My Cato Essays


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 696
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Podcast of "Religious Toleration Versus Religious Freedom"

This is a podcast of my first Cato Essay (Nov. 3, 2011). Podcasts of nearly all my essays, starting at the beginning, will appear weekly on the L.org site. Of the 136 essays I’ve written so far, I regard this as one of the more interesting.

Ghs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PODCAST

The Philosophy of the Declaration of Independence, Part 1

Smith continues his series on the Declaration of Independence by looking to the intellectual history behind its famous reference to unalienable rights.

The Libertarianism.org podcast of my Cato Essay #4 (Nov. 22, 2011) has been posted.

Ghs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Philosophy of the Declaration of Independence: Part 2

George H. Smith examines two instances of curious wording in the Declaration of Independence.

The Podcast of my Cato Essay #5 (Nov. 29, 2011) is now available on L.org. I discuss the meaning of "self-evident" in the Declaration, and why Jefferson did not include "property" in his list of unalienable rights.

Ghs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Social Laws, Part 5

Smith discusses the value of sociology and some misconceptions of methodological individualism.

My Cato Essay #140 is now up.

Ghs

I'm still waiting on part four of your video series.

I haven't had access to a video camera for a long time. That problem should be resolved soon, after which I will film the next 2 videos in quick succession.

Ghs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Social Laws, Part 5

Smith discusses the value of sociology and some misconceptions of methodological individualism.

My Cato Essay #140 is now up.

Ghs

I'm still waiting on part four of your video series.

I haven't had access to a video camera for a long time. That problem should be resolved soon, after which I will film the next 2 videos in quick succession.

Ghs

Cool. Can't wait. I think the third video's bit about "property in" was informative and should be brought to the forefront more often by libertarians to facilitate communication.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Americans with Attitudes: Smuggling in Colonial America

George H. Smith explores America’s proud history of smuggling in the colonies—and the disastrous attempts by the British to put an end to it.

The L.org podcast of my Cato Essay #6 (Dec. 6, 2011) is now up. The anecdotes in this podcast make it one of my favorites. The letter written by an English smuggler is priceless.

Ghs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey, George, do you think you could at one point do an essay on intangible property (i.e., stocks, debts, IP, electronic currency) and quasi-property? I'd be interested in seeing your thoughts on the matter.

Property, tangible and intangible.

Property is property. Intangible property is a complete chimera until "it" disappears from your electronic accounts. Then it becomes "intangible" until you get it restored, if you do. $100 electronically stored in your bank account is completely fungible into paper dollars in your hand. 1000 shares of stock so also stored are also completely fungible when made into paper certificates and you place them into your safe deposit box. Intangible property is merely property that does not exist.

--Brant

the matrix is upon us--the matrix is tangible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey, George, do you think you could at one point do an essay on intangible property (i.e., stocks, debts, IP, electronic currency) and quasi-property? I'd be interested in seeing your thoughts on the matter.

I doubt it. Although I have views about IP in general and could put up a reasonable defense of those views, I haven't given the topic the sustained thought required to write about the controversy. Moreover, there are a number of technical matters (relating to the computer world) that would require a long time to master, and, in general, I don't feel I could contribute anything to the debate that hasn't been said before. If I had a few months to focus on IP exclusively, things might be different, but that's not feasible.

I will not write essays unless I feel I have a deep background on the subject being discussed. I abhor what I call "book report" essays, by which I mean an essay in which the writer has obviously said everything he knows about a topic, as if he prepared for writing by spending a few hours in a library. This matter of depth is difficult to pin down, but I think most readers will know what I mean. The "this is all I know about x" style of writing is fine for incidental, transitory posts, but not for serious essays.

Ghs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey, George, do you think you could at one point do an essay on intangible property (i.e., stocks, debts, IP, electronic currency) and quasi-property? I'd be interested in seeing your thoughts on the matter.

I doubt it. Although I have views about IP in general and could put up a reasonable defense of those views, I haven't given the topic the sustained thought required to write about the controversy. Moreover, there are a number of technical matters (relating to the computer world) that would require a long time to master, and, in general, I don't feel I could contribute anything to the debate that hasn't been said before. If I had a few months to focus on IP exclusively, things might be different, but that's not feasible.

I will not write essays unless I feel I have a deep background on the subject being discussed. I abhor what I call "book report" essays, by which I mean an essay in which the writer has obviously said everything he knows about a topic, as if he prepared for writing by spending a few hours in a library. This matter of depth is difficult to pin down, but I think most readers will know what I mean. The "this is all I know about x" style of writing is fine for incidental, transitory posts, but not for serious essays.

Ghs

Fair enough. I've seen many libertarians offer contracts as replacements for IP (and shitload of other stuff), but it never made sense to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

“Liberty and Property!” The Sons of Liberty and Resistance to the Stamp Act, Part 1

George H. Smith recounts the violent reaction to the Stamp Act, a tax on paper goods levied against the American colonies in 1765.

The L.org Podcast of my Cato Essay #7 (Dec. 13, 2011) is now available.

Ghs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

“Liberty and Property!” The Sons of Liberty and Resistance to the Stamp Act, Part 1

George H. Smith recounts the violent reaction to the Stamp Act, a tax on paper goods levied against the American colonies in 1765.

The L.org Podcast of my Cato Essay #7 (Dec. 13, 2011) is now available.

Ghs

How central would you say the concept of property is to freedom, George? I'm someone who likes Enlightenment ideas, but I've always skipped the bits about property because they never seemed very interesting to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The official Objectivist 1960s position through Nathaniel Branden was rejection of praxeology while generally embracing von Mises. This was without elaboration. I think it was in a book review in The Objectivist Newsletter of Human Action.

--Brant

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Social Laws, Part 7

Smith discusses some controversial features of praxeology, as defended by Ludwig von Mises.

My Cato Essay #142 is now up.

Ghs

Praxeology may have its place, but many of its distinction, such as between "government" and "the market" are just too flimsy and superficial to be of use. Not on that, but it's become a fertile soil for all sorts of nonsense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now