Andrew Breitbart Dead at 43


dennislmay

Recommended Posts

Folks:

There are at least three story lines to follow:

1) who the hell is this President?;

2) why did the media act implicitly to obliterate his past; and

3) what are they hiding now that his administration is activating.

Adam

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 82
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Folks:

There are at least three story lines to follow:

1) who the hell is this President?;

2) why did the media act implicitly to obliterate his past; and

3) what are they hiding now that his administration is activating.

Adam

Black liberation theology is a rascist version of liberation theology which is the Maoist revolutionary answer of how to break the stanglehold of the Catholic church in Latin countries - getting it ready for communism. Maoist revolutionaries [Che converted] don't want to wait for the conditions to be right for revolution - they want to actively create the conditions. Black Liberation Theology is also in bed with radical Islam which since WWII has had strong connections to European Fascism. As Hayek carefully documents in "The Counter-Revolution of Science" fascism is just an intermediate step leading to communism. An industrial society requires the intermediate step - the conversion in one step is too painful and people will rebel.

Obama is a 3rd generation Marxist from both sides of the family. His immersion in Maoist/Black Liberation Theology/Radical Islam places him as a person who is attempting to create the conditions for revolution leading first to a fascist dictatorship and eventually world-wide one party communist rule. He is also perfectly positioned to become a martyr if necessary - Glenn Beck has been documenting comments from Nation of Islam leader Lewis Farrakhan indicating a martyrdom may be in the works to create a crisis leading to dictatorship.

The mainstream media in this country is 93%-95% socialist leaning. They are supporting their political goals. They have to lie about and cover for Obama for him to be effective.

Dennis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw Hannity.

What a wet noodle of a story!

We all know that Obama was educated by left wing radicals, he obviously liked it and was very friendly to his mentors, and that the left wing media suppressed videos where he shows it.

He hugged one. Wow!

And a leftie professor implied he sat on the video. Double wow!

:smile:

But I believe Hannity did this on purpose. He did a spin tonight like I have rarely seen him do. I think he wants to bait the liberal press into mocking the "smoking gun" and go overboard. Once the buzz gets at fever pitch and the left-wing press has compromised itself with some outright doozies, I think Hannity will stick it to them with a real smoking gun.

I might be wrong, but I don't think so. Hannity used up his prime show real-estate to present this wet noodle. I even think there might be another wet noodle or so still coming. But then, he will lower the boom. I will be watching to see if my idea plays out in the upcoming videos. If it does, and I think it will, this will be one hell of a ride.

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Michael:

That was the gentleman who ran against Schakowsky.

Adam

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Folks: There are at least three story lines to follow: 1) who the hell is this President?; 2) why did the media act implicitly to obliterate his past; and 3) what are they hiding now that his administration is activating. Adam
Black liberation theology is a rascist version of liberation theology which is the Maoist revolutionary answer of how to break the stanglehold of the Catholic church in Latin countries - getting it ready for communism. Maoist revolutionaries [Che converted] don't want to wait for the conditions to be right for revolution - they want to actively create the conditions. Black Liberation Theology is also in bed with radical Islam which since WWII has had strong connections to European Fascism. As Hayek carefully documents in "The Counter-Revolution of Science" fascism is just an intermediate step leading to communism. An industrial society requires the intermediate step - the conversion in one step is too painful and people will rebel. Obama is a 3rd generation Marxist from both sides of the family. His immersion in Maoist/Black Liberation Theology/Radical Islam places him as a person who is attempting to create the conditions for revolution leading first to a fascist dictatorship and eventually world-wide one party communist rule. He is also perfectly positioned to become a martyr if necessary - Glenn Beck has been documenting comments from Nation of Islam leader Lewis Farrakhan indicating a martyrdom may be in the works to create a crisis leading to dictatorship. The mainstream media in this country is 93%-95% socialist leaning. They are supporting their political goals. They have to lie about and cover for Obama for him to be effective. Dennis

I agree there will be some stories to bait the mainstream media and Obama spokesmen into creating a narrative to explain why Obama was under the wing of terrorists, Marxist professors, Islamic radicals, rascists, and other extremists then like with ACORN the hammer will come down making it obvious he has been groomed since he was a youth to be a revolutionary.

They mentioned last night that video connecting Obama to Islamic radicals has been covered up [i think it was the LA Times]. There is also the matter of his college funding and ability to gain entrance being funded by Islamic terrorism supporters from Saudi Arabia and his trip to Pakistan to further his radicalization.

Dennis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adam,

I know that.

I've met the dude and his wife and talked with them. I worked his campaign. But that's only because he has a guitar and can sing and this enchanted Kat. (I'm not much of a political campaigner, otherwise.) :smile:

I was glad to see him get mainstream airtime.

But that doesn't change things. The story (Obama hugging a radical professor he introduced at a public event and the lefties sitting on the video of it) is still not a shocker like it was hyped to be.

Hannity is no fool, though. And Joel studied at Obama's alma mater, Harvard, where you know he met people and people.

