Subpoena for Obama to appear in Court 3 January


GALTGULCH8

Recommended Posts

Here is the link to the "World's Leading Obama Eligibility Website" :

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/

Link to copy of subpoena including a list of things to bring and a copy of check to cover travel expenses:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/117795388/subpoena-on-Obama-to-appear-at-January-3rd-hearing-and-produce-documents

ATTACHMENTS TO SUBPOENA

Additional Documents requested

1. Any and all U.S. passports, any and all U.S. immigration and naturalization papers issued to you

2. Any and all Indonesian passports, any and all Indonesian immigration and naturalization papers issued to you

3. Any and all Kenyan passports, any and all Kenyan immigration and naturalization papers issued to you

4. Any and all British passports, any and all British immigration and naturalization papers issued to you

5. Any and all travel documents used by you to travel to Pakistan

6. School registration, showing the citizenship and legal first and last name from Kaelani school in Honolulu Hawaii, Assissi school in Jakarta Indonesia, Punahoa school in Honolulu Hawaii, Occidental college and Columbia University

Just maybe this time will do the justice deserved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here we go again. Obama, the Kenyan Candidate.

This approach will not get rid of Obama. The 22 nd amendment will.

Ba'al Chatzaf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let us see what happens when what's his name does not show up.

To paraphrase Andrew Jackson -- the Court has made its decision, let the Court enforce it.

Ba'al Chatzaf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the bottom of the subpoena, a name. Orly Taitz. Orly Taitz. Pure kook.

Why would anyone here get behind the efforts of a kook like Taitz?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the bottom of the subpoena, a name. Orly Taitz. Orly Taitz. Pure kook.

Why would anyone here get behind the efforts of a kook like Taitz?

Looks okay to me. You, on the other hand, evidently fell on your head one too many times as an infant.

Not as many times as Orly Taitz did. I note she is a former real estate agent. I guess the tin foil houses did not catch on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ND, the performance of the well-caffeinated Taitz on MSNBC was what I had in mind as Kookrant. You noted the admixture of hysteria (I'd add the possibility of obsession/delusion).

Mike E, have a gander at the Wiki article on Taitz, if only for the long list of 'birther' lawsuits and subpoenas that have failed, each and every one -- especially the ones where the judge rebukes her soundly for time-wasting, incompetence or abuse of process -- or in which he expresses a magisterial sigh at her fruitless quest. Why anyone would get behind another bogus subpoena attempt of hers is completely beyond me. Her record is 0 for 258 on her suits and motions and demands. ALL of her attempts have failed. Still she tries, grabs a headline, a failure, tries again. As a problem-solving activity, this seems, um, Kooky.

As for head-drops, well ...

It makes me think what Ayn Rand might have made of Orly Taitz. The name alone is good enough for Rand fiction. Perhaps Rand would have come down on the side of the birther maniacs, perhaps not.

Edited by william.scherk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doc, I may not be so hot on the American Constitution but I do know Moldavians. This one is at least 70 per cent proof meshuggah.
If you say so. Fact is, in Bill's defense, it doesn't take much of a percentage of kook to overpower the palate. It's kind of like cat piss, you know 5% cat piss mixed with 95% Moët & Chandon Brut is still just going to taste like cat piss, albeit carbonated.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ND, the performance of the well-caffeinated Taitz on MSNBC was what I had in mind as Kookrant. You noted the admixture of hysteria (I'd add the possibility of obsession/delusion).
Imagine if you could get her and Pamela Geller together on one stage.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe she does have a case and knows it.

You naysayers are unrelenting. If you were alive when the real revolution took place and men such as Thomas Jefferson were calling King George a tyrant, I wonder if you would have been engaged in the same kind of negativity. George Washington lost more battles than he won. Fortunately for his cause the French fleet showed up just in time thanks to the efforts of Benjamin Franklin. I can believe you would have been scoffing at Washington's inability to win a battle too.

