dennislmay Posted September 21, 2013 Share Posted September 21, 2013 http://www.space.com/22875-alien-life-claim-space-microbes.htmlJust about every year for the last 10-15 years I've been reading story after storyconcerning life-forms being found where they should not exist according toconventional atmospheric transport models. This story is much like the othersexcept involving a larger piece of biological remains.I am generally inclined to believe in panspermia as a theory but I also know atmospheric scientists have been extremely sloppy since I began following theirresearch during the initial Ozone Hole scare days - mid 1980's.Atmospheric work is so incomplete and sloppy that it is actually surprising thatanyone would take their work seriously in predicting what can or cannot betransported to various altitudes. It would be worth the effort to do a few thousandballoon sampling missions at various heights per year for a few decades toget a better understanding of how bad atmospheric transport modeling actuallyis. The results would directly impact Ozone Hole and Climate Change modelingclaims so I suspect that is the primary reason we only hear from panspermiasupporters in this regard.Yet another reason to suspect Climate Change advocates are engaged in fraudbecause they have not done their homework on the atmospheric transport ofsolids - among a hundred other variables they fail to correctly model in codesnever validated.Dennis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaalChatzaf Posted September 21, 2013 Share Posted September 21, 2013 At this moment there is no Climate Science.The closest I have seen anyone come to it was Freeman Dyson, a particle physicist. Please see: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/04/05/freeman-dyson-speaks-out-about-climate-science-and-fudge/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dennislmay Posted September 21, 2013 Author Share Posted September 21, 2013 At this moment there is no Climate Science.The closest I have seen anyone come to it was Freeman Dyson, a particle physicist. Please see: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/04/05/freeman-dyson-speaks-out-about-climate-science-and-fudge/Dyson is quite correct. Charles Krauthammer recently spoke of Dyson's views concerning climate modeling saying thatDyson had more brains in his little pinkie than all the climate modelers put together. I also consider that to be a correctassessment.Dennis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now