• Announcements

    • Michael Stuart Kelly

      Major Update to OL (please click to open)   02/09/2016

      Sorry for the inconvenience, but we had to update OL and there have been some serious changes made by IPB. The real bad news is that they had to merge User Names and Display Names. This meant that I had to choose between bad and bad. I opted to keep the log-on information the same, so you can get on OL like you always did, but now your User Name is displayed. If your User Name and Display Name were the same, you will not feel the change. If they were different, you are probably irritated right now. I will figure out how you can change this so you can revert to the Display Name you used before if you like, however this may entail a change in how you log-on. The good news is that OL is now searchable from the very beginning. This means all the old posts from the A-Team in Objectivism (and everybody else) will finally show up when you search for something. I will keep changing this announcement as we adapt to these new changes. It's a pain, I know, but after looking around the backend for a bit, I believe the benefits will far, far outweigh the current irritation. They changed things in a hamhanded way and I don't like that, but I can't do anything about it. Benefit-wise, they actually did a good job, so please bear with us. In addition to this change, many good things are coming over time. You are the reason OL exists and I am sorry you have to go through this. Think of it like birth pangs... (All right, all right, that's forcing it.  ) Michael

25 posts in this topic

Dr. Russell Blaylock is one of my heroes. I listen to his lectures and his interviews and I read his books. In the year 2000, I was incorrectly diagnosed with ALS. That's when I got interested in Dr. Blaylock on brain diseases. I am amazed by his knowledge. In 2006, the diagnosis was changed to spinal cord tumor in the neck, found by MRI. Blaylock knows lots about tumors too.

Dr Russell Blaylock Nutrition 48:35

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is from the American Dental Association website user fluoride warnings:

The American Dental Association's (ADA) Council on Scientific Affairs believes that one part of the warning now required on fluoride toothpastes by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) could unnecessarily frighten parents and children, and that the label greatly overstates any demonstrated or potential danger posed by fluoride toothpastes.

The label language, "If you accidentally swallow more than used for brushing, seek professional help or contact a poison control center immediately" is now required on all fluoride toothpastes. But the ADA, in a letter sent to the FDA last year, pointed out that a child could not absorb enough fluoride from toothpaste to cause a serious problem and that the excellent safety record on fluoride toothpaste argues against any unnecessary regulation.

The following pdf, 72 page file is on their site and from 2005 and is labeled "Fluoridation Facts;"

http://www.ada.org/sections/professionalResources/pdfs/fluoridation_facts.pdf

I also do not see the warning on baby formulae that he mentioned in the video, other than this http://jada.ada.org/content/142/1/79.full

However, according to the St. Petersburg Times, June 11, 2007, the ADA did warn about fluoride, child formula and flourosis:

The American Dental Association, which has for many years been one of fluoride's biggest advocates, alerted its members late last year that parents of infants younger than a year old "should consider using water that has no or low levels of fluoride" when mixing baby formula.
However, while public health agencies in some states, such as Vermont and New Hampshire, immediately issued warnings in the media based on the ADA alert, other states took months to relay the message.
Florida's Department of Health put the message on its website four months after it was issued along with a note that read: "Mixing formula with fluoridated water poses no known health risks."
The ADA was concerned about fluorosis, a condition caused by too much fluoride that damages the enamel of teeth. Some scientists believe that even mild to moderate cases of fluorosis can lead to more significant problems. Studies have associated fluorosis with lower IQ, endocrine system problems, and skeletal damage.

St. Petersburg Times June 4, 2007

Adam

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In 2000, I read the book that this lecture is based on. That is the book that got me off unbound glutamate.

1:06:42
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Recently when Mike Adams interviewed Dr. Russell Blaylock, they came up with an interesting idea: doctors who advocate vaccines should be required to take their own vaccines.

Shortly after, Alex Jones interviewed Dr. Russell Blaylock and the subject of doctors being required to take their own vaccines came up. Dr. Blaylock said they would jump out of a window to avoid the vaccines that they advocate to the general public.

For details, listen to both interviews.

http://www.naturalnews.com/035335_vaccines_Dr_Blaylock_children.html

Neurosurgeon issues public challenge to vaccine zealots: Inject yourselves with all shots you say children should get!

by Ethan A. Huff, staff writer

(NaturalNews) Dr. Russell Blaylock, a neurosurgeon, author and expert on "excitotoxins," has issued a public challenge to vaccine pushers everywhere to put their money where their mouths are. During a recent interview with Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, about the fraudulent science of the vaccine industry, Dr. Blaylock challenged Dr. Paul Offit, vaccine manufacturer CEOs, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) scientists, and others who insist today's childhood vaccine regimens are safe to publicly receive these same regimens themselves.

