• Announcements

    • Michael Stuart Kelly

      Evil emoticon   04/16/2016

      We now have a devil emoticon. Type colon, evil, colon, all together, then space. See an example by opening this message. Here's the example  .
Michael Stuart Kelly

Introducing the Stephen Boydstun Corner

22 posts in this topic

Introducing the Stephen Boydstun Corner

I have had this corner on my mind for the longest time, but I have not had the time to properly deal with the consequences. Still, the best way to start something is to start. So I wrote to Stephen and told him what I was thinking. I am more than pleased to say that he accepted.

Stephen has an impressive body of work, but it is a bit scattered, thus often difficult to access. He has a site for Objectivity (a link to which I keep on the Portal page), but that is difficult to research for many people and quotes need to be copied by retyping.

So I thought having a Stephen Boydstun Corner on OL would be a good thing since it carries a lot of targeted traffic of people who are likely to gain value from his writing.

As with all other Corners of Insight, this in no way reflects on Stephen agreeing with anything other than things like the normal posting guidelines that apply to everybody. That includes agreeing with me. His mind is his own. Anyway, my idea is to expand with people of good will, not restrict.

I have taken so long to do this because my time is really limited and I wanted to contribute more than I can. But I think Stephen will manage nicely and I will help out as much as I can in moving stuff around, being available for technical matters, etc. I have attributed him with moderator powers for his corner.

There are three reasons why I consider this corner to be particularly valuable:

1. Stephen is one of the few people on earth at the present who has published an academic periodical on Objectivism-related subjects.

2. In his work, he sees Objectivism through the lens of great academic learning. His familiarity with philosophical and scientific technical material is overwhelming at times. At least to me it is. And he applies this knowledge to Objectivist theories and concepts, and vice-versa.

3. He has wonderful reading suggestions in philosophy and science. I believe having them (and his comments) in one place is of high value to many, especially those who like to educate themselves.

On a personal note, I have difficulty keeping up with some of his writing since I do not read technical stuff very quickly. It takes time that I often don't have to make sure I understand properly. So I am glad there is now a central place bearing his work that should be easy to research before too long. I can easily go back to review the things I missed.

In a time of terrible things happening in this world, a bit of sunshine is always welcome. Setting up the Stephen Boydstun Corner is one such sunny day for me.

Michael

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Introducing the Stephen Boydstun Corner

I have had this corner on my mind for the longest time, but I have not had the time to properly deal with the consequences. Still, the best way to start something is to start. So I wrote to Stephen and told him what I was thinking. I am more than pleased to say that he accepted.

Stephen has an impressive body of work, but it is a bit scattered, thus often difficult to access. He has a site for Objectivity (a link to which I keep on the Portal page), but that is difficult to research for many people and quotes need to be copied by retyping.

So I thought having a Stephen Boydstun Corner on OL would be a good thing since it carries a lot of targeted traffic of people who are likely to gain value from his writing.

As with all other Corners of Insight, this in no way reflects on Stephen agreeing with anything other than things like the normal posting guidelines that apply to everybody. That includes agreeing with me. His mind is his own. Anyway, my idea is to expand with people of good will, not restrict.

I have taken so long to do this because my time is really limited and I wanted to contribute more than I can. But I think Stephen will manage nicely and I will help out as much as I can in moving stuff around, being available for technical matters, etc. I have attributed him with moderator powers for his corner.

There are three reasons why I consider this corner to be particularly valuable:

1. Stephen is one of the few people on earth at the present who has published an academic periodical on Objectivism-related subjects.

2. In his work, he sees Objectivism through the lens of great academic learning. His familiarity with philosophical and scientific technical material is overwhelming at times. At least to me it is. And he applies this knowledge to Objectivist theories and concepts, and vice-versa.

3. He has wonderful reading suggestions in philosophy and science. I believe having them (and his comments) in one place is of high value to many, especially those who like to educate themselves.

On a personal note, I have difficulty keeping up with some of his writing since I do not read technical stuff very quickly. It takes time that I often don't have to make sure I understand properly. So I am glad there is now a central place bearing his work that should be easy to research before too long. I can easily go back to review the things I missed.

In a time of terrible things happening in this world, a bit of sunshine is always welcome. Setting up the Stephen Boydstun Corner is one such sunny day for me.

Michael

Michael, Thank you for doing this. Stephen is one of the bright lights in our movement.