Why would our president spend two million dollars on lawyer's fees to keep all the documents he is ordered to bring to this hearing if he had nothing to hide?

Is there any question in your minds that he does meet the criteria to be called a tyrant?

He makes no bones about the fact his father was a Kenyan hence never an American citizen.

If this suit keeps the Electoral College from functioning the election might move to the House of Representatives and the Senate.

There is no doubt in my mind that they will select someone who is incompetent and has no idea what needs to be done but at least is not a tyrant.

Reality will show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doc, I may not be so hot on the American Constitution but I do know Moldavians. This one is at least 70 per cent proof meshuggah.
If you say so. Fact is, in Bill's defense, it doesn't take much of a percentage of kook to overpower the palate. It's kind of like cat piss, you know 5% cat piss mixed with 95% Moët & Chandon Brut is still just going to taste like cat piss, albeit carbonated.

Uh, can't make it to your New Years cocktail party. sorry --

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ND, the performance of the well-caffeinated Taitz on MSNBC was what I had in mind as Kookrant. You noted the admixture of hysteria (I'd add the possibility of obsession/delusion).
Imagine if you could get her and Pamela Geller together on one stage.

Yoicks!

I can't remember how squeeze-tight Geller ever got to Taitz, if at all. I find Geller much more compelling as a speaker and writer. Taitz is oft times illiterate and incoherent. Her latest stuff, that the Sandy Hook shootings were an Obama mind-control plot, this is a bit too much for Geller, hopefully. I don't want to know.

The point being, lurking under the surface of the swamp like an alligator, my old plaint about OL/Objectivish milieus being too welcoming to the kook wings of opposition to the President. One can be proudly, solidly, firmly and consistently against everything Obama, and yet keep critical of obvious nutters like the dentist/realtor/lawyer Taitz.

Maybe she does have a case and knows it.

Well, these things come out in the wash, dontcha think? If by now Taitz had a case, her record in the courts might show that. Unfortunately for your hypothesis, she is presently 0 for 258. That's a full rinse. There is no gold in that stream. That dog is dead. That horse is lame. That road goes to Nutter's Swamp.

It does no harm to your fight against the foul usurper in the White House that you jettison the sad and demented from your alliances, that's all. No one will take your right to fight away, young revolutionary.

Fight for the right to Yellow Margarine, Gulch!

'Fortunately, farseeing men in Congress are working to see that you get margarine the way you want it. Support them.

Remember, the voice of the people is the voice of the lawmaker. Fight for the right to Yellow Margarine!'

Edited by william.scherk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

His Messiahship, Obama, is a very remarkable man. We have proof that he was born in 2 places. His Kenya birth certificate and his Hawaii birth certificate, both, are on the internet for everyone to see. Imagine that, being born in 2 places, thousands of miles apart. That required a miracle.

Actually he was born in 3 places. He said himself that he was born on Krypton.

On the other hand, he is a notorious liar. He is such a liar that I have to wonder whether he actually was born in all those 3 places.

"7 Lies In Under 2 Minutes"

1:47

http://youtu.be/UErR7i2onW0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All it takes is one judge who is a person of integrity and takes ideas and the Constitution seriously.

Still even if one did exist and heard this case and found sufficient merit in it to pursue it with an injunction it would probably be overturned on appeal given that the judicial system is so politicized. Witness the SCOTUS upholding the Affordable Care Act.

I fear the country is doomed, the dollar will collapse, followed by a hyperinflationary depression and a totalitarian dictatorship.

Hard to be hopeful as the good guys are outnumbered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Jefferson, Franklin and Washington looked like drag queens I would indeed be engaged in the same kind of negativity. Note that, no matter how worked up she gets (and she gets very worked up), not a strand of her stainless-steel wig moves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I fear the country is doomed, the dollar will collapse, followed by a hyperinflationary depression and a totalitarian dictatorship.