You can watch the full interview between Dr. Blaylock and Mike Adams here:

http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=DFBE7C32CBDBF43B7342333B7D827EB0

The CDC and state health agencies all across the country are persistent in telling the public that childhood vaccine regimens, which now include dozens of vaccines administered all at once, are completely safe. And Dr. Offit, of course, made the brazenly arrogant and astounding claim several years ago that healthy infants "could safely get up to 100,000 vaccines at once" (http://www.whale.to/vaccines/offit23.html).

Well, if these claims are true, then those making them should have no problem publicly demonstrating their validity by getting publicly vaccinated with the very same vaccine schedules, right?

Harm caused by vaccines far greater than we're being told

Contrary to the claims repeatedly made by vaccine promoters like Dr. Offit, vaccines are not generally safe, and are known to cause all sorts of serious side effects.

"Most of the damage by vaccines is hidden," says Dr. Blaylock. "We have the [...] VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) which is voluntary, but even there we see virtually millions of reactions to vaccines reported" (http://vaers.hhs.gov/data/data).

Vaccines suppress immunity rather than boost it

Rather than promote immunity, vaccines suppress it by confusing the immune system and altering the way it responds to viruses and bacteria.

"If we look at the science of the vaccination process itself, it's becoming evident that the way they do the immunizations -- sticking it into the muscle of your arm or your leg -- actually suppresses a lot of the immune system, particularly in young children," says Dr. Blaylock. "We found out that, in fact, it causes the immune system to switch to what we call a TH2-type cytokine production which inhibits immunity. And your major protection against viruses and particularly the really virulent, deadly viruses and bacteria is your cellular immunity. Well, vaccines don't stimulate cellular immunity at all, in fact they suppress it."

Vaccines destroy the body's ability to develop lifelong immunity to disease

Before the advent of vaccines, human beings developed natural immunity to diseases like polio and measles. But today, because of vaccines, these conditions and others are making a comeback in a much more virulent way.

"They're giving the impression that before these vaccines existed, these infections were just rampant and massive," says Dr. Blaylock. "But when we look at the data, the historical data on these infections -- and that includes all the childhood infections -- all of them were falling drastically before there was even a vaccine invented [...] When you get natural infections, over time, the population develops massive immunity to the infection."

"The polio virus, in fact, was a mild summer virus that had been present forever before [...] Well, interestingly, the period at which this virus suddenly changes character to produce paralysis came on the foot of the vaccination for diptheria, and for tetanus, and for pertussis -- that's when they think that the vaccine itself either altered the immunity of these children, or it mutated the virus itself to make it paralytic."

Be sure to watch the full interview at:

http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=DFBE7C32CBDBF43B7342333B7D827EB0

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Before the advent of vaccines, human beings developed natural immunity to diseases like polio and measles"

Some human beings did -- the ones who didn't die from them (that would be millions).

Since most doctors including Blaylock had those vaccines as children, and thus lived to vaccinate, or to fulminate, another day, it is strange for him to say they would jump out windows rather than get booster shots..

Alex Jones? Enough said.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is also a concept in immunology called "herd immunity."

Herd immunity (or community immunity) describes a form of immunity that occurs when the vaccination of a significant portion of a population (or herd) provides a measure of protection for individuals who have not developed immunity.[1] Herd immunity theory proposes that, in contagious diseases that are transmitted from individual to individual, chains of infection are likely to be disrupted when large numbers of a population are immune or less susceptible to the disease. The greater the proportion of individuals who are resistant, the smaller the probability that a susceptible individual will come into contact with an infectious individual.[2]

Estimated Herd Immunity thresholds for vaccine preventable diseases[2] Disease Transmission R0 Herd immunity threshold Diphtheria Saliva 6-7 85% Measles Airborne 12-18 83 - 94% Mumps Airborne droplet 4-7 75 - 86% Pertussis Airborne droplet 12-17 92 - 94% Polio Fecal-oral route 5-7 80 - 86% Rubella Airborne droplet 5-7 80 - 85% Smallpox Social contact 6-7 83 - 85% ^ - R0 is the basic reproduction number, or the average number of secondary infectious cases that are produced by a single index case in completely susceptible population.

=====================================

Apparently, in certain communities in the US, in upscale. "intellectual" communities, we are losing our "herd immunity" because the lever of vaccination is dropping below the levels above.

Whooping cough and other deadly diseases are re-emerging with a vengeance.

It is one concept to be cautious and another to be stupid.

Adam

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is also a concept in immunology called "herd immunity."

Herd immunity (or community immunity) describes a form of immunity that occurs when the vaccination of a significant portion of a population (or herd) provides a measure of protection for individuals who have not developed immunity.[1] Herd immunity theory proposes that, in contagious diseases that are transmitted from individual to individual, chains of infection are likely to be disrupted when large numbers of a population are immune or less susceptible to the disease. The greater the proportion of individuals who are resistant, the smaller the probability that a susceptible individual will come into contact with an infectious individual.[2]

Estimated Herd Immunity thresholds for vaccine preventable diseases[2] Disease Transmission R0 Herd immunity threshold Diphtheria Saliva 6-7 85% Measles Airborne 12-18 83 - 94% Mumps Airborne droplet 4-7 75 - 86% Pertussis Airborne droplet 12-17 92 - 94% Polio Fecal-oral route 5-7 80 - 86% Rubella Airborne droplet 5-7 80 - 85% Smallpox Social contact 6-7 83 - 85% ^ - R0 is the basic reproduction number, or the average number of secondary infectious cases that are produced by a single index case in completely susceptible population.