Jim

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, Kat and Michael, for the Objectivist Living forum. Thank you, Michael, for giving me the Corner. The setup for this sector has proven to be a way for me to do and communicate extended philosophical studies, while drawing together, in an integrated, systematic form, writing I have done on internet forums since beginning my internet communications about four years ago. Jim, thanks.

The Corner has provided a platform and incentive for producing serious new work. I take note of the maximum average number of distinct readers for threads by dividing the number of reads by the number of posts (plus the initial post and collapsing the count for posts I partitioned, but effectively posted at the same time). There are enough readers-plus-return-reads to make the considerable effort worthwhile.

It seems a little peculiar to thank my readers, but, well, let me say I am glad you are interested in and follow my work. The last few weeks, I have been working on the next posts in the Peirce thread; these will take us deeply into philosophy of perception, anti-foundationalism, philosophy of science, and perhaps some metaphysics. The threads Rand’s Morality of Life; Philosophy of Logic; and Chance in Physics will be extended, as I have promised. That ethics one should include Schopenhauer, perhaps Spencer, Nietzsche and Guyau (an integration and extension of my previous work for SOLO), and perhaps Bergson. Among further installments in the philosophy-of-logic thread will be discussion of Peikoff’s old paper “Aristotle’s Intuitive Induction.” The thread on chance in physics will eventually include interpretations of quantum mechanics. I expect to recast my old thread Mathematics in Science and execute its promised continuation, though now as a new thread in my Corner; I want to discuss the use of mathematics in astronomy and in theory of the rainbow abreast each other across ancient, medieval, and modern times. This will include a close treatment of Aristotle’s conceptions of science and the use of mathematics in it, conceptions to be refined, then radically reformed. I expect to execute the with-measurement program in this Corner as we go, as far as we go.

It is partly sunny and mild this Thanksgiving Day in Lynchburg. A fine apple pie (always from scratch) has just come out of the oven. Our new home and grounds continue to be our paradise. Long life is good, with enough health and memory.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

7/14/13 - Follow-On

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He has a site for Objectivity (a link to which I keep on the Portal page), but that is difficult to research for many people and quotes need to be copied by retyping.

Actually, I did not find it on the Portal Page. It was easy enough to find "boydstun objectivity" via a search engine and I printed a couple of pages to put into my Ayn Rand folder (manilla folder; on the shelf with the Ayn Rand books). His work deserves the widest possible attention, certainly among Objectivist, for whom the basic principles can be assumed, and from which discussion can advance.

I say thee yea, Steve Boydstun.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is an index of his work. This is also available on his profile page.

Objectivity

Objectivity Archive
Subject Index Key

"Universals and Measurement"
I. Orientation
II. AnalysisAffordance of Ratio or Interval Measures

II. AnalysisAffordance of Ordinal Measures / Superordinates and Similarity Classes / Amended Measure-Definitions of Similarity and Concepts

III. GenesisElaboration of Identity / First Words, First Universals / Analytic Constraint

Notes

References
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Comments on III. A, B, C
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Piece-Wise Ordinal / Entity Measure / Category Theory
Abstractions / Particulars / Themes
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"Judgments and Measurement"

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"Capturing Concepts"
Introduction
I. Categorical Perception
II. Reference and Specification
III. Measure and Matter
IV. Abstraction
V. Identity and Definition
References
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Follow-up

Proper-Noun Concepts

Definite Concept and Phrase-Length
The Concept Thought
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"Capturing Quantity"1, 2, 3

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

"Randian Axioms and Postulates in Metaphysics"
Basics / Identity with Measurement
I. Exclusions of Non-Contradiction: Entities
. . .Part 1 – Identity as to Kind
. . .Part 2 – Identity as to Particularity
II. Exclusions of Non-Contradiction: Actions
III. Exclusions of Non-Contradiction: Attributes
. . .Part 1 – Locke
. . .Part 2 – Leibniz I
. . .Part 3 –
. . .Part 4 –

Metaphysics and Life
There Is and I Am
Your Love of Existence
Thought's Living Existence

Beauty, Goodness, Life

Philosophy of Perception

Sensory Qualities: Their Relation to Sensory System and World
Primary/Secondary Qualities
Peirce on Perception and Conception
Perception and Objectivity (& Supplement)
Object and Content

