overt

Overt, On my dime? Heh. That's a hell of a trade. For you, that is. Let me give it a try from scratch. To start with, I suggest reading the posting guidelines. When you post on a new board, that's the least you should do. I am a strong believer in cordiality to people I don't know. As an old friend of mine from Brazil used to say, good manners are welcome the world over. You can take them anywhere. So welcome to OL. Michael Maybe I should have been more clear. I don't need a welcome since I won't be here after I get an answer from Ninth Doctor. Which I've received and said what I had to say about, and now I'm gone. Thanks for the attempt at friendliness, but from what I've read of yours, you couldn't maintain that friendliness with me. Good bye.

You misjudge on principle, brother. I'm not interested in detailing my limited and mostly unpleasant experience on OO, my educational background, my life-story, or anything else for that matter. However, thanks for admitting your guilt and pointing me in the direction of further examples of your guilt. My statements on OO were not directed at you in particular, but I see now that they fit. I hope you find a way out of your confusion, but I'm not going to sit here and try to convince you of anything. I don't practice blind hatred, despite what you may think; but I don't practice appeasement either.

So would it be fair to say you think of Peikoff and ARI as dogmatists and spend time bashing them?

Hey hi, Overt! Welcome to OL, where bashing has gradations undreamt of in your philosophy. No need for a welcome. I'm only here because I couldn't get an answer to my question while on OO.

As I said on the Objectivism Online forums: I don't want a flame war. I want to know if you think Peikoff is a dogmatist and if you spend time bashing him.