=====================================

Apparently, in certain communities in the US, in upscale. "intellectual" communities, we are losing our "herd immunity" because the lever of vaccination is dropping below the levels above.

Whooping cough and other deadly diseases are re-emerging with a vengeance.

It is one concept to be cautious and another to be stupid.

Adam

I could not agree more.

Blaylock is a retired neurosurgeon "with a nutritional practice." He has zero credentials in immunology or microbiology, and his own Wiki entry says diplomatically that his wingnut views on vaccines are "counter to scientific consensus." Believing him is dangerous if not to your own health, to that of your grandchildren.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you sure RuPaul isn't from Toronto? I' m sure I've seen her on Church St., lookin mighty fine.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you sure RuPaul isn't from Toronto? I' m sure I've seen her on Church St., lookin mighty fine.

Mark Levin, who is not a Dr. Ron Paul supporter, calls Ron Paul, RuPaul!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you sure RuPaul isn't from Toronto? I' m sure I've seen her on Church St., lookin mighty fine.

Mark Levin, who is not a Dr. Ron Paul supporter, calls Ron Paul, RuPaul!

Are you sure RuPaul isn't from Toronto? I' m sure I've seen her on Church St., lookin mighty fine.

Mark Levin, who is not a Dr. Ron Paul supporter, calls Ron Paul, RuPaul!

lol, well the good doctor might rue a few things but don't we all?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

> Whooping cough and other deadly diseases ...

Whooping cough (pertussis) is very rarely fatal, even without medical treatment. Depending on your age, it’s likely your mother or grandmother had whooping cough as a child.

You needn't buy the entire anti-vaccine position, you can consider one vaccine at a time. The one for pertussis was, and for all I know still is, very dangerous. The one for hepatitis is absurd -- you’re more likely to suffer from the vaccine than to even contract hepatitis. I haven’t looked into the others. There are about 20 all told (when I was a child it was -- I’m not sure -- about four). Maybe some of them are useful, I don’t know.

Trouble is you can’t believe "them" -- the government-connected medical business. They lie a lot.

I find the voice of Alex Jones -- I refer to the sounds he makes -- unbearable after a few minutes, and his manner turns me off. That said, I think he’s doing some good work. Sometimes he has other great guests, like Gerald Celente of TrendsResearch.com. Maybe you have to be a bit of a nut to be a talk radio host.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You are quite cavalier with the lives of others. "Very rarely fatal";;;yes, now. One of the very rare fatalities could be your baby niece or grandson, but hey, people die of very rare things all the time, and just dying because other people don't believe in vaccination is collateral damage to the human right of self-determination, eh?

The trouble is not that we can't believe "them". The trouble is that we can't know enough to "consider each vaccine individually"and in believing in dogmatists who practice anti-scientific medicine and give dangerous advice, we harm ourselves and others.

Another trouble is that the non-governmental medical businesses lie a lot more than the governmental ones.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You are quite cavalier with the lives of others. "Very rarely fatal";;;yes, now. One of the very rare fatalities could be your baby niece or grandson, but hey, people die of very rare things all the time, and just dying because other people don't believe in vaccination is collateral damage to the human right of self-determination, eh?

The trouble is not that we can't believe "them". The trouble is that we can't know enough to "consider each vaccine individually"and in believing in dogmatists who practice anti-scientific medicine and give dangerous advice, we harm ourselves and others.

Carol:

In 2010, 9,143 cases of pertussis (including ten infant deaths) were reported throughout California. This is the most cases reported in 63 years when 9,394 cases were reported in 1947 and the highest incidence in 52 years when a rate of 26.0 cases/100,000 was reported in 1958. Previously, the peak was in 2005 when there were 3,182 cases reported. In 2011, disease activity is still at relatively increased levels throughout the state.

This is indicative of a trend which is going to increase as the "herd immunity" decreases. Additionally, the level of compromised lungs due to this early exposure is not mentioned. Will it increase the development of lung disease as the exposed infant matures? Unknown.

Adam

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

> You are quite cavalier with the lives of others.

Certainly if a vaccine was safe and prevented whooping cough then I would be cavalier to suggest it not be used. But the old live virus vaccine, at least, was not safe, far from it. It put the baby at risk of neurological damage of degrees varying from tiny to severe and death.

There are complications from whooping cough too, including death, but the probabilities were far less. When neither of two options is perfect you go with the best choice.