Intuition
"Peirce contra Intuition and Self-Evidence"
. . .Introduction
. . .I. Anselm of Canterbury
. . .II. Roger Bacon
. . .–––Avicenna
. . .–––Neoplatonists
. . .–––Plato

Logic
Origin of 'A is A' Formula
Between False, Invalid, and Meaningless
Meaningless Tautology
Normativity of Logic – Kant v. Rand
Normativity of Logic - Robert Hanna
Predication on Identity
Contradiction with the Individual Concrete
Identity Manifold
Philosophy of Logic
Modal Logic
Quantum Logic
Why Be Logical?
Epistemology and Logic

Integration

From Integrity to Calculus

Integration in Rand – from integrity to calculus

to Piaget, Montessori, and Helmholtz

Theory of Truth

Objectivist Theory of Truth

“Perception and Truth – Kant and Rand”

. . I. Sense and Mind – Rand

. . II. Empirical Realism – Kant A, B, C, D, E

. . III. Empirical Judgment – Kant and Rand A, B, C, D, E

"Truth of Geometry"

. . .Part 1 – Aristotle
. . .Part 2 – Locke and Leibniz
. . .Part 3 – Kant, Precritical
. . .Part 4 – Kant, Critical (forthcoming)
"Analytic-Synthetic Distinction"
. . .Part 1 – Quine
. . .Part 2 – White and Rand-Peikoff
. . .Part 3 – Objective Analyticity

Change and Causality
Induction and Causality
Causal Power of Attributes
Inhering, yet Causing
Rand's Law of Causality without Uniqueness
Identity to Causality / Meyerson / Ockham
Ontology of Time
Gradients and Drivers
Types of Cause

"Induction on Identity"
Introduction
I. Varieties of Induction
II. Ockham – Contingency
III. Nicolaus – Experience of Substance
IV. Nicolaus – Reasoning to Substance
V. Hume – Experience of Cause and Effect
VI. Hume – Reasoning to Cause or Effect
VII. Hume – Necessity
VIII. Hume – Uniformity
IX. Existence is Identity

"Volitional Synapses"
Conscious Controls / Psychoneural Relation
Hypothetical Necessity
Physical and Organic Determinism / Deterministic Error

Ayn Rand Society 2007
Foundations of Ethics: Objectivism and Analytic Philosophy – Irfan Khawaja
Addendum to My Comment – Concerning Nozick 2001
Concerning Paul Bloomfield's Comment

Mathematics in Science
Functions of Mathematical Description in Astronomy and Optics, Illustrations from Antiquity
Angular Momentum and Causation
Rainbows
Aristotle
Ibn Sahl
Ibn al-Haytham / Qutb al-Din al-Shirazi / Kamal al-Din al-Farisi / Roger Bacon
—Theodoric of Freiberg A, B

Philosophy of Science
Between Realism and Constructive Empiricism
Thomas Kuhn

Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
Transactional Interpretation

"Space, Rotation, Relativity"
I. Descartes / Huygens
II. Newton / Leibniz
III. Kant
IV. Ampere / Faraday / Maxwell / Einstein

Scientific Cosmology
Copernican Revolution and Significance
Universe as a Concrete
Totality Referent
– General Relativity and Cosmology – a, b
Einstein Online
Total Angular Momentum of Universe
By Microwave and Radio
– Endless Existence – a, b
– Roger Penrose – Cycles of Time

Kant
Metaphysics of Kant and Rand
Space, Rotation, Relativity – Kant
Kant and Principia
Kant from A to Bxxx (&)
Mysticism – Kant and Rand
Categories
"Kant's Wrestle with Happiness and Life"
. . .Part 1 – to 1781
. . .Part 2 – towards 1785
. . .Part 3 – into 1785
. . .Part 4 – Moral Worth, Necessary and Free – A, B

Dewey and Peikoff on Kant's Responsibility

Nietzsche v. Rand
Your Moral Ideal
Claiming Nobility
Parallels and Influence
"Truth of Will and Value"
. . .Part 1 – Before Zarathustra
. . .Part 2 – Zarathustra and Beyond
. . .––––––– Rand 1929–38 A, B, C
. . .––––––– Rand 1938–46 A, B, C, D, E
. . .––––––– Rand in Full

Rand and Biology
– Rand's Concept of Biology Part 1 / Part 2
Reservation on Evolution
Scientific within Rational
Vegetative Robots and Value

Rational Egoism
Function of Mind
Function of Ethics
A Rejection of Egoism
Supported Choice to Live
Desire to Value
Altruism
Sacrifice
Value Out There
– Visibility, Benevolence, and Egoism – a, b

Ayn Rand
Original, True, Important
To Think
Blok
Universals
Three Treasures
Rejection
– Objectivist Label – a, b
Soul, Structure, Struggle

Edited by Stephen Boydstun
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2012sumS_zpsc437444e.jpg

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Still handsome after all these years.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, Carol. Blue-Ridge Walden.