That's why I believe this weak opening volley is leftie-bait--part of a larger strategy.

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adam,

I know that.

I've met the dude and his wife and talked with them. I worked his campaign. But that's only because he has a guitar and can sing and this enchanted Kat. (I'm not much of a political campaigner, otherwise.) :smile:

I was glad to see him get mainstream airtime.

But that doesn't change things. The story (Obama hugging a radical professor he introduced at a public event and the lefties sitting on the video of it) is still not a shocker like it was hyped to be.

Hannity is no fool, though. And Joel studied at Obama's alma mater, Harvard, where you know he met people and people.

That's why I believe this weak opening volley is leftie-bait--part of a larger strategy.

Michael

I believe the larger narrative is not about Obama - it is about the corruption of the mainstream media and collusion with the Democrats. Obama can come and go but the root problem is the corrupt extremist mainstream media which maintains a stranglehold on voter blocks that will need to be turned around to ever have any chance of keeping the nation from slipping into a fascist dictatorship.

The public needs to be made aware of the extent of the corruption and how they are being mislead at every turn. The rise of alternative sources of information seems the only cure both short and long term. At some point those not involved with corruption need to turn their backs on the mainstream media and not participate on their networks in any form. Starve them of any pretense that they are anything other than statist propaganda wings of the Democratic party.

Freedom of Speech is under attack and it is likely to get very dicey.

Dennis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dennis,

I agree that this is part of the overall narrative. But Hannity, after all, is a political attack dog and he makes no bones about wanting to get Obama booted.

All this complements each other, anyway.

I think Joel just might be the source of the Harvard videos from some quality digging time while he was studying in Crimson Country.

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What struck me most about the video was that all those years ago Obama was cultivating a phony urban-black accent for occasions when it suited his purposes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dennis,

I agree that this is part of the overall narrative. But Hannity, after all, is a political attack dog and he makes no bones about wanting to get Obama booted.

All this complements each other, anyway.

I think Joel just might be the source of the Harvard videos from some quality digging time while he was studying in Crimson Country.

Michael

Several commentators have increasingly joined in about the looming dangers to freedom of speech. I would say Glenn Beck is speaking loudest and with the most background information of anyone. Marxist/Fascist revolutions have to control information in order to succeed. Rush has been calling them the State Run Media for some time for good reason. Media collusion with the White House has been documented by Tucker Carlson. Getting rid of Obama is important but does not address the fundamental problem - corruption of the media - which is what allows a dicatorship to gain control. Gun confiscation will happen right after the effective elimination of free speech. It is the same as over once the media is lost.

It is good that alternative media is spreading into several forms. We have seen in foreign conflicts that nearly all can be shut off overnight if a government really wants to do so. The more independent forms and outlets the better.

Dennis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What struck me most about the video was that all those years ago Obama was cultivating a phony urban-black accent for occasions when it suited his purposes.

Early on during the 2008 election there were hints that Obama took professional instruction to develop this speaking style - known to be effective on the gullible.

Dennis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dennis,

I once considered doing a study of the persuasion and crowd manipulation techniques in Obama's speeches. Since I have studied a few, I can see them clearly.

But some bonehead put out a study already and went waaaaaaay over the mark, claiming Obama hypnotized the American public into voting for him. It was so propaganda-like itself it became a laughing stock and later efforts to discuss Obama's presentation and crowd control skills were either channeled into vague generalities (like he has a lot of communication talent and so forth) or dismissed as quackery.

Some of the stuff in the study was correct, some interesting stuff that could lead to further investigation was spun out of character with speculation parading as fact, and some of it was just plain dishonest.

The guy actually helped Obama hide what he does from the general public. Here's the PDF if anyone is interested: An Examination of Obama’s Use of Hidden Hypnosis Techniques in His Speeches.

These idiots just don't get it. When you fight lies with lies, everyone's a liar and accusations don't stick. The yelling buries what truth there is once the "everyone's a liar" narrative sets in with the public.

Only objective truth presented dramatically blows large-scale deception into oblivion in the short-term, like, say, the ACORN videos of James O’Keefe.

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dennis,

But some bonehead put out a study already and went waaaaaaay over the mark, claiming Obama hypnotized the American public into voting for him. It was so propaganda-like itself it became a laughing stock and later efforts to discuss Obama's presentation and crowd control skills were either channeled into vague generalities (like he has a lot of communication talent and so forth) or dismissed as quackery.

Such a claim is outright Nutsy Fagin. In addition it is also a denial of Free Will. People believe what they -choose- to believe. Belief cannot be forced or imposed. People can be fooled, at times, but never forced into thinking anything they do not wish to think.

Claims such as "mind control" is right up their with The Black Helicopters.

Ba'al Chatzaf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dennis,

I once considered doing a study of the persuasion and crowd manipulation techniques in Obama's speeches. Since I have studied a few, I can see them clearly.

But some bonehead put out a study already and went waaaaaaay over the mark, claiming Obama hypnotized the American public into voting for him. It was so propaganda-like itself it became a laughing stock and later efforts to discuss Obama's presentation and crowd control skills were either channeled into vague generalities (like he has a lot of communication talent and so forth) or dismissed as quackery.

