communitarian ethos you and your father grew up with is being eroded into nothingness. The kind, deferential, polite manners of your era will be seen as cowering weakness by other tribes, and will leave you unprepared.

We will have to learn chutzpah from the Jews in order to adapt to the New World Order:

http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/Jews/Jews-ExploitationVsTrust.html

Anti-Semitism for intellectuals, pretending Jews are an even more disparaged group--gypsies.

--Brant

Funny you mention that. I've read elsewhere Jews being described as "high-functioning Gypsies" :laugh:

It ocurrs to me:

KacyRay - Stan Marsh

Robert Baratheon - Kyle Broflovski

Seapis Bey - Eric Cartmann

:)

RB, I'll get back to your post later on.

Now, if you'll excuse me...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny you mention that. I've read elsewhere Jews being described as "high-functioning Gypsies" :laugh:

High functioning Gypsies that revolutionize physics and cure dreadful diseases.

Ba'al Chatzaf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny you mention that. I've read elsewhere Jews being described as "high-functioning Gypsies" :laugh:

High functioning Gypsies that revolutionize physics and cure dreadful diseases.

Ba'al Chatzaf

There is a serious question as to whether today's Jews are from the "lost tribes of Israel" or other stock.

--Brant

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny you mention that. I've read elsewhere Jews being described as "high-functioning Gypsies" :laugh:

High functioning Gypsies that revolutionize physics and cure dreadful diseases.

Ba'al Chatzaf

There is a serious question as to whether today's Jews are from the "lost tribes of Israel" or other stock.

--Brant

What difference does it make? Jews of all "races" are part of the Tribe.

It is the values and the culture that make a Jew a Jew not who his ancestors were.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny you mention that. I've read elsewhere Jews being described as "high-functioning Gypsies" :laugh:

High functioning Gypsies that revolutionize physics and cure dreadful diseases.

Ba'al Chatzaf

There is a serious question as to whether today's Jews are from the "lost tribes of Israel" or other stock.

--Brant

What difference does it make? Jews of all "races" are part of the Tribe.

It is the values and the culture that make a Jew a Jew not who his ancestors were.

I think of this subject because I have a passion for intelligence and naturally wonder where all those Jewish brains have come from.

--Brant

"This land is mine, God gave this land to me" is, of course, complete bunk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This discussion has deviated from the original intent of the post, so I am just answering the comments I find to be significant for the OP:


FuturistNow and Serapis Bey: Write-up is poorly organized, needs work.


Response: Sorry that I did not mention, but it is a continuation of another OP of mine “Intro to Democracy as Nemesis of ASPs”, just 1 step below this one on the same forum.


MSK: I only skimmed this article, but there is a fundamental flaw I kept seeing repeated. Did anyone actually read this thing?


Response: This is the biggest problem. There is so much of misunderstanding about racism in America, and it is being misused to the hilt by the Dems as part of their “destruction of America via welfare-state” agenda. The OP is meant to rectify the misunderstanding, BUT: Did anyone actually read this thing? With the necessary seriousness? The atmosphere the Dems have created is so very simple: anybody touching the topic from side of rationality is damned and blackened in advance, without inquiry / study. And I being a foreigner without any name / standing am not likely to get any attention.


MSK’s other comment: I do not see racism per se, is the only sensible comment I have seen so far on any boards I visit – today to even utter words ASPs, whites etc so as to even study facts immediately bring a load of huge charges of racism and murder is what has stunned me. One becomes a criminal without hearing!!!


After all Brant too said: Not reasonable to read too long stuff Reason Man!


FuturistNow: Do ASPs exist anymore? Ethnicity is very temporary in politics, etc.


Response: Very likely that you have not read the write-up, so I see no point in commenting or answering.


BaalChatzaf and the Jewish line:


Response: Jews were scattered all over the earth (including my state Maharashtra, and another Kerala in India, even to this day there is an exchange of literature and culture between these states and Israel), they were forced into trading and professions, that being considered lowly prior to Rennaissance / modernity. Like all “trading communities” they have done more +ve things, but also a few –ves like supporting the Bolsheviks, all from point of view of self-interest. BUT – even upto 1945 their position in a more ‘advanced’ Europe was what ultimately climaxed into Hitler’s hatred. It was the Anglo Saxons who gave them the platform to flourish – that is what this OP is all about, please see carefully. Like all other rational men, their contribution to humanity would have been unborn. Comments about Jews on this post seem to be more towards racism / ethnicism.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think of this subject because I have a passion for intelligence and naturally wonder where all those Jewish brains have come from.

--Brant

"This land is mine, God gave this land to me" is, of course, complete bunk

The van den Haag hypothesis is that the occurrence of high intelligence among Ashkenazic Jews was the accidental result of the way matches were made in the Jewish Shtetels (Jewish communities in eastern Europe). Men who mastered Talmud and Torah which involve very abstract principles were held in very high respect. They were considered proper matches with the daughters of prosperous and successful businessmen who have already demonstrated high practical intelligence. Meanwhile among the Catholic communities their brightest and best were shunted into the Priesthood and Monasteries where the chances of having reproductive success was minimal. In short Catholic culture developed a program of lowering IQ and Jewish culture developed (purely accidentally) a program for raising IQ. The rest is history.

With the advent of the Protestant movement, the fortunes of men improved since material prosperity was regarded as a Sign that the Almighty had bestowed His favor. As a result the Protestants also developed a breeding program for maximizing practical intelligence.

Ba'al Chatzaf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now