One reader recently asked if there is a best order in which to read my compositions in epistemology. It may be useful to share what I suggested to him, the following order of threads in this Corner:

Capturing Concepts
....Introduction
....I. Categorical Perception
....II. Reference and Specification
....III. Measure and Matter
....IV. Abstraction
....V. Identity and Definition
......References

Capturing Quantity1, 2, 3

Universals and Measurement

. . I. Orientation

. . II.A Analysis – Affordance of Ratio- or Interval-Measures
. . II.B Analysis – Affordance of Ordinal Measures
. . II.C Analysis – Superordinates and Similarity Classes

. . II.D Analysis – Amended Measure-Definitions of Similarity and Concepts

. . II.E Analysis – Conclusion of Core Task

. . III. Genesis

. . III.A Genesis – Elaboration of Identity

. . III.B Genesis – First Words, First Universals

. . III.C Genesis – Analytic Constraint

. . . Notes

. . . References

Judgments and Measurement

....Predication with Identity

....Predication with Measurment

....Appendix on Hypothetical Judgments

Theory of Truth
....Truth of Geometry
. . ..Part 1 – Aristotle
. . ..Part 2 – Locke and Leibniz
. . ..Part 3 – Kant, Precritical
. . ..Part 4 – Kant, Critical (deferred to forthcoming book)

....Perception and Truth – Kant and Rand

. . ..I. Sense and Mind – Rand

. . ..II. Empirical Realism – Kant A, B, C, D, E

. . ..III. Empirical Judgment – Kant and Rand A, B, C, D, E

....Objectivist Theory of Truth

....Analytic-Synthetic Distinction
. . ..Part 1 – Quine
. . ..Part 2 – White and Rand-Peikoff
. . ..Part 3 – Objective Analyticity

. . ..Part 4 – Aristotole to Abelard (deferred to forthcoming book)

Philosophy of Logic

....Normativity of Logic – Kant v. Rand
....Normativity of Logic – Robert Hanna
....Between False, Invalid, and Meaningless
....Meaningless Tautology

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

PS

I forgot to include, which could come before those under Theory of Truth:

Peirce – Perception and Conception

Peirce contra Intuition and Self-Evidence

....Introduction

....I. – Anselm of Canterbury

....II.A – Roger Bacon (Avicenna)

....II.B – Roger Bacon (Plotinus)

....II.C – Roger Bacon (Plato)

....II.D – Roger Bacon (himself, in limbo)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We%20of%20Love_zpszai03ddb.jpg

Walter Klingler and I were married yesterday 19 January 2016, the twentieth anniversary of our partnership.

Here is a poem I wrote for us for this day, which begins with our first meeting those twenty years ago:

WE OF LOVE

Stand in deep winter my night to glassed light,

. . his spring to door, his smile, his bright,

. . his bring inside to our words and eyes

. . into our worlds and ways, and to our yes.

Unfold the bloom night to day, room by room,

. . on the floors, in falls or joys,

. . on our shores, wave by wave,

. . year on year, we of we of love.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratulations! From what you've shared over the years, it sounds like you've got a good one in Walter.

Cheers!

J

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent!!

Romance-Gay-Wedding-Cake-Topper.jpg

food-and-drinks-champagne-063861.gif

A...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Congrats! What were your musical selections?

The tried and true:

I think this is a good match:

Durn, no subtitles. But I expect you know the piece anyway.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratulations to you both, Stephen!

REB

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know whether to say Congratulations or Best Wishes, so both.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfold the bloom night to day, [...]

year on year, we of we of love.

Belated congratulations, Stephen.

And a wish for many more long, happy years of unfolding the bloom.

I like the photo. :smile:

Ellen

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Holy Cow!

Congratulations!

--Brant

(I dropped the wisecrack)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

.

Thank you all, each one.

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now