To repeat, when a child gets whooping cough he almost certainly recovers just fine. One would like it to be 100% certain. The question is, is the vaccine 100% safe (not to mention effective) and how do the two rates compare?

You repeat anecdotes about whooping cough tragedies, yet ignore anecdotes about DTP vaccine tragedies. The tragedy would begin with inconsolable screaming soon after the shot.

We agree that the non-government medical business lies a lot, but I don't know if it’s more than the government medical business does. The book A Shot in the Dark seems to be well documented. There are two authors, I seem to recall one of them is flaky.

Dr. Russell Blaylock seems to be a substantial guy. I wouldn't dismiss him out of hand.

 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You are quite cavalier with the lives of others. "Very rarely fatal";;;yes, now. One of the very rare fatalities could be your baby niece or grandson, but hey, people die of very rare things all the time, and just dying because other people don't believe in vaccination is collateral damage to the human right of self-determination, eh?

The trouble is not that we can't believe "them". The trouble is that we can't know enough to "consider each vaccine individually"and in believing in dogmatists who practice anti-scientific medicine and give dangerous advice, we harm ourselves and others.

Another trouble is that the non-governmental medical businesses lie a lot more than the governmental ones.

What is "non-governmental medical businesses"? Maybe less than 1% in the West. If they are lying it's hard to hear them. The big drug companies lie a lot selling their drugs, but they are connected to the hip with the FDA. The FDA is to them as the Federal Reserve is to banks.

Flu vaccines don't stop flu.

Too many vaccines are foisted off on babies too soon.

A lot of those have mercury and aluminum adjuvants.

--Brant

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Brant:

Correct.

I have never taken the flu vaccines.

I get the riot act read to me by nurses, doctors and other ancillary medical personnel. I thank them and explain that I am still open to listening and that I am still choosing to pass on the flu shots.

Adam

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If anyone wants to know the truth about any vaccine, read the insert that comes with the vaccine. That is what those who peddle the vaccine admit; you can figure the whole truth about the vaccine is probably worse. Also learn the experiences of those who took the vaccine.

Consider the math, even given that the H1N1 vaccine prevents the virus (which I don't believe), the risk from the virus versus the risk from the vaccine. The H1N1 virus was so mild that most people who got it didn't know they were sick. Do you really want to take the risks admitted in the insert in order to prevent something that is not worth preventing?

I don't bother doing the math because I reject the paradigm that all vaccines are based on. But of course I'm a kook. Anyone who wants to push any vaccine on me is an enemy and will be treated as such. And I am not impressed by the smallpox story. Smallpox was on its way out before the smallpox vaccine and the graph does not show any change in the trend when the smallpox vaccine was introduced. Mere assertion contrary to the graph is not evidence. Popular belief contrary to the graph is not evidence.

And I'm not impressed by any argument from authority such as FDA (Fraud and Deception Administration) said whatever or a doctor (Medical Deity) said whatever or government approved whatever. First, I don't accept any argument from authority as proper proof of anything. Second, I look upon government and all its tentacles as probably the least trustworthy of all things. So for example a doctor has an MD from an accredited (government approved) school, I am not impressed.

Don't blindly trust research; look into how they did the research and who did the research and who paid for the research. What conclusion were they paid to prove? Yes, the peer reviewed process is self-correcting; the research gets corrected until it supports the bottom line. If you look into the details, not just from one side but from all sides, you will often find that they are crookeder than a dog's hind leg and lower than a snake's belly and they have no more respect for truth than an alley cat has for marriage.

At the risk of seeming to be conceited, I have confidence in the ability of my immune system to survive any virus that is not genetically engineered on purpose to kill me, and probably some of those too. If anyone is worried about non-GE viruses, get all your nutrients. Nutrition works better than poisons.

Definition of 'quack': any doctor whose doctoring is not based on science. Nutrition is part (not all) of the science of health; poison for health is not. I look upon any doctor who prescribes poisons (medical drugs) for health as a quack; I don't care what letters he has after his name or how approved by government he is or how accredited the institution he got the letters from.

Yes I understand perfectly the rare case of needing a poison for surgery.

jts, the kook

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Brant:

Correct.

I have never taken the flu vaccines.

I get the riot act read to me by nurses, doctors and other ancillary medical personnel. I thank them and explain that I am still open to listening and that I am still choosing to pass on the flu shots.

Adam

The flu viruses mutate too fast for the vaccines to keep up.

--Brant

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Brant:

Correct.

I have never taken the flu vaccines.

I get the riot act read to me by nurses, doctors and other ancillary medical personnel. I thank them and explain that I am still open to listening and that I am still choosing to pass on the flu shots.

Adam

I don't get the flu shot either. I am not concerned with adults like ourselves on this issue, but with the children whose parents could mistakenly put them at risk.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Brant:

Correct.

I have never taken the flu vaccines.

I get the riot act read to me by nurses, doctors and other ancillary medical personnel. I thank them and explain that I am still open to listening and that I am still choosing to pass on the flu shots.