Well, I think maybe Ed Hudgins had better aim his next editorial about Apocalypsoism at you too, then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The point being, lurking under the surface of the swamp like an alligator, my old plaint about OL/Objectivish milieus being too welcoming to the kook wings of opposition to the President. One can be proudly, solidly, firmly and consistently against everything Obama, and yet keep critical of obvious nutters like the dentist/realtor/lawyer Taitz.
"Too welcoming"? You calling this thread too welcoming? What do you expect, for MSK to come along and delete every birther thread someone wants to start? Or just about anything Chimp Twist posts?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there any question in your minds that he does meet the criteria to be called a tyrant?
Tyrant? Only a tyrant? And here I thought this came from an actual press conference:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The point being, lurking under the surface of the swamp like an alligator, my old plaint about OL/Objectivish milieus being too welcoming to the kook wings of opposition to the President. One can be proudly, solidly, firmly and consistently against everything Obama, and yet keep critical of obvious nutters like the dentist/realtor/lawyer Taitz.
"Too welcoming"? You calling this thread too welcoming? What do you expect, for MSK to come along and delete every birther thread someone wants to start? Or just about anything Chimp Twist posts?

I have whined about this on other occasions, but not to the point of hoping for heavy administrative hand. More like wishing that folks on the margins were more helpfully critiqued when they go off the field of Reason. Jerry is the price we pay for our own freedom to rant at OL. So, on that count, yes, it is a shitty thing to say about OL/Objectivish milieu. There are cranks and nutters galore in every 'movement' that does not issue Party ID (and even then). And such as Jerry (and Orly) get their tails yanked plenty here.

My whiny complaints have another strike against them. Back when J Neil Schulman and his part incarnation as Lord were a topic, that whole edge-of-rationality brought forth a long, long discussion, perhaps even a useful discussion.

I don't know. My heart kind of sags for Objectivish things when Objectivish folks get in bed with Orly Taitz in re Obama, and can't quite separate the quixotic (and valiant) from the quixotic (and demented).

I withdraw my hideous accusation of 'over-welcoming the nuts' on OL. It is unfair. Better a robust, weedy garden than a ordered, bland monoculture. Better OL than SOLO, Orly Taitz-boosters notwithstanding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The point being, lurking under the surface of the swamp like an alligator, my old plaint about OL/Objectivish milieus being too welcoming to the kook wings of opposition to the President. One can be proudly, solidly, firmly and consistently against everything Obama, and yet keep critical of obvious nutters like the dentist/realtor/lawyer Taitz.
"Too welcoming"? You calling this thread too welcoming? What do you expect, for MSK to come along and delete every birther thread someone wants to start? Or just about anything Chimp Twist posts?

I withdraw my hideous accusation of 'over-welcoming the nuts' on OL. It is unfair. Better a robust, weedy garden than a ordered, bland monoculture. Better OL than SOLO, Orly Taitz-boosters notwithstanding.

Amen. Pulsating Principal Perigo's gift to his readership on Christmas day was a reprint of his oratorical masterpiece. "Love to Hate you BB"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I withdraw my hideous accusation of 'over-welcoming the nuts' on OL. It is unfair. Better a robust, weedy garden than a ordered, bland monoculture. Better OL than SOLO, Orly Taitz-boosters notwithstanding.

The Mutt is the perfection of the Dog.

Ba'al Chatzaf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Et al,

Tomorrow is the day of reckoning. I understand that Obama just flew back to Hawaii to continue his vacation. It appears he has no intention of showing up in response to the subpoena for him to bring along the host of documents he has kept out of sight.

I wonder if the judge will be able to deal with the no show in a way which will have the consequence of causing the usurper to forfeit being inaugurated by virtue of his failure to be vetted. One may dream.

I trust the decisions will move to the House of Representatives now held by the GOP and the Senate held by the leftist, progressive, socialist, statists, exploiters and fascists.

Or will the tyrant prevail?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now