Some of the stuff in the study was correct, some interesting stuff that could lead to further investigation was spun out of character with speculation parading as fact, and some of it was just plain dishonest.

The guy actually helped Obama hide what he does from the general public. Here's the PDF if anyone is interested: An Examination of Obama’s Use of Hidden Hypnosis Techniques in His Speeches.

These idiots just don't get it. When you fight lies with lies, everyone's a liar and accusations don't stick. The yelling buries what truth there is once the "everyone's a liar" narrative sets in with the public.

Only objective truth presented dramatically blows large-scale deception into oblivion in the short-term, like, say, the ACORN videos of James O’Keefe.

Michael

After watching "Person of Interest" I ocassionally watch "The Mentalist". I find the show interesting because I have always tried to understand con-men and later in light of my interest in physics and being in the military - the actions of spies - and others who use manipulation techniques. I have known a few extreme womanizers in my life and their techniques are interesting as well. I have not done any kind of in depth study but it is clear that most people understand a great deal less about the subject than I do just from what I have picked up here and there.

The "everyone's a liar" or "everyone is a cheat" is very effective in shutting down thought in many people. It is a favored technique among socialists maintaining their political power and socialists pushing class warfare. I have been often surprised in how easily people can be manipulated in class warfare. People with poor analytical skills literally cannot understand how the labor of one person might be considerably more valuable than anothers. When it comes time for help on a math problem or something that needs computer programming skills they blank-out about how that is something not everyone can do and good luck finding anyone willing to do it. I have found that the vast majority of people who have resumes saying they can do it are still useless.

Long story short - manipulation works. Those who are good at it can gather wealth, power, and sex well beyond what their actual skill set would suggest. Most everyone is suseptible to various kinds of manipulation. Being aware of it and being aware of your own weak spots is about all you can do.

Dennis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Long story short - manipulation works. Those who are good at it can gather wealth, power, and sex well beyond what their actual skill set would suggest. Most everyone is suseptible to various kinds of manipulation. Being aware of it and being aware of your own weak spots is about all you can do.

Dennis

Manipulation is a skill. You probably do not approve of it, but it is a skill none the less.

Ba'al Chatzaf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Claims such as "mind control" is right up their with The Black Helicopters.

Bob,

Really?

You believe that the mind of a suicide bomber is not the result of an effective form of brainwashing?

You believe that suicide cults exist because people knew what they were getting into when they signed up?

Ever heard of isolation and gaslighing?

I could go on...

Michael

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the greatest respect to Breitbart and his family, the ideas here of his adrenaline overdoses and 24/7 lifestyle are correct I think. I would further observe that he was a happy warrior - fuelled by hatred of his enemies - glorying in daily slaying them.

In other words, he kept taking the poison, expecting the enemy to die.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uploaded by Americanrevolution02 on Mar 13, 2012

U.S. Congressman Danny K. Davis with communist ties sits on the U.S. House Committee on Homeland Security.

Barack Obama a close friend of Danny Davis admits to sharing his values and considers him one of the best Congressman in the country.

Here is a 2004 video which also shows O'bama speaking for Davis as the best Congressman in America...

Even though I predicted before the first Iowa Democratic primary caucus that this marxist would be President in 2008, I did not know about this video.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Michael:

Thanks.

I do not know why, but my system seems to go back and forth with my ability to embed them.

Adam

still functionally technically challenged on given days

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Michael:

Thanks.

I do not know why, but my system seems to go back and forth with my ability to embed them.

Adam

still functionally technically challenged on given days

It's just your hormones dear, you're not responsible.

Don't worry your handsome little head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Michael:

Thanks.

I do not know why, but my system seems to go back and forth with my ability to embed them.

Adam

still functionally technically challenged on given days

It's just your hormones dear, you're not responsible.

Don't worry your handsome little head.

Sexist!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Michael:

Thanks.

I do not know why, but my system seems to go back and forth with my ability to embed them.

Adam

still functionally technically challenged on given days

It's just your hormones dear, you're not responsible.

Don't worry your handsome little head.

Sexist!

Now, now, I know you don't really mean that, you're just not yourself - you'll be ok in a couple of days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Michael:

Thanks.

I do not know why, but my system seems to go back and forth with my ability to embed them.

Adam

still functionally technically challenged on given days

It's just your hormones dear, you're not responsible.

Don't worry your handsome little head.

Sexist!

Now, now, I know you don't really mean that, you're just not yourself - you'll be ok in a couple of days.

Michael:

Thanks.

I do not know why, but my system seems to go back and forth with my ability to embed them.

Adam

still functionally technically challenged on given days

It's just your hormones dear, you're not responsible.

Don't worry your handsome little head.

Sexist!

Now, now, I know you don't really mean that, you're just not yourself - you'll be ok in a couple of days.

I can't stand the cramps!

I punched the girl scout selling cookies this afternoon!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now