Adam

I don't get the flu shot either. I am not concerned with adults like ourselves on this issue, but with the children whose parents could mistakenly put them at risk.

Nobody should get flu shots. They're worth nothing. Zip. They are ineffective for the viruses mutate faster than the vaccines can keep up.

--Brant

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a video of this interview. Here is the transcript.

http://www.naturalnews.com/035555_Russell_Blaylock_interview_excitotoxins.html

Health Ranger interviews neurosurgeon Dr. Russell Blaylock on MSG and brain-damaging excitotoxins

by NaturalNews

(NaturalNews) In the following interview, Dr. Russell Blaylock, renowned neurosurgeon, author and researcher, talks to Mike Adams about MSG, aspartame and other brain-damaging excitotoxins that are widely used in our food supply today. Dr. Blaylock is the author of Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills and other important books on this important topic as well as others. In this interview, find out why Dr. Blaylock was shocked at what he found out about the effects MSG and aspartame have on our brain function and pathology and much more.

Health Ranger: Hello and welcome everyone, this is Mike Adams, the Health Ranger for Natural News.com and today I'm joined by neurosurgeon and author, researcher, Dr. Russell Blaylock. He's widely regarded as the foremost authority on excitotoxins, and we're going to be talking about MSG, aspartame, and other issues as we interview him today via Skype video. Dr. Blaylock, thanks for joining me today.

Dr. Blaylock: Well thank you, Mike.

Health Ranger: It's great to have you on, you know I'm a big fan of your work and your books. In fact, one of your earlier books, Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills is one of the first books I read that helped get me into the business of teaching people about health.

Dr. Blaylock: I'm glad I contributed- you're a great person to teach people about these things. I'm a great fan of yours as well.

Health Ranger: Well, I'm a huge fan of your work, but for those watching , most people are probably familiar with you and your work and your books, but for those who may not be, can you give us just a brief background of how you got started in this, what encouraged you to write that book and so on.

Dr. Blaylock: Well, I was a neurosurgeon and during my residency training, I was interested in what causes all these neurological diseases and I was particularly interested in something that most of my colleagues were not interested in. That's nutrition and its effect on the brain and recovery from brain injury. So that naturally led into looking at things that produce these problems. And I came across a book by George Schwartz on the MSG syndrome and as I read this little book about it, I said well there's a lot of things in here I wasn't familiar with. So I started researching monosodium glutamate and what it does to the brain and I was astounded by what I found. This is a very common additive to food and most people have no clue as to what it's doing to the brain function and pathology, particularly in the developing brain, a child's brain. I amassed all of this research, and so I decided to write a book, my first book, and I put it together and I presented it to the publishing company and they liked it and printed it.

Health Ranger: Now, most people who read that book are truly astonished by what you unveil in there. You talk about how the excitotoxins overexcite nerve cells and cause those cells to die, how it passes through the blood/brain barrier and so on. Just how toxic is MSG really and then, might you also add, what have you learned since writing the book that would add to the weight of the evidence?

Dr. Blaylock: Well actually, this book was written in 1994 and updated a few years after that but the amount of information we have about this toxicity has grown by leaps and bounds. There's an enormous amount of literature, so the weight of the evidence on my side is just overwhelming. Now, what we've discovered is that this is a very toxic substance, particularly to the developing brain. So if a mother is consuming it while she's pregnant in these high amounts, it not only passes through the placenta to the developing baby, but the amount or concentration of glutamate in the baby's blood is twice as high as the mother's. And of course this is a very delicate developing brain, the brain is under very complex development and we know that glutamate plays a big role in brain development. If the levels are too high or too low it can cause significant abnormalities in how the brain develops. Well women have been consuming this stuff and children have been consuming this stuff since 1945. And the amount in the food has doubled every decade since that time. Massive amounts of this stuff- and a study, a research foundation found out in fact that the amounts humans are consuming is the same amount that produces lesions in animal's brains. So of all the life forms on earth, humans are the most sensitive to the MSG toxicity.

Health Ranger: Well let's make sure we cover two of the basic concepts again for those viewers who may be new to this. Number one, why is MSG added to foods and then number two, what are the most common symptoms that people might observe in their own physiology that would be a clue that they're experiencing MSG toxicity.

Dr. Blaylock: Well it was previously added to food during wartime into the sea rations, into the Japanese rations for the soldiers to increase taste, to stimulate taste. And they had discovered long ago that if you add a little bit of monosodium glutamate, it stimulates certain cells in the tongue to make food taste very good- so you could take a very bad tasting food, particularly canned foods, they have that tinny type taste to it, a metallic taste, and you put MSG in it, it just tastes scrumptious. Well, all the food manufacturers discovered this as they were introduced to it by the military and so all the major food manufacturers started adding MSG to food, including baby foods. So, up until 1970 it was placed in the baby foods itself and then when Dr. John Olney, a neuroscientists, discovered this toxicity to the brain and the serious implications of that toxicity, that's when we started giving a little bit more attention to it. As far as symptoms, of course the first group of symptoms that came to the public's attention was the MSG syndrome in which people would have flushing of their face and heart palpitations and sometimes pains going down their arms and even episodes of GI discomfort and diarrhea. Well those are the obvious symptoms. What was discovered after that in fact that there's silent damage to the brain in which there's very few symptoms. But over time, we see destruction of major important areas of the brain, things that can cause Alzheimer's, Parkinson's disease, ALS and that if you have these diseases it's make them progress much faster.

Health Ranger: Now, as a neurosurgeon, have you ever actually seen brains that you know those those tissues have been damaged by MSG, is it something that's visible when you're actually looking at a living brain or is it not visible?

Dr. Blaylock: Well it's not visible to the naked eye, you would have to look under a microscope to see it, but we know there are certain areas of the brain that are very sensitive, for instance the hypothalamus. There's a nucleus in the hypothalamus called the arcuate nucleus, that controls your energy supply. That's where leptin receptors are located and growth hormones. And it is the most sensitive place in the entire brain, it's virtually wiped out by high doses of MSG. We know there's a lot of damage to that nucleus and there's good evidence that this obesity epidemic is caused by damage to that nucleus by the large amount of MSG put in food. Germans knew this, the German research scientists are writing about this regularly. In America, they don't want to talk about it because of the enormous wealth.

Health Ranger: It's really extraordinary, the food lobby has so much influence in Washington that they're able to keep the FDA off of this issue or the USDA off of this issue. And it's not just MSG, they're able to put sodium nitrite in processed meat for example, to the point where today if you go buy beef jerky and you look at the ingredients, it's got both MSG and sodium nitrite in it. It's like a double dose of a toxic chemical cocktail, it's amazing.

Dr. Blaylock: Well if you look at a lot of processed food you'll see they do contain multiple toxins and multiple forms of glutamate, this excitotoxin. So I refer to them rather than MSG I refer to it as excitotoxic food additive. And they put it in virtually everything. Every processed food and those that don't put it in there have trouble selling their food because they can't get the taste hyped up enough to be able to sell it.

Health Ranger: You know that's a good point, Dr. Blaylock, I also have noticed because I'm very sensitive to MSG and I have been for as long as I can remember- decades. Causes severe headaches, face flushing and things like that so I know if I've had some MSG. I've learned to look for it on labels. And I've found that, of course, the food companies hide it under all these different names. And my pet peeve name today is yeast extract because it's used by many of the so-called natural food companies and even the vegetarian foods. They're loaded with yeast extract. Can you talk about yeast extract and other hidden names for a minute?

Dr. Blaylock: Yeah When I first spoke on this issue in Chicago at a convention one of the chief manufacturers of processed foods came up and told me, he said if you convince everyone of the toxicity of this, we'll just change the name. We're gonna get it in the food one way or another. I told him, well, I'm gonna tell everybody the story of our conversation and I do, I repeat this story because it's very important. And the government allows them, if it's less than 99 percent pure MSG they can call it anything they want to. Caramelized yeast, caseinate, carrageenan, natural flavoring, vegetable extract, protein concentrate, soy isolate, the names just go on and on and on and on, and they're very benign sounding like natural flavoring. Well people think that's natural, or it'll say hydrolyzed protein or plant protein, people think that's natural. That's why you see it in so many natural foods and these natural food stores.

Health Ranger: Yeah, it's sickening, it's insidious, I mean this is an age when consumers want full transparency, consumers want to know, are there GMO's in the product, They want to know, is it organic or not, they want to know is there MSG in there and these companies just keep trying to hide it. Now to their credit, some companies have placed claims on their labels that say no MSG added and generally I find that to be an honest claim. And some of those companies are very much doing the right thing in that realm, but other companies just hide it under a different name. Seems to be a wide diversity of ethics in the food industry.

Dr. Blaylock: Well you see they do this quite commonly. When my book came out and a lot of people were talking about it, it had a big impact on these companies. They began to remove MSG on the label. And they would even put NO MSG and I would look at the label and I would see about three to four different forms of disguised glutamate in it. So they learned very quickly to just disguise the name, most of the public's not going to know what it is and they'll say well it says plainly on the label, no MSG, but in fact it contains more glutamate.

Health Ranger: Incredible, I want to urge those watching right now to learn more from Dr. Russell Blaylock and his website is RussellBlaylockMD.com did I get that right?

Dr. Blaylock: That's right.

Health Ranger: Russell BlaylockMD.com, put it on the screen there, and then also you could check out his books at bookstores everywhere, including Amazon.com where he's got Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills and Health and Nutrition Secrets, is that another one? What's your book on cancer, Dr. Blaylock?

Dr. Blaylock: Natural Strategies for Cancer Patients.

Health Ranger: Ok, good, Natural Strategies for Cancer Patients I really want to encourage you to check out his books, you'll learn a wealth of information. It's just astonishing. Dr. Blaylock, you, as a neurosurgeon, you are of course well informed about the structure and function of the brain and yet, I'm sure you often find yourself either arguing with or debating with some sort of MSG pusher who says things like, Oh, it's perfectly safe, it doesn't affect brain function at all. Is that a common piece of feedback that you hear from the industry?

Dr. Blaylock: Well not anymore. In the beginning, I did. When I first started giving lectures, when the book first came out. I did an interview with Chicago Tribune and I pointed out all these different dangers and then they had the representatives of the company that makes the product come back after me and say, well it doesn't enter the brain because of the blood/brain barrier, and I'd already discussed that with the reporter. That in fact there's compelling evidence and now absolute proof that it does pass the barrier. And that there's many tissues in the body that have glutamate receptors. Virtually every cell in your body has glutamate receptors, and there's no barrier. Now they know I've accumulated so much powerful evidence they never try to confront me directly, they know I've been to an audience, they never try to come back and defend themselves. There's no defense. All the evidence is on my side.

Health Ranger: They just hope people don't pay attention to your message?

Dr. Blaylock: Exactly. That's right. They just ignore me, have the major media ignore it because they evidence I have is so compelling, most of the scientific world would agree with what I'm saying once they start looking at it, and more and more articles are being written on this.

Health Ranger: You mentioned the scientific world. That's one of the most extraordinary things happening today is that the so called scientific world, in many cases they simply abandon the science and they become a priesthood of defenders of a certain narrow mythology. Such as, MSG doesn't harm the brain or all vaccines are safe and effective, for example, complete quackery. But that becomes the line of the so-called scientist who abandoned the science. I mean are you concerned about the reputation, the credibility of the scientific community because of that, or what are your thoughts on that?

Dr. Blaylock: Well, you're exactly right and this is a major problem and a number of studies and articles have been written in some of the clinical journals, very good journals, pointing out this fact. The fact that the pharmaceutical companies, the food industry is having such a massive affect on publication of papers and research articles that it's really polluting the scientific world. They're trying to make this more stringent, where there's transparency and you know that these people work for the company. For instance, when I look at an article that says MSG is good for the elderly because it makes them eat more nutritious food or that it's safe, I can almost assure you if I look at who wrote the paper it's either someone that works directly for the "geno-modo" company or is connected and is being funded by the "geno-modo" company [sic], the principle maker of monosodium glutamate and its other additives.

Health Ranger: What do you think about the theory, there's something that I've noticed as a very keen observer of this, that Chinese people in particular seem to not suffer the migraine headaches that many white people do when they consume MSG. Is there a metabolic difference in the way different people process glutamate?

Dr. Blaylock: Well, actually, the difference is they don't consume near as much of this as we do.

Health Ranger: Really?

Dr. Blaylock: When they eat, they eat small portions, and now we're starting to see in the Japanese population that are eating these higher portions, they're getting grossly obese, they're having neurological problems, Alzheimer's increasing, ALS, Parkinson's disease- all increasing significantly in Japan and these countries that traditionally ate a smaller amount. The other thing is the rest of their diet. For instance, they eat a lot of omega-3 fatty acids, they have one of the highest flavonoid intakes from fruits and vegetables of any population in the world. These are protective against a lot of this toxicity. Americans don't do that, they do just the opposite. They're eating things that enhance the toxicity of glutamate.

Health Ranger: Yeah, that's a really good point. Instead of the antioxidants, they've got other junk food, other fried food and then maybe a couple vaccines on top of that and some chemtrails on top of that. It's like a toxic stew.

Dr. Blaylock: Fluoride and aluminum, it just goes on and on and on. Pesticides, herbicides, all add to the toxicity and have been shown to enhance the toxicity of glutamate additives.

Health Ranger: Incredible. Alright, one last question for you in this segment, Dr. Blaylock, and then we'll wrap this up. What about the critics of your work who say, hey well glutamate appears naturally at some level in tomatoes or seaweed or other natural foods. What's your response to that criticism?

Dr. Blaylock: Well it does, but it's almost always bound as a protein so when it's released in your body, it has to break down the protein. It's a slow release so your blood levels really don't go up that high. Now we know in people with, for instance, ALS, if they eat, for instance, a steak their blood level goes twice as high as a person that does not have ALS. So with certain neurological conditions, you do have to avoid foods that naturally have high glutamate levels, like meats and pureed tomatoes. When you eat a whole tomato, it's very slow release of the glutamates and your blood level really does not rise that high. If you're physically active, that glutamate, instead of going to your brain, goes into your muscles. If you're sedentary and you eat the very same diet, most of it's going to go to your brain and have toxicity. So there's so many variables there.

Health Ranger: Yeah, that's interesting. So there's a fitness level impact on the way your body metabolizes it. That's fascinating. I want to bring up one last question, sorry, one more that just came to mind when you were speaking there. People talk about glutamine, the amino acid, and the dietary importance or applications of glutamine, and then some people confuse glutamine with glutamate. Can you briefly describe the difference for those watching?

Dr. Blaylock: Well, glutamine is an amino acid that's converted to glutamate. In your brain, in order to make glutamate, your body has glutamine that is converted in your brain cells into the glutamate neurotransmitter. If you feed an animal a lot of glutamine, you will produce excitotoxicity in the brain. You will produce these brain lesions. Patients who have ALS, if you feed them a lot of glutamine, they will get worse and die a lot sooner. So there is a conversion of glutamine into glutamate. They're related amino acids, so there's a relationship. As far as the health effects of glutamine, that's just way overblown and I get this question a lot when I lecture. People want to say, well isn't it good for gut repair and good for immune stimuli and I say well, yes, your immune cells have glutamate receptors that have to do with producing the free radicals they use to kill microorganisms. So, to a limited degree, yes, it's good for that. Now as far as for gut repair, the new results show that glutamine is not that good for gut repair. Things like pyruvate are much more effective. Pyruvate also protects your brain against glutamate.

Health Ranger: Oh really. Pyruvate, which, any mineral bound in pyruvate form?

Dr. Blaylock: Magnesium or calcium, it doesn't matter, its' the pyruvate that protects you. Pyruvate's used in the Krebs cycle to produce energy. When you produce energy in the brain, it protects the brain against excitotoxicity. And it's an antioxidant.

Health Ranger: Now you're getting me fascinated, I'm going to ask you one more question, sorry. People often ask me what is the defense against high glutamate foods. For example, if they know they're going out to eat, with a social group let's say, they know they're going to get some MSG in the soup or whatever, can they take something beforehand to reduce the effects of MSG?

Dr. Blaylock: Well there are several things. One of the most important is magnesium. One of the most prominent glutamate receptors, one of the regulators of its over activity is magnesium. So people who have low magnesium, that eat soup for instance with MSG in it, they'll have a terrible headache, terrible response to the glutamate. If they have a higher magnesium level, if they take magnesium supplements, then get their brain levels up higher, they're much more resistant to the toxicity. Also, curcumin, all your antioxidants, vitamin E, vitamin C. These things protect against glutamate's excitotoxicity in the brain and its toxic response. And the pyruvate.

Health Ranger: That's really interesting, so there is a strategy you might call defensive eating. Again, if you know you're gonna subject yourself to the toxicity, obviously it would be wiser to not do that. But, if you want to, you could protect yourself in advance with better nutrition. That's fascinating.

Dr. Blaylock: If you combine these nutrient protectants, and I've protected the literature about how to protect yourself against glutamate toxicity. If you combine them you could produce tremendous protection against this toxicity to the brain. But like you say, you don't want to expose yourself to a toxin just because you can reduce the level of damage.

Health Ranger: Right. It's like putting a helmet on your head so you can strike yourself with a sledgehammer.

Dr. Blaylock: That's exactly right. You brought up the migraine headaches. I want to expand on that a little bit- the interesting thing, when you look at people who have migraine headaches, number one they have very low magnesium levels. When they have an attack of migraine, the spinal fluid glutamate level goes up tremendously. Once the attack stops, the glutamate level falls. And this is why glutamate in your diet can trigger a migraine headache. And usually when I was treating migraine headaches that were very resistant to treatment, the first thing I'd tell them, get off all the glutamate. I'd make a list of things and tell them how to get off the glutamate. Their attacks would get dramatically better, they were less intense and easier to control. And you put them on the magnesium or the pyruvate, they got even better. A lot of them never had a migraine attack again.

Health Ranger: That's fascinating, you've got so much great information here, we're about out of time for this segment. Let me just give your websites again- RussellBlaylockMD.com, folks, sign up there for Dr. Blaylock's email newsletter and you can stay informed on issues like what we've talked about here. Also, you have a wellness center website, is that right? Can you give us the URL?

Dr. Blaylock: It's BlaylockWellnessCenter.com

Health Ranger: Perfect, BlaylockWellnessCenter.com, and there you can find books, DVDs, lots of information Dr. Blaylock has put together to educate you about how to protect your health against excitotoxins. Dr. Blaylock I want to thank you for joining me in this segment. We'll do more in the future, but I thank you for this time.

Dr. Blaylock: Thank you, I appreciate it.

Health Ranger: Alright, folks, that was our interview with Dr. Russell Blaylock. Share this video, it's very important to get this out there. Check out his websites for more information, and also search YouTube and TV.NaturalNews.com for more videos interviewing Dr. Russell Blaylock. We're gonna talk to him about vaccines and other topics in future videos. Thanks for joining me today. This is Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, reporting for NaturalNews.com

Watch the full video at:

http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=8C501468CA914ABEE2D9395667D5F200

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now